Byju's American assets Epic and Tynker sold for a song
Live Events
Two American assets of troubled edtech company Byju's, coding platform Tynker and kids learning platform Epic , have been sold for a fraction of what the company paid for them.A US bankruptcy court approved both the sales during a hearing on May 20, as per a report by EdWeek Market Brief.Computer science education company CodeHS has acquired Tynker for $2.2 million in cash, a significant drop from the $200 million that Byju's paid in a cash-and-stock deal to acquire it in 2021.Epic, which was acquired by Byju's in 2022 through a $500-million cash-and-stock transaction, has been sold to China's TAL Education Group for $95 million.Queries sent to Byju's are yet to elicit a response.Epic was Byju's second-biggest buyout after coaching centre operator Aakash Institute, which it acquired in 2021 for nearly $1 billion.In June 2024, ET had reported that some lenders within a consortium that loaned $1.2 billion to Byju's had said that they had filed a petition in a US court to initiate bankruptcy proceedings against the company's subsidiaries Epic, Tynker and Osmo.On April 10, the lenders filed a lawsuit in the US against Raveendran, his wife Divya Gokulnath and former company executive Anita Kishore. The lawsuit alleged that the three of them planned and executed a scheme to hide and misappropriate $533 million from the money they had lent to Byju's Alpha, a special purpose financing vehicle the edtech company had established in the US to receive the loan.Prior to this, a Delaware Bankruptcy Court ruling indicated that multiple fraudulent transfers and theft had taken place. According to the lenders, the court also found that suspended director Riju Ravindran had violated his fiduciary responsibilities as a director of the US entity, Byju's Alpha Inc.In India, both the brothers have moved the NCLT and NCLAT seeking a stay on the committee of creditors (CoC) and the removal of the resolution professional. This move comes after the resolution professional for Think & Learn began steps to withdraw certain legal proceedings in a New York court. Separately, concerns have also been raised over the ongoing sale of the company's assets.Think & Learn, represented by the RP, has also alleged that its shareholding in Aakash is getting diluted after the coaching centre operator amended its articles of association (AoA) to remove the reserved rights of minority investors by enforcing the resolutions passed at an extraordinary general meeting (EGM) last November.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
India has 'no basis' to seek WTO consultations on auto tariffs: US
The US has told the World Trade Organization (WTO) that there was "no basis" for India seeking consultations with it under the trade watchdog's safeguard agreement over American tariffs on automobiles and auto components. Last week, India sought consultations with the US after Washington adopted a measure in the form of a tariff increase of 25% ad valorem on imports of passenger vehicles and light trucks, and certain automobile parts originating in or from India. The measure on automobile parts applied from May 3, 2025, and for an unlimited duration. On Monday, Washington informed the WTO that the tariffs on autos were imposed pursuant to Section 232, which is a national security statute, and the US is "maintaining these actions pursuant to the essential security exception" in the global trade rules. Insisting that it did not act pursuant to Section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974, under which it imposes safeguard measures, the US said, "These actions are not safeguard measures and, therefore, there is no basis to conduct consultations under the Agreement on Safeguards with respect to these measures." India had said that the US failed to notify the WTO Committee on safeguards under a provision of the Agreement on Safeguards (AoS) on taking a decision to apply the safeguard measure. The US imported $89 billion worth of auto parts globally last year, with Mexico accounting for $36 billion, China for $10.1 billion, and India for just $2.2 billion. Washington has given a similar response to New Delhi's proposal to impose retaliatory duties on 29 American products including apples, almonds, pears, anti-freezing preparations, boric acid and certain products made of iron and steel to counter the American tariffs on steel and aluminium in the name of safeguard measures. New Delhi told the WTO that these measures would affect $7.6 billion imports into the US. The issues at the WTO are coming up at a time when the two sides are negotiating a Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA). American trade officials were in New Delhi from June 4-10 for the trade pact talks.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Anti-ICE protest: Car rams into crowd, 66-year old woman injured-Watch video
Moment from incident (@GhostCypher04) A 66-year old woman reportedly suffered a broken arm and injury on face after a car rammed into a crowd protesting against the immigration and customs enforcement (ICE) department in downtown Chicago on Tuesday evening . In a video which has now gone viral, on social media platforms, a maroon sedan can be seen speeding through the protesters, nearly hitting multiple pedestrians. Demonstrators were seen momentarily chasing and striking the vehicle before it drove off from the scene without halting. The woman, identified as Heather Blair, was on her way back home when the car barrelling down the street hit her, fracturing her left arm. She was taken to Northwest Memorial Hospital for treatment, Blair told CBS news. 'I thought it was a violent act, because the car was accelerating," Blair said. "It seemed like it was getting kind of heated, and we didn't want to be involved in any violence'. The police said they are still investigating the matter. Massive demonstrations erupted in key US cities last week following a wave of immigration raids, as the Trump administration moves to deliver on his campaign pledge to deport immigrants using aggressive measures. "President Trump promised to carry out the largest mass deportation campaign in American history and left-wing riots will not deter him in that effort," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
China to kill AUKUS without firing a bullet? Trump's ‘America First' stand behind review of nuclear submarine deal with Australia
President Donald Trump has launched a Pentagon-led review of the 2021 AUKUS pact, which brings together Australia , the United Kingdom, and the United States in a multi-decade effort to counterbalance China's growing influence in the Indo-Pacific. This deal was signed under the Biden Administration , a commitment to give its allies the missing military edge in the form of nuclear-powered submarines to Australia. This review marks the first serious reappraisal of the deal since its 2021 announcement and is being undertaken to find the perfect strategy to tackle China's military posturing in the Pacific and South China Sea. Also Read: Trump's US losing its tourist destination sheen, Australia joins growing list of friendly nations dropping America from travel itineraries by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Dad-Approved Ways to Celebrate Father's Day in Costa Mesa - Travel Costa Mesa Travel Costa Mesa Read More Undo Officials say the review is to ensure the project aligns with Trump's 'America First' agenda and addresses concerns over resource limits in the US Navy . With the Chinese People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) modernising rapidly and operating multiple nuclear submarines as well as aircraft carriers, the US forces are getting stretched. Live Events A defense official confirmed that the review will examine America's readiness, allied contributions, and the US industrial base. Why is Trump having second thoughts? Trump's team, led by Undersecretary Elbridge Colby, has questioned the submarine component, known as Pillar I, while supporting broader cooperation in intelligence and advanced technologies. Colby warned that US nuclear submarine capacity may not be sufficient to both supply Australia and meet American needs in a hypothetical conflict on other fronts, such as around Taiwan. This review is normal for a new administration (Trump) to evaluate key defense agreements. Canberra has already committed around A$4 billion toward US production and $500 million upfront. But the review stresses that the US must hit production targets, about 2.33 submarines per year, before transferring vessels. The Australian Government forecast suggests that this submarine program could cost a staggering US$235 billion over 30 years. Trump's approach also uses AUKUS to pressure Australia to increase defence spending significantly, from 2% of GDP to roughly 3.5%. Australia's Deputy PM Richard Marles said that AUKUS will stay on track. He called the review 'natural and understandable,' given the change in US leadership. He stressed that Australia has a 'plan' and 'is sticking to it.' The Chinese reaction China maintained its opposition to the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal as the Trump Administration reviewed it to align with its " America First " agenda. Beijing had earlier labeled the deal as driven by 'Cold War thinking' and accused the US, UK, and Australia of embarking on a 'path of error and danger.' Also Read: Trump threatens broader troop deployment if ICE protests and riots spread After the news that the US is reviewing AUKUS, the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian said at a briefing on Thursday, June 12, 'China has made clear more than once its position on the so-called trilateral security partnership between the U.S., U.K., and Australia, designed to advance cooperation on nuclear submarines and other cutting-edge military technologies." What is AUKUS and what was it meant to serve? The AUKUS pact, short for Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States, is a strategic security partnership announced in 2021. Its purpose is to strengthen military capabilities among these three countries and deter threats in the Indo-Pacific region, especially amid China's growing influence. The deal, estimated to cost US$239 billion (or A$368 billion) over three decades, is structured around two main pillars. Pillar I: Nuclear Submarines Pillar I will focus on providing Australia with nuclear-powered attack submarines, marking a big leap forward from its current fleet of diesel-electric vessels. Only five countries, the US, Russia, China, France, the UK, and India operate nuclear-powered submarines. Australia will build a nuclear submarine base that will be operational by 2027 just off Perth, for $1.7 billion. US and UK submarines will begin short-term rotational deployments to Western Australia by 2027. These deployments are meant to familiarise Australia with nuclear-powered technology and operations. From 2032, Australia will purchase at least three second-hand Virginia-class submarines from the US, with the option to buy two more if needed. The long-term vision is to create a new generation of nuclear-powered submarines, SSN-AUKUS. The UK and Australia will jointly design these submarines using British blueprints, but with integrated US technology. They will be constructed in both countries and serve both navies. With this part of the plan, the Australian government officials hope to strengthen deterrence, build Australia's domestic defence industry, and deepen military interoperability among the three nations. Pillar II: Advanced Capabilities and Intelligence Sharing This part includes collaboration on artificial intelligence, undersea robotics, long-range hypersonic missiles, quantum technologies, cyber operations, and electronic warfare systems. The arrangement expands on decades of deep intelligence sharing between the US and UK, now extended to Australia. It is designed to give the allies an edge in emerging technologies that are crucial for modern warfare. Together, both pillars of AUKUS aim to reshape the Indo-Pacific security landscape and establish a long-term technological and strategic alignment framework between the three partner countries. What lies ahead for Australia? The Pentagon review is expected to wrap up within 30 days; however, no timeline is given. Its outcome could reshape AUKUS or prompt negotiations over defence spending and industrial commitments. Australia may also consider a fall-back plan if the submarine deal is delayed or altered, though Marles has ruled out mid-course changes. London reiterates AUKUS's strategic value but supports revisiting its terms. For Australia, the review brings uncertainty over its biggest defence project. AUKUS's future role in Indo-Pacific security could be in doubt if the review leads to cancellation or delay.
