Apple is still trying to overturn the ban on the Apple Watch blood oxygen sensor
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard new arguments from Apple and Masimo's lawyers on Monday over the legality of the original ITC ban. Apple's argument is that the fact Masimo was developing its own smartwatch when Apple released the Apple Watch Series 6 in 2020 — the first of the company's wearables with a blood oxygen sensor — shouldn't be enough to justify the ban. Masimo disagrees.
The appeals court has heard the company's arguments before, and even briefly paused the trade ban in December 2023 while the ITC considered Apple's request for a longer pause. Ultimately, the ITC ruled in Masimo's favor and denied Apple's request. Apple removed the blood oxygen sensor in 2024 so it could restart sales of the Apple Watch Series 9 and Apple Watch Ultra 2 in the US.
The companies' fight goes beyond just the blood oxygen sensor — Masimo's smartwatches were, ironically, found to infringe on Apple patents — but clearly Apple is hung up on the feature. The company's blood oxygen sensor was never as accurate as the pulse oximeters used in a doctor's office, but it was part of a fairly comprehensive suite of heart health features on the smartwatch. It's entirely possible Apple wants to reintroduce it in its watches as part of an even more ambitious health feature down the road.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNET
28 minutes ago
- CNET
Apple's Low-Cost MacBook to Start at $599, Report Says
Pricing is starting to come into focus for the cheaper MacBook that was first rumored earlier this summer. DigiTimes, citing "supply chain sources," reports Monday that this low-cost version will start at $699, or $599 with Apple's education discount. That's a significant price cut from the $999 MacBook Air ($899 with educational pricing), the current entry point to the MacBook line. What we know and don't know about the $599 MacBook Previous details remain unchanged as of this latest report: It will feature Apple's A18 Pro processor, the same chip powering the iPhone 16 Pro, and offer color options including pink, blue and yellow. The timing looks the same, too, with mass production to begin by the end of this year and shipments to start in early 2026. Previous reports called it a 13-inch MacBook, and today's news puts a finer point on the size of the display. It will feature a 12.9-inch screen, a bit smaller than the 13.6-inch MacBook Air. No other details have emerged about the display, but you can expect it will come with a lower resolution and lower brightness than the M4 MacBook Air's Liquid Retina display. With the smaller display, I'm curious to know how much this smaller, cheaper MacBook will weigh. The M4 Air weighs 2.7 pounds. Will the super-cheap MacBook weigh less than 2.5 pounds? Closer to 2 pounds even? And will it be added to the MacBook Air line or simply be called a MacBook? Memory and storage allotments remain a mystery. I'm hoping for 16GB of RAM and a 256GB solid-state drive, but I'm guessing it'll offer only 8GB of RAM and a 128GB SSD. After all, the baseline MacBook Air went from 8GB of RAM to 16GB only last year. I'd be happy with a compromise of 8GB of RAM and a 256GB SSD. The A18 processor won't be able to match the performance of an M4 chip, but it does support Apple Intelligence, giving budget buyers access to Apple's nascent AI features that will hopefully improve during the lifespan of your next MacBook. Cheap MacBook or entry-level iPad? While a $599 MacBook will help Apple grab greater laptop market share, will it eat into its iPad sales? Consider that with Apple's educational pricing, the base iPad with an 11-inch display and A16 chip costs $329, but when you add the Magic Keyboard Folio for $229, you'll end up paying only $41 less than the $599 MacBook. Given that choice, I'm grabbing the MacBook.
TechCrunch
28 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
iPhone 17, the ‘thinnest iPhone ever,' and everything else we're expecting out of Apple's hardware event
Apple usually announces its new hardware in the fall, and this year is likely no different. The event is reported to be on September 9, and Apple is expected to release its iPhone 17 lineup, along with updates for the Apple Watch and AirPods. As always, there are many rumors circulating, including bigger screens and improved cameras for the iPhone 17 models and the introduction of an ultra-thin iPhone Air that could replace the Plus model. iPhone 17, 17 Pro, and 17 Pro Max The iPhone 17 is expected to get a significant makeover to align more closely with the Pro models. It could feature a slightly larger 6.3-inch screen, which is an increase of 0.2 inch compared to the iPhone 16, as well as a 120Hz display, a substantial upgrade from the current 60Hz. It's also rumored to have a 24-megapixel front camera. It could also come in new colors: purple and green. iPhone 17: Purple and Green Colors in Testing as Potential New Shade for 2025 Full Article: — Majin Bu (@MajinBuOfficial) June 20, 2025 The Pro's upgrades will be noticeable on the back of the phone, rumors suggest. Conceptual renderings show that the three rear cameras may be arranged in a rectangular bar that extends from one edge of the device to the other. The flash, light sensor, and microphone would be positioned far to the right side. Where the MagSafe charger is, the Apple logo is said to be centered for aesthetic reasons. Notably, the iPhone 17 Pro may switch materials, potentially replacing the titanium band around the screen with aluminum. This could help Apple reduce costs as well as provide a lighter feel. The iPhone 17 Pro Max is expected to see fewer upgrades, too, with the most significant change being a slightly thicker body, likely to accommodate a larger battery — which would be a huge win. According to leaker Instant Digital, the iPhone 17 is predicted to be priced around $800, and the Pro model could cost around $1,050. The Pro Max is expected to have a price tag of $1,250. Techcrunch event Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital, Elad Gil — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $600+ before prices rise. Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. San Francisco | REGISTER NOW iPhone Air Image Credits:Apple Track The most widely discussed rumor is that Apple might be introducing its slimmest phone ever, the iPhone Air, which may replace the iPhone Plus. This rumored device is said to have a profile thickness of 5.5 mm, making it about 0.08 inch thinner than current iPhones. It'll also feature a 6.6-inch screen. This move appears to be Apple's response to the trend of slimmer smartphones, following in the footsteps of other companies like Samsung and Huawei. The iPhone Air could potentially outshine the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge, which measures 5.8 mm thick. Additionally, it may pave the way for Apple's long-rumored foldable phone, predicted to launch in September 2026. While the thin design is stylish, it would come with some compromises. Based on the renders we've seen, the Air is expected to have only one rear camera lens, unlike the Plus, which has two. There are also rumors that there may not be enough space for a speaker at the bottom, meaning the only audio source could be the front earpiece at the top. Reports suggest the device will be priced at $950 and will be available in black, silver, and light gold. Apple Watch Series 11, Ultra 3, and SE 3 Image Credits:Apple After a two-year wait, there are various rumors surrounding the Apple Watch Ultra 3, suggesting it will undergo significant changes. These may include faster charging speeds, 5G support, and satellite connectivity. Additionally, it's speculated that the watch will feature a larger display. One of the most exciting potential upgrades for both the Ultra 3 and Series 11 is the incorporation of blood pressure monitoring capabilities. This feature would notify users if their blood pressure levels are too high or too low. Apple is also considering adding a sleep apnea feature. However, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, the company may need to delay the release of these features for further tweaks. The third generation of Apple Watch SE isn't expected to receive major updates, aside from possibly a larger display. There continue to be reports of a plastic version being introduced, according to Gurman. Rumored prices for the watches are: $250 for the Apple Watch SE 3, $400 for the Series 11, and $800 for the Ultra 3. AirPods Pro 3 Image Credits:Apple After the release of the AirPods Pro 2 in 2022, it's about time for an upgrade, and Apple might just be ready to deliver. Rumors suggest that the AirPods Pro 3 will feature a sleeker design, touch-sensitive controls, smaller earbuds, and a slimmer case. Additionally, the H3 chip is expected to enhance active noise cancellation and adaptive audio.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
60 percent blame Trump for high costs amid expensive Air Force One, ballroom projects
The U.S. economy isn't in a recession — yet. And hopefully, it won't be. But according to Moody's Analytics chief economist Mark Zandi, the number of industries cutting back on headcount is … well, concerning. Meanwhile, Americans are struggling — grappling with debt, the rising cost of living, and a general sense that their dollar just isn't going far enough. And they're not just blaming 'the economy' in the abstract. Six out of 10 Americans say the Trump administration is driving up their cost of living, according to a new Morning Consult poll. But there's one person who doesn't seem to be feeling the pinch. President Donald Trump is spending millions of dollars and accepting literal gold gifts, which feels wildly out of touch with everyday Americans. Last week, Donald Trump received a glass disc with a 24-karat gold base from Apple CEO Tim Cook. Earlier this year, he accepted a $400 million jet from the Qatari royal family, worth over 100 times more than all foreign gifts given to U.S. presidents combined since 2001. And get this: it could cost up to $1 billion to renovate. He's also reimagined the Oval Office, drenching it in gold, from the stars surrounding the presidential seal on the ceiling to the statues on the fireplace mantel. And it emerged last week that Trump intends to build an enormous $200 million ballroom for hosting official receptions — one of the biggest White House projects in more than a century. Take a look: 'So we'll start in two months maybe, two and a half months, and we'll have it completed in less than two years. It's a very incredible structure — a lot of it's interior work, it's gonna be beautiful, because normally I can build a building like that in four, five months, but it's very intricate, beautiful, beautiful — the best marbles.' And who's paying for this? White House officials say Trump and 'unspecified donors.' If it's a gift, it could raise both ethical and legal questions, potentially violating the Foreign Emoluments Clause of the U.S. Constitution or the Foreign Gifts and Decorations Act, which exists to block this type of thing. Democrats are skeptical. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said at a press briefing, 'Listen, I'm happy to eat my cheeseburger at my desk. I don't need a $200 million ballroom to eat it in. OK?' And many Americans feel the same. Sure, White House upgrades might look impressive. And yes, gold gifts make for great photo ops. But while the president is basking in marble and chandeliers, millions of Americans are just trying to make rent, keep groceries on the table and pay off their credit cards. When the person in the highest office is spending and receiving millions frivolously, while the rest of the country is tightening its belt, it's not just bad optics — it's a reminder of exactly how far removed our leaders can be from the lives of the people they represent.
