logo
Trump says that he 'will not convince or beg' Iran to enter nuclear negotiations

Trump says that he 'will not convince or beg' Iran to enter nuclear negotiations

Yahoo4 days ago
Sources told The Jerusalem Post that Trump said that Iran was still welcome at the table, but that the US would not convince them to negotiate.
US President Donald Trump has recently stated in private conversations that the United States has decided to stop trying to persuade Iran to engage in talks over its nuclear program.
'If they want to come—they are welcome. But we are not going to try and convince or beg them to do so,' the president said in several discussions, according to two sources who spoke with The Jeursalem Post.
Trump's remarks come after a prolonged effort by his administration to convince Tehran to hold negotiations, insisting that any deal must prohibit Iran from enriching uranium.
Iran refuses to give up uranium enrichment
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi reiterated Iran's stance in an interview with Fox News, saying, 'We cannot give up our right to enrich uranium.' He also noted that the attacks by Israel and the US had caused significant damage to Iran's nuclear facilities.
In response, President Trump posted on Truth Social: 'If necessary—we will strike the nuclear sites again.'
On Friday, a meeting is set to take place in Istanbul between Iran's deputy foreign minister and the deputy foreign ministers of Britain, France, and Germany. European countries have warned Iran that if a new nuclear agreement is not reached by August, the UN Security Council will trigger the snapback mechanism, reimposing significant sanctions on Iran.
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's CIA chief teases critical new evidence in long-running Russiagate 'hoax'
Trump's CIA chief teases critical new evidence in long-running Russiagate 'hoax'

Fox News

time2 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Trump's CIA chief teases critical new evidence in long-running Russiagate 'hoax'

CIA Director John Ratcliffe suggested Sunday that the statute of limitations would not likely interfere with prosecutions against key figures implicated in Russiagate, telling "Sunday Morning Futures" host Maria Bartiromo that some testimonies that propelled the Trump-Russia collusion narrative occurred within the last five years. He also hinted at more evidence to come. "John Brennan testified to John Durham in August of 2020. He also testified to the House Oversight Committee in 2022. Hillary Clinton testified before John Durham under oath in 2022. James Comey testified before the Senate Committee in September 2020. "All of that's within the last five years and much of that testimony is frankly completely inconsistent with what our underlying intelligence that is about to be declassified in the Durham Annex [reflects]," he said, teasing the release of the "classified annex" of the John Durham report. Ratcliffe said that intelligence will showcase intent to accelerate the Steele Dossier into intelligence community assessments and as the basis for Crossfire Hurricane. The "Steele Dossier" was authored by ex-British intelligence officer Christopher Steele and was funded by Clinton's presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee through the law firm Perkins Coie. Bartiromo pressed on, asking Ratcliffe to clarify whether there is still an opportunity for indictments, potential prosecutions and "accountability" for Brennan, Comey and Clinton, to which he replied, "That's why I've made the referrals that I have." "DNI Gabbard has made referrals. And we're going to continue to share the intelligence that would support the ability of our Department of Justice to bring fair and just claims against those who have perpetrated this hoax against the American people and this stain on our country." A spokesperson for Clinton did not respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment in time for publication. Comey and Brennan did not respond to Fox News Digital's prior requests for comment regarding the Trump administration's accusations. Former prosecutor Andy McCarthy told Fox News last week that following through on legal action against former President Barack Obama, who was also mentioned by name in the accusations brought forth by the Trump administration, would be a tall order. "The scandal here... is they had a legitimate reason to investigate Russia's meddling in the election and what they did was they used that as a pretext to basically investigate Trump to spy on his presidency and to try to make him an ineffective president," McCarthy told "Fox & Friends" last Thursday. "That's why it's a terrible political dirty trick," he continued. "The issue again is… is it prosecutable? And I just don't see it." Former President Obama dismissed the Trump administration's claims with a statement. Congressional Democrats have also railed against the claims. Rep. Jim Himes, D-Conn., a ranking member on the House Intelligence Committee, for instance, criticized Gabbard's claims as "baseless." Virginia Sen. Mark Warner, ranking Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, accused Gabbard of "weaponizing her position to amplify the president's election conspiracy theories."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store