Black Mirror season 7 amazes, but falls short on tech-driven storytelling; did the episodes live up to expectations?
When a sci-fi fan sits down to watch Black Mirror, they expect a certain level of technological intrigue. However, season seven, while rich in psychological depth, did not quite deliver what matters most: groundbreaking technology. Over time, Black Mirror's sharp focus on the dark side of technological development seems to have been dialled down. Instead of showcasing tech evolution, the latest season often felt like a collection of recycled ideas, familiar narratives, and only average innovation.
Here's a breakdown of all the episodes of Black Mirror season 7 and why I felt it missed the mark in many places:
Episode 1: Common people
The season opener Common People had plenty of potential, striking the right emotional chord from the beginning. The premise—a husband using high-tech means to save his wife's life—was intriguing. Yet, the execution felt predictable, echoing themes explored in previous seasons, without enough technological twists to keep it fresh. Chris O'Dowd and Rashida Jones delivered convincing performances, but the climax did not do justice to the setup.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW VIDEO
Siena Kelly and Rosy McEwen's second episode is a psychological thriller about a culinary researcher whose reality shifts after an old schoolmate joins her workplace. However, the story lacked impact and clear explanation. The technological metaphor—hinting at the Mandela effect—felt underdeveloped and unsatisfying. Instead of focusing on a novel tech invention, the episode leaned more heavily into psychological manipulation, missing the essence of Black Mirror's tech-driven storytelling.
Episode 3: Hotel Reverie
Set in 40s Hollywood, the black-and-white episode explored the use of AI-based virtual production to recreate films in the modern world. Emma Corrin impressed as Dorothy, but Issa Rae's performance as Brandy felt less convincing. While the episode succeeded in evoking emotions, the technology served more as a background detail than a core focus. Compared to the early seasons, the episode lacked the sharp technological commentary that once defined the show.
ALSO READ |
Episode 4: Plaything
This episode offered beautiful storytelling but left me confused by the climax. The ending did not fully justify the episode's emotional buildup. Peter Capaldi's chilling performance brought back memories of Bandersnatch and elevated the narrative. A video game journalist becomes obsessed with an unusual game populated by artificial lifeforms, leading to the end of humanity. If I had to rank all the season seven episodes, Plaything would likely take first place for its storytelling quality, even if its tech innovation was modest.
Are the makers running out of fresh ideas? Eulogy felt like a rehash of concepts explored in earlier seasons, similar to Common People. It followed a lonely man revisiting memories and photographs of a deceased ex-girlfriend using a system that allows users to relive moments inside images. Sound familiar? While the emotional angle was powerful, thanks largely to Paul Giamatti's gut-wrenching performance, the technological element took a back seat. Again.
Episode 6: USS Callister: Into Infinity
The most anticipated episode, USS Callister: Into Infinity, a sequel to the beloved season four episode USS Callister, finally delivered. In my opinion, it had the most satisfying climax out of all the episodes. Revisiting the digital realm adventure of the office peers with even more high stakes to save their lives, the narrative served tech value and character development with a familiar backdrop. The theme of digital consciousness lives up to the expectations in the episode.
Black Mirror season 7 shines when it comes to storytelling, emotional depth and character development. But, it surely lacks in presenting new, high-end and fresh technological concepts. It touches the deep psychological string, but leaves you wanting more of the show's sci-fi trademark.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
2 days ago
- The Hindu
Thug Life: First day first show reactions Tourist Family
What a week—so many choices, so little time. This episode of FOMO Fix dives into some of the buzziest new releases and helps you figure out what's worth watching. On Hype Check, I'm joined by film critic Shilajit Mitra to break down our first-day-first-show reactions to Thug Life, the much-anticipated Kamal Haasan–Mani Ratnam collaboration. It starts off with promise, but let's just say things go south after the interval. Then on TV Gold, I spotlight Mountainhead, Jesse Armstrong's razor-sharp satire on tech billionaires. It's dark, hilarious, and deeply relevant. If Succession met Black Mirror at a Silicon Valley retreat, this would be the outcome. Also in this week's heads up: • Tourist Family, a refugee drama that refuses to lean into trauma and instead delivers warmth, humor, and hope. • Stolen, a lean and tense thriller set over one unforgettable night. It's tightly made, hard-hitting, and leaves a mark.
NDTV
2 days ago
- NDTV
Long Before Housefull 5 's Multiple Climaxes, There Was A Netflix Film That Did It
Housefull 5A and Housefull 5B. These aren't two seat numbers of the same row in a cinema hall for the movie Housefull 5. They refer to the two alternate endings of the fifth installment in the popular but oft-ridiculed comedy franchise. This edition, directed by Tarun Mansukhani and produced by Sajid Nadiadwala of Nadiadwala Grandson Entertainment, won't just be a Housefull -style slapstick comedy. There's also an element of murder mystery to it. When a billionaire (Ranjeet) is murdered on a cruise ship, three men -- played by Akshay Kumar, Abhishek Bachchan, and Riteish Deshmukh -- come forward claiming to be his rightful heir, Jolly. Chaos and comedy ensue when the search for the billionaire's killer and the real heir begins. As Housefull 5 releases in theatres today, the comedy thriller will have two climaxes with different murderers. At the trailer launch of the film, Nadiadwala proudly declared a film with two different endings was something that hadn't "happened anywhere else in the world", adding that he was toying with the idea for the last 30 years. "I've written a story [ Housefull ] where every theatre will have a different killer. So, if you watch it at Gaiety, it'll have one killer. If you watch it at Galaxy, there'll be another. In PVR screen number 4, you'll see a different killer, and in PVR screen number 5, yet another one. It's like every time you watch the film, you'll get a different ending," the producer had said. But Is That So? While two alternate endings with different murderers is a first for the Housefull franchise, which started 15 years ago, it's not a novel concept. In 2018, streamer Netflix came out with Black Mirror: Bandersnatch, an interactive film set in the dystopian sci-fi thriller world of Black Mirror anthology series franchise. It was directed by David Slade and penned by Black Mirror creator Charlie Brooker. Set in 1984, the movie followed a young programmer named Stefan Butler, played by Fionn Whitehead, who is adapting a fantasy gamebook into a video game. And, Black Mirror: Bandersnatch had not two, but many, many endings. How so? Its interactive medium film gave the viewer the agency to make decisions for the protagonist. They chose what happened to Stefan - whether he accepts or rejects help from the game company in developing the game, or whether he jumps off the balcony or not. However, Bandersnatch wasn't the first of its kind either. In the past, Malayalam film Harikrishnans (1998) and Hollywood movie Clue (1985) released in theatres with different endings. Bandersnatch, however, gave the viewer the power to decide the end. This Netflix film received mixed reviews with much debate over the extent to which the viewer's decision influenced the story's narrative and subsequent outcome. But when have reviews ever been a concern for the Housefull folk. Its budget, crassness of jokes, and also box office collections have only increased over the years. The last film, Housefull 4 was mounted on a budget of Rs 150 crore and it managed to collect over Rs 280 crore at the ticket windows. As for Housefull 5, you can choose your poison - Housefull 5A, Housefull 5B, or, maybe both?
Indian Express
27-05-2025
- Indian Express
Content now like ‘roti-sabzi': Anupam Mittal calls out ‘thumb warrior' generation
Anupam Mittal, founder of and a judge on Shark Tank India, has shared a heartfelt post on LinkedIn that is resonating with many, especially parents. He opened up about how technology, social media, and artificial intelligence-driven content are reshaping our daily lives, often in ways we don't even notice. What struck a chord with many was a story about his seven-year-old daughter: her day might begin innocently with Peppa Pig, but before long, she's pulled into what Mittal described as a 'vortex of glitchy animation and algorithmic chaos'. This isn't just about kids, though. He pointed out that adults aren't immune either. Every day, we're passively consuming AI-packaged quotes and shallow content as if it's become part of our routine–'like roti-sabzi,' he said. Mittal's message isn't a rant against technology. He's still optimistic about India's potential, confidently stating, 'Yes, I believe the next wave of global entrepreneurs will come from India. I have put my money on it.' But his optimism is laced with concern. He warns that we might also be creating a culture dominated by distraction–what he calls 'thumb warriors,' people who are 'overstimulated, under-inspired' and oddly comfortable with it. Mittal reflected on how India 'leapfrogged straight to Reels' unlike the West, which transitioned slowly from the radio to television to the internet. With a billion smartphones in our hands, we've turned vast intellectual potential into endless hours of short-form entertainment–prank videos, choreographed dances, and a deluge of algorithm-driven 'wisdom', according to him. It's this shift that worries Mittal most. 'We're raising a generation that doesn't play. Teens that don't talk. Adults that don't think – just scroll,' he observed, adding that as AI evolves, this constant stimulation was only going to get more intense. It's both a massive opportunity and, as he puts it, a 'Black Mirror episode no one signed up for'. Mittal made it clear that he's not offering a solution or asking people to delete their apps. He's speaking as a concerned father who wants people to pause and reflect. In the end, he leaves readers with a question that lingers, 'How do we make sure the India we're building doesn't forget to look up?' The post went viral on Linkedin and many shared their views. A user wrote, 'Yes, there's overstimulation. But not all scrolling is mindless. Many are creating, learning, building audiences, even launching businesses all from their phones. This generation isn't lost they're evolving differently. Fast. Visually. Algorithmically. I believe, our job isn't to fight the scroll it's to guide what fills it. Let's not write off a billion brains too quickly. Let's help them channel it.' Another person agreed with Mittal and wrote, 'Couldn't agree more! I see people around me, staring into their mobile screens (more like lost in the loop of endless scrolling). We need to take conscious efforts to pull away from this vortex from time to time.' A third person commented, 'Absolutely agree. Deleting social media isn't the real solution. But drowning in AI wisdom all day is just like digging into the sea: endless, overwhelming, and often directionless. After all, even too much roti-sabzi can be harmful.'
