
‘I've had murderers try to find me. I've had armed people say they'll shoot' – Dan Reed on the fallout from his Michael Jackson films
'I've kept company with very violent people for a very long time,' says documentary-maker Dan Reed, in his office whose location has to be kept secret – I was led here, from a decoy address, by the Channel 4 publicist. 'I've had murderers try to find me. I've had people threaten to shoot me who are armed. I've been threatened many, many times. I don't want to say I'm a tough guy, but the needle doesn't go into the red until I've got something quite specific. The threats delivered face to face I took seriously. People trying to find my home address to post me a parcel I took seriously. People in China sending me emails? I don't take so seriously. They're going to have to get on a plane.'
OK, well he does sound like a tough guy, or at least a foreign correspondent of the old school, and that's fair enough. From the Kosovan war (The Valley, 1999) to the Russian mafia (From Russia With Cash, 2015), Reed's films have long been threaded together by the reasonable fascinations of the hard-hitting documentary-maker – corruption, crime, natural disaster, war.
Yet the death threats we're talking about – and there have been thousands – the ones that urge him to die like a dog in the gutter, or say simply 'You're really disgusting. Go to DEAD. FUCK YOU', are from Michael Jackson fans, following his 2019 film Leaving Neverland. In it, Wade Robson and James Safechuck give detailed, devastatingly plausible accounts of Jackson as a serial paedophile, moving from one seven- or eight-year-old to the next at 12-month intervals, lovebombing them, sexually abusing them, discarding them.
The follow-up which airs this week, Leaving Neverland 2: Surviving Michael Jackson, is about the fallout from that film, and the awful fact that, when you combine the casual victim-blaming in the mainstream media and the fury of fans, Wade and James have been victimised all over again. We see how they have struggled with depression as adults, particularly since they've become fathers themselves. But perhaps more than anything, Surviving Michael Jackson feels like a completely new, feature-length outrage, exploring the attempts of the Jackson estate's lawyers to keep the allegations from ever reaching open court.
Their testimony is graphic and hard to watch. 'When I met with James,' remembers Reed, 'I said: 'If we're going to do this, we have to go there. We have to be absolutely clear, this was sexual abuse. This wasn't affection gone wrong.' Wade immediately got that as well. It was going to be absolutely hardcore, no room for ambiguity. Jackson surfed on that ambiguity for his entire life.'
From a documentary point of view, it's almost distracting how famous Jackson was, because Leaving Neverland isn't about his fame or music or the lavish, childlike lifestyle for which he was known – except to explain the hold he had over the boys' families, particularly their mothers. Rather, it is an anatomy of grooming, which 'doesn't happen the way we think it does. Your kid has a secret agreement with the predator. It will be very obvious to you what your kid is getting from it: your kid will be excited to see the person, will resist attempts to limit that time, they're like a teenager in love. To show that, I had to get the guys to say: 'It was amazing.' Until it wasn't.'
That is what makes the film petrifying: however much you might judge Robson and Safechuck's mothers who were often, if not in the room, in the environs when the abuse took place, you can also see how hard it would be to protect your child from a paedophile who wooed them so cynically. Reed – who has four children, ranging from two months to 22 – doesn't think it's that complicated: 'I don't care what anyone says or does. I would never, ever allow my child to spend the night in bed with someone who wasn't a member of the family, and even then …' His demeanour as he interviews Stephanie, James's mother, and Joy, Wade's, isn't studs-first, it's neutral (in the films, questions are asked off-camera, but you can generally tell how they have been posed). 'I loved that quote of Stephanie's: 'I had one son, I had one job, and I fucked up.' Joy is a little more evasive.'
Critically, Leaving Neverland was a great success. Robson and Safechuck were astonished and moved by the warm receptions they got at film festivals. They hadn't expected to be congratulated for their bravery. But they also had strident detractors, on mainstream chatshows, making excuses for Jackson that you can't imagine anyone making today – and this was only six years ago when #MeToo as a hashtag was in general use.
It seems like extremely recent history for anyone to have been uttering the argument that 'Jackson was just being affectionate', says Reed. 'In some of the ridiculous media that came out afterwards, that line 'Maybe they were sharing a bed, and maybe nature took its course, and maybe his penis got hard …', and you're thinking, what the fuck?' Others, including Piers Morgan, made an argument less inflammatory but more easily falsifiable: that the pair were money-grabbing. Reed bats this off easily – he says that when Leaving Neverland came out, five more people came forward with allegations, and the estate paid them off with millions of dollars – but you can tell by the way he says 'Piers Morgan' that the aspersion vexes him. If the poorer party in a relationship is always thought to be on the make, the logical end point is that rich people can get away with anything.
'The thing I've never understood,' Reed continues, 'is the people who said: '[Michael Jackson] never had a childhood, he never grew up.' Why does not having a childhood entitle you to molest children?' Lawyers acting for the estate, blocking Robson and Safechuck at every turn, are just doing what lawyers do, is Reed's urbane opinion.
He brings the same shrug-energy to the rage of the diehard fans, who muster mostly online but occasionally spring into real life protesting outside the offices of Channel 4, for instance (who have distributed the films along with HBO). 'Nowadays, most people get their information online, and there, people will regularly say: 'You know Leaving Neverland was debunked, right?'' Does he never find that frustrating? He cares about Wade and James, and has seen at close hand what it has cost them to describe what happened. 'In 2019, I'd try to counter it. But you realise it doesn't matter because those people don't want to know the truth. They want an excuse to continue being in their tribe, to continue worshipping Michael Jackson. It is a bit of a cult.' And now 'we live in a world of disinformation. If I shed a tear every time some piece of disinformation pops up online, I'd be a pile of dust on the floor.'
Reed has returned to these themes in films between the Neverland sequence: in The Truth vs Alex Jones, he tells the story of how disinformation has been monetised; in that case, famously, with the brutal falsehood that the Sandy Hook elementary school shooting was a hoax. In Stopping the Steal, covering Trump's challenge to the 2020 election results, Reed found himself back at the subject of paedophilia. A 'hyper-conservative, Mormon politician was asked to throw the election, and he said no – at which point, the online scumosphere starts calling him a paedophile. It's become this hand grenade that people throw around, and I don't think that existed in 2019.'
He's currently working on a documentary about the riots last summer after the Southport murders, and describes this curious internationalism that has taken hold – Elon Musk, driving far-right narratives, as well as hosting, on X, the violent content that spurred the real-life violence. 'That's the frontline – cultural spaces where the left cannot go and the right is supreme. That space contains a lot of concerns that ordinary people have, and it contains a lot of madness as well. Whoever is prepared to stand on that hill gets to sing the song they want to sing. The hill is a real place, built on immigration and family values. The liberal social democratic centre steers clear of these hard discussions, which has allowed the right to take the hill.'
The splenetic misinformation war waged by the Michael Jackson faithful didn't launch the far-right, obviously. It took no interest in democratic elections; it was only interested in defending child abuse for the sake of Thriller. But Leaving Neverland 2 is a fascinating and sad account of the sheer complexity of a world in which new norms of bad faith constantly challenge the truth, and make the price of telling it unimaginably high.
Leaving Neverland 2: Surviving Michael Jackson is on Channel 4 on Tuesday 18 March at 9pm.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Pupils pretended to be dead in school shooting rampage as first victim pictured
Artur A, 21, carried out the worst school massacre in Austria's history yesterday when he started shooting students at a school in Graz, where he had reportedly been the target of bullying The victims of Austria's worst school shooting played dead as the raging gunman prowled the corridors, picking off his former classmates and teachers with a legally-owned rifle and pistol. The horrified pupils pretended to be dead in the hope the killer, named locally as Artur A, would pass them by at Dreierschuetzengasse high school, reports say. The terror was captured in dramatic footage in which the piercing screams of the victims can be heard ringing out in Austria's second-largest city of Graz. The bloodbath came to an end when the killer turned a gun on himself in a toilet cubicle. Kosovan student Lea Bajrami, 15, is the first victim to have been named and pictured following the rampage at the BORG Dreierschützengasse high school. Details of the remaining victims have not yet been shared. Artur A, 21, had initially planned to take a pipe bomb to the school, but reportedly left the bomb behind with a farewell video for his mum before he set off to kill 10 pupils and staff- nine of whom were children aged 15-17. The adult victim was a 47-year-old female teacher. All eleven of those seriously injured in the massacre in Graz were described as stable in hospital today. In the video message, he told his mum he was acting "of his own free will". She reportedly saw it 24 minutes later and immediately alerted police. But despite trying to stop the bloodbath from unfolding, she opened the message too late as her son had already carried out his bloody attack before turning the gun on himself, according to 'Heute' in Austria. Friends said the shooting could be an act of revenge after Artur dropped out of school and failed to pass his sixth form exam. In a suicide note found at his house in Graz, he revealed that he had felt "bullied". The people of Austria will observe three days of national mourning from today. Graz's main square was lit with a sea of candles last night. Thousands of young people held a silent vigil in front of Archbishop Johann fountain in the heart of the old town, in front of the city hall. "When you hear about it, you have so much sympathy for the people, maybe you could have known someone," said Felix Platzer, a passerby at the vigil. "This is an example of solidarity and you grieve together and together it is easier to cope." Graz Cathedral held a service of reflection. In a nearby parish church, prayers were said for victims including one called Leo. 'We are lighting a light for Leo,' said Father Pesendorfer, who was in tears. Flags on the Hofburg Palace in Vienna, where the president has his office, will fly at half mast this morning. Meanwhile, long queues formed outside a blood donation centre in Graz as 28 injured were being treated in hospital; 12 were said to be in a serious condition, with two critical. An adult victim died while being treated in a local clinic last night. Austria has one of the highest rates of gun ownership in Europe, with roughly 370,000 Austrians legally owning 1.5million registered firearms, according to the interior ministry. Wild hunting is popular in the country and more than half of Austria's registered firearms fall under the category of weapons that can be owned by any adult without a licence. The school is closed until further notice, with a vigil due to be held to remember the victims later today as the country goes into three days of mourning.


Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Top of the Pops presenter who was as famous as Zoe Ball on 'what went wrong'
Sarah Cawood was a regular face on our TV screens in the 1990s, but now she's living a very different life away from the cameras Sarah Cawood was one of the biggest TV hosts of the '90s and a key presenter on Top of The Pops. But her life has changed dramatically two decades after her big break. Sarah's first major role was in children's television for Nickelodeon in the '90s, and just two years later she secured a presenting job on Channel 4's The Girlie Show alongside Sara Cox. The programme ran for two series and followed a magazine format, featuring interviews, live music and stunts. The show aired at the late 'post-pub' slot of 11pm on Fridays, aiming to be edgier than its competitors and capitalising on the 'ladette' culture that defined the decade. She then joined the revamped Live and Kicking programme for its final two years on air. Her most significant role came when she landed a spot on Top of The Pops. After her stint ended, she went on to present various mini-series and one-offs, including co-commentating the Eurovision semi-finals in 2007, 2009 and 2010. However, around this time, many of the big presenting opportunities began to dwindle, with Sarah joining Heart East Anglia's breakfast show team for a year in 2014 before leaving to focus on caring for her children, reports the Daily Record. In 2022 Sarah was diagnosed with breast cancer - but thankfully she was treated and given the all-clear. Earlier this year, the star opened up about her health struggles on social media, expressing fears about her breast cancer returning. "This is the reality of anyone who has had any kind of cancer," she said. "I never struggled with health anxiety before but post-breast cancer it's all-consuming and it wears me out a bit tbh. "I have been feeling tired since the new year began and although it's probably just life-ing, there's always a niggling worry that it's back. "All I can do is carry on doing healthy things, moving my body, practising mindfulness and living each day with gratitude that I got to breathe again this morning. "So on we go! Batting away those intrusive thoughts and getting on with it. To anyone either going through a cancer diagnosis or anyone who has recovered from cancer and feels like this: I've got you, and my inbox is always open. "And remember, anything that doesn't feel right: get it checked out. Early detection is key." Reflecting on her television career in another heartfelt Instagram message, she shared insights into her acceptance of being 'unsuccessful' on TV, adding: "Do I miss telly? I miss the money! And yes, sometimes I wonder what went wrong, but I'm here now so I'm going to make the most of it, however, that looks".


Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Other X-rated shows force Love Island to push boundaries - but at what cost?
Returning to unedited Love Island sex on camera likely to produce more problems for show makers than solutions Love Island's last throw of the dice will be as sad as it is fascinating to watch. We We now know that the decision-makers of ITV 's reality show will return to broadcasting scenes of contestants having sex, should they arise. X-rated capers were edited out a few years back after the likes of Emma-Jane Woodham, Terry Walsh, Tommy Fury, Molly Mae and many others threw caution and their clothes to the wind. Guests to the villa mucked about like rabbits as their continuous on-screen copulation quickly became a feature of the first few series. But emotional and mental health concerns in the heightened, ruthless era of social media - not to mention issues related to broadcasting sexually risqué material - saw the Love Island guidelines tightened up in 2018. Less became more as at least something was left to the imagination from that period. Now we're back. From the noises ahead of its return on Monday night, it would appear sex on camera is being revisited as a solution to the show's plunging ratings. Especially with mainstream media outlets currently struggling to resist their temptation to try and normalise the likes of adult performer Bonnie Blue. On current dating shows such as Channel 4 's Naked Attraction, participants already choose partners on the basis of what their private parts look like. Forget their charm, charisma or personalities, contestants stand starkers in pods that first show their lower halves - which are examined by the picker and TV viewers - then the top. Imagine going into work the day after being rejected (or even selected!) off that. On the E4 show, Open House, couples arrive at a luxury retreat to test whether opening up their relationships to have sex with other couples or individuals will strengthen their own. And yes, the cameras do switch to infra red when both parties decide they'd like two (or three) to become one. That's before you get to the streaming shows on Netflix and YouTube not bound by Ofcom guidelines. Love Island's lack of coitus by comparison has clearly led producers to row back on their performative consideration for contestants' love-term futures. Never mind the threat of losing commercial deals as brands steer clear of Islanders swerving out go their lane to engage in conduct incompatible with their values. Visits to 'the restaurant', 'the nail shop' and the other euphemisms for sex are welcome again. You'd suspect the selection process for this new series will have been conducted with willing participants in mind. Producers will doubtless be delighted with another Terry and Emma-Jane who, in 2016, had sex on top of the covers in the shared bedroom. Or Kem Cetinay and Amber Davies, who had to deny having unprotected sex on the way to winning the 2017 series. You'd also be forgiven for thinking show bosses would have no compunction about broadcasting just that little bit too much, to escape with a ticking off from toothless Ofcom but grab the headlines and returning viewers that would make it worth it. Because like that other fading concept, Big Brother, whose producers kick contestants off the show for doing exactly the kind of thing they throw big money at them for, Love Island chiefs want controversy. They want notoriety. They want to go viral. They want people to care again. The clue, though, is in the name. Surely the participants want to find love, not sex. Surely they are there to establish emotional connections and foster lasting relationships. Not to be on a televised lads or girls' holiday. Shows like the Netflix hit Love Is Blind smash it in several countries because they focus on bonding, not boning. And once the boundaries on Love Island are pushed, what then? Would every contestant have to be willing to have sex on camera? And what does it say about our society that so many viewers simply shrug their shoulders over it? Because it might titillate and fascinate once again - but it will throw up more questions than answers. Ends