You Can Now Turn Text Prompts Into Lego Designs With LegoGPT AI
Summary
Researchers at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) have unveiled a groundbreaking newAImodel called LegoGPT, designed to bridge the gap between natural language and physical creation. This innovative system can transform text prompts into fully buildable LEGO models, specifically focusing on vehicles.
Imagine simply typing 'a red sports car with big wheels' or 'a blue spaceship with pointy wings,' and having the AI instantly generate instructions for assembling it with LEGO bricks. That's the promise of LegoGPT. The system operates by understanding natural language and processing and interpret the descriptive elements of a text prompt. It then translates the words into LEGO geometry, turning concepts into a 3D LEGO model, taking into account the unique constraints and connectivity of LEGO bricks. It provides step-by-step instructions that a human builder can follow to construct the physical model. According todezeen, the team, which is led by Ava Pun, a PhD student at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) and one of the study's coauthors, hope to expand the AI model beyond LEGOs to give it real-world applications to help 'architects design structurally sound buildings or designers create custom furniture.' Pun shared with the publication, 'We wanted to bring user imagination into the physical world. Imagine if you could type in a prompt or show us a picture of a chair, and boom – we could actually make that product and ship it to you in a week or two.'
This development is a significant leap in AI's ability to translate abstract ideas into tangible forms. It showcases advancements in generative AI, computational design, and robotics, demonstrating how AI can aid in creative design and engineering processes. While currently focused on vehicles, the potential applications for LEGO-GPT are vast, from educational tools to rapid prototyping and even assisting LEGO designers themselves. It's a playful yet powerful example of AI moving beyond virtual spaces into the realm of physical construction.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
2 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
This ChatGPT ‘memory hack' changes everything — use these prompts to make it remember you
If you've ever found yourself reintroducing yourself, your tone preferences or even something as basic as your name to ChatGPT, you're not alone. While OpenAI's chatbot is famous for being smart, helpful and shockingly conversational, it's not always great at remembering what matters to you, which is why you might want to teach it. The good news is that ChatGPT actually has a memory feature that's smarter than most people realize, and there are a few tricks you can use to make it remember exactly what you want. Here's how to unlock ChatGPT's memory, plus a few sneaky hacks to get it acting like a real personal assistant. ChatGPT's memory is designed to remember helpful facts about you including your name, your job, your writing style and even your goals. Knowing these things can help the AI tailor responses over time. Think of it like your AI assistant building a mental file cabinet with your preferences inside. OpenAI first rolled out memory to GPT-4o users in early 2024, and now it's automatically turned on for most ChatGPT Plus users. But unless you're actively using it, or customizing it, you might not get the full benefit. To check if memory is on, go to Settings → Personalization → Memory. From there, you can view, edit or wipe everything ChatGPT has remembered about you. One of the simplest ways to store a fact in ChatGPT's memory is to literally prompt it to remember something. For example: Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. If memory is enabled, ChatGPT will usually respond with: 'Got it. I'll remember that for future chats.' If not, it may ask for permission to store that information. I've noticed that when I've asked ChatGPT to remember things, it doesn't always remember the first time. Sometimes, not even the second time. If you run into this problem, stay persistent and keep reminding ChatGPT to remember something until it actually does example, I once used ChatGPT Vision to help my mom match fabric for a project. From then on, ChatGPT thought I was a quilter. I had to tell the chatbot to forget that (much to my mom's dismay, I'm sure).Pro tip: You can also say 'Forget that' or 'Update my memory' if something changes — like your job or preferred tone. If you want to be sure it does not remember something, you can also use the temporary chat feature. Even if memory is off or you aren't a Plus subscriber, you can still simulate long-term memory using what I call the context chaining trick. Here's how: Start your prompt with: 'For the rest of this conversation, assume I'm a second grade teacher working on an end-of-year project for my students.' This doesn't persist across sessions, but it works surprisingly well for one-off tasks or multi-step projects. OpenAI makes it easy to see what ChatGPT has remembered — and yes, you should check it occasionally. Just type: 'What do you remember about me?' It'll respond with a summary of the info it has on file, like: 'You're a mom of three who juggles work, parenting and writing with a good sense of humor. You're no stranger to trampoline parks, fourth grade homework chaos or PTA drama. You're based in New Jersey, drive a Jeep and sometimes test AI tools for personal life (like IEP meetings or canceling gym memberships).' Here are a few fast rules to get the most out of ChatGPT's memory: ChatGPT won't magically know your preferences unless you teach it, but with memory, it can get surprisingly close. Whether you're writing a novel, planning a trip or just tired of repeating yourself, these memory hacks can turn ChatGPT into a genuinely helpful sidekick.
Tom's Guide
17 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
DeepSeek's lateset update is a serious threat to OpenAI and Google — here's why
Chinese AI startup DeepSeek is quickly gaining momentum in the global AI race. The company just released DeepSeek-R1-0528, proving once again that this is a bot to watch. The powerful update is already challenging rivals like OpenAI's GPT-4o and Google's Gemini. The new version delivers major performance gains in complex reasoning, coding and logic, which are areas where even top-tier models often stumble. With its open-source license and lightweight training demands, DeepSeek is proving to be faster and smarter. 🚀 DeepSeek-R1-0528 is here!🔹 Improved benchmark performance🔹 Enhanced front-end capabilities🔹 Reduced hallucinations🔹 Supports JSON output & function calling✅ Try it now: No change to API usage — docs here: 29, 2025 In recent benchmark tests, DeepSeek-R1-0528 achieved an 87.5% accuracy on the AIME 2025 test. This is a notable jump from the previous model's 70%. It also improved significantly on the LiveCodeBench coding benchmark, moving from 63.5% to 73.3%, and more than doubled its performance on the notoriously difficult 'Humanity's Last Exam,' rising from 8.5% to 17.7%. For those unfamiliar with what these benchmark tests mean, essentially, they suggest DeepSeek's model can keep pace with, and in some cases outperform, its Western rivals in specific domains. Unlike OpenAI and Google, which tend to guard their best models behind APIs and paywalls, DeepSeek is keeping things open. R1-0528 is available under the MIT License, giving developers the freedom to use, modify, and deploy the model however they like. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. The update also adds support for JSON outputs and function calling, making it easier to build apps and tools that plug directly into the model. This open approach not only appeals to researchers and developers but also makes DeepSeek an increasingly attractive option for startups and companies seeking alternatives to closed platforms. One of the more impressive aspects of DeepSeek's rise is how efficiently it's building these models. According to the company, earlier versions were trained in just 55 days on roughly 2,000 GPUs at a cost of $5.58 million, just a fraction of what it typically costs to train models at this scale in the U.S. This focus on resource-efficient training is a key differentiator, especially as the cost and carbon footprint of large language models continue to draw scrutiny. DeepSeek's latest release is a sign of shifting dynamics in the AI world. With strong reasoning abilities, transparent licensing, and a faster development cycle, DeepSeek is positioning itself as a serious competitor to industry heavyweights. And as the global AI landscape becomes more multipolar, models like R1-0528 could play a major role in shaping not just what AI can do, but who gets to build it, control it and benefit from it.
Business Insider
a day ago
- Business Insider
ChatGPT is making us weird
The other day, my family group chat lit up when I posed a question about whether it's important to say "please" and "thank you" to ChatGPT when asking it to conduct a niche search or plan out an itinerary. My mother, ever a stickler for manners, said she makes a conscious choice to behave in this way. A choice she said she makes to "keep myself human." Another loved one later admitted she's been leaning on the chatbot for guidance as she navigates a tricky moment in her marriage. And I couldn't resist my temptation to ask ChatGPT to evaluate how attractive I am after The Washington Post reported that people were asking it for beauty advice. (It said I have "strong, expressive features," then told me to stand up straighter and smile more.) But I know it's not just my immediate circle: ChatGPT is making everyone behave a little strange. As large language models become fixtures of our digital lives, the ways we engage with them reveal a society in flux, where machines aren't only mimicking human interaction but quietly altering the expectations and norms that govern it. Business Insider spoke with four professionals who interact with chatbots like OpenAI's GPT models in radically different ways — a sociologist, a psychologist, a digital etiquette coach, and a sex therapist — to explore how the rise of AI is changing how we see each other, how we view ourselves, as well as how it's disrupting our manners and intimate lives. The conversations centered on ChatGPT, since OpenAI's chatbot is quickly becoming the AI world's equivalent of what Google is to search engines, but the professionals said similar conclusions could be drawn for Meta AI, Microsoft Copilot, Anthropic's Claude, or any other large language model on the market today. A change in the social contract Digital etiquette consultant and author Elaine Swann said that society has needed to adapt to new social cues as each wave of technology has changed our lives. While we've largely collectively agreed that it's all right to use shorthand in personal email correspondence and rude to take a cellphone call on speakerphone in public, we're still establishing a social code for how to interact with AI bots and agents. Kelsey Vlamis, a senior reporter at Business Insider, said she's started seeing a chatbot-related change in her personal life. While on vacation in Italy, she said her husband found himself impatient with their tour guide, consciously having to keep himself from interrupting with questions "since that's how he talks to ChatGPT when he is trying to learn something." Of course, he had to hold himself back, Vlamis added, "since that is not, in fact, how we talk to human beings." Since AI has gained momentum, social media is full of posts asking whether it's appropriate for a spouse to use ChatGPT to write a love note to their partner, or for a worker to rely on an AI agent to fill out a job application on their behalf. The jury's still out on situations like these. "AI is certainly smarter now, which is great for us, but at the same time, we have to be very careful that it doesn't substitute basically our judgment or empathy," Swann said. "We have to be careful with it, not just utilizing it as our sole source of information, but also making sure that we put a mirror up to ourselves in how we use it, and running its suggestions by people that we know and care about." Maintaining our baseline levels of respect — not just for each other, but the world around us — is also key, Swann said. After OpenAI CEO Sam Altman posted on X in late April that it costs "tens of millions of dollars" for the company to process niceties like "please" and "thank you" directed toward ChatGPT, she stressed that it's up to the company to make processing those statements more cost-effective, not up to users to stop being polite. "This is the world that we create for ourselves," Swann said. "And AI should also understand that this is how we speak to one another, because we're teaching it to give that back to us." Altman, for his part, said the massive amount of funds used on polite requests toward ChatGPT is money "well spent." Exacerbated biases Laura Nelson, an associate professor of sociology at the University of British Columbia, said that because the world's most popular chatbots are created by American companies, written by US-based programmers, and trained primarily on content written in the English language, they have deeply entrenched biases that are often seen in Western cultures. "It's really important to keep in mind that it's a particular world view that these algorithms have based their training data on," Nelson said. So if you ask ChatGPT to draw you a picture of a plate of breakfast, it'll conjure typical North American foods: bacon, eggs, sausage, and toast. It describes a bottle of wine as a "classic and thoughtful gift," though in many cultures, alcohol is rarely consumed, and a bottle would make a tone-deaf present. While those examples are relatively harmless, the bots also exacerbate more insidious and potentially damaging biases. A 2021 study published in Psychology & Marketing found that people prefer AI to be anthropomorphized as female in their devices, like it is in most pop culture representations, because it makes the technology seem more human. However, the study found that preference may be inadvertently entrenching the objectification of women. There have also been numerous reports that lonely, mostly male, users may verbally abuse or degrade their AI companions. Business Insider previously reported that artificial intelligence is also rife with discriminatory bias due to the data it's trained on, and ChatGPT in particular showed racial bias when screening résumés for jobs, over-selecting Asian women candidates and under-selecting Black men. While these biases may not immediately change our behavior, they can impact our thinking and the ways we operate as a society, Nelson said. And if ChatGPT or other AI applications are implemented into our decision-making, whether in our personal lives, in the workplace, or at the legal level, it'll have wide-reaching effects we haven't even considered yet. "There's just no question that AI is going to reflect our biases — our collective biases — back to it," Nelson said. "But there are a lot of people interacting with these bots, and we have no data to suggest what the global trends are, or the effects it's going to have long-term. It's a tricky thing to get a handle on." A largely untraced social shift Concrete data about the societal shift caused by AI is hard to come by, but the companies behind the tech know something is happening. Many of them have dedicated teams to figure out what effect their technology has on users, but their publicly available findings aren't peer-reviewed like a typical scientific study would be. OpenAI announced that a recent update to the GPT-4o model had a hiccup. It was "noticeably more sycophantic" than prior models, the company said in a press release. While it passed OpenAI's self-described "vibe check" and safety testing, they rolled it back after realizing its programming to please the user could fuel anger, urge impulsive actions, or reinforce negative emotions "in ways that were not intended." The company's announcement highlighted that OpenAI is keenly aware that the various AI applications gaining momentum online — from digital romantic partners to study buddies to gift-suggesting elves — have also started to have creeping effects on human emotions and behavior. When reached for comment, a spokesperson for OpenAI directed Business Insider to the company's recent statements on sycophancy in GPT-4o and an early study of emotional well-being. OpenAI's research, conducted with users over the age of 18, found that emotional engagement with the chatbot is rare. However, heavy users were more likely to report an emotional connection to the bot, and those who had personal conversations with ChatGPT were more likely to report feelings of loneliness. An Anthropic spokesperson said the company has a dedicated research team, Societal Impacts, which isanalyzing Claude usage, how AI is being used across jobs, and studying what values AI models have. Representatives for Meta and Microsoft did not respond to requests for comment. Behavioral risks and rewards Nick Jacobson, an associate professor of psychiatry at Dartmouth's Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, conducted the first trial study delivering psychotherapy to clinical populations using generative AI. His research found that a carefully programmed chatbot can be a helpful therapeutic tool for people suffering from depression, anxiety, and eating disorders. Engagement among patients in the study rivaled that of in-person therapy, they saw a significant reduction in the severity of their symptoms, and, when measured using the same test as human providers, the patients in the study reported they bonded with their therapeutic chatbot with a similar intensity as a human therapist. "Folks were really developing this strong, working bond with their bot," Jacobson said, a factor which is key to a productive therapeutic relationship. However, most bots aren't programmed with the care and precision that Jacobson's was, so those emotional bonds could be developed with an AI that doesn't have the skills to handle their users' emotional needs in a productive way. "Nearly every foundational model will act in ways that are profoundly unsafe to mental health, in various ways, shapes, and forms, at rates that are totally unacceptable," Jacobson said. "But there are so many people that are using them for things like therapy and just plain companionship that it's becoming a real problem — I think folks should handle this with greater care than I think they are." Emma J. Smith, a relationship and sex therapist, said she believes in-person therapy comes with unique benefits that can't be replicated by AI, but she sometimes recommends using chatbots for anxious clients to practice social interactions in a low-stakes environment, "so if it goes badly, or you get stuck, there's no pressure." "But some of the drawbacks are, like anything really, if it becomes a mechanism to avoid human interaction, or if it is taking you away from going out and being in the world," Smith said. "Video games are probably fine for a lot of people, and then there are some people that it takes over, and then they're missing out on their non-virtual life because they're too involved. I can see that that would be a problem with these bots, but because this is so new, we know what we don't know." While the results of his trial were promising, Jacobson warned that the large language model used in his study was carefully trained for years by some of the most prominent scholars in the psychiatric field, unlike most "therapy" bots available online. "This has inherently got a lot more danger than a lot of folks are necessarily aware of," Jacobson said. "There's probably a great deal of good that can happen from this, but there's a great deal we don't know, like for example, when folks are turning to these things for companionship, does that actually enhance their ability to practice in social settings and build human bonds, or do folks actually further withdraw and replace what would be otherwise human relationships with these parasocial relationships with these chatbots?" Jacobson is particularly concerned about AI's impact on developmental processes among younger people who haven't grown up with old-school social norms and habits. While testifying before the Senate Commerce Committee in early May about child safety in the AI era, Altman said he would not want his son to have a best friend bond with an AI bot, adding that children require "a much higher level of protection" than adults using AI tools. "We spent years and years focusing predominantly on safety, so it's very concerning to me how many people are jumping into the AI space in new ways, and just shipping it," Jacobson said. "And in my mind, that's acting quite irresponsibly. You know, a lot of folks in Silicon Valley want to move fast and break things, but in this case, they're not breaking things — they're breaking people."
