
Once inevitable collision between Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies now seems less likely, astronomers say
At first glance, it appears likely that the galactic duo — separated by about 2.5 million light-years — is on an inevitable collision course. The Milky Way and Andromeda are barreling toward each other at about 223,694 miles per hour (100 kilometers per second).
However, the Local Group, or our corner of the universe, includes 100 known smaller galaxies. A team of astronomers factored in some of the largest among them, including the Large Magellanic Cloud, or LMC, and M33, or the Triangulum galaxy, to see how much of a role they might play on the chessboard of our galaxy's future over the next 10 billion years.
After factoring in the gravitational pull of Local Group galaxies and running 100,000 simulations using new data from the Hubble and Gaia space telescopes, the team found there is about a 50% chance of a collision between the Milky Way and Andromeda in the next 10 billion years. There is only about a 2% chance the galaxies will collide in 4 to 5 billion years as previously thought, according to the study published Monday in the journal Nature Astronomy.
A merger of the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies would destroy them both, eventually turning both spiral structures into one elongated galaxy, the study authors said. Collisions between other galaxies have been known to create 'cosmic fireworks, when gas, driven to the center of the merger remnant, feeds a central black hole emitting an enormous amount of radiation, before irrevocably falling into the hole,' said study coauthor Carlos Frenk, professor at Durham University in England.
'Until now we thought this was the fate that awaited our Milky Way galaxy,' Frenk said. 'We now know that there is a very good chance that we may avoid that scary destiny.'
However, there are many unknown factors that make it difficult to predict the ultimate fate of our galaxy, according to the study authors. And, Frenk warns, the Milky Way has a greater chance of colliding with the LMC within 2 billion years, which could fundamentally alter our galaxy.
The LMC orbits the Milky Way, while M33 is a satellite of Andromeda.
The LMC's mass is only about 15% of the Milky Way's. But the team found that the satellite galaxy has a gravitational pull, perpendicular to Andromeda, that changes the Milky Way's motion enough to reduce the chance of a merger between the two giant galaxies. It's a similar case for M33.
'The extra mass of Andromeda's satellite galaxy M33 pulls the Milky Way a little bit more towards it,' said lead study author Dr. Till Sawala, astronomer at the University of Helsinki in Finland. 'However, we also show that the LMC pulls the Milky Way off the orbital plane and away from Andromeda. It doesn't mean that the LMC will save us from that merger, but it makes it a bit less likely.'
Previous research also has assumed most likely values for unknown data, such as the uncertainties in the present positions, motions and masses of the Local Group galaxies. In the new study, the team accounted for 22 different variables, including those unknowns, that could contribute to a collision.
'We ran many thousands of simulations, which allowed us to account for all the observational uncertainties,' Sawala said. 'Because there are so many variables that each have their errors, that accumulates to rather large uncertainty about the outcome, leading to the conclusion that the chance of a direct collision is only 50% within the next 10 billion years.'
In just over half of the simulations predicting what could occur in 8 to 10 billion years, the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies initially sailed somewhat closely past each other before circling back and then losing enough orbital energy to collide and merge as one galaxy. These initial close encounters between each galaxy's halo — a large envelope of gas — would eventually lead to a collision.
'In general, the merger would most likely involve a strong starburst, during which many new stars would form, followed by a period of intense radiation caused by exploding young stars and the newly active supermassive black hole, eventually shutting down star formation completely,' Sawala said. 'A few billion years later, any traces of the former Milky Way and Andromeda would disappear, and the remnant would be a largely featureless elliptical galaxy.'
In the other simulations, both galaxies crossed paths without disturbing each other.
Geraint Lewis, a professor of astrophysics at the University of Sydney's Institute for Astronomy, finds the results showing the gravitational influence of M33 and the LMC interesting. He has previously authored research on a potential collision between Andromeda and the Milky Way.
'We won't know if the collision is definitely off in the future, but this clearly shows that the story that people tell — that there will be a collision that will destroy the Milky Way and Andromeda — is not as clear or certain that people think,' Lewis said. 'But even if there is a pretty close encounter rather than smashing head-on, the gravitational tearing that each will assert on each other is likely to leave the two large galaxies in a sorry state.'
While including the LMC's gravitational effects on the Milky Way is important, accounting for uncertainties is the most important aspect of the new study, said Scott Lucchini, a postdoctoral fellow in the Institute for Theory and Computation at the Center for Astrophysics, Harvard & Smithsonian.
'Here, they've sampled from the uncertainties in the positions, velocities, and masses of the galaxies to obtain the relative probabilities of different outcomes,' Lucchini wrote in an email. 'This really gives us the whole picture of what could happen in the future.'
Galaxies are full of intricacies. Their shapes can become distorted, interactions can change their orbits and they can lose mass in different ways. Such complexities make predictions difficult, Lucchini said.
That essentially leaves the fate of the Milky Way 'completely open,' the study authors wrote in the new paper.
However, more data coming from the Gaia space telescope in the summer of 2026 will provide measurements that refine some of the uncertainties about the speed and direction at which Andromeda is moving across the sky, Sawala said.
The fate of the sun may have a bigger impact on Earth's future than the motions of galaxies, according to the researchers.
Our sun is 4.5 billion years old. When it starts to die in another 5 billion years, it will swell into a red giant that engulfs Mercury, Venus and potentially Earth, according to NASA.
'The short answer is that the end of the sun is far worse for our planet than the collision with Andromeda,' Sawala said. 'While that merger would mean the end of our galaxy, it would not necessarily be the end of the sun or the Earth. Although our work also shows that earlier studies, that purported to predict precisely what the fate of the solar system would be after the merger, were clearly premature, in general, collisions between stars or planets are extremely rare during galaxy mergers. And while the end of the sun is certain, our study shows that the end of the galaxy is anything but.'
While the team didn't model a merger between the LMC and the Milky Way in detail, they found a 'virtual certainty' that a merger between the two galaxies will occur within the next 2 billion years, which aligns with previous research, Sawala said. But the effects will likely be more minor than a merger between the Milky Way and Andromeda.
'The merger (between the Milky Way and the LMC) will not destroy our galaxy but it will change it profoundly, particularly impacting our central supermassive black hole and the galactic halo,' Frenck wrote in an email. He also served as a coauthor on a 2019 paper on the potential merger.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Found: The Oldest Black Hole in the Universe
Scientists using the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) have discovered the oldest known black hole in the universe. Nestled within a glowing red galaxy, it dates back 13 billion years and provides a rare glimpse into the universe's earliest moments. The black hole and the galaxy it belongs to are called CAPERS-LRD-z9. It is part of a series of galaxies known as the Little Red Dots. Compared to other galaxies, they are tiny, and they emit red light. Since 2022, scientists have been puzzled by the red spots. Observed in the distant realms of our universe, astronomers thought they were either a cluster of faraway stars or black holes at the center of different galaxies. The fact that they emit so much light suggested that they might be clusters of stars. However, they formed at such an early time that so many stars together was improbable. A new class of galaxy 'We started seeing these objects everywhere,' Anthony Taylor, co-author of the new study, told Science News. It is now generally accepted that the Little Red Dots are a new class of galaxy that formed in the early stages of the universe. The team decided to focus the JWST on one in particular, which seemed to be the oldest. This was CAPERS-LRD-z9. It emitted a huge range of infrared wavelengths. Using spectroscopy to split the light, the team studied the wavelength characteristics, looking for the fingerprint of a black hole. As fast-moving gas is sucked into black holes, it circles and creates a certain pattern of wavelengths of light. The gases moving toward us stretch into red wavelengths, while those moving away compress into blue wavelengths. 'There aren't many other things that create this signature. And this galaxy has it!' exclaimed Taylor in a statement. A blink of time A few even more distant spots could potentially be older black holes, but researchers have yet to see the same spectroscopic signature from them. This means that, at the moment, this is the oldest black hole ever discovered. At 13.3 billion years old, it formed just 500 million years after the Big Bang -- a blink of time in the scale of the universe. 'When looking for black holes, this is about as far back as you can practically go,' said Taylor. "We're really pushing the boundaries of what current technology can detect." Though the galaxies are quite small, the black hole at the center of CAPERS-LRD-z9 is not. It is about 300 million times the mass of our Sun, and roughly 10 times more massive than Sagittarius A*, the black hole at the center of the Milky Way. Even more intriguingly, its mass might represent around half of its galaxy's total stellar mass, a proportion far greater than in younger galaxies. Studying CAPERS-LRD-z9 doesn't just confirm the existence of a black hole. It gives astronomers a crucial testing ground to refine theories of early galaxy and black hole evolution. 'We only ever survey very tiny areas of the sky with the James Webb Space Telescope,' said co-author Steven Finkelstein, 'So, if we find one thing, there's got to be a lot more out there.' Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Consulting is changing. Here are 4 unlikely ways the Big Four are reinventing themselves to seem less 'stodgy.'
Household names turn to the Big Four professional services firms for consulting and accounting. But the Big Four are moving into industries like space and venture capital. One industry observer says this helps distance them from a reputation for being "stodgy" as consulting changes. This year, Deloitte became the first of the Big Four consulting and accountancy firms to launch a satellite into space. No, really. You may know Deloitte, EY, PwC, and KPMG for consulting, accounting, audit, and tax, which embed them in some of the world's biggest organizations and generate billions in annual revenue for each firm. But space, advertising, and venture capital are among the buzzier projects they've been developing. These ventures are a way for the companies to show they are adapting to industry changes, Tom Rodenhauser, managing director of the consulting industry research firm Kennedy Intelligence, told Business Insider. They "demonstrate their innovation and creativity" while distancing the Big Four from their "stodgy audit reputation," he added. They also boost their profiles and serve as a recruitment tool, he said. The initiatives also bring consulting arms closer to tech companies and AI innovators, Rodenhauser said, as the firms pin their future success on the technology. "I do expect more of these as consulting becomes even more technical," he added. Here are some Big Four's ventures that may not come to mind when you picture accountants and consultants. EY Studio+ Your creative ad campaign isn't typically led by a team of corporate suits, but EY has acquired 37 agencies and firms specializing in design, marketing, and customer experience since 2014. In June, it announced that it was launching a business unit focused on marketing and sales, called EY Studio+. The division launched with 7,000 employees, and EY said it plans to expand it by 10% to 20% in the following year. EY was playing catch-up with rivals Deloitte, which has offered marketing solutions through Deloitte Digital since 2012, and Accenture, which created Accenture Song in 2022. EY Studio+ offers design, marketing, sales, customer service, and customer technology services. Its website features case studies that set out how it can advise clients on the back-office systems and strategies of marketing departments — as with its existing consulting work — but also take the lead in designing customer experiences. Laurence Buchanan, global leader of EY Studio+, told Business Insider, that they were targeting chief marketing officers who were "under increasing pressure to re-imagine their customer experience and business models" because of AI. When it launched the studio, EY said that the new unit marks "a significant milestone" in CEO Janet Truncale's "All in" strategy to reshape the firm to tackle client "issues that are more complex and inter-connected than ever before." Deloitte-1 Satellite Deloitte — the largest of the Big Four, by annual revenue and employee numbers — has had a space division since April 2023 and launched a satellite in March in collaboration with SpaceX and Spire, a space data company. "We're driving space-enabled innovation and shaping what's possible for industries both on and off this planet," Jason Girzadas, CEO of Deloitte US, said in a LinkedIn post. In July, Deloitte announced that it had built and installed a cyber defense system on its satellite, called "silent shield." Brett Loubert, leader of Deloitte's US space practice, said it would help clients protect their space-based assets and "understand and manage the risks to their missions, strengthen their cyber resiliency and protect against evolving cyber threats." KPMG and Hippocratic AI Like the rest of the Big Four, KPMG has long had healthcare organizations among its advisory clients, but it's recently moved to direct collaborations with healthtech companies. The industry is booming, and in July, KPMG announced it was working with Hippocratic AI to deploy teams of medical AI agents. The AI agents are designed to address backlogs in healthcare systems by conducting "non-diagnostic patient-facing clinical tasks," KPMG said in a press release. Hippocratic AI developed the agents, while KPMG's role is to analyse and improve operations, upskill care professionals, and plan for the expansion of AI "across the entire care continuum." PwC Raise | Ventures PwC has three core lines of business — assurance, advisory, and tax. But the firm has also developed its own venture capital division called PwC Raise | Ventures, which operates in the UK. Raise | Ventures supports rapidly growing startups seeking Series A funding as well as larger businesses looking for further investment to grow, per PwC's website. An online guide says it can help founders improve pitch decks, introduce them to a network of investors, and help with due diligence. Its website tells prospective clients that working with PwC Raise | Ventures will "increase the probability of achieving a successful fundraise on good terms." Have a tip? Contact this reporter via email at pthompson@ or Signal at Polly_Thompson.89. Use a personal email address, a nonwork WiFi network, and a nonwork device; here's our guide to sharing information securely. Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
James Webb Finds Evidence of Free-Floating Planets So Large They Can Gather Their Own Planetary Systems
So much for heliocentrism. An international team of astronomers using observations made with the James Webb Space Telescope have found evidence of massive planets out there that're capable of forming their own planetary systems — without a star. These planets would be the center of something like a mini version of our solar system where other, smaller planets revolve around it. But without the light of a star, these systems, if they exist, would go largely overlooked by our telescopes, lost to the dark void of space. The work, a new study accepted for publication in the The Astronomical Journal, focuses on free-floating "rogue" planets which are not gravitationally bound to a star. While some rogue planets are first formed around a stellar object before being ejected from their system, the astronomers believe these ones may have formed from the same mechanism that gives birth to stars. "These discoveries show that the building blocks for forming planets can be found even around objects that are barely larger than Jupiter and drifting alone in space," lead author Belinda Damian, an astronomer at the University of St Andrews in Scotland, said in a statement about the work. "This means that the formation of planetary systems is not exclusive to stars but might also work around lonely starless worlds." Using James Webb observations taken between August and October 2024, the astronomers examined eight free-floating planets. With masses between five to ten times that of Jupiter, these belong to a class of objects believed to be the lowest mass objects that form from the collapse of the giant gas clouds that are sometimes referred to as stellar nurseries, as they're typically associated with star formation. For one reason or another, these objects didn't accumulate enough mass to sustain nuclear fusion reactions in their cores and become proper stars. These shouldn't be confused with brown dwarfs, however, which are much more massive substellar objects that are dozens of times heavier than Jupiter that also fail to kickstart nuclear fusion, earning them the moniker of "failed" stars. In this latest work, the astronomers detected excess emissions in the infrared spectra of these objects, showing that six of them have emissions associated with warm dust. This indicates the presence of a disk, or a circumstellar cloud of gas and dust that surrounds the planet. In itself, this isn't unusual, and such disks have been detected around rogue planets before. Around stars, these disks, referred to as protoplanetary disks, are where dense regions of gas and dust can coalesce to form planets, and are the leftover material from the star's formation which didn't get sucked into its collapsing core. But the kicker here is that the scientists have detected signs that the rogue planets' disks are already exhibiting the crucial first steps of planetary formation in the form of harboring silicate grains, which appear to be growing and crystallizing. These dusty grains can clump together to form planetesimals, the large, solid objects that are the building blocks of a baby planet. This is the first detection of silicate grains around a planetary mass object, the authors said. And it pairs tantalizingly with their previous study which showed that the rogue planet disks can last for millions of years, providing more than enough time to incubate inchoate worlds. "Taken together, these studies show that objects with masses comparable to those of giant planets have the potential to form their own miniature planetary systems," coauthor Aleks Scholz, who is also a St Andrews astronomer, said in the statement. "Those systems could be like the solar system, just scaled down by a factor of 100 or more in mass and size. Whether or not such systems actually exist remains to be shown." Ironically, then, maybe our ancestors weren't totally off the mark with their whole geocentrism fixation — they just had the wrong planetary system in mind. More on exoplanets: James Webb Spots Planets Forming Into Solar System in Real Time, Like an Organism's First Cells Solve the daily Crossword