EXCLUSIVE An Airbnb in a war zone? Global holiday rental giant facing legal action over offering stays in 100s of homes in illegal Israeli settlements
According to a damning new complaint, Airbnb have breached UK anti-money laundering laws by listing more than 300 holiday rentals in illegal Israeli settlements across the West Bank and East Jerusalem - territories widely recognised as occupied under international law.
The complaint, brought forward by the UK-based Global Legal Action Network (GLAN) and Palestinian rights organisation Al-Haq, was officially filed with the NCA on Tuesday.
The groups accuse Airbnb's UK arm of handling profits from crimes committed under international law - namely, the ongoing occupation of Palestinian land.
But Airbnb's operations in the region are no secret. In fact, the company appears on the United Nation's blacklist of companies involved in activities tied to Israeli settlements - areas the UN, and now the International Court of Justice (ICJ), have declared illegal.
In a landmark ruling in July 2014, the ICJ stated Israel 's occupation of Palestinian territory is illegal under international law.
The court further ruled that all states have a duty to end trade and investment that supports the occupation, a damning blow to any company still profiting from it.
Yet, Airbnb appears to have continued to operate in these areas.
Ashish Prashar, former UK senior advisor to the Middle East Peace Envoy and current a special advisor to GLAN on their Palestine Portfolio, told MailOnline: 'By bringing this case against Airbnb, what we're saying is that no one, no business, no company, no entity, should make profits from war crimes'.
Ashish Prashar, former UK senior advisor to the Middle East Peace Envoy and current a special advisor to GLAN on their Palestine Portfolio, told MailOnline: 'By bringing this case against Airbnb, what we're saying is that no one, no business, no company, no entity, should make profits from war crimes'.
As of 2023, there are currently over 300 listed properties up for rent in occupied territories which Al-Haq have displayed in a settlement watch infographic.
Al-Haq's Forensic Architecture Investigation Unit (FAI) conducted an in-depth investigation into Airbnb listings located in illegal Israeli settlements within the occupied West Bank.
'This investigation uncovered how Israeli settlers exploit resources and infrastructure systematically denied to Palestinians, including by using accommodation platforms like Airbnb to sustain their illegal presence on stolen Palestinian land,' the organisation's website reads.
But despite the unraveling controversy, Prashar claims as a business, Airbnb have a choice in who they carry out business with and are willingly choosing to rent out properties on 'stolen land' and with 'an entity that's being accused of genocide right now'.
'The fact that Airbnb are willing to continue the charade, are willing to continue to extract money from war crimes, says a lot about Brian Chesky (Airbnb's CEO), says a lot about the leadership of the company and says a lot about the board and everyone else who's responsible for these decisions,' he said.
Echoing Prashar's concerns, Shawan Jabarin, general director of Al-Haq, said: 'At a time when we are witnessing genocide in Palestine, businesses like Airbnb are providing services that deny the Palestinian people their means of subsistence, threatening the viability of the group.
'Following the finding by the International Court of Justice, that Israel's occupation is illegal, business activities trading in goods and services that maintain the illegal occupation, must come to an end.'
Despite earlier pledges, Airbnb has a patchy track record. In November 2018, following heavy criticism from Human Rights Watch, Airbnb promised to 'act responsibly' and remove all listings in illegal Israeli settlements.
But less than six months later, in April 2019, the company quietly reversed its decision under legal pressure from Israeli hosts and US-based guests.
It instead vowed to donate profits from Israeli settlement listings to humanitarian causes.
An Airbnb spokesperson told MailOnline: 'Airbnb operates in compliance with applicable laws in Ireland, the UK, and the US.
'Since 2019, Airbnb has donated all profits generated from host activity in the West Bank to an international nonprofit, in line with our global framework on disputed territories'.
Critics claim this is not good enough.
'By continuing to let out properties on behalf of Israelis, who illegally occupy on stolen land, or even in some cases stolen homes from Palestinians, [Airbnb] are supporting that occupation. Airbnb listing a property in the West Bank is a breach of that ruling. They're in breach of international law,' Prashar said.
'They are basically saying: "We're cool with the Palestinians being dominated because we're going to make a quick buck of it and donate some of the rest of the money",' he added.
Zainah el-Haroun, a spokesperson for Al-Haq also said the donation 'misses the point entirely'.
'It is not enough to simply donate profits. Companies are morally and legally bound to ensure their activities do not support, maintain or benefit for Israel's unlawful occupation,' Haroun said.
'No charitable donation can undo the underlying human rights harms caused by facilitating any aspect of Israel's unlawful occupation.'
Pictured: A vehicle moves along a partially-demolished road ahead of an Israeli military armoured bulldozer during an army operation in the Palestinian refugee camps in Tulkarem in the northwest of the occupied West Bank on April 16, 2025
Pictured: Children walk past a damaged car along a street that was bulldozed by Israeli troops in an eastern neighbourhood of the occupied-West Bank city of Jenin, during an ongoing Israeli military operation on February 13, 2025
Human rights lawyers have said the donations do not cleanse the company of criminal liability.
'These are the first ever cases to apply anti-money laundering legislation in the UK and elsewhere to business activity in the illegal Israeli settlements,' Gerry Liston, a senior lawyer at GLAN said.
'They demonstrate that senior executives of companies profiting from Israel's occupation of Palestinian territory risk prosecution for a very serious criminal offence'.
Alongside the UK complaint, GLAN has filed a legal challenge in Ireland after police there refused to investigate Airbnb Ireland's role in facilitating listings in the settlements.
GLAN has also sent a 'preservation letter' to Airbnb's parent company in the US - a key move under American legal procedures that could pave the way for discovery of internal documents.
A spokesperson for the National Crime Agency declined to confirm whether it would investigate, telling Middle East Eye: 'The NCA does not routinely confirm or deny the existence of investigations.'
In the Netherlands, a similar case led by the European Legal Support Center (ELSC) has also been brought against Booking.com, which like Airbnb lists properties in the illegal Israeli settlements.
Booking.com has been approached for comment.
ELSC joined GLAN, Sadaka and AL-Haq at the launch of the complaint at a press conference in Dublin on June10, 2025.
But with mounting legal pressure from coordinated actions across the UK, US, and Ireland, Airbnb's global business model is now under unprecedented scrutiny.
'This is not just immoral – we argue that it is illegal,' said statement from GLAN. 'And we are taking action to stop it.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
Premier League sets summer transfer record 11 days before window shuts
The Premier League 's total expenditure during the summer transfer window has reached a record £2.37bn after Leeds completed the £18m signing of Noah Okafor from AC Milan. Data from shows that top-flight clubs have already surpassed the previous record of £2.36bn – which was set in 2023 – and have already spent over 12 per cent more than last summer, when the total was 'just' £1.97bn. And with 11 days until the window closes and some potentially huge deals still to be signed, the league is on course to surpass the £2.5bn mark after deadline day on 1 September. Premier League spending dwarves that of Europe's other leagues, with the league's clubs spending more on transfers this summer than all of Serie A, Bundesliga, Ligue 1 and La Liga teams combined, according to the BBC. Serie A has the second-highest spend at the time of writing, with a total of £783m as of 18 August. Champions Liverpool have headlined Premier League spending, with the Reds completing over £200m worth of deals including spending £69m on Hugo Ekitike and a move for Florian Wirtz that could become a British record of £116m if all add-ons are met. In addition, the Reds saw a bid worth £110m for Alexander Isak turned down earlier this month. Elsewhere, Manchester United paid up to £73.7m for Benjamin Sesko and up to £71m for Bryan Mbeumo, while Arsenal are on the verge of a £67.5m deal for Eberechi Eze. Six clubs have broken their own transfer records this summer, with Nottingham Forest, Bournemouth, Brentford, Burnley and Sunderland joining Liverpool in paying a record sum for a player. Plenty of Europe's top clubs have been active in the market too, with Atletico Madrid having spent over £150m and clubs including Juventus and bayer Leverkusen surpassing the £100m mark. The biggest signing outside of the Premier League was Bayern Munich's capture of Luis Diaz from Liverpool, in a deal worth £65.5m.
The Guardian
3 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Conservative asylum policy: the moderate Tory tradition faces extinction
The traditional test of effectiveness in a leader of the opposition is whether the holder of that office looks like a prime minister in waiting. It is famously hard to achieve when fronting a party that was recently expelled from office. Kemi Badenoch is struggling with that challenge in most areas, but especially with regard to immigration and asylum. Mrs Badenoch has warned that 'Britain is being mugged' by foreigners who treat the country as 'the world's softest touch'. She has urged Conservative-run local authorities to follow the example of Epping council, which this week was granted an injunction by the high court to prevent asylum seekers being housed in hotels. On that point she had already been upstaged by Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, who joined protests at the hotel in question, mingling in a crowd alongside notorious far-right activists. Rival parties have been quick to point out that the Conservatives' appalling record of managing the asylum system in general, and the accommodation question in particular, disqualifies them from commenting on the subject. Nigel Farage has called Mr Jenrick a 'fraud' on the grounds that he was the responsible minister in September 2023, when the number of asylum claimants housed in hotels peaked at 56,042. Official figures released on Thursday show that that number was down to 32,059 at the end of June this year – lower than in March but higher than a year ago. Labour insists that it is bringing the situation under control, noting that the backlog of asylum cases is falling. Over time, that should ease pressure for temporary accommodation. But the government struggles to make a case for patience and incremental change when the terms of debate are framed by opportunists and demagogues waging a campaign of social division. There is little space for a rational conversation about fair asylum processes when prominent politicians depict all claimants as criminals and cast the entire system as a conspiracy to transfer public resources from native-born Britons to undeserving foreign interlopers. Those paranoid, xenophobic assumptions are not new, but their capture of mainstream politics has accelerated recently. In part, that expresses the cowardice of a Labour government that projects more anxiety about Britain somehow becoming an 'island of strangers' than it does for the systemic corrosion of refugee rights. But it is also a symptom of moral collapse in a Conservative party that finds its function as the official opposition eclipsed by Reform UK, with Mr Farage playing the role of prime minister in waiting. Mrs Badenoch looks intellectually and strategically paralysed by her predicament. She claims not to make common cause with Reform while refusing to articulate any ideological distinction between the two parties. Mr Jenrick openly manoeuvres to replace her as leader and, in the process, erases any remaining distinction between traditional Conservatism and radical anti-immigrant nationalism. A party that was once a broad church is folding itself up into a narrow hardline sect. Mr Jenrick's defeat in last year's leadership contest suggests that there is – or was then – a substantial portion of the party that mistrusts his agenda. Some MPs may even be appalled by his antics. If so, the time to speak up is long overdue. Otherwise their continued silence can be taken as acquiescence in the total extinction of moderate Conservatism as a force in British politics.
Telegraph
3 minutes ago
- Telegraph
HMRC mounts clampdown on pensions tax relief claims
HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) is increasing scrutiny of higher earners' pension tax relief claims in order to collect more revenue. The tax office announced on Thursday that from 1 September it will no longer be accepting requests for pension tax relief over the phone as part of a crackdown on incorrect claims. Instead, individuals will have to submit requests online or by letter. The change could also mean some individuals are 'asked to provide evidence where it would not previously have been required'. HMRC said this was to 'protect taxpayers' money' after an internal review found some workers were making incorrect claims for pension tax relief. You can save a maximum of £60,000 a year into your pension and benefit from tax relief. Basic-rate taxpayers automatically get 20pc relief added to their pot but higher earners paying 40pc or 45pc tax may need to claim the extra tax relief via self-assessment. The tax office undertook a review into claims for up to £10,000 of relief and found that around one third of requests were for an incorrect amount. HMRC said that common mistakes included individuals claiming relief who were not higher-rate taxpayers getting their pension contributions wrong, and claiming relief for pensions that were under a 'net pay' arrangement so the worker had already received the full relief. In most cases, higher earners do not need to request extra tax relief because workplace pension schemes generally use a 'net pay' system. Under this arrangement, the employee receives tax relief via the payroll at their highest marginal rate so there is usually no need to claim extra relief. Higher earners should claim tax relief if their pension provider uses a 'relief at source' arrangement, so only 20pc is claimed. Personal pensions generally use 'relief at source' arrangements. About 80,000 claims for Personal Pension Relief (PPR) are submitted to HMRC every year. The announcement comes amid speculation that Rachel Reeves could cut the tax-free pension lump sum to raise more than £2bn a year. The Telegraph understands the idea is to feature on an extensive list of money-raising proposals that civil servants will present to the Chancellor ahead of the autumn Budget, as she battles a hole in the public finances of up to £50bn. Helen Morrissey, of stockbroker Hargreaves Lansdown, told the Financial Times that preventing savers from claiming tax relief over the phone could 'present an issue for people who don't have online access and doing it by letter may well be quite a lengthy process'. An HMRC spokesman said: 'We're lowering the threshold to ensure that people claim the right amount of relief and protect taxpayers' money. This comes after we conducted a review which revealed that many claims below the current evidence threshold were incorrect.
