Community Corrections Staff Gearing Up For Industrial Action
'We will be looking to take industrial action if we do not get an improved offer from Corrections, and the mediation, set down for Wednesday 4 June, fails,' says Fleur Fitzsimons, National Secretary for the Public Service Association Te Pkenga …
Community Corrections staff – who manage the 26,000 people the Department of Corrections is responsible for outside of prisons – are gearing up to take industrial action.
Community Corrections staff – including Probation Officers and Electronic Monitoring staff – are frustrated with low pay and ballooning workloads further fuelled by anger over the Government's rushed changes to the Pay Equity Act, says Fleur Fitzsimons, National Secretary for the Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi.
'We will be looking to take industrial action if we do not get an improved offer from Corrections, and the mediation, set down for Wednesday 4 June, fails,' Fitzsimons says.
Community Corrections staff are 68% female, which falls just agonisingly short of the Government's new threshold requiring a workforce to be made up of 70% women to take a pay equity claim.
'Up until the recent reversal, Probation Officers were subject to a five-year long pay equity claim, they were found to be significantly undervalued and their claim was before the Employment Relations Authority to be settled, Fitzsimons says.
'With the ability to raise a pay equity claim cynically extinguished by the Government, underpaid Community Corrections workers will be expecting to see a significantly improved offer from Corrections,' Fitzsimons says.
Community Corrections workers include probation officers, programme facilitators, electronic monitoring staff, community work supervisors, bail support officers, administration staff, and many others.
On any given day, Community Corrections staff work with 70% of the people Correction is responsible for, about 26,000 people living in the community. These people include those: who have been released from prison; who are serving Community-based sentences; who are electronically monitored; and who are on electronic bail.
PSA union Community Corrections members have been negotiating with Corrections since December and have been offered increases of around 1%, further embedding their low pay, Fitzsimons says.
The PSA is balloting members on taking three escalating actions – a complete withdrawal of labour for two, then four then eight hours. An indicative poll of Delegates showed unanimous support for industrial action.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
an hour ago
- 1News
Te reo in schoolbooks: 'Govt has it the wrong way round'
Te Reo experts say the Government has got its approach back to front in removing Māori words from school texts. It was revealed last week that Education Minister Erica Stanford decided to cut Māori words, except for characters' names, from any new books in the Ready to Read Phonics Plus series. The concern was that Māori words were confusing for young readers learning English. However, two experts in te reo Māori and bilingualism told TVNZ's Marae programme nothing could be further from the truth. Watch the full discussion on TVNZ+. Dr Vincent Ieni Olsen-Reeder, research fellow at Te Herenga Waka Victoria University of Wellington, said: 'It's because the reverse of what the ministry says is actually true. ADVERTISEMENT 'The more we expose our tamariki while their brains are well-geared to learning communication while they're still young, they are learning about patterns and phonetics and grammar in a really comprehensive way that doesn't require a lot of external teaching applied to it.' Olsen-Reeder's doctoral research looked at the effectiveness of bilingualism in revitalisation efforts, and the ways bilingualism could remove anxieties around te reo Māori use among its speakers. He said students in Māori-medium education like kura kaupapa Māori are examples of how kids can excel in literacy across both languages. He believes the Government has missed the mark and that not only does it look as if te reo is being taken away from 'the eyes and the minds' of tamariki, particularly Māori tamariki, but it only contributes to New Zealand's lower English proficiency. 'All these things taking the language away from how we speak every day, just doesn't make sense,' he said. Localised, homegrown structured literacy programme Instead, he said there would have been a 'real opportunity' for Aotearoa to create a localised structured literacy programme that's informed by the way New Zealanders actually read, write and speak, which he says has never been done. ADVERTISEMENT 'It's always been informed by overseas,' he said, 'and there was a real chance here to investigate how structured literacy programme from Aotearoa could have been built in a way that really make sense to how New Zealanders read and write and speak, and all those things.' (Source: 1News) He said resources could have been better utilised towards this goal and consideration of Pacific languages taken into account. The role teachers play Colleague Dr Awanui Te Huia, associate professor at Te Herenga Waka, is currently looking into the intergenerational use of te reo, exploring the findings from the country's largest longitudinal study of child health and wellbeing, Growing Up in New Zealand. She said as a 'position of authority' in the lives of tamariki, teachers play a big role in how children may value their language. 'When their teacher provides them with themselves, examples of themselves, examples of their language, the way that they're perhaps interacting with their ao hurihuri (ever-changing world) – outside of these confined kura environments… [for tamariki] it reinforces the fact that these institutions see our language as valuable. They see our whānau as valuable and the ways that we are culturally, as te iwi Māori, and all of our diversity.' ADVERTISEMENT She said it was important that it's compulsory in mainstream institutions because tamariki Māori tend to be in English medium schools. Teaching teachers te reo Consequently, this also requires quality teacher education, she said. 'If we go back to Te Ahu o Te Reo and all of the improvements we were saying in terms of teacher attitudes and the significant positive changes that that was having in our classrooms in terms of identity, and we've seen the research from that, that was totally clear.' Te Ahu o Te Reo was first piloted in 2019, offering free lessons to teachers to better integrate te reo Māori in the classroom. It was expanded in 2020 to help 10,000 more teachers learn te reo. The budget for the programme was cut in 2024 despite a glowing independent review commissioned by the ministry. Resourcing public libraries ADVERTISEMENT Te Huia said resourcing public places, like libraries, properly would help. 'Getting some form of integration of our whānau back into these public spaces so they can see themselves in libraries and participate in our language outside of the kāinga, as well as outside of the kura. 'So, seeing it all around our communities has a direct impact on how relevant, how cool, and how useful te reo Māori is - those were some of the three findings from some of our research.' For the full discussion, watch Marae on TVNZ+. Glossary tamariki - children ao hurihuri - ever-changing world ADVERTISEMENT kāinga - home(s)
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Invercargill's eight mayoral candidates debate
Eight candidates vying for Invercargill's top job stepped up during a mayoral debate in the city on Tuesday night. Reporter Tess Brunton was there. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
When The Privatising Rubber Hits The Climate Change Denial Roads
First a disclosure. I'm the co-owner of a plug-in hybrid car. It cost in the vicinity of $20,000 more than if it had been completely petrol fuelled. A key factor in the purchase decision was to make a small contribution to reducing carbon emissions. Then along came the National-ACT-NZ First coalition government's decision to introduce road user charges (RUCs) for fully electric and hybrid vehicles. It felt like a kick in the teeth to those trying to do their bit for reducing climate change driven carbon emissions. Not just because of this decision, it has become obvious that this is a government that resides within a spectrum between climate change indifference and climate denial. Roads is one of the big areas where this indifference is being played out in real time. But now, following the Government's announcement by Minister of Transport Chris Bishop to replace the petrol tax with road user changes for all vehicles, privatisation is being used to strengthen the Government's 'journey of travel'. On 6 August two helpful explanatory articles spelt out the details of the announcement. One was by James Ensor in the NZ Herald (6 August): Road user changes for all. The other was Bridie Witton in The Post (6 August): Petrol tax replaced by RUCs. In his announcement Minister Bishop called it 'the biggest change to how we fund our roading network in 50 years'. He argued that the 'surge' in fuel-efficient, hybrid and full electric vehicles had eroded the longstanding connection between petrol consumption and kilometres driven. He received 'cheer leader' support from Stuff Political Editor, and a former leading player in the rightwing NZ Initiative thinktank, Luke Malpass in his paywalled article arguing that the decision would bring the country into the 21st century; The Post (7 August): Cheerleader support. There was also strong support from the NZ Initiative's chief economist Eric Crampton who drills down further in a considered Newsroom column (12 August): Better transport funding. Although I disagree with his approach to the issue, I readily acknowledge that it is thoughtful and considered. The announcement Chris Bishop expects the legislation to pass in 2026, with the system becoming operational by 2027. In summary the announced decision involves Scrapping fuel excise duty and move all vehicles to a RUCs system. Charges would be based on distance travelled, vehicle type, time and location. In the name of 'modernisation' the current RUCs paper 'labels on windscreen' system would be replaced by a fully digital e-RUC system. The New Zealand Transport Authority's (Waka Kotahi) dual role as both regulator and RUC retailer will be split with NZTA losing the latter role. Private firms taking over the collection and administration of RUCs charges (the above former role). Distinguishing facts from political fiction Following the initial coverage of the Transport Minister's announcement, Bridie Witton wrote a second cautionary piece casting doubt on the claimed benefits. Published on 8 August in The Post she suggested that most vehicle owners might not benefit: Most vehicle owners unlikely to come out ahead. Witton's piece included Professor Simon Kingham, former chief science adviser to the Ministry of Transport, observing said the new system would to be more expensive to operate. Consequently, the increased costs had to come from somewhere. Kingham, as reported by Witton, explained that: This was because every car would need a transponder or some kind of digital device to track road use and report the data back, potentially to an app, for the easy digital payment Bishop envisioned. He noted the Government's roading ambitions cost more than it was raising in revenue, adding that it wasn't certain whether the Government planned to pass the new costs on to consumers or offset it through taxes. Bishop has confirmed it will bring in more revenue, which suggests people will pay more. Kingham also warned that a distance- and weight-based system could disincentivise people from moving to fuel-efficient vehicles. 'It will be relatively more expensive in fuel-efficient cars, and relatively more cheaper in gas-guzzling cars. If it's entirely based on distance, then everybody pays the same.' He said there was potential for more sophisticated pricing, such as charging more around schools or at peak times, but that could mean every driver has a tracking device in their car, which he said was 'moving into 'Big Brother' territory'. Dropping the fuel tax also made it less attractive for people to transition to electric vehicles, he added. Ideologically driven privatisation Just as Christopher Luxon's government has become increasingly known for its indifference to (and among some, especially NZ First, denial of) climate change, it also has become increasingly known for its ideological preference for privatising functions of public utilities. I have discussed the latter in the context of outsourcing planned surgery which would normally be undertaken by public hospitals. See my Newsroom columns (12 March and 16 June respectively): Increased risk and Follow the money. Also see my health systems blog Otaihanga Second Opinion (14 July): Who benefits. Under the PR guise of 'modernisation' private firms are to take over from NZTA the collection and administration of road user charges. This is based on the simplistic ideological assertion that this will drive innovation and reduce compliance costs by allowing the market to offer high-tech solutions, such as integrations with in-car computers. In Chris Bishop's words: Instead of expanding a clunky government system, we will reform the rules to allow the market to deliver innovative, user-friendly services for drivers. Embellished nonsense! As a reluctant user of NZTA's current system of managing RUCs payments I find it straightforward and efficient. Eric Crampton expresses a similar view in his above-mentioned article. No reason is given as to why NZTA itself could not be allowed to implement the proposed new system efficiently and effectively as private firms might be able to. There is every reason to believe that it could. There is a strong addiction within the government to privatising public utilities. Arguably the most addicted is ACT leader and Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour. This addiction extends to privatising tax collection of RUCs. The biggest beneficiaries will be the private corporates who take their cut to gather the tax. Why should this not surprise anyone! Ian Powell Otaihanga Second Opinion is a regular health systems blog in New Zealand. Ian Powell is the editor of the health systems blog 'Otaihanga Second Opinion.' He is also a columnist for New Zealand Doctor, occasional columnist for the Sunday Star Times, and contributor to the Victoria University hosted Democracy Project. For over 30 years , until December 2019, he was the Executive Director of Association of Salaried Medical Specialists, the union representing senior doctors and dentists in New Zealand.
