Aldwark Bridge tolls set to rise for first time in 20 years
According to a report by the Planning Inspectorate, tolls at the bridge have not increased since 2005.In 2020, a structural inspection took place and found large cracks, rotted timber and corrosion to the bridge. Mr Bell, who runs Aldwark Toll Bridge LLP, said he had spent hundreds of thousands of pounds to make sure the necessary repairs were carried out and the bridge could remain open."The bridge has taken a lot of work and a huge amount of investment and we're relieved that the bridge has now got some security and a future that can be more more less guaranteed," he said."The number of vehicles crossing the bridge wasn't enough to sustain it and it was actually losing money."By increasing the tolls it has allowed the bridge now to be financially viable, which secures its future for the residents of Easingwold and Aldwark."
'Direct financial burden'
Mr Bell said he was waiting for the approval to be ratified within the next couple of days and then fees could increase immediately. After the first three years, the tolls will go up in line with inflation, eventually increasing to £1.40 for cars and £2.60 for goods vehicles after 10 years.The plans received 101 objections from people who argued the increases were too steep and believed the bridge should be council-run. Sir Alec Shelbrooke, MP for Wetherby and Easingwold, told the Planning Inspectorate the changes would "impose a direct financial burden on local families, businesses, and communities".He said: "The average family using the bridge for their daily commute will see their toll expenses rise by £624 per year in the immediate term. "Over the next decade, this burden will escalate to an eye-watering £1,040 per year. "This is not a small increase—it is a massive additional cost imposed on households that are already grappling with the rising cost of living."However, Mr Bell said if the bridge was to close due to not being financially viable, bridge users would be left further out of pocket by having to make the journey around the river.
Listen to highlights from North Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
4 minutes ago
- The Sun
I'm worried about a clash of interests between jobs but I need the money – please help!
APPRENTICE star and West Ham United vice-chair Karren Brady answers your careers questions. Here, Karren gives her expert career advice to a reader who has been left to present a stressful project alone after her colleague took a last minute holiday. Q: I work part-time as a teaching assistant in a primary school, and I recently asked if I could increase my hours to full-time. I need the extra money, but I've been told there isn't the budget to do this currently. So, I've been thinking about working as a self-employed childminder on the days I'm not contracted at school, but I'm worried the senior leadership team might be annoyed if I approach parents with details of my childminding, in case they think it's out of order or a clash of interests. I don't know how else I would find potential clients, though. Please help! Kia, via email A) It's fantastic you're taking the initiative to boost your income – it sounds like becoming a self-employed childminder could be a great fit for you, especially with your experience. Since your employer can't offer you more hours at the moment, it's absolutely fair for you to explore other options. However, before you do anything else, I would check the school's policy on outside work or speak discreetly with your line manager. A quick, honest conversation can help clarify boundaries and prevent misunderstandings. Apprentice star Karren Brady terrified after burglar launched FOUR raids on £6m home in 16 hours taking designer gear If promoting your services directly to parents at the school feels tricky, try alternative routes, such as Facebook groups, childcare platforms, community centres or word-of-mouth through neighbours and friends, as these can be effective. Childminders need to ensure they are registered with Ofsted and you will need to declare any self-employed income to HMRC, so do make sure you keep accurate records. With your skills, you're in a strong position – just be sure to keep your school role and any private work as separate as you can. Best of luck with your new venture!
Times
4 minutes ago
- Times
How the shift to electric cars is being tripped up by health and safety
Some £25 million of taxpayer money is available to help those without driveways charge an electric vehicle from their home, but some local authorities are blocking funding requests on health and safety grounds over concerns that hidden charging cables are a trip hazard. Being able to charge a vehicle at home can be make or break for drivers wanting to go electric. Home charging can cost as little as 6p per kilowatt-hour (kWh) — almost nine times less than public chargers, which cost about 52p/kWh on average. Charging at home is easy if you have a driveway or garage. Those without would have to run a cable from their property to the street, which can obstruct the pavement — an offence under the Highways Act. A number of companies argue a better option is to dig shallow channels into the pavement to run the cable through, which is topped off with a flat lid that sits flush to the ground and typically costs about £1,000. Residents first need planning permission and a street works licence from their local council, and sometimes have to pay an ongoing annual maintenance or licence fee to the council or company. Advocates argue that gullies are safer than loose hanging cables, which can obstruct the pavement. About 35 per cent of households in the UK, and 56 per cent in London, do not have off-street parking according to the RAC Foundation, a think tank. These households must rely on expensive public chargers. Fully charging a Renault Zoe with a 52kWh battery would cost £3.12 at home at 6p/kWh, and £27.04 on a public charger at 52p/kWh, according to ZapMap, a site that compiles information about public charging spots. In a survey of 5,000 drivers by the energy supplier Eon Next, 59 per cent said the cost of going electric was the biggest barrier to making the switch, and 28 per cent cited the lack of public charging infrastructure. Michael Goulden, the cofounder of Kerbo Charge, which has installed about 1,000 gullies across 30 council areas since January 2023, said: 'People repeatedly tell us that home charging is the only way to make the numbers work. Electric cars are more expensive to lease, but they can make it work as the running cost is cheaper than petrol. But only if they can charge from home.' • Can you still save money with an electric car? Drivers can apply for a £350 grant towards the cost of buying a home charger (which typically costs £800 to £1,200) if it is installed alongside some kind of 'cross-pavement solution'. Last month the government also opened a £25 million fund for councils, incentivising them to allow cables 'to run safely beneath pavements'. Some councils including Bromley, Enfield, Lancashire and Suffolk have either trialled or fully approved cross-pavement charging. But other local authorities, despite touting their net-zero credentials, have rebuffed residents' calls to trial them. Lewisham borough council in southeast London told one resident who was keen on trialling a company called Charge Gully that it posed 'an electric and tripping safety hazard'. The council also said in the email in December, seen by The Sunday Times, that gullies raised issues of liability for maintenance or in the case of an accident, and created 'potential access issues for utility companies'. Goulden said there were about 150 residents in Lewisham on his company's waiting list, all unable to install a charging gully because of the council's stance. He said the council had refused to meet the company. He said: 'In London nearly 60 per cent of households have no driveway, and it has the highest level of electric car adoption, so those two together make it the highest priority area to make cross-pavement charging available.' Lewisham council said on its website that it was among the first local authorities to 'declare a climate emergency' in 2019. In its 2024 climate action plan it said its ambition was 'to make Lewisham a place where low-carbon travel is the easy choice'. • Fix our woeful rollout of EV charging to rescue our car industry Lewisham council said there were still concerns about the long-term safety and practicality of cross-pavement charging, including risks to people with mobility challenges, and potential electric shock hazards. It added: 'Even when installed correctly, these mechanisms can degrade over time or be misused, creating hazards homeowners or the council could be held responsible for.' The Sunday Times understands at least 11 councils in London are blocking requests for cross-pavement chargers, as well as Birmingham city council and Oldham borough council in Greater Manchester. Birmingham council, which said 30 per cent of its residential properties have no access to off-street parking, 'does not licence or permit the use of trailing cables on the highway' because it deems them to be a tripping hazard. Installers including Charge Gully and Kerbo Charge have insisted that the lids of their gullies fit flush to the pavement and require little maintenance. • Read more money advice and tips on investing from our experts Goulden said residents would also be liable for any accident involving a cable. 'It's no different to if someone's using a lamppost charger where there's a trailing cable, so there's precedent for that. 'Most car insurers now include cable trip cover provided someone's taken reasonable care. But the whole point of this is that it removes trip hazards. You can walk around a city and see people trailing free-hanging cables along the pavement. A gully would rectify that.' Edward Baker lives in Greenwich, southeast London, and is keen to make the switch to electric. But he has no driveway and there is only one public charger within a 20-minute walk of his house, so the only feasible option for him to afford an electric car would be to install a cross-pavement charger. Baker, 47, has spent almost two years trying to persuade Greenwich council to let him trial a pavement charging channel, installed by Charge Gully using a technique approved by other councils. Charge Gully promises not to compromise pedestrian access, but Baker's efforts have been rebuffed. • Can't charge an electric car at home? Then petrol may be cheaper He said: 'About half of residents here live in terraced houses, so all of them are disadvantaged. It's about five times more expensive to charge on public networks than at home. It feels like this would reduce pressure on government budgets because we would be paying for the gullies ourselves.' The Royal Borough of Greenwich also declared a climate emergency in June 2019, and has 'set an ambitious target to reach net-zero carbon emissions 20 years ahead of the national target of 2030'. It did not respond to a request for comment. Ben Hopkinson from the Centre for Policy Studies, a right-leaning think tank, said: 'Enabling easy access to home charging is one of the biggest barriers to the uptake of electric vehicles. Yet this is another example of the planning system making commonsense solutions more difficult. 'Councils that have made climate emergency pledges should be keen to approve these kerb installations instead of blocking them.' This year the Department for Transport said it was looking at how installing cross-pavement chargers could be made easier. It said: 'We are committed to delivering the charging infrastructure the country needs to drive the switch to electric vehicles.' Has a council blocked your attempts to charge an electric car? Let us know in the comments
BBC News
4 minutes ago
- BBC News
Man's anger over number plate mix-up parking penalty
A man was wrongly issued with a parking charge after his car was mixed up with another vehicle with a nearly identical number Lynn said that on 18 March 2024, he paid £1.70 to park for about 30 minutes in Rushton's Yard car park in Ashby, Leicestershire, but later received a demand for £165 from solicitors representing private firm Horizon 53-year-old said photographic evidence, provided by the company, showed his Hyundai entering the car park - but a Kia with an identical number plate bar one letter leaving nine hours Parking said it wrote to Mr Lynn on 25 July to say the issue was rectified, but he said he had not received confirmation of this. Reflecting on the situation, Mr Lynn said: "It's ridiculous. They have clearly different cars with similar but different plates but they just haven't checked properly."The result of this is that I received a pretty nasty letter, threatening me with legal action if I didn't pay a fine I should not have been issued with in the first place."On 25 March 2024, Mr Lynn was sent a letter demanding £85 - £51 if he paid within 14 he said he only became aware of the matter in July this year - when he received a letter from solicitors acting on behalf of Horizon Parking demanding £ Lynn said he moved house in December 2022 but said he had, in error, not notified the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Authority (DVLA) of his change of address until some time in "early 2024".He said his address had subsequently been updated, but believed earlier correspondence could have been sent to his old Parking said it originally wrote to Mr Lynn, to the address provided by the DVLA, on 25 March 2024, then sent reminder letters on 24 April and 24 May last year. 'I'm pretty angry' Mr Lynn added: "The fact remains none of those letters should have been sent in the first place."There has been no humanity in the way this has been dealt with, either in terms of having a person look at those number plates and spot the mistake - or in the aggressive letter they sent."I almost paid them to make them go away, but I pushed back because it was a clear mistake."All they had was ANPR [automatic number plate recognition] evidence and they had not spotted the plates - while alike - were different. It beggars belief nobody checked."My fear is that lots of errors like this get made but that most people just pay up because they are scared about being dragged to court and having to pay huge legal fees even if they haven't committed the offence."I'm pretty angry about the whole thing." A Horizon Parking spokesperson told the BBC the matter had been rectified when it was brought to their BBC asked the firm to clarify if that meant the charge had been cancelled, and that potential legal proceedings had been halted, but it declined to said it had written to Mr Lynn, from Ashby, to inform him, but he said he had not received a letter from the company. "We do make every effort with our processes to issue correct parking charges," a statement from Horizon Parking said."We'll investigate to see how we can improve, but would encourage drivers to appeal in circumstances where the parking charge may be incorrect, to enable the matter to be resolved at an early stage."Unfortunately, we didn't receive an appeal and the parking charge therefore proceeded via our recovery methods. "Once the matter was brought to our attention, it was rectified."
