logo
Exclusive-Le Pen's far-right French party rebuffed US offer of support, sources say

Exclusive-Le Pen's far-right French party rebuffed US offer of support, sources say

The Star7 hours ago

FILE PHOTO: French far-right leader Marine Le Pen speaks at a rally in support of her, after calls for a peaceful mobilisation following Marine Le Pen's conviction for embezzlement of EU funds, resulting in her being barred from running for office for five years, in Paris, France, April 6, 2025. REUTERS/Gonzalo Fuentes/File Photo
PARIS (Reuters) -A U.S. State Department delegation met with senior officials from France's National Rally (RN) in late May, but their offer to publicly support figurehead Marine Le Pen after a court barred her from office was rebuffed by the far-right party, two sources said.
Le Pen, one of the most prominent figures of the European far right, was a frontrunner for the 2027 French presidential election before a court in March banned her from the contest after she was convicted of embezzling EU funds.
U.S. President Donald Trump and other right-wing leaders were quick to rally behind her, alleging political censorship.
The U.S. delegation that visited Paris was led by Samuel Samson, an official at the State Department's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (DRL). He is part of an influx of young conservatives rising up the ranks of Trump's administration.
Samson met with senior RN officials but Le Pen and her popular No. 2, party president Jordan Bardella, were not present, the two sources said. The aim, one of the sources said, was to discuss ways the Trump administration could offer public support to Le Pen, who wants to overturn her conviction.
However, the offer was declined, the two sources said. The RN officials said an endorsement from Trump's State Department could hurt the party's hopes of winning the 2027 election, one of the sources said. The RN officials also told Samson there was no need to support Le Pen as Bardella stands a good chance of winning if she cannot run, the source said.
A longtime pariah for many in France, Le Pen has worked hard to clean up the image of her eurosceptic nationalist party, pitching it more broadly as a defender of family incomes, jobs and French identity.
A senior State Department official, speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed the meeting took place, but disputed the characterization that an offer for help was rebuffed. The official said RN representatives "indicated the fact that they need to act in their own interest as independent parties".
The RN welcomed Washington's engagement, the official added.
The RN's response is an illustration of how despite areas of ideological proximity, Trump's support is seen as a liability by some European nationalists.
A source close to Le Pen confirmed the meeting, saying "support for our party from a foreign administration isn't exactly something we're accustomed to."
The RN did not respond to a request for comment.
Samson's meeting with RN officials and their rejection of U.S. support have not been reported.
'LAWFARE' CONCERNS
Earlier this month, the DRL said on X that its officials "met with French officials, political parties, and other stakeholders to reaffirm a shared commitment to free speech, democratic choice, and religious freedom ... Echoing (Trump) we are concerned by those in Europe 'using lawfare to silence free speech and censor their political opponent[s].'"
Polls show a majority of French people did not take issue with her ban.
The day before the RN meeting, writing on the State Department's Substack, Samson cited Le Pen's case as evidence that "Europe has devolved into a hotbed of digital censorship, mass migration, restrictions on religious freedom, and numerous other assaults on democratic self-governance."
The State Department official rejected criticism from Trump's opponents that his administration was only concerned about the "censorship" and human rights of far-right figures.
"The unfortunate reality of the current human rights discourse is that it is politicized and it does cherry pick," the official said, adding that the Trump administration was simply trying to "fix" that.
Samson has been the driving force behind a push to support UK anti-abortion protesters, one of the sources said. In March, the DRL wrote on X, he met with anti-abortion activist Livia Tossici-Bolt. She was found guilty in April of breaching an order which banned protest outside a clinic in southern England.
His stated concerns about a European attack on free speech echo those made by U.S. Vice President JD Vance during a bombshell speech in Munich earlier this year.
(Reporting by Gabriel Stargardter and Elizabeth Pineau in Paris; additional reporting by Humeyra Pamuk in Washington; Editing by Richard Lough and Toby Chopra)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US strikes may have set back Iran nuclear program only months, sources say
US strikes may have set back Iran nuclear program only months, sources say

The Star

timean hour ago

  • The Star

US strikes may have set back Iran nuclear program only months, sources say

Satellite image over Fordow, before the U.S. struck the underground nuclear facility, near Qom, Iran, June 2, 2025. 2025 Planet Labs PBC via REUTERS/File Photo WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A preliminary U.S. intelligence assessment has determined that U.S. strikes over the weekend on Iranian nuclear facilities have set back Tehran's program by only a matter of months, three sources with knowledge of the matter told Reuters. The initial report was prepared by the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Pentagon's main intelligence arm and one of 18 U.S. intelligence agencies, said two of the sources, who requested anonymity to discuss classified matters. The classified assessment is at odds with the statements of President Donald Trump and high-ranking U.S. officials - including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. They have said the weekend strikes, which used a combination of bunker-busting bombs and more conventional weapons, essentially eliminated Iran's nuclear program. Trump has said the attacks were necessary to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. Iran denies it is seeking such a weapon and says its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes. Hegseth on Sunday said that the strikes had "obliterated" Iran's nuclear ambitions, while Trump said Iran's crucial nuclear sites had been "completely and fully obliterated." Assessing the damage at the Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites is expected to be a difficult task, and the DIA is not the only agency tasked with the job. One source said the assessment was not universally accepted and had generated significant disagreement. A U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the U.S. did not know the extent of the damage yet. Still, the initial assessment indicated the strikes may not have been nearly as successful as the Trump administration has claimed. One of the sources said Iran's enriched uranium stocks had not been eliminated, and in fact the country's nuclear program may have been set back only a month or two. The Pentagon disputed the notion that the damage to Iran's nuclear program was minor, though it did not dispute that the DIA assessment exists. "Based on everything we have seen — and I've seen it all — our bombing campaign obliterated Iran's ability to create nuclear weapons," Hegseth said in a statement provided to Reuters. "Our massive bombs hit exactly the right spot at each target—and worked perfectly. The impact of those bombs is buried under a mountain of rubble in Iran; so anyone who says the bombs were not devastating is just trying to undermine the President and the successful mission." The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. But in a statement to CNN, which first reported the intelligence assessment, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the conclusion was incorrect. "This alleged assessment is flat-out wrong," Leavitt said, according to CNN. "Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000 pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration." Initial military assessments can change as more information comes to light and it is not uncommon for opinions to vary across different U.S. intelligence agencies. Democrats have previously said Trump's claims that the weekend strikes eliminated or seriously set back Iran's nuclear program were not yet backed by evidence. "There's zero evidence that I've seen that the nuclear program was completely and totally obliterated as Donald Trump has claimed," House of Representatives Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said on Monday. Classified briefings on the matter for members of the House of Representatives and Senate were canceled on Tuesday. (Reporting by Jonathan Landay and Idrees Ali in Washington and Gram Slattery in The Hague; Additional reporting by Phil Stewart; Editing by Don Durfee and Cynthia Osterman)

[UPDATED] Iran Guards arrest European accused of spying on 'military' sites
[UPDATED] Iran Guards arrest European accused of spying on 'military' sites

New Straits Times

time6 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

[UPDATED] Iran Guards arrest European accused of spying on 'military' sites

TEHRAN: Iran's Revolutionary Guards said Tuesday that a European accused of spying on "sensitive and military" sites was arrested in the country's south. The arrest came as a fragile ceasefire between Iran and Israel took hold after 12 days of fighting, and followed multiple local media reports in recent days of individuals detained on accusations of spying for Israel. "A European was arrested by security forces from the Intelligence Organisation of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps... in Hormozgan province" in the south, the Guards' Sepahnews website said, noting "the individual... entered Iran as a tourist". "He was gathering intelligence on sensitive and military sites," it added, without elaborating on who the suspect was accused of working for. Iran has vowed swift trials for people arrested on suspicion of collaborating with Israel. Authorities have also announced the executions of several people convicted of working with Israel's spy agency, the Mossad. On Monday, Iranian authorities arrested a European national on suspicion of spying for Israel. On Friday, media reported that another European national was arrested on suspicion of espionage. The Mehr news agency later that day published a video saying the Revolutionary Guards took into custody a German national in Markazi province, west of Tehran. It said he was suspected of being "a spy who had entered Iran disguised as a tourist".

Zelenskiy warns NATO allies before Hague summit of Russia threat
Zelenskiy warns NATO allies before Hague summit of Russia threat

The Star

time6 hours ago

  • The Star

Zelenskiy warns NATO allies before Hague summit of Russia threat

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy speaks to the press with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte (not pictured), on the sidelines of a NATO summit, in The Hague, Netherlands June 24, 2025. REUTERS/Claudia Greco/Pool REFILE - CORRECTING EVENT FROM "A BILATERAL MEETING" TO "SPEAK TO THE PRESS". THE HAGUE (Reuters) -President Volodymyr Zelenskiy warned European NATO members on Tuesday that they risked being attacked by Russia if it was not defeated in Ukraine, urging them to heed U.S. calls to sign off a big new spending goal for the alliance at a summit. The two-day gathering is intended to signal to Russian President Vladimir Putin that NATO is united, despite U.S. President Donald Trump's past criticism, and determined to expand and upgrade its defences to deter any attack from Moscow. "Russia is even planning new military operations on NATO territory – meaning your countries," Zelenskiy told a defence industry event on the sidelines of the summit, hours after Russian missiles killed at least 11 people in southeast Ukraine. "No doubt we must stop Putin now, and in Ukraine, but we have to understand that his objectives reach beyond Ukraine. European countries need to increase defence spending." NATO'S RUTTE HAILS TRUMP'S 'DECISIVE ACTION IN IRAN' Trump, en route to the summit in the Netherlands, posted a screenshot of a message from NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte congratulating him on his "decisive action in Iran" and getting all NATO allies to agree to spend at least 5% of their GDP on defence. "Europe is going to pay in a BIG way as they should, and it will be your win," the message read. Trump was pressed by travelling reporters to say whether he remained committed to mutual defence among allies as set out by NATO's Article 5, and responded: "I'm committed to saving lives. I'm committed to life and safety. And I'm going to give you an exact definition when I get there." Trump is expected to meet Zelenskiy for talks during the summit. Zelenskiy has said he wants to discuss substantial purchases of weaponry including Patriot missile defence systems as well as sanctions and other ways to put pressure on Putin. In The Hague, Zelenskiy said it was essential that Ukraine lead in drone technology, which has shaped the battlefield and developed at breathtaking pace in the 40 months the war has lasted so far. Rutte, a former Dutch prime minister, underlined the need for transatlantic cooperation in the defence industry. "Today, NATO's military edge is being aggressively challenged by a rapidly rearming Russia, backed by Chinese technology and armed with Iranian and North Korean weapons," he said. "Only Europe and North America together can rise up to meet the challenge of rearmament." RUSSIA CRITICISES NATO'S SPENDING BOOST The Kremlin accused NATO of being on a path of rampant militarisation and portraying Russia as a "fiend of hell" in order to justify its big increase in defence spending. The summit and its final statement will be focused on heeding Trump's call to spend 5% of GDP on defence - a significant jump from the current 2% goal. It is to be achieved both by spending more on military items and by including broader security-related spending in the new target. Russia has cited its neighbour's desire to join the U.S.-led transatlantic defence pact as one of the reasons why it invaded Ukraine in 2022. NATO was founded by 12 Western countries in 1949 to resist the threat from the communist Soviet Union. Russia denies any plan to attack the alliance, which now boasts 32 members, but Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said it was "largely a wasted effort" to assure the grouping of this because it was determined to demonise Russia. "It is an alliance created for confrontation ... It is not an instrument of peace and stability," he said. (Additional reporting by Lili Bayer and , Bart Meijer in The Hague; Writing by Keith Weir; Editing by Dominique Vidalon and Kevin Liffey)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store