Maharashtra Reclaims Raghuji Bhosale's Historic Sword in London Auction for Rs47.15 Lakh
2
3
4
5
6
Nagpur: In a proud moment for Maharashtra, the state govt successfully acquired the historic sword of Maratha warrior Raghuji Bhosale I at an international auction in London on Tuesday. The acquisition, which includes the cost of the auction, handling, transport, and insurance, amounted to Rs47.15 lakh, announced cultural affairs minister Ashish Shelar at a press conference in Mumbai.
Calling it a proud moment for the state, Shelar credited chief minister Devendra Fadnavis for leading a rapid and coordinated response to secure the prized artefact, including contacting the Indian embassy in London and securing the sword through mediated auction. "This is the first time our govt retrieved such a significant historical object from abroad," Shelar said.
TOI had reported on April 28 that the sword linked to Raghuji Bhonsle I was listed for auction at Sotheby's London as part of a high-profile collection of arms and armour. The listing described it as an 18th-century khanda, with an estimated value between £6,000 and £8,000 (roughly Rs6.3 to Rs8.4 lakh).
On Monday, Mudhoji Bhosale, currently residing in Nagpur and a descendant of Raghuji Raje, had written to the Prime Minister, home minister, chief minister, and culture minister, urging them to ensure the sword returns to Maharashtra, its rightful home. Following the letter, sources confirmed that a phone call took place between Mudhoji and chief minister Devendra Fadnavis at 1.50am on April 29 to discuss the matter. Mudhoji is also expected to address the media at a press conference on Wednesday.
Fadnavis said in a tweet, "I'm happy to share that the Maharashtra govt successfully brought back the historic sword of Raghuji Bhosale from a London auction. This priceless treasure, tied to the proud legacy of Nagpur and the Maratha Empire, will now return home. Thanks to the swift action by our cultural affairs team, this rare symbol of valour and heritage comes back where it belongs — in Maharashtra."
The sword is a rare example of the Maratha 'Firang' type — a straight, single-edged European blade with an intricately crafted Mulheri Ghat hilt, adorned in gold and wrapped in green cloth. Most notably, the sword bears a Devanagari inscription in gold: 'Srimant Raghoji Bhosale Senasahib Subha Firang', marking it as a personal weapon of Raghuji Bhosale I.
Experts believe the sword may have been taken out of the country during British looting after the Battle of Sitabuldi in 1817, when the East India Company defeated the Nagpurkar Bhosales and seized valuable artefacts from their treasury.
Raghuji Bhosale I (1695–1755) was a key military leader under Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj and the founder of the Bhosale dynasty of Nagpur. His military campaigns helped expand the Maratha Empire into Bengal, Odisha, and parts of South India. He was honoured with the title 'Senasahibsubha' for his service. "This sword is not just a weapon — it is a symbol of Maratha legacy, resilience, and pride," Shelar said.
Sotheby's which conducted the auction on Tuesday, said on its portal that the basket-hilt sword (khanda) was sold for £38,100.
Raje Mudhoji Bhonsle of the Nagpur royal family congratulated and thanked the Maharashtra government for acquiring the sword. His representatives also took part in the bidding process on his behalf and had bid up to Rs35 lakh, the member of the erstwhile royal family told the media.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
23 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Anatomy of the budding India-China bonhomie
Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi's just concluded visit to India and the agreement between the two sides on the India-China boundary question is an encouraging sign in mending the relationship between the two countries, which has been struggling to normalise since the border standoff in 2020. Wang Yi's visit to Delhi and the agreement outlining several measures to manage the contested border ahead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's planned trip to China for the annual Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit also reflect broader changes occurring in geopolitics. The India-China dynamics must also be read in conjunction with the engagement of the two countries with Russia. The three-way conversations involving Russia, India, and China are noteworthy as it is reflective of the broader regional geopolitical realignments in response to US policies towards them. In an ideal world, New Delhi would prefer to see Chinese power balanced by the US and/or Russia. (AFP) External affairs minister S Jaishankar is now in Russia. For both India and China (as also for Russia), the three-way conversations present an excellent opportunity to signal to Washington that there are possibilities of alternative global blocs and realignments outside of Washington's orbit and influence. What is perhaps more important and consequential are the underlying causes behind the current bonhomie between India and China. Beyond the optics, it is also evident that both India and China are eager to achieve a degree of normalcy in their relationship. The statement from the ministry of external affairs on the outcomes of Wang's India visit testifies to that. It is, therefore, possible to argue that there is a convergence between New Delhi and Beijing on the need to normalise bilateral relations. However, their respective definitions of normalcy are different. For China, normalcy means moving on from the current border impasse with India and focussing on the global balance of power. As Wang said, 'We (India and China) should never allow bilateral relations to be defined by the boundary question or specific differences to affect the overall picture of our bilateral ties.' Without normalcy with India, China knows that it will not be in a position to leverage Indian unhappiness with US President Donald Trump for its own larger geopolitical purposes. In other words, China seeks to exploit the current opportunity to challenge the US's global supremacy, and for that purpose, normalcy with India would be helpful. But the question is whether Beijing is willing to engage in sustained give-and-take negotiations with New Delhi to settle the border issue. For New Delhi, normalcy with China is centred on disengagement at the border so that it can focus on the larger geopolitical questions of India-China relations, India-China-Russia dynamics, and so on. For India, normalcy on the border and status quo ante bellum as of 2020 is key. China's global objectives behind the current warmth towards India should not be missed. Wang stated recently that 'as important members of the Global South, we have the responsibility to take the lead in opposing hegemonism and power politics'. There is little doubt that China would want to use India and Russia, and the Global South, to target the US-led world order. However, let's be clear. If Trump offers a G-2 with China, Beijing is likely to settle for it, sacrificing its secondary geopolitical equations. A similar logic extends to Russia as well. Moscow would vociferously promote the virtues of an alternative world order outside of the US orbit, but what it wants is to be recognised and treated by Washington and Europe as a great power and be accommodated within the European balance of power system, rather than being part of a China-led global order. As for India, it will continue to emphasise the importance of the Global South, multipolarity, and global alternatives, but New Delhi is not comfortable being part of a China-led, Russia-backed, non-American world order. If India is accommodated into a US-led world order as an important stakeholder, New Delhi is likely to accept that. In an ideal world, New Delhi would prefer to see Chinese power balanced by the US and/or Russia. However, since these options are not currently available, it is inclined to settle for underbalancing China, given its lack of capacity to balance Beijing on its own. In that sense, the three countries – India, China, and Russia – are hedging against geopolitical uncertainties and opting for their respective second-best options. This essential geopolitical dynamic should not be lost on our policymakers. In the meantime, and notwithstanding the deep mistrust between the two countries, India needs to engage with China for two key reasons. For India, conflict management with China is a key issue, as the fundamental contradictions in the relationship are unlikely to disappear soon. Therefore, it is essential to establish and strengthen confidence-building measures (CBMs) to manage Sino-Indian tensions. In that sense, the recent agreements are in the right direction. A no less important reason for India to engage with China on a sustained basis is that managing the relationship with Beijing — its rise as a global power and ambitions for superpower status, aggressive pursuit of its territorial ambitions, and attempts at unipolarity in Asia — is going to be India's most crucial task for the next several decades. From that perspective alone, New Delhi will need to engage productively with Beijing. Happymon Jacob is the founder and director of the Council for Strategic and Defense Research and the editor of INDIA'S WORLD magazine. The views expressed are personal
The Hindu
23 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Cotton farmers condemn removal of import duty, call it a disastrous setback
The Andhra Pradesh Tenant Farmers Association slammed the Union government's decision to remove the 11% import duty on cotton, calling it a 'severe blow' to India's cotton growers. In a press release on Wednesday (August 20), association State general secretary P. Jamalayya and president E. Katamayyah said the Union government scrapped the import duty on cotton, effective from August 19, and it will remain in force until September 30. The government claimed the decision was taken in the interest of the public and agricultural infrastructure development. Farmers' unions, however, dismissed this reasoning as 'false and misleading.' They feared that scrapping import duties would depress domestic cotton prices, allowing importers and traders to stockpile cheap foreign cotton and manipulate markets when the Indian harvest begins in October. 'This will directly hurt small and marginal tenant farmers, pushing them into deeper debt and triggering more farmer suicides,' they felt. They pointed out that the MSP announced for cotton this year is ₹7,710 a quintal, far below the ₹10,075 a quintal recommended under the C2+50% formula. In Andhra Pradesh alone, cotton is grown on nearly 15 lakh acres, meaning lakhs of agricultural families would be severely affected, they said and urged the Centre to restore import duties, guarantee MSP at C2+50%, and ensure that the Cotton Corporation of India (CCI) purchases cotton to protect domestic farmers.
Hindustan Times
23 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
MEA reacts as Bangladesh Govt calls for action on banned ‘Awami League offices on Indian soil'
The Centre on Wednesday categorically rejected claims of political offices of the banned Bangladesh Awami League being run in India, saying the government does not allow any political activity against other countries from the Indian soil. HT Image 'The Government of India is not aware of any anti-Bangladesh activities by purported members of the Awami League in India or of any action that is contrary to Indian law. The Government does not allow political activities against other countries to be carried out from Indian soil,' the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said in a statement on Wednesday. The government also said that it expects free, fair and inclusive elections at the earliest in Bangladesh.
