
Labour's AI plans for schools risk creating ‘cardboard cutout' students
Laura Trott, the shadow education secretary, said that a switch to computer learning could dumb down academic standards.
Writing for The Telegraph, she said the growing use of ChatGPT, which can solve maths sums and write essays, was 'dangerous'.
Her intervention comes after a study by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in the US found that relying on AI programs eroded students' ability to think critically.
Labour has unveiled plans to roll out the technology across schools, allowing it to draw up lesson plans and even mark homework.
Ministers say that doing so will free up teachers to spend more time in the classroom helping their pupils rather than being bogged down in paperwork.
Ms Trott said: 'If we ease teachers' workloads by embracing this technology without caution, we risk crushing critical thinking underfoot.
'It's a dangerous trade-off and only incentivises young people to use AI tools as a crutch.'
The MIT study found that human graders consistently marked down AI written essays for their lack of originality and independent thought.
But when AI programs were presented with the same work they awarded it higher marks.
Ms Trott said the Government needed to wake up to the dangers of the technology and act to curb its growing use before 'the horse has bolted'.
'If we let AI flatten thinking, we'll end up with cardboard cutouts, everyone sounding the same, thinking the same,' she added.
'If vast numbers of students lean on chatbots to write, research, and code for them, what remains of traditional education?
'We must demand education policies that protect and foster true thinking, not just tech-enabled shortcuts.'
It comes amid efforts to roll out a new 'quality mark' for schools who can demonstrate that they are using AI in a responsible way.
The Good Future Foundation, a UK-based non-profit organisation, has developed the scheme, which it is hoping to roll out to hundreds of schools.
Daniel Emmerson, its executive director, said: 'The potential for AI to make a positive impact is staggering, but the implications of irresponsible use are significant.
'The Government has already outlined how vital AI can be to the future of education in Britain.
'It is vital that our educators are given the support they need to understand and implement this technology in the classroom to confidently prepare all students to benefit from and succeed in an AI-infused world.'
We risk starving children of the ability to think critically
By Laura Trott
We've been here before. In the 1950s, it took years for society to wake up to the dangers of smoking, despite the growing evidence and rising public concern. Big Tobacco denied the harms, resisted regulation, and continued to profit while young people bore the consequences. Today we are facing an eerily similar moment with smartphones and social media.
Technologies that have transformed modern life are quietly eroding childhood, fuelling mental health problems, destroying educational attainment, and fostering dependency by design. The new beast is Big Tech. The question is not whether these harms exist, but how long we are prepared to look the other way.
This is not about burying our heads in the sand. Technology has undeniable benefits. During Covid, when schools were closed, digital tools kept learning alive. But 'alive' is not the same as thriving. Many children fell behind, and many more are still struggling. Technology offered a lifeline, but a fragile one.
Now, a new threat is emerging. ChatGPT is everywhere. University libraries report it as the most common program open on students' laptops. Yet a recent MIT study should alarm us all.
Students who used ChatGPT to write essays sounded shockingly alike, with the same phrases and the same logic. Human graders marked down these AI-generated essays for their lack of originality. Meanwhile, AI scoring systems rewarded them. If we ease teachers' workloads by embracing this technology without caution, we risk crushing critical thinking underfoot. It's a dangerous trade-off and only incentivises young people to use AI tools as a crutch. The study's findings are stark. Brain scans revealed that using AI tools reduces activity in regions responsible for learning and memory by up to 55 per cent.
Students relying on AI struggled to recall what they'd written and performed worse without it. Their brains seem to essentially be switched off. The danger isn't just laziness, it's the erosion of independent and critical thought that builds knowledge. Researchers of the study warned that the findings 'raised concerns about the long-term educational implications' of using AI both in schools and in the workplace.
This evidence is clear to see – just look at Sweden. After pushing digital learning since 2018, it is now reversing course, unpicking some of the damage it believes technology embedded into learning has caused. Research showed students learned better with printed textbooks and pen and paper. Those physical tools improve comprehension and memory. The policymakers overlooked one truth: young children still need old-fashioned practice to master reading and writing.
We risk locking the stable door after the horse has bolted. If vast numbers of students lean on chatbots to write, research, and code for them, what remains of traditional education? We risk starving children of their ability to think independently and critically.
We must remember what makes us human. Creativity, individual thought, intellectual curiosity. If we let AI flatten thinking, we'll end up with cardboard cutouts, everyone sounding the same, thinking the same. This soil cannot nurture the Shakespeares or JK Rowlings of tomorrow. That loss is tragic. It's time to act. We must demand education policies that protect and foster true thinking, not just tech-enabled shortcuts. Because the future depends on minds, not machines.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
14 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Phillipson sparks row over two-child benefit cap
Bridget Phillipson has sparked a fresh Labour row over the two-child benefit cap. The Education Secretary faced a backlash after declaring that the Government's benefits climbdown last week would make it harder to abolish the two-child limit. But Labour MPs who led the welfare revolt and Jeremy Corbyn, Sir Keir Starmer's predecessor, issued fresh calls on Sunday to abolish the 'cruel and immoral' policy. The backbench rebellion on welfare forced Sir Keir to tear up his plans to reform disability benefits, wiping out an estimated £5 billion in savings. Ms Phillipson insisted there was now less scope to abandon the two-child cap, which restricts child tax credit and Universal Credit to two children in most households. She told Sky's Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips: 'It does come at a cost, and that's why, in keeping with our fiscal rules, we do need to make sure that we have a strong foundation for the economy. 'We make sure we get this right. These ultimately will be matters that the Chancellor has to consider right across the board.' Pressed on whether the chances of the cap being lifted were lower because there was now less money, Ms Phillipson said: 'The decisions that have been taken this last week do make future decisions harder. 'But all of that said, we will look at this collectively in terms of all of the ways that we can lift children out of poverty.' Sir Keir endured the biggest rebellion of his premiership to date last Tuesday as 49 Labour MPs voted against his welfare Bill despite a string of major last-minute concessions. Out of those rebels, more than one third have also signalled their opposition to the two-child benefit cap since Labour took power. Mr Corbyn currently sits as an independent MP but last week announced his involvement in a new hard-Left party alongside Zarah Sultana, a fellow independent, which fight Labour nationally. Responding to Ms Phillipson's remarks, Mr Corbyn told The Telegraph: 'The two child benefit cap is cruel and immoral. The government should have scrapped this cap the minute it was elected. 'For it to double-down now one year later, all because it couldn't take enough support away from disabled people, is disgraceful. 'Keeping children in poverty is not a tough choice – it's the wrong choice.' The two Labour backbench MPs who masterminded the welfare rebellion also called on the Prime Minister to change course and scrap the cap. Rachael Maskell, who tabled an amendment backed by dozens of Labour MPs that sought to kill the Bill altogether, said it was 'crucial' that no child was denied opportunity. 'It's got to be an absolute focus of this government to lift as many children out of poverty as possible,' Ms Maskell said. 'Slowing the pace of that ambition is not acceptable and therefore starting by ending the two-child limit, as well as the benefit cap, is really important. 'It's absolutely crucial that the government does not waver on this issue, that it finds the expectation of what a Labour Government should do and finds the resource to be able to deliver that.' Neil Duncan-Jordan, whose open letter denouncing the cuts was signed by 42 Labour MPs back in May, told Sir Keir to make child poverty a key priority during his second year in power. He told The Telegraph: 'Whilst not the only lever to pull, lifting the two-child benefit cap is widely acknowledged as the quickest way to lift the largest number of children out of poverty. 'It doesn't fix the problem, but it is an essential part of what needs to happen if we are serious about tackling child poverty.' Clive Lewis, the Labour MP for Norwich South, added that 'of course' the limit should be scrapped. He said: 'If this Labour Government is to rebuild the country, it must start with the scourge of poverty – in all its forms. There can be no credible definition of success that does not include its eradication as a central goal.' Jon Trickett, another prominent Left-wing Labour MP, added: 'It is wrong to keep children in poverty because we are protecting disability benefits. Dividing the poor against each other whilst protecting wealth is entirely wrong.' John McDonnell, who was Mr Corbyn's shadow chancellor and has also been stripped of the Labour whip, condemned briefings over the weekend which suggested that plans to scrap the cap were 'dead in the water'. 'The idea that scrapping the two-child limit is to be some sort of punishment beating of the PLP for voting against disability benefit cuts is disgusting,' he wrote on X. The Child Poverty Action Group has said the number of children in poverty will jump from 4.5 million currently to 4.8 million by 2029 unless Sir Keir takes action. While the two-child limit applies across the UK, the Scottish government confirmed it will provide funding to essentially scrap the policy north of the border from March 2026.


The Guardian
37 minutes ago
- The Guardian
One year of Labour - Politics Weekly live at Crossed Wires festival
One year on from Keir Starmer's election victory and Labour are well behind Reform in the polls, while the government is already having to bend to the will of its backbenchers. So how can Starmer recover? Kiran Stacey talks to Jonathan Ashworth, the chief executive of Labour Together and former MP for Leicester South, and Marie Tidball, the Labour MP for Penistone and Stocksbridge, about the party's first year in government, live at the Crossed Wires podcast festival in Sheffield


Geeky Gadgets
an hour ago
- Geeky Gadgets
Create Your Own AI Employee in Just 5 Minutes (No Code)
Imagine having an employee who never sleeps, never takes a coffee break, and can handle repetitive tasks with flawless precision—all set up in just five minutes. It might sound like a scene from a sci-fi movie, but thanks to advancements in AI and automation platforms, this is no longer a distant dream. Tools like Zapier, Replit, and Cursor 1.2 are transforming how we approach work, making it possible to create an AI-powered 'employee' that can manage customer inquiries, streamline workflows, and even develop apps—all without requiring a degree in computer science. The question is no longer whether AI can integrate into your daily operations, but how quickly you can make it happen. And the answer? Faster than you might think. In this guide by Creator Magic, discover the surprisingly simple steps to build your own AI employee, using innovative tools that are as accessible as they are powerful. From automating customer interactions with Zapier to simplifying app development with Replit, you'll explore how these platforms are breaking down barriers to innovation. Along the way, you'll discover how AI can take over time-consuming tasks, allowing you to focus on what truly matters—whether that's scaling your business or reclaiming hours in your day. By the end, you'll not only understand how to set up your AI assistant but also gain insight into the broader implications of integrating AI into your workflow. After all, the future of work isn't just coming—it's already here, waiting for you to take the reins. AI Automation Made Simple How Zapier Automates AI Employee Tasks Zapier has transformed automation by allowing you to design workflows that handle tasks such as responding to YouTube comments or managing customer inquiries. With its latest updates, you can set up an AI 'employee' capable of monitoring comments, identifying specific keywords, performing web searches, and generating thoughtful replies. This capability ensures consistent engagement with your audience while saving time and effort. Here's how you can set up a workflow using Zapier: Define a YouTube trigger to detect relevant comments or interactions. Use AI orchestration to gather information or craft personalized responses. Integrate APIs to execute the workflow seamlessly and efficiently. For example, you can configure the AI to answer frequently asked questions, provide humorous replies, or direct users to helpful resources. This automation allows you to maintain 24/7 responsiveness, freeing you to focus on higher-priority tasks without compromising on audience engagement. Replit: Simplifying Mobile App Development Replit has made mobile app development accessible to everyone, regardless of their technical background. Its AI-powered templates and assistants enable you to build functional apps quickly and efficiently. For instance, you can create a Tide Times app by selecting a pre-designed template, integrating APIs for real-time data, and refining the design using natural language prompts. The platform's AI assistant simplifies the development process by automating repetitive coding tasks and offering suggestions to enhance functionality. Whether you are a beginner or an experienced developer, Replit accelerates the development cycle, allowing you to bring your ideas to life with minimal effort. By reducing the complexity of app creation, Replit enables you to focus on innovation and user experience. Build an AI Employee in 5 Minutes Watch this video on YouTube. Uncover more insights about AI automation in previous articles we have written. Cursor 1.2: Enhancing AI Coding Efficiency Cursor 1.2 introduces features designed to optimize coding workflows and minimize errors. A built-in to-do list helps you organize tasks, making sure that no step is overlooked during the development process. Additionally, enhanced mobile and web capabilities allow you to code from virtually anywhere, making it easier to stay productive on the go. These updates highlight how AI tools are becoming increasingly user-friendly, catering to both professional developers and non-coders. By simplifying complex tasks, Cursor 1.2 enables you to focus on creativity and problem-solving rather than technical details. This tool exemplifies how AI-driven platforms are reshaping the way coding and development are approached, making them more efficient and accessible. How AI Tools Are Transforming Accessibility AI tools are rapidly evolving, making automation and development more accessible than ever before. Natural language processing (NLP) allows you to interact with these tools conversationally, significantly reducing the learning curve for non-technical users. For example, you can describe your desired outcome, and the AI will generate the necessary code or workflow to achieve it. This widespread access of technology enables individuals and businesses to build AI-driven systems without requiring prior technical expertise. Whether it's automating customer interactions, managing administrative tasks, or developing applications, AI tools are reshaping how problems are solved. By lowering barriers to entry, these tools enable a broader audience to harness the power of AI for innovation and efficiency. Future Implications of AI in Workflows The potential of AI to transform workflows is immense. By automating repetitive or time-consuming tasks, AI systems free up your time for strategic decision-making and creative problem-solving. This capability is particularly valuable for businesses looking to scale operations without increasing overhead costs. As AI tools continue to advance, they will become even more integral to both personal and professional workflows. Embracing these technologies now can help you stay ahead of the curve, unlocking new opportunities for growth and efficiency. By integrating AI into your daily operations, you can position yourself or your business to thrive in an increasingly automated world. Media Credit: Creator Magic Filed Under: AI, Guides Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.