Agribusiness and Trade: NZ food and fibre sector poised for growth
In the past, over-regulation, compliance creep and anti-farming rhetoric eroded trust and stalled investment in our primary sector. But the settings are changing, and so is sentiment.
According to the February Federated Farmers Confidence Survey, general farmer confidence has rebounded by 16 points since July 2023. While there's still work to do, this is the largest uplift in confidence in five years, and I predict the next survey, due in the coming weeks, will break new records as farmers reap the benefits of their hard work. The message is clear: this Government backs farmers and the policy reset is working.
Over the six years of the previous government, the rural sector was burdened by unworkable regulations that siffled production and stopped them competing on the world stage. Farmers and growers want to innovate and lead the world. They know they must be at the forefront of market trends to command shelf space in the world's supermarkets and the attention of increasingly discerning consumers, and when given permission to compete they produce some of the most effect, high-quality, safe food and fibre the world has seen.
To ensure the farmers and growers can achieve this this we've reset rules, wound back costly red tape regulation, and reinstated common sense so producers have the freedom to do what they do best – grow food.
The focus is now firmly on moving forward. We're looking at how we can increase land use flexibility to ensure farmers can adapt and diversify based on opportunity, not red tape. And we're driving a full overhaul of the Resource Management Act to create a regulatory system that enables, rather than obstructs enterprise. One that recognises food and fibre as a strategic and economic asset, and allows us to smartly meet environmental obligations rather than closing down good businesses.
At the same time, we're building long-term investment partnerships with the sector. In Budget 2025, we launched the Primary Sector Growth Fund (PSGF), a $246 million commitment to co-invest in high-impact innovation. The first project, Resilient Pastures, is already underway: a seven-year, $17 million programme to breed more productive, climate-tolerant pasture systems.
This is just the start. Upcoming PSGF projects will focus on automation, breeding gains in livestock and plants, and new platform technologies to give producers the tools to compete and win.
We also introduced Investment Boost, allowing agribusinesses to immediately deduct 20% of the cost of new assets from their tax bill, giving firms more capital to reinvest at speed, and to help drive economic growth and export opportunities.
Trade delivering – sharing our food and fibre with the world
As we reset the domestic policy environment, we've also been relentlessly focused on unlocking global opportunities for New Zealand's world-class producers and exporters.
May marked one year since the EU Free Trade Agreement came into force—well ahead of schedule, and already it's delivering. In just 12 months, exports have increased by more than $1 billion. Similarly, we've also marked two years of the UK FTA, which has seen a 21% boost in exports worth an additional $644.4 million.
Beyond Europe, we've signed a Free Trade Agreement with the United Arab Emirates which once enacted will unlock over $1 billion in additional trade value.
We've also concluded negotiations with the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), a high-potential $3 trillion regional economy, and launched negotiations with India, recognising its critical importance as a long-term growth market for New Zealand's exporters.
Trade is not magical, it merely creates jobs and lifts incomes for every New Zealander. Todd McClay
In Asia, we're progressing an upgraded Services Agreement with China, and successfully resolved a long-standing non-tariff barrier in the cosmetics sector, unlocking an estimated $200 million in new market access for Kiwi exporters.
Importantly, we're tackling non-tariff barriers (NTB) head-on. In the past 18 months alone, we've resolved $933 million worth of NTBs that were holding exporters back, including forcing Canada to honour its obligation to New Zealand dairy farmers under the CPTPP agreement - and we're going after more.
This is trade policy focused on execution and growth. These outcomes are expanding shelf space, lifting export value, and reinforcing New Zealand's competitive edge in a global market that demands quality, trust and speed. Trade is not magical, it merely creates jobs and lifts incomes for every New Zealander.
Global markets demand proof, not just promises
Premium markets increasingly demand not just great products, but verifiable systems behind them. That's why we've launched New Zealand's first Grass-Fed certification standard, giving red meat and dairy exporters a trusted mark to differentiate in global markets where sourcing claims are under the microscope.
Initiatives like this reinforce what the best in the industry are already doing. From leading grass-fed systems to precision technology and value-added processing --New Zealand agribusiness is already creating the future. Government's role is to support, enable, and amplify that progress, clear the roadblocks, and scale the success.
The challenge is set and accepted
New Zealand's position in the global food economy relies on dedication and relentless ambition focused on innovation that leads the world and keeps New Zealand forefront in the minds of global consumers.
There is no shortage of ability on our shores or desire to succeed. The demand is there, and the capability exists. What's needed now is ambition backed by smart rules, better investment pathways, and a clear strategic direction, led by a sector that's hungry to remain on the top shelf.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
17 hours ago
- Newsroom
Anne Salmond: The ‘war' on NZ values
For some time now, various environmental non-governmental organisations have been talking about a 'war on nature' in New Zealand. Many initiatives highlight the gravity of what's at stake – the 'Fast Track' Act, the Regulatory Standards bill; proposed amendments to the Overseas Investment Act, the National Environmental Standards for Commercial Forestry, and National Directions under the Resource Management Act affecting forests, fresh water and soils; the radical rewriting of the Resource Management Act, the removal of regulatory powers from local councils and talk about the abolition of regional councils; and the defunding of environmental groups and initiatives. The way these measures work is often deliberately opaque. Most New Zealanders do not realise that under the Regulatory Standards Bill, for instance, the oft-touted appeal to freedom for 'persons' under this bill is as much (or even more) about freedom for corporations as it is for individuals, since under the law, corporations are treated as legal 'persons.' Under the tangled weave of amendments to the Overseas Investment Act, international corporations are given relatively unfettered access to exploit natural resources in New Zealand, whether in mining, forestry or building infrastructure, even in our most prized and/or vulnerable landscapes and seascapes. These amendments work together with the 'Fast-track Approvals' Act, the Regulatory Standards Bill, proposed amendments to national directions under the Resource Management Act, the radical rewriting of the Resource Management Act and many other measures to reduce restraints on harmful extractive activities. At the same time, many international corporations use the infrastructure paid for by taxpayers and ratepayers, pay little or no tax, expatriate their profits, exit when their activities cease to be profitable and too often leave behind costly and lasting damage (e.g. oil exploration, mining and industrial forestry) for ratepayers and taxpayers to pay for. How is that supposed to generate long-term prosperity for New Zealand, and New Zealanders? These and other new legislative and regulatory measures give local corporations similar, relatively unfettered rights, even if they inflict lasting damage on local communities and the environments they live in. How does that square with the PM's launch last month of a new '100% Pure New Zealand' tourism campaign? An insistence on economic calculation is a two-edged sword. If Fonterra, for instance, insists on charging international prices for butter and other produce to other New Zealanders, then by the same logic, other New Zealanders should have the right to charge Fonterra for the damage they cause to rivers, lakes and aquifers; the harm to citizens' health, safety and enjoyment; and their contributions to New Zealand's carbon and biodiversity global debts. That's not happening, though. So wealth flows out of the country, or into the pockets of relatively limited number of local shareholders, directors and chief executives, while waterways, landscapes and the climate are wrecked, and other citizens experience a reduced quality of life and an increased cost of living. In order to achieve these one-way flows of wealth, there's been a barrage of measures that diminish accountability to the electorate. Not surprisingly, some are now also talking about a 'war on democracy' in New Zealand. This is epitomised by the way the proportional principle that underpins MMP has been undermined during coalition negotiations, with large numbers of measures with little or no electoral support signed off without public scrutiny, followed by a blitzkrieg of legislation aimed at exhausting parliamentary and public opposition. This 'war on democracy' includes the overuse of urgency in Parliament to enact measures with as little debate as possible; the undue influence of lobby groups and party funders; the debasement of select committee processes; the silencing of public servants and attempts to harness them to ideological agendas instead of the public interest; the use of Parliamentary Service-employed political staff to attack individual critics; attacks on universities and the rule of law; the undermining of local government while centralising executive power; and to cap it all, unheralded and unwanted changes to electoral processes that are likely to disenfranchise large numbers of voters. Many MPs seem to have forgotten who pays their salaries, and the job they've been hired to do in Parliament – i.e, to serve the interests of all New Zealanders, faithfully and well. That applies to all MPs, whether in government or opposition. At times, the fight against a barrage of harmful legislation is left to voluntary organisations and individual citizens with limited resources, when that is the primary responsibility of opposition MPs. Democracy in New Zealand is staggering under these assaults. This begs the question, does this add up to a 'war on New Zealand' and New Zealanders? Whose interests are being served by the current legislative agenda? Unheralded amendments to the Pay Equity Act, passed under urgency and aimed at constraining the incomes of low paid (mostly) female workers; a host of measures that reduce incomes, increase precarity and worsen working conditions for many; the loss of access to affordable housing, reliable and affordable childcare and healthcare, and the ability to put food on the table; increases in unemployment, homelessness and child poverty; the failure to give citizens the assurance that if they are disabled, ill, out of work or hit by disaster through no fault of their own, they will be supported, and that they can afford a reasonable retirement – all raise questions about how New Zealand is being governed at present. No wonder so many New Zealanders are leaving the country to look for a brighter future. There can be no worse indictment against any government. These are heartland issues, I think, that cut across the political spectrum. A love of our country, its heritage and landscapes, a belief in democracy and a fair deal for all, and a desire for a good future for our children and grandchildren is not the preserve of any one political party in New Zealand. A widespread sense of frustration and helplessness is not helped by the fragmentation of the debate, with those who want a healthy environment, a vibrant local democracy, a more equitable society and a Parliament that's dedicated to the public interest heading in slightly different directions. The loss of journalistic depth and independence in public media, and the use of algorithms and bots in social media to alienate and divide people make matters worse. A 'war on reality,' truth and evidence uses misinformation, slurs and 'double speak' to confuse attempts at resistance that are already uncoordinated and siloed. Yet at the same time, huge, spontaneous surges of opposition to the Treaty Principles Bill and the Regulatory Standards Bill, both provoking unprecedented numbers of submissions, suggest that many New Zealanders are eager to reclaim democracy in this country. Very few are willing to see fringe political parties, lobby groups and think tanks decide their future. There are some brilliant younger leaders waiting in the wings, and some are already in Parliament. If some of them reached across the aisles and agreed to tackle these challenges together, that might make a difference. One thing's for sure – party politics is not working well for New Zealand at present. Outside Parliament, there are also impressive younger leaders. What's needed is a banner under which Kiwis can come together to restore the accountability of the executive to Parliament, and to the people of this country. Perhaps a non-partisan Civic Assembly would be useful, with leaders and attendees from the wider community coming together to address key challenges to democracy in New Zealand, and devise strategies to tackle them. These challenges might include democracy and Parliament; democracy and the media; democracy and Te Tiriti; democracy and the environment; and democracy and inequality, for instance. Or a series of such meetings, in different locations? Any other ideas? In any case, something must happen, and soon. Democracy in this country is at a turning point. New Zealanders who value their democratic freedoms need to come together across different spheres of influence to talk, think and plan; step away from the abyss; and act to make a positive difference.
Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
NZ 'back on course', govt says
By Russell Palmer of RNZ The government has launched a defence of its record on tackling the cost of living. Finance Minister Nicola Willis joined Prime Minister Christopher Luxon at the Beehive Theatrette for the weekly post-Cabinet briefing. She spent much of the previous week facing questions about her meeting with Fonterra chief executive Miles Hurrell. Luxon said this week marked a full year since the tax bracket changes National campaigned on had come into effect. "It's only through a strong economy that wages rise faster than inflation, that Kiwis can get ahead of their daily costs and our businesses can take risks that can mean that they can invest, grow, and create more jobs," he said. He directly targeted National's main rival in opposition. "Other parties in Parliament believe that raising taxes, growing the public sector, and giving more handouts to those who refuse to work is the answer. Taxing more, spending more, and borrowing more as Labour and others advocate for didn't work in the past and it won't work in the future." The government's decision to increase fees paid to board members on Crown entities - in some cases up to 80 percent - may undercut the messaging that National is prioritising low and middle-income New Zealanders' interests. But Luxon today pointed to the building products changes announced over the weekend, and the proposed ban on payment surcharges as recent examples. He then pointed to other items in the government's agenda, including: the current pipeline of infrastructure projects, Roads of National Significance, completing the City Rail Link, signing trade deals with the United Arab Emirates and Gulf Cooperation Council, starting negotiations with India, the digital nomads visa, and the Investment Boost policy. Willis soon picked up the baton, rattling off her own list of changes the government had made which she said had helped lower costs, including: the Family Boost policy, ending the Reserve Bank's secondary mandate to account for unemployment, curbing government spending, changing residential tenancy laws, tax deductability changes for landlords, delaying the previous government's petrol excise increases, scrapping the Auckland Regional Fuel Tax, increasing rates rebates for seniors, increasing Working for Families support, and extending maximum subscription lengths. She said National had campaigned on tackling the cost of living crisis, and pointed to rising GDP per capita and wages rising faster than inflation as a result of the government's interventions. "Taking the pressure off inflation - that is the general level of price increases across the economy - helps with the cost side of the cost-of-living equation. Lower inflation means less pressure on prices... it's pleasing to say that wages are now growing faster than inflation and forecasts show this trend continuing over the next few years." She said the government's tax changes meant "households have benefited by an average of $60 a fortnight". The change to interest deductibility for landlords had helped to take the heat out of the rental market, she said, noting "the 2.6 increase for the year to June was the lowest since 2011". She said the government was also making big structural changes, saying "the last government conclusively proved that band aids are not enough" and pointing to a series of policies yet to come to fruition: the Going for Housing Growth policy, Fast-tracking renewable energy consenting, work to address supermarket competition, and to curb council rates increases. "Economies are like oil tankers, you can't turn them around on a dime. But New Zealand is back on course," Willis said. The lists of government achievements kept coming, with Willis also pointing to: education reform, the investment boost (again), promoting global trade and investment, changes to the research and development sector, and "delivering infrastructure projects faster and better". Meanwhile, a Cabinet Office Circular reveals the government signed off on increases to fees available to board members of Crown entities. This includes increases of 30 percent for Group 2 and 4 boards and Audit and Risk committees, and an increase of 80 percent for Group 3 bodies. Luxon said the public sector director fees "have got completely out of whack compared to private sector fees". "Obviously we will never pay as much as someone in the private sector but when you are spending $32 billion on healthcare for example, it's important that we are actually able to attract really good governors for the Health NZ board, for example," he said. The changes took effect at the start of July.
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Duck, Dive…Revive?
Indicators partially correct May's stumble But sense of the recovery failing to launch remains, pushing back timing of labour market recovery Sluggish property market turns up in Q2 inflation figures Downtrend in rent inflation has further to run Runway to a sub-3% OCR looking clearer Here's our take on the learnings and implications from the past few weeks' worth of econo-news. 1. Tariffs, but with happy markets US tariffs and trade negotiations are back on the front page. That's dashed some hopes the prior 90-day tariff pause might slide into permanency. But a string of recent trade deals has helped produce a vastly different reception amongst financial market participants and forecasters this time around. Indicators of global risk appetite remain healthy and global equity markets have blasted through record highs. That's helpful for confidence, to the extent it lasts. Alongside this and, most importantly for NZ's economic plight, the recent trend stabilisation in global growth expectations has held. Consensus forecasts for global growth were even nudged up a touch this month, for both 2025 and 2026 (to 2.3%y/y and 2.4% respectively). Continued resilience in the global economic data pulse, particularly in the US, has helped. We won't add to speculation on whether this is all too optimistic ahead of another trade deal deadline on Friday, and the effective US tariff rate rising above 15%. Suffice to say, the dragging uncertainty associated with US trade policy, while lower than previously, looks set to stick around, a negative impost on investment particularly. 2. Investment appetites stirring? Despite this uncertainty, we're encouraged by a sprinkling of indications NZ investment appetites may at least be stirring. Surveyed investment intentions have not only established a foothold at above average levels but have pushed on further in recent months (ANZ survey, July edition out Wednesday). Admittedly, buoyant rural sector cash flows are having an outsized impact here, per the chart. Boosting the odds these intentions are ultimately acted upon is anecdote suggestive of reasonable interest in the government's Investment Boost scheme. And perhaps also the lift in investment-related imports we noticed in last week's merchandise trade figures. There's a heap of month-to-month volatility in these data, but in June we saw plant and machinery imports up 13%y/y, imports of transport equipment rising 19%, and those for intermediate goods up 21%. It's all partial stuff but, taken together, helps assuage some of our prior concerns sluggish business investment might be a dragging anchor for the broader recovery. 3. Steadying of the wobble Other June economic data to hand paint a picture of a partial steadying from May's surprise and unwelcome wobble. Most 'high frequency' indicators have pulled back a bit from the brink (chart next page). The underlying sense of the recovery so far failing to launch remains though. Indicative of such, two of the better monthly indicators we watch – the Performance of Manufacturing and Performance of Services indices – continue to openly question the extent of growth uplift we've got on the board. And that's even after our second quarter GDP forecast was pruned to -0.2%q/q. The Reserve Bank's new Kiwi-GDP 'nowcast' sits at -0.3%. We still think the mid-year activity air-pocket will pass. The underlying drivers of the recovery remain in place and should reassert themselves in coming quarters. But the recent weakness does push back the likely timing of the eventual labour market recovery. We doubt the current undershoot of firms' labour requirements relative to worker availability will change appreciably this side of Christmas. Our forecast peak in unemployment has been shunted out to 5.4% in the final quarter of the year. Wage growth should thus continue to slow through to the middle of next year. 4. Inflation (slightly) less threatening We think the supply overhang in the labour market is symptomatic of what's going on in the broader economy. And it's central to our expectation the current burst of inflation will peter out early next year. Our updated forecasts have CPI inflation peaking at 2.9% y/y in the current (third) quarter (forecast table at back of document). That's a touch lower than previously and follows the nudge up to 2.7% in Q2 revealed by Stats NZ last week. Hikes in food and energy prices are expected to feature prominently again in Q3, as well as this year's annual rates increase. Thereafter, a brisk return to the mid-point of the Reserve Bank's 1-3% target range is anticipated through the first half of 2026. An eye-catching but perhaps not surprising feature amongst the detail of the June inflation numbers was the downward pressure on many of the components linked to the sluggish housing and construction markets. Construction costs fell outright in Q2 for the first time since 2011. We've got additional declines pegged for the next two quarters, in part reflecting past weakness in house prices. Annual inflation in property maintenance prices fell to 1.4%, with that for household supplies and services at 1.5%. Meanwhile, household appliances and domestic accommodation experienced annual deflation in Q2 of 0.9% and 6.3% and respectively. Notably, these CPI subgroups comprise five of the top ten most sensitive to interest rates, according to recent research by the Reserve Bank. 5. Rent declines confirm excess supply Annual rent inflation was marked at a still robust 3.2%y/y in June. Rents in the CPI are measured on the stock of all rental properties. But note that rents for new tenancies – a flow measure collected by MBIE more closely aligned to market conditions – are now deflating at a (smoothed) annual rate of around 2%. That's around the weakest in the history of a series going back to the mid-90s. It puts the median new tenancy rent back at late 2023 levels around $560/week. It fits with the general state of rental market oversupply highlighted in our recent research, a development noted as most obvious in Auckland and Wellington. Heightened supply, alongside the fact net migration remains, not only weak, but also subject to continued downward revisions, points to the strong likelihood CPI rental (stock) inflation falls back towards 2% over the coming 12 months. till, one development worth highlighting is that available rental listings, according to the data we collect from Trademe, appear to have stopped rising. On our estimates, rental vacancy rates have tracked roughly sideways at 3.3% for the past two months. If sustained, this would cap a multi-year uptrend and mean rental supply capacity, while still large, is no longer expanding. 6. Runway to a sub-3% OCR looking clearer It's been relatively quiet on the interest rate front recently. There's been a pause in the trend declines in most retail interest rates (chart opposite). However, the net of recent growth and inflation goings on described above is sufficient in our view to reintroduce some gentle downward pressure, should the RBNZ resume Official Cash Rate cuts in August as we expect. A 25bps cut in August is as close to fully priced as it gets and we think the combination of sputtering demand and contained inflation supports the case for a follow up in October. That is, there's no change to our long-held forecast for a 2.75% low in the OCR cycle. At a high level we still think the risks are falling evenly either side of this view but more recently there's probably been more of a skew to the downside.
