Revealed: the far-right, antisemitic men's club network spreading across US
The Old Glory Club (OGC) – which has at least 26 chapters in 20 US states and until now has drawn little attention – exemplifies the alarming rise of organized racist political groups in the past few years but especially during the rise of Donald Trump and his return to the White House.
The OGC network has held conferences, meetups and other events. Key members like podcaster Pete Quinones use their platforms to push far-right ideas about Jewish people and immigrants. Other members have used their platforms to respond to political events, and to advocate measures including 'cancellation insurance' for members whose extreme political views might impede their professional lives.
Harry Shukman, a researcher at UK anti-fascist non-profit Hope Not Hate, who last month published an exposé on the OGC-affiliated Basketweavers organization in the UK, told the Guardian: 'Groups such as the OGC are a new breed of extremist organisation which aims first to build an offline social network before taking over society.'
He added, 'They seek to lower the bar to participating in the far right, and by doing so have proved attractive to a cohort of mostly male members, some of whom have never before undertaken any form of activism.'
Heidi Beirich, co-founder and chief strategy officer of the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism, said the OGC 'appears to be another major new network of racists, too many of which are springing up in the era of Trump'.
She said the group was 'pushing violent ideologies, including race hate and antisemitism and has links to prominent figures on the far right'.
The OGC was incorporated on 16 June 2023, according to Virginia company records, but the organization took shape over more than a year through in-person conferences and online networks.
The Old Glory Club Substack began publishing in October 2022, with an X account launching the same month. Podcast aggregators show Old Glory Club podcast content appearing online by November 2022 at the latest.
At that time however, the organization appeared to be conceived as mostly a collaborative effort at content production. In a November 2022 podcast the pseudonymous YouTuber and central OGC figure known as Charlemagne told far-right podcaster Auron Macintyre – now an on-air personality at Glenn Beck-founded Blaze Media – that OGC was 'a group of American gentlemen who have decided to organize a social club … to publish content and … try and figure out a new political settlement for Americans'.
Also in October 2022, another pseudonymous YouTuber, the Prudentialist, appealed for donations to OGC in a podcast, saying that the money 'will one day be used for mutual aid for our friends that get doxed or fired or affected by natural disasters and other acts of God'.
By April 2023, the Prudentialist was presenting OGC in podcasts as part of an effort by the far right to 'create networks of patronage [and] political support' in order to 'maintain not just some semblance of power, but … anti-fragility against a state that wants you broke, dead or transitioned'
He added that OGC would offer opportunities for members to 'meet, host conferences and … to support people in the future who like that firefighter in Virginia was fired for simply donating to Kyle Rittenhouse's legal defense fund', an apparent reference to the fallout from 2021 Guardian reporting on donors to Rittenhouse's legal defense whose identities were revealed in leaked data from a Christian crowdfunding site.
Other key members advocated a strategy of decentralization for the far-right to create enduring activist institutions.
In a 10 July 2022 republication of his speech at that year's rightwing Tennessee Scyldings conference, charter member and frequent OGC spokesman Ryan Turnipseed lamented the fact that Spain's authoritarian fascist dictator Francisco Franco – a touchstone for the contemporary far right – had 'failed to secure his line of succession' despite propaganda and purges.
'This is a lesson we need to learn,' he added.
He proposed a decentralized network of groups, which would allow 'us to draw upon the knowledge and abilities of these groups. We no longer have to wait on a Caesar or a Franco to 'unite the right' into some effective fighting force. Instead, we can be effective with what we have now.'
Others stressed the importance of in-person meetups, and directly referenced similar initiatives overseas.
According to a July 2022 Substack post by the pseudonymous 'Red Hawk' inviting applications for local chapters, chapters must consist of at least 'five American men over the age of 18', and meet quarterly and annual reporting requirements on membership and finances.
Local chapters and the organization as a whole are overseen by an OGC central committee, according to the post and subsequent podcasts.
The organization's core members have orchestrated four annual conferences, with the last two happening under the OGC banner.
According to speakers on a recorded after-action report on the most recent OGC in-person conference held in May, OGC membership has burgeoned in the last year. They claimed that OGC now has 'literally hundreds' of members, and 'We're so large at this point that we've passed the point where the Central Committee is going to be able to know all or even most of the individual members'.
'Altogether we've built a very, very effective organization'
It is not yet clear how the names in company records for the umbrella organization and its chapters correspond with all of the online aliases of key members.
But those records do reveal that members include prominent far-right influencers, current and former US military members and police officers, court officers and contractors with US government security clearances.
The Guardian has contacted all named members for comment.
Turnipseed is a charter member of the OGC umbrella organization, a frequent contributor at its Substack, a frequent podcaster, and has spoken at OGC and Skyldings conferences.
Previously, Turnipseed was excommunicated in May 2024 by First Lutheran church in his native Ponca City, Oklahoma, after a viral 2023 Twitter thread criticizing the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod's new catechism for accommodating progressive political positions, briefly making him a cause celebre for the online far right.
In February 2023, Turnipseed had been identified by antifascist researchers as a member of what they called a rising 'white supremacist faction within the Lutheran faith'. Later that month the president of the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod called for the excommunication of those 'propagating radical and unchristian 'alt-right' views'.
Not long after his excommunication, Immanuel Lutheran church in Wichita, Kansas, defied the ban by accepting Turnipseed into membership.
Other OGC chapter members have connections with the wider world of rightwing politics.
Matthew Pearson of Tampa Bay, Florida, is listed on the initial filings of the Yellow Dog Pack, a Florida OGC chapter. Pearson is a writer for two Christian Nationalist publications, American Reformer and Truthscript, where he has praised a book that says Christians should be anti-gay, and commended the social theories of Nazi jurist Carl Schmitt.
Other members are connected with the armed forces and defense contractors.
Evan Dale Schalow, 25, of Midlothian, Virginia, is listed as a charter member of the OGC in Virginia company records. According to his LinkedIn bio, Schalow has also been a horizontal construction engineer in the Virginia national guard since 2022 and before that he was an ROTC cadet while at Longwood University from 2020. According to the same biography he has US government secret security clearance.
The Guardian emailed the Virginia national guard to confirm Schalow's service but received no response.
Harvey Pretlow Rawls III is named as a charter member of the Old Glory Club and the Vetus Dominicum Club chapter in Virginia company records.
According to his LinkedIn page, Rawls is also a systems engineer at HII, the US's largest military shipbuilder. The same page indicates that he has an active secret clearance, the second tier of US security clearances, which can take up to a year to investigate and approve.
The Guardian contacted HII about his role at the company.
Michael R Gibbs of Phenix City, Alabama, meanwhile, is the only person listed on the initial filing of the Magnolia League, an OGC chapter in Alabama. According to his LinkedIn page he served as a sergeant in the US Marine Corps between 2008 and 2013, and then as a deputy in the Muscogee county sheriff's office between 2014 and 2016.
The same page says he is now a buyer for firearms company Remington.
Two members of OGC Indiana chapter the Tippecanoe Society, meanwhile, are lawyers who have spent time in government service.
Kyle Lindskog of Zionsville, Indiana, is now a freelance attorney, according to his LinkedIn biography, but between 2015 and 2018 he was a city attorney in St Petersburg, Florida.
Paul Scott Lunsford Jr of Carmel is an intellectual property attorney at a firm he founded, but between 2006 and 2010 he was an operations officer in the US navy.
Beirich, the extremism expert, said: 'The fact that OGC members apparently include current and former military members and police officers, and similar government officials, is a particular cause for alarm, and frankly shocking.'
She added: 'This may ultimately pose a national security threat right at the time when the Trump administration is abandoning efforts to root extremists out of the military while hiring racists, antisemites and Qanon believers to staff the administration.'
The OGC Substack reflects the broader preoccupations of its members: a mix of far right causes and racist politics. They includeneo-Confederate pleas for the redemption of Confederate symbols and the Confederate cause and a laudatory discussion of the 1967 documentary of post-colonial Africa, Africa Addio, which film critic Roger Ebert once called 'a brutal, dishonest, racist film'.
There are claims that white Evangelical Christians are the west's 'most hated minority', and a reproduced Dave Greene speech in which he characterizes 'Jewish Talmudic law' as 'an attempt to trick God', and telling his audience that they and the 'Jewish community' are 'on the opposite ends of this age's struggle'.
In many ways, however, the Substack appears to give a more acceptable face to the politics that key members express in cruder terms elsewhere.
For example, Peter R Quinones – a self-described 'charter member' of the group – is listed as an officer on the initial filing of the foundational Old Glory Club.
Quinones is a broadly influential figure on the far right. His Substack is the 78th most popular Substack newsletter on US politics, according to that platform's figures. His podcast was 142nd most popular in US political podcasts according to data from podcast tracking service Rephonic, putting it roughly on par with shows by CNN's Kaitlin Collins and Andrew Sullivan, and ahead of podcasts by Jim Acosta and Candace Owens.
He has issued a regular podcast since 2017, first titled Free Man Over the Wall, and later under its present title, The Pete Quinones Show.
During that time and continuing up to the present, he has unleashed hundreds of hours of content marked by racism and antisemitism, which has included urging listeners to take direct action against Jewish and non-white neighbors.
In a podcast last month in response to US attacks on Iran – which he attributed entirely to the malign influence of Israel – Quinones urged listeners to respond by simply boycotting businesses owned by Jews, and took sideswipes at Indians.
'It's Jews,' he began. 'You can't live with them. You can't allow them in. If you allow them in, you have to suppress them. But it's better not to allow them in.'
Quinones continued: 'Don't do business with them. Do as much business as you can with Heritage Americans'.
'Heritage Americans' is a phrase that, according to rightwing commentator Mike Coté, the so-called New Right uses to describe 'the ethnic population of the United States prior to 1940, with a strong emphasis on Anglo-Protestant Europeans' in an expression of 'European-inflected 'blood-and-soil' nationalism' which is opposed to older 'creedal' versions of American nationalism.
In the same broadcast Quinones also said 'Don't do business with Indians,' adding: 'We got an app down here that some of the guys at the Alabama Old Glory Club are doing, which is to show which gas stations and hotels are not owned by Indians here.'
Quinones later encouraged listeners to likewise 'build an app for your local area, which shows where there's, are owned by heritage Americans, or at least stuff that's not owned by Indians. And you may want to include another group in that.'
In other recent podcasts, Quinones has proffered elaborate anti-Semitic conspiracy theories often promoted by white supremacist groups. In one podcast he worried about the far-right being persecuted for its beliefs about Jews. 'You start, you know, persecuting people who are you know, starting to ask the Jewish question,' he said.
The 'Jewish question' is an antisemitic framing of Jewish presence in society as a problem requiring a 'solution,' and has historically been used to justify persecution and genocide, including in Nazi Germany.
Since 2022, Quinones has also collaborated in making content for the Old Glory Club network, and has promoted it on his own show.
On an Old Glory Club post-election livestream in November, Quinones referred to Black voters with a racial slur favored by white nationalists, saying: 'The North American street ape is hopeless.'
He used the same slur a month later in response to a video of a black teenager.
Shukman, the Hope Not Hate, researcher said: 'The Old Glory Club and its affiliates like the Basketweavers may claim to provide community, but the truth is they conceal a much more sinister aim.'
He added: 'We have seen that the leaders of these groups can be vicious and degrading to junior members, especially maladjusted young men. The OGC's senior figures also have a track record of making deeply racist statements and affiliating with known far-right activists. '
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Is Trump's expansion of presidential powers setting the stage for future Oval Office holders?
Near corn dog and cookie vendors, Ray Seeman was washing his hands on a sweltering day. He had come to the rally in a Maga cap and a T-shirt that proclaimed: Cult 45: proud member. Is this a cult? 'It seems like it,' he laughed. 'It seems like you're either in or you're out.' A cult, perhaps, but not an imperial presidency, Seeman insisted, though he does understand Donald Trump's frustrations. 'I don't like executive orders,' he said. 'I like it to go through due process. But at the same time you've got to get stuff done sometimes.' A few thousand people had gathered at the Iowa state fairgrounds on Thursday to witness the president kick off a year-long celebration of the US's 250th anniversary of independence from a tyrannical king. No one here seemed concerned that the US might now be propping up a monarch of its own. But Trump's critics warn of an expansion of presidential power unlike anything seen in modern American history. In less than six months, Trump has taken a series of executive actions that have established new norms for the authority of whoever occupies the Oval Office. Longstanding mechanisms designed to limit executive power – Congress, the judiciary and internal safeguards – are being undermined or proving ineffective in restraining him. Last month, Trump ordered a military strike on Iran without seeking congressional approval. A solitary Republican, Thomas Massie of Kentucky, spoke out to describe the move as unconstitutional because only Congress has the power to declare war. Trump scorned him and, setting another dangerous precedent, imposed a limit on classified information shared with senators and representatives. Trump took unilateral action to impose tariffs under the cover of declaring a national emergency. He dismantled agencies, fired civil servants and froze spending that was approved by Congress and assumed to be protected by law; he has, for example, blocked more than $6bn in federal funding that helps fund after-school and summer programmes. Trump shattered another norm when he took control of California's national guard and deployed it to quell mostly peaceful protests over immigration raids in Los Angeles, despite opposition from state governor Gavin Newsom and other state officials. The president has breached the justice department's traditional independence, ordering it to scrutinise his political opponents and punish his critics through measures such as stripping their Secret Service protections. At the same time, he pardoned his supporters who took part in the January 6 attack on the US Capitol, abandoning any notion that pardons be used sparingly. While courts have acted to block some executive actions, the US supreme court's recent ruling limiting nationwide injunctions and Trump's direct attacks on judges signal the weakening of another democratic guardrail. And even as Trump brazenly accepts gifts from foreign countries, seeks to profit from the presidency through a cryptocurrency venture and bullies law firms, media companies and universities – all unthinkable under his predecessors – there is only token resistance from Congress. Republicans hold the majority in both chambers and have a cultish devotion to Trump, or visceral fear of his wrath. On Thursday, they rammed through his 'big, beautiful bill' despite warnings that it will rip the social safety net from millions of Americans and add trillions of dollars to the national deficit. Hours later, a triumphant Trump was greeted in Des Moines, Iowa, by supporters in a car park festooned with 55 national flags. One man wore a T-shirt entirely covered with a photo of a bloodied Trump with fist raised after last year's assassination attempt. A bearded vendor in a red T-shirt, checked shorts and plastic flip-flops spread red Trump 2028 caps on the ground. Flags and T-shirts declared: 'Jesus is my savior. Trump is my president.' Michelle Coon, 57, a psychotherapist, denied that Trump is behaving like an autocrat. 'I don't think he has been given that kind of power,' she said. 'I see people in Congress having a voice. He's lucky enough to have both houses right now; he might not have that in two years. The supreme court has come down both on his side and against his perspective so I see it fairly balanced right now.' Coon added: 'He's a great leader but I don't think that's necessarily authoritarian. He's trying to gather a lot of people around him to get good wisdom from others. I don't think we have anything to fear here.' Josue Rodriguez, 38, a pastor who works for the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference, was equally sanguine. 'We have a wonderful system called checks and balances where, if they feel that an individual has become all too powerful, too mighty, they have the right to take him to court and the supreme court will decide what is correct and not correct,' he said. Rodriguez also retains faith in political parties, saying: 'If they feel that the president is acting in a manner that goes against the American people or what is allowed legally, he will be challenged within his own party. At the end of the day, these people want to get re-elected and they're not going to allow things that will cause them to lose their re-elections.' But some analysts suggest that extreme partisanship is preventing effective congressional oversight, as members of the president's party are unwilling to challenge Trump's overreach. They are sounding the alarm about an erosion of democratic norms that could have lasting implications for future presidencies. Bill Galston, a senior fellow in governance studies at the Brookings Institution thinktank in Washington, this week initiated a new executive power project because he considers it the most important constitutional issue of the moment. 'It didn't start with President Trump but it may end there,' Galston said. 'It's hard to imagine a subsequent president seeking to advance executive power as a deliberate project to the extent that President Trump has been doing. 'This is not an accident. This was something that was carefully planned as both a political strategy and a legal strategy and I have to say I'm impressed with the administration's strategic focus on the issue of presidential power and the elimination of long-established limits to it.' Galston pointed to a drive to undermine the autonomy of so-called independent agencies. A legal challenge has been set in motion that will likely culminate in a supreme court decision next term that, Galston suspects, may effectively eliminate a 90-year precedent that guaranteed the independence of agencies. Trump is not the first American president to see how far he can go. In 1973, the historian Arthur Schlesinger Jr published The Imperial Presidency, acknowledging that, while he had cheered on Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal, the expansion of executive authority now threatened to 'override the separation of powers and burst the bonds of the Constitution'. The book was timely because the Watergate scandal and the Vietnam war saw a reassertion of congressional authority in the domestic and foreign spheres. Presidential power began to expand again, however, under Ronald Reagan. Galston noted: 'Young conservatives who came of age serving in the Reagan administration chafed more and more against congressional restraints, culminating in the publication in 1989 of a collection of essays by the American Enterprise Institute called The Fettered Presidency. 'So in 16 years, the adjective switches from 'imperial' to 'fettered' and I trace a lot of the modern conservative drive to expand the powers of the president at Congress's expense to that experience.' The trend accelerated with George W Bush's aggressive response to the September 11 2001 terrorist attacks. But other factors were in play: whereas divided government was once cause for negotiation, deepening polarisation between the parties made gridlock more likely, much to the frustration of the White House occupant. Barack Obama duly used an executive action to create the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (Daca) programme. He stepped up his use of such actions in 2014 as he became frustrated with how difficult it was to push legislation through Congress, saying: 'I've got a pen and I've got a phone.' Larry Jacobs, director of the Center for the Study of Politics and Governance at the University of Minnesota, said: 'There's a long history here and it's not just Trump. Look at just this century. Bush expanded presidential powers in ways that Obama took advantage of and then Obama expanded presidential powers in ways that Trump then expanded on. 'You can think of this as a loaded gun that's left on the table in the Oval Office. It's quite alarming. The next president who comes in, whether Democrat or Republican, is going to see the office through the eyes of their predecessor, not through the eyes of George Washington, who was leery of using his powers.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
So big, so beautiful: Fox News ignores the critics and champions Trump's bill
Donald Trump's mega-bill has been widely criticized in the press. News outlets and Democrats have warned that millions of people could be stripped of their health coverage through cuts to Medicaid, that cuts to food programs would see children go hungry, and that the legislation would cause the deficit to balloon. Fox News sees it differently. 'This legislation is packed with massive, huge, important wins for you, the American people,' Sean Hannity told viewers on Monday, as US senators debated the bill in Washington. 'Here's what the bill doesn't do. It does not decrease Medicaid, Medicare, Snap or social security benefits,' Hannity continued, a claim that completely contradicted the assessment of the Congressional Budget Office, which estimates the bill will cut Medicaid across the US by 7.6 million to 10.3 million people. Hannity had more. 'The big, beautiful bill also does not increase the deficit. Instead, the deficit will go down around a little shy of $2tn – that's to begin with, according to estimates,' he said. 'Because guess what? That's what happens when you cut taxes. It stimulates the economy, creates jobs, gets people off the welfare rolls. Guess what? People are working, now they're paying taxes.' It was unclear where Hannity got his $2tn number from, because he didn't say. But the CBO says the bill would add at least $3.3tn to the national debt over the next nine years, while the tax cuts will benefit high earners more than others. Hannity held up Ronald Reagan's tax cuts in 1981 as an example of how the deficit will be reduced – a take that ignored that those tax cuts saw an increase of the deficit, and had to be reversed over the rest of Reagan's presidency. Still, Hannity was sold. 'The American people are on the verge of a level of prosperity they have never experienced before,' he said. Hannity's interpretation was starkly different from the one many Americans were seeing. Even Republican senators have been dubious about the bill's benefits, with three voting against it in the early hours of Tuesday morning, and House Republicans wavering on Wednesday. Yet, on Tuesday, Laura Ingraham largely ignored the bill – framing it only as Democrats losing a battle to 'derail' the legislation before going on a minutes-long riff about a 'slide in patriotism' in the US. She went on to offer complaints that there were 'more foreign flags waving' in America's streets and that leftwing politicians believe that 'America can only be redeemed when she's totally dismantled and then remade, with millions of new people from other countries'. Elsewhere, there were occasional, albeit small, concessions that the 'big, beautiful bill' might not quite be the masterly piece of legislation the White House would have people believe. 'It's not perfect, but it does need to pass if we want this tax cut,' Ainsley Earhardt said on Fox & Friends at the start of the week. Her co-host Brian Kilmeade at least presented some of the negative points in an interview with Scott Bessent, the treasury secretary, on Tuesday, challenging him to address the claim that 'this is a tax break for the rich'. But Bessent didn't even attempt to address that, and Kilmeade was unwilling or unable to press him further. The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from people in the know. If you have something to share on this subject you can contact us confidentially using the following methods. Secure Messaging in the Guardian app The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories. Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs. This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said. If you don't already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu. Select 'Secure Messaging'. SecureDrop, instant messengers, email, telephone and post See our guide at for alternative methods and the pros and cons of each. Later that day, the theme continued. Trace Gallagher pulled up data from the Tax Foundation and the Tax Policy Center during his show, with a series of bullet points claiming that if Trump's bill failed it would lead to tax increases for families and small business owners. Gallagher left out the part of the Tax Foundation's analysis where the organization said the bill would reduce incomes by 0.6% and result in a nearly $3.6tn deficit increase, and ignored the Tax Policy Center's verdict that most of the tax cuts in the bill would go 'to the highest-income households'. His guests seemingly overlooked those bits, too, as they kept up the ruse. 'No bill is perfect,' Elizabeth Pipko, a former spokesperson for the Republican National Committee, told Gallagher, as she claimed 'the Democrats seem to have forgotten that' before accusing the mainstream media, with no irony, of not accurately representing the bill. Pipko added: 'I think it will pass, and I think it'll go down in history as again another false alarm from the legacy media, from the Democrats, and another victory for President Trump.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Tiffany Trump offers FIRST glimpse at newborn baby after welcoming son with husband Michael Boulos
Tiffany Trump, the daughter of President Donald Trump, posted the first photos of her newborn son's face Thursday on Instagram, showing him off in a number of adorable snaps. Tiffany and husband Michael Boulos welcomed their first child, son Alexander Trump Boulos, in May. In the first of the new photos, Alexander, who has thick brown hair and blue eyes, can be seen sweetly looking at the camera while being held by his mom with his mouth open in surprise. The second picture showed her husband holding the baby, while Tiffany looked lovingly at her son. The new parents were both dressed in white. In another snap, they dressed him up in a knit teddy bear outfit, as he slept peacefully in a wooden basket. Others included Tiffany sweetly holding Alexander, as well as more family photos. Tiffany first announced her son's birth on Instagram, so it's only fitting that she would continue to post more photos of him on the social media platform. When Tiffany shared the initial announcement of her son's arrival, she shared a black-and-white snapshot of the baby's foot, alongside a caption that read: 'Welcome to the world our sweet baby boy, Alexander Trump Boulos. 'We love you beyond words! Thank you for coming into our lives!' Michael was quick to comment on the post, writing: 'He's a blessing!' Mom Marla Maples also shared: 'No greater joy in the world. Michael and Tiffany this Gran Mar Mar loves you all so much!! You rocked it, my girl!' The newborn is Donald's 11th grandchild. His son, Donald Trump Jr. has five children, while daughter Ivanka Trump has three, and son Eric Trump has two. Tiffany publicly confirmed that she was expecting her first child in mid-December, months after her father announced it to the world. The President excitedly shared the news that he was going to become a grandfather again while speaking at the Detroit Economic Club back in October. He recognized several guests in the crowd, including businessman Massad Boulos, who is Tiffany's father-in-law, and then delivered the good news. 'He happens to be the father of Tiffany's husband, Michael, who's a very exceptional young guy,' said the President. 'And she's an exceptional young woman. And she's going to have a baby. So that's nice.' Last month, her sister, Ivanka, threw her a lavish Peter Rabbit-themed baby shower in Palm Beach, Florida. A radiant Tiffany was seen wore a stunning powder blue dress with short sleeves, which featured embellishments on the bust. Her other sister-in-law, Lara Trump, was also at the shower, while Ivanka shared details of the gorgeous celebration, including the intricately decorated cookies featuring adorable Peter Rabbit characters. Peter Rabbit motifs adorned the bar that was set up in outside the house. Tiffany was spotted posing in other snaps with friends including Camilla Ravah, Sarah Shatz and Karen Shiboleth. The couple started dating in 2018, after they met on vacation in the Greek Isles with actress Lindsay Lohan. Michael proposed in the White House Rose Garden with a 13-carat emerald-cut diamond ring worth $1.2 million. They married at Tiffany's father's Mar-a-Lago estate in November 2022. Tiffany, who graduated from Georgetown University Law Center in 2020, has not been heavily involved in her father's political efforts - although she did attend the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee last summer. Her billionaire husband Michael was born in Lebanon and is the heir to Boulos Enterprises, a Nigerian distribution and assembly company for vehicles including motorcycles and power bikes, run by his father.
