
Bill before Maine lawmakers seeks to preserve stipends for child care workers
May 15—A bill before Maine lawmakers seeks to preserve stipends for child care workers while also providing additional one-time funding for a program that helps families pay for child care, both of which advocates say are critical despite concerns about the costs.
The Legislature's Health and Human Services Committee held a public hearing Thursday on a bill from Senate President Mattie Daughtry, D-Brunswick, that seeks to build upon existing Maine programs that provide the stipends, help families pay for child care and give access to free child care for employees in the industry.
"Here in Maine, and nationally, the cost of child care is one of the biggest hurdles for working families," Daughtry said.
She said her bill expands programs that are already working to make them stronger and more effective. Supporters testified that it would help the industry, which has struggled with workforce recruitment and retention; retain employees, and would give families more economic stability.
The bill, LD 1955, has three Republican and several Democratic co-sponsors, indicating it is likely to receive broad support from lawmakers, but is opposed by the Mills administration due in large part to its cost of $6.8 million over two years.
"While OCFS appreciates the intent of this bill to enhance the affordability of early care and education and further educational opportunities for those interested in pursuing a career in this field, OCFS would encourage the committee to focus on existing initiatives and programs before considering additional funding allocations, expansion or modification of programs," said Bobbi Johnson, director of the Office of Child and Family Services in the Maine Department of Health and Human Services, in written testimony opposing the bill.
SALARY SUPPLEMENTS ARE 'ESSENTIAL INVESTMENT'
The $6.8 million includes one-time funding of $3.8 million to clear the waitlist of the Child Care Affordability Program, which helps eligible families pay for child care so parents can work, go to school or participate in a job training program, as well as an additional $2 million over two years for the program. The waitlist currently includes more than 600 families, Daughtry said Thursday.
Her bill also includes a $1 million increase in funding for child care worker stipends that have been in place since 2021, which currently range from $240 to $540 per worker monthly. That should be enough to prevent a decrease in payment amounts, Daughtry said.
"These payments are not bonuses, but essential investment intended to help make early educators' wages more sustainable and reflective of their vital work," she said.
The bill would also provide scholarships and apprenticeships for child care workers to continue their education in the field, and continue a pilot program making child care workers eligible for free tuition for their own children.
The bill comes after Gov. Janet Mills proposed a reduction in the stipends in her proposed budget unveiled in January, seeking to set them at the 2022 level of $200 monthly in an effort to save the state $30 million over two years.
Democratic lawmakers have balked at the proposed cuts and the HHS Committee, with some support from Republicans on the panel, restored the full stipend in its budget recommendations to the full Legislature.
A spokesperson for Mills said Thursday that she is reviewing Daughtry's bill. The stipend program has grown to cost the state over $30 million in last year's general fund budget, according to the administration.
"Unfortunately, in a tough budget cycle, tough decisions have to be made and we believe it is important to return the program to a sustainable level of spending, as we initially had, so that we can continue it far into the future," DHHS spokesperson Lindsay Hammes said in an email Thursday.
In addition to the cost, Johnson said some of the changes the bill would make to existing programs are not needed. It requires annual reporting and an assessment of the stipends every five years, but the office already provides data and information on the payments in its annual report, Johnson said.
She also said the office has found that most child care providers who apply for the pilot program offering them free tuition also are eligible for and have been able to get benefits through the broader child care affordability program. Mills eliminated the pilot program in her proposed budget to save the state $2.5 million annually.
The office expressed concerns about the one-time nature of the $3.8 million in funding for the affordability program. "One time funding leaves families with a lack of stability going forward as families are likely to lose their spot in the program at their next annual redetermination and be returned to the waitlist," Johnson wrote.
TESTIMONY IN OVERWHELMING SUPPORT
Sen. Marianne Moore, R-Calais, the Senate Republican lead on the HHS Committee, said Thursday that she signed on to co-sponsor Daughtry's bill because of the high need for child care in rural areas. "I believe this bill is a commonsense next step for our commitment to Maine's kids," Moore said.
Child care workers and advocates also spoke overwhelmingly in support of Daughtry's bill.
Ingrid Stanchfield, CEO of the Boys & Girls Clubs of Kennebec Valley, told the committee that her organization currently provides child care for about 300 children through various programs. The service is critical to keeping parents, especially women, in the workforce and giving their families more economic stability, Stanchfield said.
She said the pay supplements have been critical to helping child care workers cover expenses like health insurance and groceries for their families and have helped the Boys & Girls Clubs attract workers. "The workforce for child care right now is desperate ... finding workers is very difficult," Stanchfield said.
She said the Boys & Girls Clubs currently receive about $60,000 annually from the state for the stipends. "It's very important for (the employees) and for us to be able to continue to provide child care," she said.
Daughtry's bill was among several bills related to child care that the committee took up Thursday.
LD 1428, from House Speaker Ryan Fecteau, D-Biddeford, would make it easier for people who want to open child care facilities to do so by requiring municipalities to allow the centers to open in residential-zoned areas, and specifying that child care facilities can use public outdoor space nearby to meet licensing requirements for outdoor play, rather than having to provide their own on-site outdoor space.
The Office of Child and Family Services testified in support of Fecteau's bill, but the Maine Municipal Association testified against it, saying it would take away municipalities' ability to make their own decisions about local zoning.
Later in the day, the committee was expected to hear proposals for an advisory board to oversee the affordability program and providing one-time funding to clear the waitlist, directing DHHS to enter into contracts with providers to increase the number of slots for certain populations of children, including those under 3 and children with disabilities, and the establishment of "resource hubs" to help families locate early childhood programs.
Copy the Story Link
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump aides want Texas to redraw its congressional maps to boost the GOP. What would that mean?
This coverage is made possible through Votebeat, a nonpartisan news organization covering local election administration and voting access. Sign up for Votebeat Texas' free newsletters here. Republicans representing Texas in Congress are considering this week whether to push their state Legislature to take the unusual step of redrawing district lines to shore up the GOP's advantage in the U.S. House. But the contours of the plan, including whether Gov. Greg Abbott would call a special session of the Legislature to redraw the maps, remain largely uncertain. The idea is being driven by President Donald Trump's political advisers, who want to draw up new maps that would give Republicans a better chance to flip seats currently held by Democrats, according to two GOP congressional aides familiar with the matter. That proposal, which would involve shifting GOP voters from safely red districts into neighboring blue ones, is aimed at safeguarding Republicans' thin majority in Congress, where they control the lower chamber, 220-212. The redistricting proposal, and the Trump team's role in pushing it, was first reported by The New York Times Monday. Without a Republican majority in Congress, Trump's legislative agenda would likely stall, and the president could face investigations from newly empowered Democratic committee chairs intent on scrutinizing the White House. Here's what we know about the plan so far: On Capitol Hill, members of the Texas GOP delegation huddled Monday night to discuss the prospect of reshaping their districts. Most of the 25-member group expressed reluctance about the idea, citing concerns about jeopardizing their districts in next year's midterms if the new maps overextended the GOP's advantage, according to the two GOP aides, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the private deliberations. Rep. Jodey Arrington, R-Lubbock, was skeptical of the idea. 'We just recently worked on the new maps,' Arrington told The Texas Tribune. To reopen the process, he said, 'there'd have to be a significant benefit to our state.' The delegation has yet to be presented with mockups of new maps, two aides said. Each state's political maps must be redrawn once a decade, after each round of the U.S. census, to account for population growth and ensure every congressional and legislative district has roughly the same number of people. Texas lawmakers last overhauled their district lines in 2021. There's no federal law that prohibits states from redrawing district maps midcycle, said Justin Levitt, an election law professor at Loyola Marymount University and a former deputy assistant attorney general in the Department of Justice's civil rights division. Laws around the timing to redraw congressional and state district maps vary by state. In Texas, the state constitution doesn't specify timing, so the redrawing of maps is left to the discretion of the governor and the Legislature. Lawmakers gaveled out of their 140-day regular session last week, meaning they would need to be called back for a special session to change the state's political maps. Abbott has the sole authority to order overtime sessions and decide what lawmakers are allowed to consider. A trial is underway in El Paso in a long-running challenge to the state legislative and congressional district maps Texas drew after the 2020 U.S. Census. If Texas redraws its congressional maps, state officials would then ask the court to toss the claims challenging those districts 'that no longer exist,' Levitt said. The portion of the case over the state legislative district maps would continue. If the judge agrees, then both parties would have to file new legal claims for the updated maps. It isn't clear how much maps could change, but voters could find themselves in new districts, and Levitt said redrawing the lines in the middle of the redistricting cycle is a bad idea. 'If the people of Texas think that their representatives have done a bad job, then when the [district] lines change, they're not voting on those representatives anymore,' Levitt said. 'New people are voting on those representatives.' The National Democratic Redistricting Committee, Democrats' national arm for contesting state GOP mapmaking, said the proposal to expand Republicans' stronghold in Texas was 'yet another example of Trump trying to suppress votes in order to hold onto power.' 'Texas's congressional map is already being sued for violating the Voting Rights Act because it diminishes the voting power of the state's fast-growing Latino population,' John Bisognano, president of the NDRC said. 'To draw an even more extreme gerrymander would only assure that the barrage of legal challenges against Texas will continue.' When Republicans in charge of the Legislature redrew the district lines after the 2020 census, they focused on reinforcing their political support in districts already controlled by the GOP. This redistricting proposal would likely take a different approach. As things stand, Republicans hold 25 of the state's 38 congressional seats. Democrats hold 12 seats and are expected to regain control of Texas' one vacant seat in a special election this fall. Most of Texas' GOP-controlled districts lean heavily Republican: In last year's election, 24 of those 25 seats were carried by a Republican victor who received at least 60% of the vote or ran unopposed. The exception was U.S. Rep. Monica De La Cruz, R-Edinburg, who captured 57% of the vote and won by a comfortable 14-point margin. With little competition to speak of, The Times reported, Trump's political advisers believe at least some of those districts could bear the loss of GOP voters who would be reshuffled into neighboring, Democratic-held districts — giving Republican hopefuls a better chance to flip those seats from blue to red. The party in control of the White House frequently loses seats during midterm cycles, and Trump's team is likely looking to offset potential GOP losses in other states and improve the odds of holding on to a narrow House majority. Incumbent Republicans, though, don't love the idea of sacrificing a comfortable race in a safe district for the possibility of picking up a few seats, according to GOP aides. In 2003, after Texas Republicans initially left it up to the courts to draw new lines following the 2000 census, then-U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, a Sugar Land Republican, embarked instead on a bold course of action to consolidate GOP power in the state. He, along with his Republican allies, redrew the lines as the opening salvo to a multistate redistricting plan aimed at accumulating power for his party in states across the country. Enraged by the power play, Democrats fled the state, depriving the Texas House of the quorum it needed to function. The rebels eventually relented under threat of arrest, a rare power in the Texas Constitution used to compel absent members back to return to Austin when the Legislature is in session. The lines were then redrawn, cementing the GOP majority the delegation has enjoyed in Washington for the past two decades. However, what's at play this time is different than in the early 2000s, when Republicans had a newfound majority in the Legislature and had a number of vulnerable Democratic incumbents they could pick off. Now, Republicans have been entrenched in the majority for decades and will have to answer the question of whether there's really more to gain, said Kareem Crayton, the vice president of the Brennan Center for Justice's Washington office. 'That's the tradeoff. You can do that too much so that you actually make them so competitive that the other side wins,' Crayton said. 'That's always a danger.' Texas Republicans are planning to reconvene Thursday to continue discussing the plan, according to Rep. Beth Van Duyne, R-Irving, and Rep. Wesley Hunt, R-Houston, who said they will attend the meeting. Members of Trump's political team are also expected to attend, according to Hunt and two GOP congressional aides familiar with the matter. Natalia Contreras is a reporter for Votebeat in partnership with the Texas Tribune. She's based in Corpus Christi. Contact Natalia at ncontreras@ Disclosure: New York Times has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here. Big news: 20 more speakers join the TribFest lineup! New additions include Margaret Spellings, former U.S. secretary of education and CEO of the Bipartisan Policy Center; Michael Curry, former presiding bishop and primate of The Episcopal Church; Beto O'Rourke, former U.S. Representative, D-El Paso; Joe Lonsdale, entrepreneur, founder and managing partner at 8VC; and Katie Phang, journalist and trial lawyer. Get tickets. TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.

Associated Press
25 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Consultant on trial for AI-generated robocalls mimicking Biden says he has no regrets
LACONIA, N.H. (AP) — A political consultant told a New Hampshire jury Wednesday that he doesn't regret sending voters robocalls that used artificial intelligence to mimic former President Joe Biden and that he's confident he didn't break the law. Steven Kramer, 56, of New Orleans, has long admitted to orchestrating a message sent to thousands of voters two days before New Hampshire's Jan. 23, 2024, presidential primary. Recipients heard an AI-generated voice similar to the Democratic president's that used his catchphrase 'What a bunch of malarkey' and, as prosecutors allege, suggested that voting in the primary would preclude voters from casting ballots in November. 'It's important that you save your vote for the November election,' voters were told. 'Your votes make a difference in November, not this Tuesday.' Kramer, who faces decades in prison if convicted of voter suppression and impersonating a candidate, said his goal was to send a wake-up call about the potential dangers of AI when he paid a New Orleans magician $150 to create the recording. He was getting frequent calls from people using AI in campaigns, and, worried about the lack of regulations, made it his New Year's resolution to take action. 'This is going to be my one good deed this year,' he recalled while testifying in Belknap County Superior Court. He said his goal wasn't to influence an election, because he didn't consider the primary a real election. At Biden's request, the Democratic National Committee dislodged New Hampshire from its traditional early spot in the 2024 nominating calendar but later dropped its threat not to seat the state's national convention delegates. Biden did not put his name on the ballot or campaign there but won as a write-in. Kramer, who owns a firm specializing in get-out-the-vote projects, argued that the primary was a meaningless straw poll unsanctioned by the DNC. At the time the calls went out, voters were disenfranchised, he said. Asked by his attorney, Tom Reid, whether he did anything illegal, Kramer said, 'I'm positive I did not.' Later, he said he had no regrets and that his actions likely spurred AI regulations in multiple states. Kramer, who will be questioned by prosecutors Thursday, also faces a $6 million fine by the Federal Communications Commission but told The Associated Press on Wednesday that he won't pay it. Lingo Telecom, the company that transmitted the calls, agreed to pay $1 million in a settlement in August. The robocalls appeared to come from a former New Hampshire Democratic Party chair, Kathy Sullivan, and told voters to call her number to be removed from the call list. On the witness stand earlier Wednesday, Sullivan said she was confused and then outraged after speaking to one of the recipients and later hearing the message. 'I hung up the phone and said, 'There is something really crazy going on,'' she said. 'Someone is trying to suppress the vote for Biden. I can't believe this is happening.' Months later, she got a call from Kramer in which he said he used her number because he knew she would contact law enforcement and the media. He also described his motive — highlighting AI's potential dangers — but she didn't believe him, she testified. 'My sense was he was trying to convince me that he'd done this defensible, good thing,' she said. 'I'm listening to this thinking to myself, 'What does he thing I am, stupid?' He tried to suppress the vote.'


Washington Post
27 minutes ago
- Washington Post
National Guard troops have temporarily detained civilians in LA protests, commander says
WASHINGTON — National Guard troops already have temporarily detained civilians in the Los Angeles protests over immigration raids , the commander in charge said Wednesday, but they quickly turned them over to law enforcement. Maj. Gen. Scott Sherman, speaking in an interview with The Associated Press and one other media outlet, also said about 500 of the National Guard troops have been trained so far to accompany agents on immigration operations . Photos of Guard soldiers providing security for the agents have already been circulated by immigration officials.