DJB withdrew water bill rebate over rainwater harvesting violation in Dwarka societies, NGT told
The water agency has also written to the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) to impose an environmental compensation (EC) on such societies for polluting the groundwater table.
NGT has been hearing a plea since February 2023, after a Dwarka resident alleged that RWH pits in the sub-city were leading to groundwater contamination. A joint inspection by an NGT-appointed expert committee in May 2023, which included members from DPCC and DJB, had initially found RWH pits at 235 societies in Dwarka, with high ammoniacal nitrogen and high total dissolved solids found in 180 of these societies. A subsequent inspection, as per a report dated March 27, had found 115 societies had faecal coliform, with another four societies not having a RWH pit operational.
'That DJB…as per the findings of the survey conducted, has sent a letter to DPCC dated January 1, 2025 for imposing EC to the defaulters,' said a submission dated July 22, apprising the tribunal of action taken so far. It said on the same day, a report was sent to the director (revenue) for imposing a penalty too.
'That Director (Revenue) on March 24 informed that the 10% rebate or RwH in water bills in the said 119 societies where RwH system was not found to be functional, has been withdrawn...' the report added, stating as a punitive action, each of the 119 societies was warned that their water supply will be disconnected if corrective action was not taken.
Since then, 55 societies have responded, the water utility said. 'Among these, eight did not have faecal coliform and ammoniacal nitrogen. In 19 of these, faecal coliform was still found. In another nine societies, pits were found dry and samples will be collected in the monsoon season,' it said, adding that 12 societies had sought additional time. In two societies, RWH pits were dysfunctional, and in five, rectification work was ongoing.
The Delhi government had made RWH systems mandatory in 2012 and as per law, non-compliance can attract a penalty of 1.5 times the water bill amount. A 10% rebate is given on the water bill if an RWH system is installed. It is also mandatory for government buildings in Delhi to have RWH. However, maintenance of these structures has long been a problem.
DJB in March last year also issued an order, asking water consumers to ensure the run-off of waste water from balconies and parking spaces does not contaminate the groundwater through RWH pits, stating failure to do so may lead to withdrawal of the rebate provided to users.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Bageshwar mining poses grave danger, govt panel says in alarming report
1 2 3 Dehradun: Unregulated mining in Bageshwar has triggered slope instability, spring depletion and land subsidence, creating conditions that mirror those seen in Jyotirmath (earlier named Joshimath) before its collapse, a technical committee told National Green Tribunal (NGT) on July 30 in an alarming report. The expert panel, constituted by the govt, warned that the region faced an impending disaster unless immediate corrective measures were taken to prevent further ecological and geological damage. The committee included experts from the Geological Survey of India, the Uttarakhand Landslide Mitigation and Management Centre, the Department of Geology and Mining, and the Indian Institute of Remote Sensing. It surveyed 61 soapstone mines across Bageshwar, Kanda and Dugnakuri tehsils, and found unsafe excavation practices such as vertical cutting without benches, direct dumping of mining debris into natural drainage, and encroachment near homes, fields and springs. The report flagged that these activities had made the terrain extremely prone to landslides and rockfalls, especially with the district falling under seismic zone V — the highest risk zone for earthquakes. The panel's report drew comparisons with the Jan 2023 Jyotirmath subsidence, where over 800 homes developed cracks due to poor drainage and construction in a geologically fragile zone. The committee said, "A Jyotirmath-type crisis is in the making if the current practices continue." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Access all TV channels anywhere, anytime Techno Mag Learn More Undo The report also noted that there was inadequate documentation of slope modifications and no mapping of water resources, making regulation difficult and ineffective. Residents of Kanda-Kanyal valley, where a concentration of mines operates, had reported recurring landslides, cracks in houses, declining crop yields and drying of water sources. The team observed ground deformation and found that several springs had either deteriorated in quality or stopped flowing altogether. Satellite data confirmed ground shifts near mining sites. In some locations, mining activity extended within metres of houses and farmlands, violating environmental norms and compounding the risk of slope failure during monsoon. The panel recommended mandatory slope stability assessments, scientific monitoring using local seismic networks and satellite data, digitisation of mining leases, and mapping of local water sources. It also suggested enforcement of buffer zones between mines and human settlements, and holding leaseholders accountable for violations. NGT, which is hearing the matter, directed that mining must not resume in geotectonically sensitive areas unless a seismic study is completed and reviewed by a competent body. In Dec 2024, a court-appointed inspection team had flagged "official obstruction" during its visit to Bageshwar. The commissioners informed Uttarakhand high court that officers on site attempted to interfere with their inquiry, offered bribes, and discouraged villagers from speaking. Following this, HC stayed all mining activity in Bageshwar and later summoned DG of mines safety in Feb to explain why heavy machinery had been permitted despite existing court orders. Police later seized 124 excavators, and the state pollution control board suspended clearances for over 100 mines while issuing notices to 54 operators. During a hearing on June 9, HC directed GSI and the Central Ground Water Board to conduct a field inspection after villagers reported water accumulation in abandoned mine pits ahead of monsoon. The court noted that these artificial ponds, combined with choked natural drains, were increasing slope instability and could lead to widespread damage if not addressed before heavy rains. It also pointed out that many low-income families remained in affected areas, while those who could afford it had already moved out.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
1,855 trees cut without permission in Mohali: DFO to NGT
Mohali: The district forest officer (DFO) has informed the National Green Tribunal (NGT) that 1,855 trees were cut in Mohali area without mandatory permission. He informed that this happened outside the jurisdiction of the forest department and the land in question was not classified as forest land. In a written reply submitted to the NGT, DFO Kanwar Deep Singh clarified that the land where the felling occurred falls under a non-forest category, and thus, the forest department had no authority to regulate or prevent cutting of trees on it. "The forest department does not have jurisdiction over the said land since it is not a forest area," stated the DFO. The issue came to light in the wake of a petition filed by the Environment Protection Society, through its president, Harbhajan Singh Minhas and Save My Trees Foundation coordinator, Daljit Singh. The complaint raised serious environmental concerns over large-scale felling of trees in the district. According to the DFO's report, although the department was asked to assess the trees on non-forest land, permission for felling of trees was not granted. "It was clearly mentioned in our correspondence that the assessment does not constitute special permission or a No Objection Certificate (NoC). As per procedure, permission must be obtained from the competent authority of the respective department," the reply stated. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Could Be the Best Time to Trade Gold in 5 Years IC Markets Learn More Undo The forest officer assessed the reserve value of the felled trees and 21 poles at around Rs 69 lakh. He proposed that this amount may be imposed as environmental compensation under the Environmental Protection Act, 1986. However, he noted that enforcement of environmental compensation lies within the purview of the Punjab State Pollution Control Board or the department of environment, not the forest department. "As provisions related to environmental compensation fall under the Environment Protection Act, the agency concerned may be directed to take necessary steps," the DFO stated. In a strong recommendation for environmental restoration, the forest department has suggested planting 10 times the number of saplings in place of the cut trees. "To ensure environmental protection and prevent pollution, we advise that 18,550 tree saplings be planted. These can be procured from forest department nurseries," said the DFO. The matter now rests with the NGT and environmental authorities, with further directions awaited on compensatory measures and accountability of agencies involved in the unauthorised tree felling. MSID:: 123077325 413 | Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Citing court rulings, govt says Curchorem STP doesn't need green clearance
Margao: State govt has defended the construction of the sewage treatment plant at Curchorem without conducting an environmental impact assessment (EIA), pointing to several court rulings that it claims exempt STPs from such requirements. In a written reply to a legislative assembly question by MLA Viresh Borkar, environment minister Aleixo Sequeira has categorically stated that 'there is no requirement for environmental clearance (EC) for STPs under the EIA Notification 2006.' The STP at Curchorem courted controversy after it emerged through an RTI reply in June that the Goa State Pollution Control Board (GSPCB) had no records of any EIA being conducted for the STP. Govt's position rests primarily on three judicial orders. The most significant is a National Green Tribunal (NGT) decision in Kehar Singh versus State of Haryana of Sep 2013, which govt claims clarified that STPs don't require environmental clearance under the 2006 EIA notification. Further, the reply refers to two more recent cases — an NGT ruling in Undir Paryavaran Saurakshan Manch and others versus the Goa Coastal Zone Management Authority and others of Jan 2019, and a high court judgment in Jairaj Naik and others versus the Sewerage and Infrastructural Development Corporation of Goa Ltd of Nov 2019. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Most Beautiful Female Athletes Right Now Undo However, this contradicts the earlier NGT judgment cited by activists (Application No. 124 of 2013), which mandated prior environmental clearance for the construction of STPs, particularly for combined effluent treatment plants handling more than 10% industrial contributions. Nevertheless, govt's reply has left considerable information gaps. The reply states that details regarding water quality assessments, public consultations, and environmental monitoring are 'not available' or 'not applicable' due to govt's position that no EIA was required. Govt stance notwithstanding, activists maintain that the STP's location on the Zuari riverbank is fraught with environmental red flags. Activist and Curchorem resident Aditya Dessai earlier pointed out that the project resulted in 'large-scale destruction of mangroves through filling of the riverbed within the high tide line'. Besides, the sewage line passing through the Cacora industrial estate also raises questions about whether the facility should be classified as a combined effluent treatment plant, which would bring into play stricter EIA requirements under the NGT guidelines. Further in its reply, govt has acknowledged receiving at least one complaint regarding the STP construction and operation, with the matter currently 'under consideration' and 'the decision pending'. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
