Federal cut to children's advocacy funding ‘abandons American children,' says South Dakota nonprofit leader
South Dakota Searchlight
A Rapid City-based nonprofit that advocates for children in the state court system lost $15,000 last week after the federal government terminated grant awards to the National Court Appointed Special Advocates Association.
The decision 'abandons American children' and will cause ripple effects throughout the state, said Seventh Circuit CASA Program Executive Director Kehala Two Bulls. The organization serves children in Pennington, Fall River and Custer counties. Seven other organizations serve South Dakota's other circuit courts.
Volunteers with CASA advocate for children who've been removed from their families and placed in state care due to suspected abuse and neglect. The volunteers meet with the children and other contacts, such as teachers, therapists and caseworkers. They also write reports to judges about the children's needs, strengths and interests to create 'customized services and decision making,' Two Bulls said.
Over 330 CASA volunteers worked with 658 children in 37 counties last year, according to the state Unified Judicial System.
The national organization suspended all services and support to state and local programs, it announced last week, after the Trump administration's Department of Justice terminated funding.
In a statement to Reuters, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi said grants were rescinded that 'do not align with the administration's priorities,' but she said the Department of Justice will 'continue to ensure that services for victims are not impacted and any recipient will have the ability to appeal and restore any grant if direct impact on victims can be thoroughly established.' The national CASA office said it is appealing.
Though the Seventh Circuit was the only South Dakota CASA office receiving grant funds from the national office, other local organizations rely on services provided by the national organization. That includes training and coordination, Two Bulls said.
About 80 percent of the Seventh Circuit CASA's cases are Indian Child Welfare Act cases.
Shifting that administrative burden and coordination to states will result in redundancy and reduced efficiencies, she added.
'Children will be destabilized by these changes,' Two Bulls said. 'It's important for people to make these decisions responsibly. Whether people agree with this or not, there's a need for people at a local level to partner with us and step up and come up with the funding, the infrastructure, the support needed, because these are real kids that deserve good futures.'
Seventh Circuit CASA was awarded $25,000 in grant funding this year — $5,000 to conduct background checks of volunteers and $20,000 to develop support and specialized services for older youth in the system. The organization already received and spent about $10,000, but won't receive the remaining $15,000.
In 2014, 207 kids in the Seventh Circuit were in state care over the course of the year, Two Bulls said. In 2024, that grew to 795 children because cases are taking longer to resolve.
Older children are staying in the system longer and aging out once they turn 18 years old, she added. Last year, 35 kids aged out of foster care in the area. Nearly a decade ago, that number was closer to five children a year. About 80 percent of the Seventh Circuit CASA's cases are Indian Child Welfare Act cases.
Youth who age out of the system are more likely to become homeless, incarcerated or die than their peers, according to the Annie E. Casey Foundation. Two Bulls said the grant was intended to build supplemental training for advocates focused on building life skills for older children.
The grants amounted to about 5 percent of the organization's operating budget, Two Bulls said. While the terminated funding won't shutter the program, she'll have to reallocate funds or find new revenue for the increasing need the grant was intended to address.
'This action was completely disconnected from the need and the vulnerability in our community,' Two Bulls said. 'What we have is less funding and less infrastructure to properly address it. We're painfully aware of how many kids it leaves at risk.'
Greg Sattizahn, state court administrator for the South Dakota Unified Judicial System, said in a news release that the state is committed to 'providing leadership, support and encouragement' to the eight CASA nonprofits across the state.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump wants to honor traitors and racist myths in our national parks and shrines
As part of a Trump administration effort to restore 'truth and sanity' to American history, national parks visitors are now encouraged to report 'inappropriate' markers and displays. Most comments from the public have praised the parks, complimented the rangers or urged reversal of Trump's funding cuts. Among the few negative reports, one Yellowstone visitor complained that the bison had 'delayed traffic.' I have a report to make about two inappropriate, if not anti-American, displays planned for our public spaces — by the Trump administration itself. The first concerns the National Park Service's plan to install the statue of a traitorous American who fought for an enemy country in a war against the U.S. that cost the lives of hundreds of thousands of U.S. soldiers. His name is Albert Pike, a Confederate army general whose outdoor statue in Washington D.C. was toppled during the George Floyd protests in 2020. By levying war against the U.S. government and aiding and abetting its enemies, Pike's behavior fits the constitutional definition of treason. And, according to historian Allen W. Trelease in 'White Terror,' Pike 'may well have been affiliated' with the Reconstruction Ku Klux Klan, the most savage domestic terrorist organization in American history. The second is even worse: Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth is planning to restore a monument that celebrates slavery to Arlington National Cemetery — which, while not a national park, is considered the nation's ' most hallowed ' ground. 'The Reconciliation Monument,' as it is formally known, was unveiled in 1914. It includes grotesque imagery: an enslaved Black man following his owner and an enslaved woman cradling the baby of a Confederate officer (described on the cemetery's website as a 'mammy'). In 2023, the bipartisan Naming Commission established by Congress ordered the removal of the monument. Retired Army Brigadier General Ty Seidule, the commission's vice chair, called it 'the cruelest I've ever seen because it's a pro-slavery, pro-segregation, anti-United States monument meant to say that the white South was right and the United States of America was wrong.' Hegseth defended returning the monument by saying 'we're proud of our history.' That includes American slavery, apparently. Hegseth recently reposted on social media a seven-minute news clip about the self-described Christian nationalist co-founder of his church denomination. Among many other controversial things the pastor says in the clip, he doubles down on an assertion he made decades earlier, that slave owners and slaves had 'a mutually affectionate relationship.' Shouldn't a secretary of Defense know something about American history, especially the Civil War and the barbarity of slavery, which is nothing to be proud of? The monument bears an inscription that describes the Civil War as the 'Lost Cause,' the revisionist myth — call it 'Confederate woke' — that the South's enslaved were happy and content and that the war was fought not over slavery, but over states' rights. In fact, Alexander Stephens, the vice president of the Confederate States of America, declared at the war's outset that the Confederacy was founded upon 'the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery — subordination to the superior race — is his natural and normal condition.' By restoring a pro-slavery monument to Arlington, Hegseth is not honoring our history but dishonoring the Union soldiers buried in the cemetery. It became necessary to create Arlington in 1864 because by then Northern cemeteries were running out of room for dead Union soldiers. But their sacrifice ended slavery in the U.S. The Civil War, in which as many as three-quarters of a million men died, was not fought over an abstract theory of federalism. The Confederacy cannot be separated from the cause for which it fought. 'If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong,' as Lincoln said. When you visit our parks and shrines, please report anti-American messaging such as this. Gregory J. Wallance was a federal prosecutor in the Carter and Reagan administrations and a member of the ABSCAM prosecution team, which convicted a U.S. senator and six representatives of bribery. He is the author of 'Into Siberia: George Kennan's Epic Journey Through the Brutal, Frozen Heart of Russia. '
The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
DOJ: George Washington University ‘deliberately indifferent' to antisemitism
The Department of Justice (DOJ) announced Monday that George Washington University is in violation of federal civil rights law and described it as 'deliberately indifferent' to antisemitism on campus. The DOJ said George Washington took 'no meaningful action' to combat antisemitism that led to harm to Jewish students and faculty. In a letter to the university, the DOJ said Jewish students were intimidated and fearful during the pro-Palestinian encampment on campus last spring and that multiple Jewish students reported harassment or assault from protesters. The DOJ will be seeking 'immediate remediation' with the university, with fears likely to mount that could lead to pulled federal funding. 'Every student has the right to equal educational opportunities without fear of harassment or abuse,' said Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division. 'No one is above the law, and universities that promulgate antisemitic discrimination will face legal consequences.' The Hill has reached out to George Washington University for comment. After finding the University of California, Los Angeles, broke federal civil rights law due to antisemitism on campus, the Trump administration pulled $500 million in federal funding. The Trump administration is now looking for UCLA to pay a $1 billion fine, along with other concessions, in order for federal funding to be restored.
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
What to know about past meetings between Putin and his American counterparts
Bilateral meetings between Russian President Vladimir Putin and his U.S. counterparts were a regular occurrence early in his 25-year tenure. But as tensions mounted between Moscow and the West following the illegal annexation of Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula in 2014 and allegations of meddling with the 2016 U.S. elections, those meetings became increasingly less frequent, and their tone appeared less friendly. Here's what to know about past meetings between Russian and U.S. presidents: Putin and Biden met only once while holding the presidency –- in Geneva in June 2021. Russia was massing troops on the border with Ukraine, where large swaths of land in the east had long been occupied by Moscow-backed forces; Washington repeatedly accused Russia of cyberattacks. The Kremlin was intensifying its domestic crackdown on dissent, jailing opposition leader Alexei Navalny months earlier and harshly suppressing protests demanding his release. Putin and Biden talked for three hours, with no breakthroughs. They exchanged expressions of mutual respect, but firmly restated their starkly different views on various issues. They spoke again via videoconference in December 2021 as tensions heightened over Ukraine. Biden threatened sanctions if Russia invaded, and Putin demanded guarantees that Kyiv wouldn't join NATO –- something Washington and its allies said was a nonstarter. Another phone call between the two came in February 2022, less than two weeks before the full-scale invasion. Then the high-level contacts stopped cold, with no publicly disclosed conversations between them since the invasion. Putin met President Trump six times during the American's first term — at and on the sidelines of G20 and APEC gatherings — but most famously in Helsinki in July 2018. That's where Trump stood next to Putin and appeared to accept his insistence that Moscow had not interfered with the 2016 U.S. presidential election and openly questioned the firm finding by his own intelligence agencies. His remarks were a stark illustration of Trump's willingness to upend decades of U.S. foreign policy and rattle Western allies in service of his political concerns. 'I have great confidence in my intelligence people, but I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today,' Trump said. 'He just said it's not Russia. I will say this: I don't see any reason why it would be.' Since Trump returned to the White House this year, he and Putin have had about a half-dozen publicly disclosed telephone conversations. President Obama met with Putin nine times, and there were 12 more meetings with Dmitry Medvedev, who served as president in 2008-12. Putin became prime minister in a move that allowed him to reset Russia's presidential term limits and run again in 2012. Obama traveled to Russia twice — once to meet Medvedev in 2009 and again for a G20 summit 2013. Medvedev and Putin also traveled to the U.S. Under Medvedev, Moscow and Washington talked of 'resetting' Russia-U.S. relations post-Cold War and worked on arms control treaties. U.S. State Secretary Hillary Clinton famously presented a big 'reset' button to Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov at a meeting in 2009. One problem: instead of 'reset' in Russian, they used another word meaning 'overload.' After Putin returned to office in 2012, tensions rose between the two countries. The Kremlin accused the West of interfering with Russian domestic affairs, saying it fomented anti-government protests that rocked Moscow just as Putin sought reelection. The authorities cracked down on dissent and civil society, drawing international condemnation. Obama canceled his visit to Moscow in 2013 after Russia granted asylum to Edward Snowden, a former National Security Agency contractor and whistleblower. In 2014, the Kremlin illegally annexed Crimea and threw its weight behind a separatist insurgency in eastern Ukraine. The U.S. and its allies responded with crippling sanctions. Relations plummeted to the lowest point since the Cold War. The Kremlin's 2015 military intervention in Syria to prop up Bashar Assad further complicated ties. Putin and Obama last met in China in September 2016, on the sidelines of a G20 summit, and held talks focused on Ukraine and Syria. Putin and President Bush met 28 times during Bush's two terms, according to the Russian state news agency Tass. They hosted each other for talks and informal meetings in Russia and the U.S., met regularly on the sidelines of international summits and forums, and boasted of improving ties between onetime rivals. After the first meeting with Putin in 2001, Bush said he 'looked the man in the eye' and 'found him very straightforward and trustworthy,' getting 'a sense of his soul.' In 2002, they signed the Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty -– a nuclear arms pact that significantly reduced both countries' strategic nuclear warhead arsenal. Putin was the first world leader to call Bush after the 9/11 terrorist attack, offering his condolences and support, and welcomed the U.S. military deployment on the territory of Moscow's Central Asian allies for action in Afghanistan. He has called Bush 'a decent person and a good friend,' adding that good relations with him helped find a way out of 'the most acute and conflict situations.' President Clinton traveled to Moscow in June 2000, less than a month after Putin was inaugurated as president for the first time in a tenure that has stretched to the present day. The two had a one-on-one meeting, an informal dinner, a tour of the Kremlin from Putin, and attended a jazz concert. Their agenda included discussions on arms control, turbulence in Russia's North Caucasus region, and the situation in the Balkans. At a news conference the next day, Clinton said Russia under Putin 'has the chance to build prosperity and strength, while safeguarding that freedom and the rule of law.' The two also met in July of that same year at the G8 summit in Japan, in September — at the Millennium Summit at the U.N. headquarters in New York, and in November at the APEC summit in Brunei. In an interview with former Fox News host Tucker Carlson last year, Putin said he asked Clinton in 2000 if Russia could join NATO, and the U.S. president reportedly said it was 'interesting,' and, 'I think yes,' but later backtracked and said it 'wasn't possible at the moment.' Putin used the anecdote to illustrate his point about the West's hostility toward Russia, 'a big country with its own opinion.' 'We just realized that they are not waiting for us there, that's all. OK, fine,' he said. Litvinova writes for the Associated Press. AP writer Yuras Karmanau contributed to this report.
