logo
Trump administration delays briefings on Iran strikes and ceasefire deal

Trump administration delays briefings on Iran strikes and ceasefire deal

First Post8 hours ago

The Senate session has been rescheduled for Thursday to allow Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio to participate, according to several individuals familiar with the revised schedule read more
US Joint Chiefs Chairman General Dan Caine speaks during a news conference at the Pentagon in Washington, after the US military struck three sites in Iran, directly joining Israel's effort to destroy the country's nuclear program. AP
The Trump administration on Tuesday postponed classified briefings for both Senate and House members, as lawmakers continue to seek further information regarding President Donald Trump's recent directive to carry out strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend, as well as his announcement on Monday that a ceasefire agreement had been reached between the two countries.
Both briefings were cancelled. The Senate session has been rescheduled for Thursday to allow Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio to participate, according to several individuals familiar with the revised schedule, who spoke on the condition of anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the discussions. It remains unclear when the House will receive its briefing.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Trump proclaimed on social media that Israel and Iran had agreed that there will be an 'Official END' of their conflict. That tentative truce briefly faltered Tuesday when Israel accused Iran of launching missiles into its airspace, but Trump later declared it was 'in effect!'
Separate briefings for the House and Senate were scheduled to be led by CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, alongside General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Deputy Secretaries of State Christopher Landau and Steve Feinberg.
Members of Congress from both parties, including Democrats and some Republicans, have raised numerous questions regarding President Trump's decision to initiate military action without prior consultation. They have argued that the president should have either sought congressional approval or provided a more detailed justification for the strikes.
According to two individuals familiar with the intelligence shared with lawmakers, Congress has not been presented with any new intelligence since March, when Gabbard informed them that the United States did not believe Iran was actively developing a new nuclear weapon. These individuals requested anonymity in order to speak about the classified briefings provided to Congress.
Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said it is 'outrageous' that the administration postponed the briefings.
'There is a legal obligation for the administration to inform Congress about precisely what is happening,' Schumer said. 'What are they afraid of? Why won't they engage Congress in the critical details?'
California Rep. Pete Aguilar, chair of the House Democratic caucus, said that lawmakers 'need evidence, we need details and we need to know them now.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Many lawmakers feel they have been left in the dark on what led to the strikes and amid escalating tensions between the White House and Congress over the role of the United States internationally — disagreements that don't always fall along party lines.
Democrats have been generally suspicious of the Republican president's strategy, and his motives abroad, but some believe the U.S. could have a role in supporting Israel against Iran. Others strongly believe the U.S. should stay out of it.
Some of Trump's strongest Republican supporters agree with the Democrats who oppose intervention, echoing the president's years of arguments against 'forever wars.' But most Republicans enthusiastically backed the strikes, saying Trump should have the power to act on his own.
Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said Tuesday that the strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities were 'clearly' within Trump's powers and went as far as to question the constitutionality of the War Powers Act, which is intended to give Congress a say in military action.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'The bottom line is the commander in chief is the president, the military reports to the president, and the person empowered to act on the nation's behalf is the president,' Johnson told reporters.
After Trump first announced a ceasefire between the two countries on Monday, Republicans immediately praised him. Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, suggested in a post on X that Trump should be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., posted: 'Historic! The President of Peace!'
But Democrats said they wanted more information. After Iran's retaliation on the U.S. base in Qatar earlier in the day on Monday, Schumer said he wanted an additional classified briefing 'laying out the full threat picture, the intelligence behind Iran's retaliation, and the details, scope, and timeline of any U.S. response.'
Senate Democrats are also forcing a vote as soon as this week on a resolution by Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., requiring congressional approval for specific military action in Iran.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'You have a debate like this so that the entire American public, whose sons and daughters are in the military and whose lives will be at risk in war, get to see the debate and reach their own conclusion together with the elected officials about whether the mission is worth it or not,' Kaine said.
While he did not seek approval, Trump sent congressional leaders a short letter Monday serving as his official notice of the strikes, two days after the bombs fell.
Trump said the attacks were 'limited in scope and purpose' and 'designed to minimize casualties, deter future attacks and limit the risk of escalation.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump admin races to strike deal with Harvard by end of June: Report
Trump admin races to strike deal with Harvard by end of June: Report

India Today

time21 minutes ago

  • India Today

Trump admin races to strike deal with Harvard by end of June: Report

The Trump administration is increasing efforts to reach a settlement with Harvard University in the long-standing legal confrontation with the prestigious institution, according to The Washington Post. A deal could be finalised by the end of the month. The goal is to set a national precedent that will basically be a blueprint for the rest of higher education, the report claimed. advertisementThe university has been one of the primary targets of the Trump administration's pressure campaign on higher education, focusing on alleged antisemitism, diversity policies, anti-Israeli protests, and hiring practices. Despite the pressure, Harvard has been receiving support for resisting what it calls overreach from the federal government. Harvard has no intention of surrendering its core FUNDING FREEZE TRIGGERS WIDER SUPPORT Harvard has sued the administration twice to halt punitive measures, most notably a freeze on over $3 billion in federal research funding. The university argued that this action endangers scientific and medical projects. More than 40 groups have filed amicus briefs in court supporting Harvard's case, including alumni associations, hospitals, research universities, and former US officials."These cuts threaten everything from the development of cancer treatments to economic stability in more than 20 states," the briefs claim. advertisementIn response to the legal pressure Harvard has exerted, a coalition of 16 Republican-led states filed a brief on Monday in support of the Trump administration's stance. The attorneys general of those states alleged that Harvard has allowed antisemitism on campus and argued that institutions receiving federal funds must be held accountable under anti-discrimination laws."Harvard's current, suffocating atmosphere of antisemitism is illegal," the brief stated. "And that illegal conduct is not protected by the First Amendment."FREEDOM OF SPEECH, FOREIGN STUDENTS AT CENTRE OF DEBATEThe centre of Harvard's argument is that the administration's actions violate the university's First Amendment rights and that federal procedures under Title VI were not followed. The university contends that the government is trying to control campus speech and force ideological conformity."The government cannot attempt a hostile takeover of any private institution, much less a private college or university," the American Civil Liberties Union wrote in a brief. Harvard is seeking a court ruling in the US District Court in Massachusetts that would resolve the case before it goes to trial on July 21. In a related development, a federal judge in Massachusetts issued a preliminary injunction to block the State Department and Department of Homeland Security from barring international students and scholars from entering the US to study or work at Harvard. The administration had earlier revoked Harvard's certification to host foreign students, prompting a lawsuit in May.- EndsMust Watch

US judge blocks Trump admin from withholding EV charger funds to 14 states
US judge blocks Trump admin from withholding EV charger funds to 14 states

India Today

time21 minutes ago

  • India Today

US judge blocks Trump admin from withholding EV charger funds to 14 states

A federal judge on Tuesday temporarily blocked the Trump administration from withholding funding previously awarded to 14 states for electric vehicle (EV) charging District Judge Tana Lin, based in Seattle, ruled that the states are likely to succeed in their legal challenge, which argues the federal government acted unlawfully by suspending billions in grants meant to expand EV charging networks. The funds were part of a broader federal push to support EV US Department of Transportation halted the program in February and rescinded state plans while conducting an internal review. Judge Lin's injunction does not apply to the District of Columbia, Minnesota, and Vermont, which also joined the lawsuit but failed to show they would face immediate harm from the funding order will take effect in seven days, giving the Trump administration a window to appeal and potentially seek a stay from a higher February, the Trump administration halted states from using USD 5 billion allocated through the Biden-era National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) initiative was designed to cover up to 80 per cent of project costs for building electric vehicle charging stations. As of now, at least 16 states have one or more operational EV stations, according to the EV States May, the Government Accountability Office concluded that the Trump administration broke the law by withholding funds from the electric vehicle program. It stated that the administration is legally obligated to implement the program as White House rejected the findings, calling them 'wrong and legally indefensible,' and instructed the Department of Transportation to disregard them. The department is now expected to release a draft of its revised electric vehicle guidance later this month.- Ends(With inputs from Reuters)Tune InMust Watch

India welcomes Israel-Iran truce: Ready to play our part
India welcomes Israel-Iran truce: Ready to play our part

India Today

time21 minutes ago

  • India Today

India welcomes Israel-Iran truce: Ready to play our part

Hours after US President Donald Trump's claims of an Iran-Israel ceasefire, India on Tuesday said it stands ready to play its part to resolve the situation and insisted on "dialogue and diplomacy" as the way Delhi said it remained "deeply concerned" about the overall situation, but welcomed reports of a ceasefire between Iran and Trump announced the ceasefire between Israel and Iran, later he accused both sides of violating "We have been following developments overnight relating to the conflict between Iran and Israel, including the US action against Iran's nuclear facilities and Iranian retaliation against US military bases in Qatar," the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said."While we remain deeply concerned about the prospects for overall and sustained regional security and stability, we welcome reports of a ceasefire between Iran and Israel and the role played by the US and Qatar in bringing it about," it Delhi again called for resolution of the conflict through dialogue and diplomacy."We wish to reiterate that there is no alternative to dialogue and diplomacFy in order to address and resolve the multiple conflicts in the region," the MEA said in a statement."India stands ready to play its part in these efforts and hopes that all concerned parties will work towards sustained peace and stability," it Delhi's latest statement came two days after Prime Minister Narendra Modi conveyed to Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian India's "deep concern" over Iran's conflict with had also called for immediate de-escalation of the situation through "dialogue and diplomacy".The phone conversation initiated by Pezeshkian on Sunday came after the US bombed three major nuclear sites -- Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan -- in Iran, bringing itself into the Israel-Iran conflict."We discussed in detail about the current situation. Expressed deep concern at the recent escalations," Modi had said in a social media post."Reiterated our call for immediate de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy as the way forward and for early restoration of regional peace, security and stability," the prime minister US attack on the Iranian nuclear facilities had triggered fears of a wider regional conflict.- EndsMust Watch

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store