Prime Minister to visit Canada for trade and security talks
The Times reported that the pair will meet on June 14, ahead of the G7 leaders' summit in Alberta, against the backdrop of growing concerns about Donald Trump's trade war against its northern neighbour and repeated threats to annex Canada.
Mr Trump has repeatedly suggested turning Canada into its 51st state and imposed tariffs that led to retaliation from Ottawa.
The Canadian prime minister made the trip to Washington DC last month in a bid to ease tensions, but was dealt a blow last week when the US president doubled tariffs on steel imports.
Only the UK was spared from the White House's tariff hike, thanks to a deal struck between the two countries.
President Donald Trump signs executive orders in the Oval Office (Evan Vucci/AP)
Levies will remain at 25% for imports from the UK, however Britain could still be subject to the higher 50% rate from July.
Sir Keir Starmer's trade pact with the US, struck last month, included relief on the steel and aluminium tariffs, but the implementation is yet to be finalised.
The Prime Minister's trip follows a royal visit by the King, who warned Canada is facing a 'critical moment' in its history, with the world a 'more dangerous and uncertain place' in a speech to open the nation's parliament.
Charles delivered an address written by the Canadian government that said Mr Carney's administration would bond with 'reliable trading partners and allies', a move that follows Mr Trump's economic tactics.
Many Canadians have seen the King's two-day visit to Ottawa as a symbol of support for the nation that has faced the unwanted attention of Mr Trump.
Charles told the parliament 'self-determination' was among a number of values Canada held dear and the government was 'determined to protect'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
15 minutes ago
- Reuters
US aluminium tariffs threaten scrap clash with European Union
LONDON, June 9 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's move to double tariffs on aluminium imports heightens the risk of a full-blown scrap war with the European Union. Although they are supposed to be blanket tariffs with no exceptions or exemptions, there is one significant gap in the tariff wall. Aluminium scrap is explicitly excluded on the grounds it constitutes a key raw material for U.S. manufacturers. The Trump administration's decision to lift aluminium tariffs to 25% effective the start of March has already caused U.S. imports of recyclable material to rise. This week's doubling of the tariff rate to 50% could turn the import flow into a flood. The European Union, which is mulling export duties on aluminium recyclables to stop what it terms "scrap leakage", is coming under pressure to move sooner rather than later. The U.S. Midwest aluminium premium has rocketed to a record $1,325 per metric ton after Wednesday's doubling-down on import tariffs. That's the price U.S. buyers will pay over and above the international price traded on the London Metal Exchange (LME), currently $2,430 per ton for cash metal. What once reflected the cost of transport to get metal to the U.S. Midwest manufacturing hub is now a tariff premium, capturing the fracture of the global aluminium pricing structure. U.S. consumers of aluminium goods will ultimately foot the bill but mid-stream processors are likely to do well. Fabricators converting raw metal to semi-finished goods such as can sheet were the prime beneficiaries of the first Trump administration's 10% tariffs, according to a report by consultancy Harbor Aluminum commissioned by the Beer Institute. Mid-stream processors passed on the tariff, even if the raw material was domestically sourced scrap, Harbor found. The new tariffs will incentivise fabricators not only to maximise their domestic purchases of scrap but to tap overseas markets, where U.S. buyers can now outbid just about anyone else for available material. U.S. imports of aluminium recyclable materials jumped to over 80,000 tons in March, the highest monthly volume since 2022. There were sharp increases in supply from Canada and Mexico, the two largest and nearest suppliers to the U.S. market. However, the tariff differential has started to draw material out of Europe, according to the European Aluminium association. Exports from EU countries to the United States spiked in the first quarter of the year, it said. They are only going to accelerate as the transatlantic price gap widens after this week's doubling of tariffs. The EU is facing a "full-blown scrap crisis", according to the association. Director General Paul Voss called on the European Commission to immediately impose a corresponding duty on scrap exports to the United States. The Commission has already identified high aluminium scrap exports as a key hurdle in its ambition to meet the bloc's "Circular Economy" targets. A March "Action Plan", opens new tab for both the aluminium and steel sectors promised a decision by the third quarter of this year on suitable trade measures, including reciprocal export tariffs on countries "that apply unfair subsidies" to their recycling industries. There's now a sense of urgency that some sort of defensive trade barrier will be required to stem export flows. Aluminium scrap is a highly globalised marketplace but that looks set to change as Europe figures out how to stop the loss of raw material to the United States. Caught in the middle of this tug-of-war is China, the world's largest aluminium scrap buyer. The country has imported 1.8 million tons in each of the last two years and although it sources much of its material from Asia, it is a significant buyer of both U.S. and European end-of-life scrap. Beijing last year relaxed the purity rules on imports of both copper and aluminium scrap to encourage greater domestic recycling. This is particularly important for China's aluminium sector, where production of primary metal is now close to the government's mandated capacity cap, meaning supply growth will have to come from recycling. Chinese buyers are facing the twin challenge of export restrictions in Europe and competition with U.S. players in their own Asian supply chain. The scrap wars have only just begun. The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters. Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X, opens new tab.
Reuters
15 minutes ago
- Reuters
South African rand stable ahead of US-China trade talks
JOHANNESBURG, June 9 (Reuters) - The South African rand was steady in early trade on Monday, as markets awaited pivotal U.S.-China trade talks set to take place later in the day that could ease tensions between the two nations. At 0621 GMT the rand traded at 17.7450 against the dollar , near Friday's closing level. Three top aides of U.S. President Donald Trump will meet with their Chinese counterparts in London later in the day to discuss the trade dispute between the two countries, a standoff that has kept global markets on edge. Like other risk-sensitive currencies, the rand often takes cues from global drivers like U.S. policy and economic data in addition to local factors. Domestic investors this week will look to manufacturing (ZAMAN=ECI), opens new tab and mining (ZAMNG=ECI), opens new tab data to gauge the health of Africa's most industrialised economy. Attention remains on the country's long-delayed budget after Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana, in his third attempt at passing it, made only minor adjustments to spending plans and deficit projections. On Wednesday the National Assembly is expected to debate the revised fiscal framework adopted by a key parliamentary committee last week. South Africa's benchmark 2035 government bond was also flat in early deals, with the yield at 10.075%.
The Herald Scotland
18 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
president donald trump deploys national guard california
"Presidents set precedents and this one is escalatory, incendiary, and could come back to haunt all Americans," Sen. Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, said June 8. Trump's order gives 2,000 soldiers the authority to protect federal property like office buildings but no power to arrest civilians, according to a spokesperson for U.S. Northern Command, which is directing the operation. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth also has put an active-duty Marine unit on orders to prepare to deploy to California. The 300 members of the California National Guard who deployed Sunday to three sites in Los Angeles appeared to face little in the way of organized opposition, according to a Defense official who was not authorized to speak publicly. Their presence was a performative show of force, the official said, as their authority is clearly restricted. Most of the Guard soldiers are military police officers whose day jobs typically are in civilian law enforcement. They understand the need for restraint, the official said. If they see a protester vandalize federal property, a Social Security Administration office, for example, they can detain the suspect and turn them over to local police. Trump's order fell short of invoking the Insurrection Act, an 18th century law that gives the president authority to use the military to enforce federal law, suppress a rebellion or protect a group's civil rights if the state does not do so. It was last invoked in 1992 during by President George HW Bush at the request of California's governor in response to riots after police officers involved in the beating of Rodney King had been acquitted. Trump and Hegseth's unilateral action over Newsom's objection sets dangerous precedent, Reed said in a statement. "It is crucial that decisions of this magnitude are made with transparency, restraint, and respect for constitutional balance," Reed said. "The President and Defense Secretary should immediately stand down these troops and Congress should reject this dangerous overreaction."
