logo
Sulphur business owner found not guilty of stealing COVID funds

Sulphur business owner found not guilty of stealing COVID funds

American Press11-07-2025
Jenilea Pena was found not guilty of stealing federal funds issued to small business owners during the COVID-19 pandemic. (Special to the American Press)
A Sulphur woman accused of stealing nearly $100,000 in federal funds issued to small businesses during the COVID pandemic has been cleared of wrong doing.
This week a unanimous jury found Jenilea Pena not guilty of wire fraud and making false statements to the government.
Pena was one of three owners of Planet Nutrition in Sulphur, owning 25 percent of the business. An indictment filed in federal court on March 20, 2024, claimed Pena filed for a small business loan in 2020 through the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act without the knowledge of the majority owner.
According to the indictment, Pena was accused of using $97,000 of the loan for her own personal use and submitting a fictitious document signed by the majority owner.
After a four-day trial, the jury returned a not guilty verdict late Thursday on both counts.
Faced with the option to plead to a misdemeanor, 'Jenilea chose the harder path — the path of principle,' according to her attorney, Adam Johnson. 'She stood firm, confident that the truth would prevail. And it did.'
Johnson said though Pena was falsely accused, 'she never lost faith in the process, in her integrity or in her God.'
'This verdict is more than a legal outcome,' Johnson said 'It is a restoration of reputation, a reaffirmation of character, and a reminder that justice — though sometimes delayed — is still possible. Jenilea and her family endured a long and painful chapter, but they did so with strength, grace and unwavering resolve.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

LINE LOSS ALERT: Lineage, Inc. Investors with Losses are Reminded of the September 30 Class Action Deadline – Contact BFA Law (NASDAQ:LINE)
LINE LOSS ALERT: Lineage, Inc. Investors with Losses are Reminded of the September 30 Class Action Deadline – Contact BFA Law (NASDAQ:LINE)

Business Upturn

time5 hours ago

  • Business Upturn

LINE LOSS ALERT: Lineage, Inc. Investors with Losses are Reminded of the September 30 Class Action Deadline – Contact BFA Law (NASDAQ:LINE)

NEW YORK, Aug. 17, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a lawsuit has been filed against Lineage, Inc. (NASDAQ: LINE) and certain of the Company's senior executives and directors for potential violations of the federal securities laws. If you invested in Lineage, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: Investors have until September 30, 2025, to ask the Court to be appointed to lead the case. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 on behalf of investors who purchased stock pursuant and/or traceable to Lineage's registration statement for its initial public offering held on or about July 25, 2024. The case is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan and is captioned City of St. Clair Shores Police and Fire Retirement System v. Lineage, Inc., et al. , No. 2:25-cv-12383. Why Was Lineage Sued Under the Federal Securities Laws? Lineage is a cold storage focused real estate investment trust ('REIT'). Through its Global Warehousing Segment, Lineage owns and operates hundreds of temperature-controlled storage facilities used by companies to store food and other perishable products. As alleged, Lineage's IPO documents touted its 'consistent cold chain demand,' which purportedly provided Lineage 'with strong cash flows even during periods of broader economic stress.' The IPO documents also represented that the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic had 'accelerated trends that . . . have the potential to be growth engines for the industry in coming years.' In truth, Lineage was allegedly in the midst of a sustained downturn, as its customers destocked excess inventory built up during the COVID-19 pandemic, and also shifted to leaner inventories on a go-forward basis and as more cold-storage supply came on line. Events Following the IPO On February 26, 2025, Lineage announced its fiscal Q4 2024 financial results, revealing that customers had been 'unwinding' previously 'overbuil[t]' levels of inventory, returning to a 'more normal seasonal pattern' that was expected to 'continue moving forward.' Lineage conducted its IPO at $78 per share. Since the IPO, the price of Lineage stock has fallen dramatically, to lows near $40 per share—approximately half the IPO price. Click here for more information: What Can You Do? If you invested in Lineage you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm. All representation is on a contingency fee basis, there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses. Submit your information by visiting: Or contact:Ross Shikowitz [email protected] 212.789.3619

Waukegan Community Unit School District 60 receiving additional revenue from state's evidence-based funding program
Waukegan Community Unit School District 60 receiving additional revenue from state's evidence-based funding program

Chicago Tribune

time7 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Waukegan Community Unit School District 60 receiving additional revenue from state's evidence-based funding program

As Gwen Polk prepares the budget she will present to the Waukegan Community Unit School District 60 Board of Education in September, she has learned that she has approximately $6.2 million in additional revenue courtesy of the State of Illinois' evidence-based funding program. Though every school district receives some of the $9.25 billion appropriated by the Illinois General Assembly, Tier 1 districts like Waukegan and North Chicago School District 187 face a harder time adequately funding education, including a smaller property tax base, and receive the most. When the Illinois General Assembly approved the final $350 million in May — $43 million was held for distribution at a later time — Lake County's 13 Tier 1 districts and the Regional Office of Education were awarded 87.5% of the county's total, with District 60 getting 38% — $6.2 million. Polk, District 60's associate superintendent for business and financial services, said the proposed budget currently sits at slightly less than $327 million. With COVID-19 federal relief funds no longer available, the additional money from the state is a big help. 'We're all affected by the fiscal cliff,' Polk said, referring to the federal money schools received nationwide. 'The increase (from the state) is going to help.' Lake County's 47 school districts and the Regional Office of Education collectively received just under $16.3 million in additional evidence-based funding earlier this month from the state, bringing its total to more than $562 million to augment their budgets. For the Waukegan public schools, Polk said evidence-based funding provides for more than half of its total revenue, which also includes property tax income. The approximate district-wide enrollment for the 2025-2026 school year is 14,000. By contrast, Barrington Community Unit School District 220, a Tier 4 district — they receive the smallest amount of evidence-based funding — with approximately 8,100 students, received just over $6.5 million. State Sen. Adriane Johnson, D-Buffalo Grove, said evidence-based funding became law in Illinois in 2017 to help all schools get to a level of funding to adequately educate youngsters. 'Education is the great equalizer,' Johnson said, 'If students' schools are adequately funded they they get the support and resources they need. This helps students in low-income areas get those resources.' Originally proposing $550 million for the final round of evidence-based funding, Johnson said that with a tight state budget, $350 million was the most she and her colleagues could get passed. In Waukegan, like most school districts, the bulk of the budget goes toward salaries and benefits for teachers, staff, and administrators. The current evidence-based funding is 4.1% more than a year ago, but not close to full adequacy. With the largest share of evidence-based funding in Lake County, District 60's adequacy level is 72%, well below the ideal amount. Barrington's adequacy level is 119%. Some of the highest adequacy levels are found where the property values are also high. Leading Lake County in adequacy is Rondout School District 72 at 255% which includes parts of Lake Forest, Lake Bluff, Green Oaks, and Mettawa. Bannockburn School District 106 is at 202% while Lake Forest High School District 115 is at 193% and Township High School District 113 serving Deerfield and Highland Park High Schools is at 190%. District 187 Principal John Price said the adequacy level in North Chicago dropped from 78% to 71%. A year ago, there was a large influx of migrant children that is not the case this year. The district is receiving $1.67 million, the second-highest amount in Lake County. Price said District 187's budget is approximately $80 million, and its evidence-based funding totals just under $40.1 million.

Dedham developer plans $500 million lab, housing project off Route 128
Dedham developer plans $500 million lab, housing project off Route 128

Boston Globe

time9 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

Dedham developer plans $500 million lab, housing project off Route 128

The project, which is tentatively called 'The Campus at 128,' has not yet been formally proposed to the town, and is in its 'infancy,' said Peter Zahka, an attorney representing Supreme Cos. But given its scale and scope, he and Petruzziello wanted to start the public process early; they gave a preliminary presentation to the Dedham Select Board last month. 'It's very important that you're here in front of us. It's not typical at all for you to be coming in ... but this is not a real typical project,' said Dedham Select Board Vice Chair Dimitria Sullivan at the July meeting. 'Something of this magnitude (is) really different than what we have seen.' Advertisement Large-scale campus development proposals have been rare in Greater Boston since the COVID-19 pandemic upended the global commercial real estate market. The Select Board last month wrestled with potential benefits and drawbacks of a project of such magnitude: while it could bring much-needed commercial tax revenue and create local jobs and housing, it would also generate substantial change for an area that has historically been a quiet suburban residential enclave. Advertisement Bringing in commercial development and multifamily apartments to a town with a majority residential tax base would be a boon to Dedham's municipal finances, particularly the town's 'operational deficit,' Rosenberger said. In Dedham, commercial owners pay more than twice the residential property tax rate: a commercial property Still, he said he's heard from neighbors concerned about potential negative environmental impacts and more traffic. 'The more commercial we can provide, the better off the residential tax base can be,' he said. ' It's human nature to be concerned about a project of this magnitude. ... There's going to be impacts that are going to be to direct abutters, to traffic, that will need to be figured out.' Early plans shown to the Select Board last month show a possible 400,000 square feet of lab space, 470,000 square feet of research and development space, and 644 apartments on the acreage. Petruzziello later told the Globe he would also plan to include at least one residential building reserved for people age 55 and older. Creating hundreds of apartments would both help ease Advertisement 'It's a project that we think, if done correctly ... could be a grand slam for everybody,' Zahka said. Also at the July meeting, abutting landowner David Newman asked what consideration Supreme Cos. has given to neighbors at this stage of the development process. 'I, frankly, don't see any consideration to the abutters,' Newman said. 'I know we're early on in the project, but you're obviously out of the gate, causing a lot of sleepless nights to most residents on our street.' Select Board Chair Erin Boles Welch said the Planning Board will hold regular meetings that would include public comment. A 2022 Town Meeting vote allowed for a planned commercial development on land within a specific residential zoning district, if that commercial development met certain restrictions. At least 60 percent of the project would need to meet the definition of 'laboratory, research and development' standards and front Route 128/Interstate 95. That vote sparked the idea that the vacant land could host something substantial, Petruzziello said. Three years ago, when Dedham voters approved future lab campuses in residential areas with highway frontage, the life-science lab market in Greater Boston was peaking in demand and development. These days, however, the landscape looks very different. In an interview, Petruzziello and Zacha said that 57 acres off Route 128 is an ideal location for a planned commercial development. The campus could be home to 'tough tech' labs, or labs for artificial intelligence or robotics companies, rather than life-science labs, Petruzziello said. Commercial real estate markets can change swiftly — and he wants to be ready with a project when tenants are once again ready to lease up. Advertisement 'It's going to take us two years to permit, and we want to be ready … when they're knocking on our door,' Petruzziello said. Petruzziello said the mix of potential uses for The Campus at 128 is still in flux, but he would aim to formally propose a project with town officials 'sometime in 2026, for sure.' Catherine Carlock can be reached at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store