UK Government must deliver promise on unfettered trade – Little-Pengelly
The DUP agreed the Safeguarding the Union command paper with the previous government in 2024, which allowed it to return to the Stormont powersharing Executive at Stormont.
However, the unionist party says that all of its concerns over post-Brexit trading arrangements have not been met.
The Windsor Framework, and its predecessor the Northern Ireland Protocol, require checks and customs paperwork on goods moving from Great Britain into Northern Ireland.
Under the arrangements, which were designed to ensure no hardening of the Irish land border post-Brexit, Northern Ireland continues to follow many EU trade and customs rules.
DUP MLA Ms Little-Pengelly told the gathering in Lisburn that unionism faced 'new challenges'.
She said: 'Chief amongst them is the imposition of the sea border within our own country.
'A division between Northern Ireland and the rest of the United Kingdom that no unionist can ever truly accept.
'It is not enough to celebrate our culture if we do not stand to defend it.
'The union is not a distant idea.
'It is our political, economic and emotional home.
'A border in the Irish Sea undermines that home, it divides our people, disrupts our trade and dilutes our identity.'
She added: 'The Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland made a clear and unambiguous promise to fully restore unfettered internal trade across this United Kingdom.
'That was a promise to the people of Northern Ireland.
'They must deliver it.'
The deputy First Minister said it was a time for 'confident and positive strong unionism'.
She described the Orange Order as a 'great unifier across many strands of our unionist conviction'.
Ms Little-Pengelly said: 'Unionism must work together outside of the Order.
'This is a time for vigilance, but it is also a time of opportunity.
'Division brings fracture and weakness, it is unity that brings strength.
'We must recognise that the bonds which pull and bind us together will always mean we have so much more in common than what can ever divide us.'
She added: 'Let us recognise the talents and abilities across all shades of unionism, and by using all such, our case will not only be strengthened, but indeed undeniable and irresistible.
'Let me be very clear, the might of the case for our continued union will always be our biggest strength.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
14 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Plastic pollution talks fail as negotiators in Geneva reject draft treaties
Global talks to reach agreement on a treaty aimed at ending the growing scourge of plastic pollution have collapsed, with no deal agreed and no clear path forward. Countries worked beyond Thursday's deadline into the night and Friday morning, but remained deadlocked on the issue that has dogged talks since they were launched, amid fervent optimism, in 2022: whether to reduce exponential growth of plastic production and place global, legally binding controls on toxic chemicals used to make plastics. Several countries expressed bitter disappointment, sadness and anger that the Geneva talks had, after the sixth and final round of negotiations, failed to reach a deal. Despite the deadlock, they said they would carry on with a resumed session in the future. Some NGOs called the failed talks a 'blow to multilateralism', and there was reflection among some delegates on how best to move forward: for instance, without the participation of petrostates that had obstructed the talks. Agnès Pannier-Runacher, France's minister for ecological transition, said she was 'disappointed' and 'angry' that a handful of countries 'guided by short-term financial interests' had bloked the adoption of an ambitious treaty. France, the EU and more than 100 countries, from every continent, 'did everything possible' to obtain an agreement to reduce plastic production, to ban the most dangerous products and to protect human health, she said. Emma Hardy, the UK's head of delegation and marine minister, said: 'I'm hugely disappointed that an agreement wasn't reached, but am extremely proud of the way the UK worked tirelessly until the end to seek an ambitious and effective treaty.' Colombia's delegate, Sebastián Rodríguez, said: 'The negotiations were consistently blocked by a small number of states who simply don't want an agreement.' Tuvalu, speaking for 14 Pacific small island developing states, said: 'For our islands this means that without global cooperation and state action, millions of tonnes of plastic waste will continue to be dumped in our oceans, affecting our ecosystem, food security, livelihood and culture.' China's delegation said the fight against plastic pollution was a long marathon and the temporary setback represented a new starting point to forge consensus. It urged countries to work together to offer future generations a planet without plastic pollution. Luis Vayas Valdivieso, the chair of the negotiating committee, wrote and presented two drafts of treaty text based on the views expressed by the countries, but representatives from 184 countries rejected both as a basis for their negotiations. Saudi Arabia said both drafts lacked balance, and Saudi and Kuwaiti negotiators suggested the latest proposal, presented in the early hours of Friday, took other states' views more into account. It addressed plastic production, which they considered to be outside the scope of the treaty. The Friday draft did not include a limit on plastic production but recognised that current production and consumption levels were 'unsustainable' and global action was needed. There was little clarity on the way forward as delegates left the UN meeting on Friday morning. But there was acknowledgment that lessons needed to be learned and a new approach was needed. Jessika Roswall, the European commissioner for environment, said she saw the outcome of the talks as a good basis for a resumed session, but they must 'be honest and learn from the process that has brought us here today'. Sign up to Down to Earth The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential after newsletter promotion Dennis Clare, of Micronesia, said: 'What might have collapsed is not so much the talks but the logic of continuing or concluding them in a forum with dedicated obstructionists.' While it was always difficult to negotiate shared goals in a multilateral forum with almost 200 countries, it was 'especially difficult if there is no meeting of the minds on what the goals are,' he said. Clare, who negotiated for Micronesia in the Montreal treaty to control ozone-depleting chemicals, a process that took eight years, said he had 'deja vu' from petrostates blocking principles back then. 'We need to consider how to approach this and whether to consider without [petrostates'] participation,' he said. 'Many ambitious countries also have great hope in China, a country that not only has a much more diverse economy than some of its petrostate allies, but also has a demonstrated interest in showing leadership to solve global problems. This is the beginning of the beginning of the world's attempt to address plastic pollution.' Christina Dixon, of the Environmental Investigation Agency, said the failure to reach a deal was a 'blow to multilateralism'. If talks resume they needed a 'new dynamic, a new chair and empowerment for delegates to utilise the right to vote … Its going to be really difficult to keep doing the same thing again and expect a different result – that's the definition of insanity.' Melissa Sky, a senior lawyer at the Center for International Environmental Law, said:'If countries hope to ever achieve a treaty that meaningfully addresses plastics pollution, they will either need to vote at the INC [Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee] or take the negotiation elsewhere' Valdivieso said the session had merely been adjourned rather than ended. Countries and the secretariat 'will be working to try to find a date and also a place' for resuming the talks, he told Agence France-Presse.
Fashion United
2 hours ago
- Fashion United
AAFA's urges Trump administration to add non-cumulative clause for Chinese tariffs
The American Apparel & Footwear Association (AAFA) has issued a response to President Trump's executive order extending temporary tariff relief on Chinese imports for another 90 days. The order, titled 'Further Modifying Reciprocal Tariff Rates to Reflect Ongoing Discussions with The People's Republic of China,' was issued on August 11 and cites ongoing trade talks between the US and Chinese officials as the main reason for the delay, maintaining the current 30 percent baseline rate on retaliatory tariffs against US goods from China. While the AAFA voiced appreciation for the administration's continued engagement with China and the extension of the pause to introduce the heightened tariffs, the association also voiced concerns about the continual delay. 'We appreciate the administration's continued engagement with China and the extension of the pause on heightened tariffs, which will help to avert devastating consequences like product elimination and business closures,' said AAFA President and CEO Steve Lamar in a statement. 'However, the constant cycle of deadline delays and vague deal terms has kept American companies and consumers stuck in the same holding pattern since April 1. This pattern has and continues to stifle innovation, strategic decision-making, and long-term growth.' The AAFA is encouraging Trump's administration to include a 'non-stacking provision,' similar to agreements with Japan and the EU. 'Even with the pause on the worst-case rate, a 30 percent tariff on our largest trading partner is still untenably high,' added Lamar. 'We can't forget that these tariffs are being added on top of existing ones, including the nearly century-old Smoot-Hawley MFN tariffs and the Section 301 tariffs. When stacked on top of these already steep tariffs, it amounts to double taxation on hardworking American families for everyday essentials like clothing and footwear.' The delay caps months of lobbying by AAFA and industry allies for tariff reduction, arguing that the current policy fails to boost domestic manufacturing or protect the sector's 3.6 million American jobs. Meanwhile, two key trade programs, the African Growth and Opportunity Act and Haiti's HOPE/HELP preferences, face a September 30 expiration deadline without congressional renewal.
The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Glasgow councillors to advance 'congestion charge' plans
Charges would be levied on drivers entering the city's boundaries, while Glasgow residents would be exempt from the fee. And users of the Clyde Tunnel could be hit with an additional road tax. However, plans to implement a workplace parking charge, which would have raised £8m a year, have been shelved. The Glasgow LEZ was implemented in June 2023, and has been one of several controversial traffic restrictions in recent a report to councillors, Executive Director of Neighbourhoods, Regeneration and Sustainability George Gillespie wrote: 'While the Council does not intend to progress a Workplace Parking Licensing scheme at this time, officers will now direct resources to the exploration of alternative potential initiatives utilising local road user charging powers. 'While a WPL scheme has the potential to encourage modal shift and generate relatively modest revenues to support sustainable transport interventions, it is considered that alternative options such as initiatives utilising local road user charging powers may prove more impactful in achieving these aims.' Councillors will be asked to note the findings of the report at a meeting next week. SNP councillor Ricky Bell, who serves as city treasurer, previously expressed support for a congestion charge. He said: 'We need to have solutions that work for Glasgow, and things like a tourist tax, congestion charging, tolling on the tunnel are the big ones that would make quite a difference to the amount of money we get.' In July, city councillors expressed interest in rolling out the tariff. Greens councillor Blair Anderson told a full council meeting: 'The only way we can meet our climate targets is moving people from cars to public transport. 'A road user charging scheme would give us the money to make Glasgow's buses publicly owned, reliable, fast and free.' Meanwhile, a 5% tourist tax, which was approved by councillors in June, will be implemented from January 2027. Visitors to the city will be charged an extra £4.83 per night in a bid to raise £16m in fresh capital each year. Drivers on the M8 would be charged upon crossing the city's boundaries. (Image: Getty Images) The Federation of Small Businesses Scotland has urged the council to proceed with 'caution'. Hisashi Kuboyama, the group's West of Scotland Development Manager, said: 'The city's post-Covid recovery has been painfully slow, and businesses' confidence isn't back up yet. The council needs to ensure the impact on local businesses is fully considered as it develops policy proposals if they want to bring the city centre back to where it was. 'We welcome the city council's decision to drop the idea of a workplace parking charge. That would have placed an extra burden on small businesses who need vehicles to carry out their work 'Similarly, we would urge extreme caution when it comes to considering a congestion charge for driving into the city or a toll on the Clyde Tunnel.' Reform Councillor Thomas Kerr also hit out at the proposals yesterday, posting to X: 'The SNP's plan in Glasgow? Tax, tax, tax. 'This congestion charge will strangle business, turn off visitors and kill investment in our city. These chancers need to go before their damage is irreversible.' A potential congestion charge has been mooted for years. In 2023, Katy Loudon of the SNP was left red-faced after her colleagues in Glasgow City Chambers raised the issue amidst a heated by-election in the Rutherglen and Hamilton West parliamentary constituency. At the time, a campaign source told The Herald: 'We're in a real scrap here and our prospects are not being helped by [Cllr Bell] telling our voters that under the SNP they'll have to pay an extra £5 a day or whatever to get into their work. It's madness. It does our chances here no good.' Loudon was subsequently routed in the contest against Labour's Michael Shanks, by a vote of 58.6% to 27.6%. Read more: Russell Findlay calls for 'pause' on new energy projects in Highlands Highland Broadband secures £50m in bid to connect 150 towns and villages 'A dire predicament': Union Street closures as 23% of units lie empty A congestion charge was implemented in London in 2003. Motorists pay £15 each day to travel within Central London. New York City followed suit in January this year, charging drivers $15 during peak driving times. Congestion pricing has been praised for reducing the amount of car traffic and carbon emissions in city centres, as well as cutting down on noise pollution. However, critics have said the tariff will cut into the profits of local businesses.
