Half of Elderly Patients Prescribed Risky Medications, Study Finds
TDT | Manama
Professor Tom Fahey, a leading expert in general practice and epidemiology, presented critical findings on the safety and appropriateness of medication use in elderly populations during the Bahrain International Conference on Family Medicine and Primary Healthcare, held at the Gulf Hotel Bahrain.
Drawing from extensive Irish research, Prof. Fahey outlined trends in potentially inappropriate prescribing and adverse drug reactions, with a particular focus on patients aged 70 and above. His presentation was based on data from a large cohort study involving over 50,000 patients in the Dublin area, highlighting how hospital admission, both elective and emergency, were significantly associated with the likelihood of receiving high-risk medications.
Prof. Fahey emphasized the risks of polypharmacy, the simultaneous use of multiple medications—particularly among elderly patients, linking it to increased emergency visits, hospitalizations, and functional decline.
In a six-year observational study across 15 general practices in Dublin, a significant number of elderly patients experienced ADRs, with over 10% requiring emergency hospitalization. The most commonly implicated drugs were NSAIDs and certain psychoactive medications.
The research also investigated the rise in the use of strong opioids, such as morphine and fentanyl, which increased from 20% to 43% over a 15-year period. Prof. Fahey warned that these drugs carry well-documented risks, particularly in older populations, mirroring concerns across other European and American healthcare systems.
Another area of concern was the prescribing of medications affected by alcohol consumption. Interventions aimed at reducing alcohol-medication interactions showed modest success, though the impact on long-term health outcomes remained limited.
Prof. Fahey concluded by stressing the urgent need for policy interventions, better prescribing practices, and clinical guidelines to mitigate medication-related harm in aging populations. He called for family physicians and primary healthcare providers to play a leading role in addressing inappropriate medication use and improving patient safety.
- Hospitalization was a major factor associated with increased exposure to risky medications, independent of other health conditions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Insider
17 hours ago
- Gulf Insider
COVID Vaccine Removed for Kids, Pregnant Women
On Tuesday, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. delivered a historic course correction from the Biden-era vaccine alongside NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya and FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary, Kennedy announced that COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for healthy children and pregnant women were officially removed from the CDC's immunization schedule. 'Hi, everybody. I'm Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., your HHS secretary. And I'm here today with NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya and FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary. I couldn't be more pleased to announce that, as of today, the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from the CDC recommended immunization schedule.' It was an unmistakable shift away from coercive one-size-fits-all medicine, and a clear signal that data, not politics, is now leading the conversation. On Tuesday, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. delivered a historic course correction from the Biden-era vaccine policy. Standing alongside NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya and FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary, Kennedy announced that COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for… — The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) June 1, 2025 Today, Dr. Marty Makary took the fight straight into the lion's den—appearing on CBS to dismantle the network's go-to vaccine talking points. When host Margaret Brennan tried to paint the updated guidance as confusing, Makary didn't flinch. 'Can you clearly state what the policy is? Because this is confusing,' she asked. Makary responded without hesitation: 'Yeah, we believe the recommendation should be with a patient and their doctor.' That's when the real shift came into focus. 'So we're going to get away from these blanket recommendations in healthy young Americans.' 'On the COVID vaccine schedule, we don't want to see kids kicked out of school because a 12-year-old girl is not getting her fifth COVID booster shot.' 'We don't see the data there to support a young, healthy child getting a repeat infinite annual COVID vaccine.' He then laid out the sheer absurdity of where the old policy was heading. 'There's a theory that we should sort of blindly approve the new COVID boosters in young, healthy kids every year in perpetuity, and a young girl born today should get 80 COVID mRNA shots or other COVID shots in her average lifespan.' 'We're saying that's a theory, and we'd like to check in and get some randomized controlled data. It's been about four years since the original randomized trials. So we'd like an evidence based approach.' And then came the knockout line—delivered with facts no one could deny. 'That is a decision between a parent and their doctor—I don't know if you know these statistics, but 88% of American kids, their parents have said no to the COVID shot last season. So America, the vast majority of Americans are saying no.' Today, Dr. Marty Makary took the fight straight into the lion's den—appearing on CBS to dismantle the network's go-to vaccine talking host Margaret Brennan tried to paint the updated guidance as confusing, Makary didn't flinch.'Can you clearly state what the… — The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) June 1, 2025 Brennan tried to shift gears—falling back on CDC data to argue that even healthy kids remained at risk. 'So the CDC data said 41% of children aged 6 months to 17 years hospitalized with COVID between 2022 and 2024 did not have a known underlying condition. In other words, they looked healthy,' she said. 'And COVID was serious for them.' But Makary was ready. Calm and precise, he dismantled the claim with surgical clarity. 'So first of all, we know the CDC data is contaminated with a lot of false positives from incidental positive COVID tests with routine testing of every kid that walks in the hospital.' 'We know that data historically under the Biden administration did not distinguish being sick from COVID or an incidental positive COVID test.' He shared what he's heard from the people who actually run the ICUs in America. 'When you go to an ICU in America and you ask how many people are in the ICU that are healthy, that are sick with COVID? The answer I get again, again is we haven't seen that in a year or years.' That's why, he warned, making universal recommendations based on flawed data isn't just wrong—it's dangerous. 'And so the worst thing you can do in public health is to put out an absolute universal recommendation in young, healthy kids.' 'And the vast majority of Americans are saying, no, we want to see some data. And you say, forget about the data, just get it anyway.' Brennan tried to shift gears—falling back on CDC data to argue that even healthy kids remained at risk.'So the CDC data said 41% of children aged 6 months to 17 years hospitalized with COVID between 2022 and 2024 did not have a known underlying condition. In other words, they… — The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) June 1, 2025 But it was the final exchange that landed like a sledgehammer. When Brennan questioned why the HHS bypassed the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for the new policy shift, Makary landed a haymaker. 'That panel has been a kangaroo court where they just rubberstamp EVERY single vaccine put in front of them.' He said the committee hadn't been focused on science, but on messaging and marketing. 'You look at the minutes of the last couple of years, they say, we want a simple message for everybody just so they can understand it. It was not a data based conversation. It was a conversation based on marketing and ease.' And without real evidence, he warned, these recommendations become little more than guesswork. 'If there's zero clinical data, you're opining. I mean—it's a theory.' 'And so we don't want to put out an absolute recommendation for kids, with no clinical data to support it.' The implication was unmistakable: public health decisions should be based on evidence and transparency—not rubber stamps and slogans. For the first time in years, someone on national television was calling out the system. But it was the final exchange that landed like a Brennan questioned why the HHS bypassed the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for the new policy shift, Makary landed a haymaker.'That panel has been a kangaroo court where they just… — The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) June 1, 2025 Also read: Moderna Disables Comments On X Post Announcing New Covid Shot Amid Backlash
Daily Tribune
5 days ago
- Daily Tribune
Half of Elderly Patients Prescribed Risky Medications, Study Finds
TDT | Manama Professor Tom Fahey, a leading expert in general practice and epidemiology, presented critical findings on the safety and appropriateness of medication use in elderly populations during the Bahrain International Conference on Family Medicine and Primary Healthcare, held at the Gulf Hotel Bahrain. Drawing from extensive Irish research, Prof. Fahey outlined trends in potentially inappropriate prescribing and adverse drug reactions, with a particular focus on patients aged 70 and above. His presentation was based on data from a large cohort study involving over 50,000 patients in the Dublin area, highlighting how hospital admission, both elective and emergency, were significantly associated with the likelihood of receiving high-risk medications. Prof. Fahey emphasized the risks of polypharmacy, the simultaneous use of multiple medications—particularly among elderly patients, linking it to increased emergency visits, hospitalizations, and functional decline. In a six-year observational study across 15 general practices in Dublin, a significant number of elderly patients experienced ADRs, with over 10% requiring emergency hospitalization. The most commonly implicated drugs were NSAIDs and certain psychoactive medications. The research also investigated the rise in the use of strong opioids, such as morphine and fentanyl, which increased from 20% to 43% over a 15-year period. Prof. Fahey warned that these drugs carry well-documented risks, particularly in older populations, mirroring concerns across other European and American healthcare systems. Another area of concern was the prescribing of medications affected by alcohol consumption. Interventions aimed at reducing alcohol-medication interactions showed modest success, though the impact on long-term health outcomes remained limited. Prof. Fahey concluded by stressing the urgent need for policy interventions, better prescribing practices, and clinical guidelines to mitigate medication-related harm in aging populations. He called for family physicians and primary healthcare providers to play a leading role in addressing inappropriate medication use and improving patient safety. - Hospitalization was a major factor associated with increased exposure to risky medications, independent of other health conditions.
Daily Tribune
5 days ago
- Daily Tribune
Education and Care Must Work Hand in Hand
TDT | Manama Speaking at the Bahrain International Conference on Family Medicine and Primary Healthcare, renowned educator and surgeon Prof. Hossam Hamdy delivered an eye-opening address on the critical need for adopting systems thinking in the rapidly evolving landscape of health professions education. Prof. Hamdy emphasized that education and healthcare are deeply interconnected systems. 'Care drives education, and education drives care,' he explained. "To respond effectively to healthcare challenges, we must produce professionals who are not only technically competent but capable of adapting to changing systems, technologies, and societal expectations." He stressed the growing importance of aligning medical education with community needs, noting that public expectations of healthcare have changed dramatically over the last two decades. 'Educational institutions must be agile and responsive, recognizing that what happens in one part of the world—whether a health crisis or a breakthrough—has ripple effects globally.' Value-Based Systems Prof. Hamdy criticized traditional, fragmented models of healthcare and education, which he said often result in poor patient outcomes, inefficiencies, and high costs. Instead, he advocated for value-based care—a model that prioritizes quality and outcomes over volume. 'We are shifting from disease-centered care to wellness-focused systems,' he noted. "And our education must follow suit." He also highlighted the global shift from siloed, discipline-specific training to interprofessional and team-based models of education. 'Medical, pharmacy, and nursing students must be trained together to work collaboratively. Waiting until professionals are in the field to teach teamwork is too late.' He concluded with a call to action for academic leaders and program designers, 'Anyone leading an educational program must understand that they are part of a broader system. Fragmentation must be replaced with integration—across disciplines, sectors, and learning phases. Only then can we produce healthcare professionals who are prepared for the challenges of tomorrow.'
