TUV's Timothy Gaston's questioning of witness ruled not a breach of code
Traditional Unionist Voice (TUV) assembly member Timothy Gaston did not breach the code of conduct while questioning a witness during a meeting of the Executive Office committee, Stormont's standards watchdog has found.A complaint had been lodged by Age NI after some of its staff appeared before the committee last October.Age NI argued Gaston's line of questioning towards Kellie Turtle was inappropriate and later complained to Stormont's standards commissioner.The investigation has concluded the MLA did not breach the code but described his questions to the witness as "excessive".
In its report, published on Friday, Stormont's committee for standards and privileges said the commissioner had investigated two alleged breaches of the code of conduct.The complainant had alleged Gaston had improperly interfered with the performance of the assembly by "distracting and diverting the committee away from the matter" that the witnesses had been invited to speak about and therefore interfered with the work of the committee.Gaston had asked whether Age NI would regard it as transphobic if an elderly person in a care home requested to be assisted by someone of the same biological sex, and later made reference to previous comments on Ms Turtle's social media accounts.The commissioner, Melissa McCullough, did not uphold the complaint, explaining that whether the MLA's questions were relevant or not, Gaston's role on the committee was to ask questions of witnesses who appear before it.She also determined that Gaston had not breached another rule, which says MLAs should not subject anyone to "unreasonable and excessive personal attacks".
'Scrutiny is essential'
Ms McCullough's report stated: "It is my view that it was excessive but not unreasonable or an attack on Dr Turtle to have asked the questions."However she did find that he had "failed to observe the Respect Principle" of conduct, which says MLAs should "show respect and consideration for others at all time".Following the publication of the report, Gaston said he welcomed the findings."This ruling is a welcome affirmation of the essential role that MLAs play in scrutinising public policy—particularly on sensitive and contested matters," he said."Scrutiny is not only permitted in the assembly —it is essential. Attempting to silence MLAs for raising legitimate concerns undermines the integrity of our democracy. "All who value freedom of speech and proper scrutiny should welcome this report."The chairwoman of Stormont's standards committee, Cathy Mason, said the committee took any allegation of a breach of the code of conduct "very seriously"."It is important that members should at all times conduct themselves in a manner which will maintain and strengthen the public's trust and confidence in the integrity of the assembly and that members should show respect and consideration for others at all times."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
12 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Relief after 10 dance centres for children across England saved from cuts
Campaigners from the world of dance including Arlene Phillips and Matthew Bourne have been celebrating after a training scheme for children was saved that they say stops the art form becoming the preserve of the elite. The National Centres for Advanced Training in Dance, or National Dance CATs, work with 10- to 18-years-olds to provide them with multiple sessions of training each week, which is combined with their mainstream education. The centres use outreach programmes to attract dancers from outside of traditional backgrounds in a bid to make dance, which has had issues with elitism for decades, more diverse and equitable. High-profile dance figures feared the 10 National Dance CATs could have been scrapped after a £300,000 grant for outreach work was cut in December 2024. But on Tuesday, the Department of Education confirmed to the campaigners, including alumni, students and parents who wrote to more than 100 MPs, that funding for the centres had been secured for another 12 months. Clare Connor, chief executive of The Place and London Contemporary Dance School, said: 'We are pleased to see government have listened … we will build on this good news and work to secure the long-term future of the programme. 'This is an encouraging step in the government's commitment to safeguarding the pathways to careers in dance, and a positive signal of the recognition of dance's contribution to our thriving and growing creative sector.' Brendan Keaney, the artistic director and chief executive of DanceEast in Ipswich, said the decision to scrap the outreach funding was a 'retrograde step' that could have reversed the progress made in the last 20 years to make access to dance easier for people from ethnic minority and working-class backgrounds. 'The outreach funding was our search vehicle. It was the route into the programme – a first step into the pathway towards a career in dance,' he said. 'The National Dance CATs are sort of like little beacons across the country, where you can get high-quality specialist dance training without having to go off to a residential school. You can go to a regular school, but also get the kind of intensive training that is absolutely essential if you're going to compete as professional dancer.' Dame Arlene Phillips, said: 'Every child should have the right to pursue the arts and dance and the opportunity to reach their potential, regardless of their background or where they live.' Sir Matthew Bourne called the National Dance CATs the 'envy of international dance companies' and said without them we could enter 'a world with no more Billy – or Betty – Elliots.' The centres were introduced by the last Labour government in 2004 in an attempt to make dance more equitable. Manchester, Salford, Leeds, Newcastle upon Tyne, Swindon, Ipswich, London, Bournemouth and Exeter all host the centres that have produced dancers who have gone on to work with Wayne McGregor, Akram Khan Dance Company, BalletBoyz, Northern Ballet and Matthew Bourne's New Adventures. Earlier this year the Guardian reported that artists, directors and actors had raised the alarm about what they described as a rigged system preventing working-class talent thriving in their industries. There had been speculation before the spending review that more funding could be cut at the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) and even some suggestions DCMS itself could have been abolished – although this was dismissed as 'madness' by culture minister Chris Bryant. The Department for Education has been contacted for comment.
The Sun
24 minutes ago
- The Sun
China's London mega-embassy could be scrapped amid claims ministers rigged decision in secret deal
CHINA's bid to build a mega-embassy in the heart of London could be scrapped amid bombshell claims ministers rigged the decision behind closed doors. A senior Tory says ministers privately gave Beijing the nod before the official process began - raising fears the final call is now 'unlawful' and could be thrown out in court. 4 4 Shadow Housing Secretary Kevin Hollinrake has written to the Cabinet Secretary demanding the controversial application be halted and restarted from scratch. His explosive letter, seen by The Sun, points to a string of evasive answers to parliamentary questions, a 'call-in' of the decision from local council control, and Chinese media crowing that the UK quietly 'greenlit' the plan just 48 hours after a Government trade mission to Beijing. He warned ministers may have 'fettered' the legal independence of Deputy PM Angela Rayner - who must decide the case fairly in a quasi-judicial role - by sending political signals before any evidence was reviewed. Mr Hollinrake wrote: 'There is a clear case that the Government codes and guidance have been breached, and Government Ministers have acted unlawfully. "In turn, that opens the Government up to a judicial review. "This will be expensive and reputationally damaging to the UK Government. "I would therefore ask that the planning process is halted and started afresh from scratch." China wants to turn the five-acre Royal Mint Court site near the Tower of London - next to sensitive data cables and Whitehall offices - into its biggest embassy in Europe. The plans have been bogged down in a national security row for years, with Tower Hamlets Council rejecting them in 2022. But Chinese officials revived their bid only weeks after Labour took power. A former Foreign Office official told The Sun Chinese diplomats made it clear before the election they wouldn't come back unless the UK gave them quiet guarantees it would be approved. The ex-official said: 'They wouldn't have come back unless the UK signalled it would be waved through." Chinese state-linked media reports from Baidu also show how Beijing interpreted a visit by Chancellor Rachel Reeves as a breakthrough in the row back in January. One article reads: "After six years of diplomatic deadlock, within merely 48 hours a monumental change has taken place: the English/British government has clearly expressed support for China to build a new embassy in London." The reports came as Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Home Secretary Yvette Cooper also sent letters to the Planning Inspectorate backing the plan. Top barrister Richard Harwood KC told The Sun the process could now be challenged in court if ministers gave the impression it was a done deal. He said: 'If the judge thinks that the government have given impression that they just want to approve it for political, in terms of international political reasons, rather than the planning merits and we were signalling that to the Chinese government in advance, then there's clearly a strong chance that the court would find that is unlawful." On the Government's move to take over the decision from Tower Hamlets, he added: "It's relatively unusual to get an application called in before the council decided what it was going to do about it." The Shadow Housing Secretary also revealed how the Cabinet Office has refused to release records of key meetings, calls and emails between Chinese diplomats, ministers, No10 and the Foreign Office - despite admitting they exist. Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick, who has campaigned against China's bid for the embassy, blasted: "This whole process is a fiasco. "Starmer, Lammy and Cooper are more interested in bending backwards for a hostile state than defending the security of British people." And Luke de Pulford, head of cross-party group IPAC, added: "If assurances over the mega-embassy have been given to Beijing, the whole process should be aborted and a public inquiry announced. "Beijing said themselves they would not apply again unless given the green light by government, and those of us opposing the plan have often felt like planning law was just window dressing for a done deal. "Time to drag this murky embassy business into the light.' The row comes as the US and Dutch governments have both raised alarm over the embassy's location at Royal Mint Court, near critical data infrastructure in the capital. A spokesperson for the Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government said: "Planning casework decisions are at a matter for MHCLG. "Ministers hold a quasi-judicial role in the planning process and adhere to the published propriety guidance when taking decisions.'
The Guardian
26 minutes ago
- The Guardian
UK officials hopeful that US will start lifting car tariffs this week
UK officials are hopeful the US will begin lifting tariffs on British cars as soon as this week after the British trade secretary meets his US counterpart in London. Jonathan Reynolds is due to meet Howard Lutnick, the US commerce secretary, on Tuesday evening to discuss the deal to lower US tariffs on cars, steel and aluminium. Downing Street is hopeful that the implementation of the deal will begin this week, according to two people with knowledge of the discussions. The aim is to secure a proclamation from Donald Trump this week that would kickstart its implementation, a government official with knowledge of the process said. The US commerce department would then be tasked with enforcing the tariff reductions on UK goods. Officials expect tariffs on British cars to be reduced first because the process is less complex than with aluminium and steel, according to the two people briefed on progress in the talks. Trump and Keir Starmer announced a 'historic' trade agreement last month that promised relief for key British industries affected by US import taxes. Trump agreed to reduce his 25% aluminium and steel tariffs to zero and slash his 25% tariff to 10% for up to 100,000 British cars a year. Two weeks ago Trump doubled US tariffs on steel and aluminium to 50% but said the UK would stay at the 25% rate until 9 July, pending enforcement of the deal and assuming that the British government 'complies with relevant aspects'. Ministers and negotiators are now racing to thrash out the details before that deadline. A trade department source stressed that the government could not predict the actions of the US administration. The UK is the only country so far that has struck an agreement with the US, though businesses have yet to feel its benefits. Starmer told MPs last Wednesday that he hoped the agreement with the US could come into effect 'in just a couple of weeks'. Cars are the UK's biggest export to the US, worth about £9bn last year. The value of the UK's steel and aluminium exports is much smaller, at about £700m a year, but the US is an important market for them. Sign up to First Thing Our US morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion One of the remaining questions for British ministers is how the quota of 100,000 cars will be allocated. Options include a free-for-all system until the quota is met, splitting it into 25,000 car exports a quarter, or earmarking a certain number of exports for small and medium-sized manufacturers. One issue the US government is concerned about is steel from other countries being processed in the UK and then exported to the US at a 0% tariff. This has triggered fears that the deal could end up excluding the UK's biggest steelmaker, Indian-owned Tata Steel, because of the origin of some of its products. Lutnick is in London for trade talks with China that aim to resolve mounting tensions between the world's two largest economies. Washington and Beijing agreed a temporary truce over tariffs last month but each country has since accused the other of breaching the deal.
