
Child-safe phone will block nudes and abuse sent to minors
HMD, Europe's largest manufacturer of smartphones, has embedded the AI technology in a phone that is capable of automatically detecting and blocking harmful content before it reaches a child.
Unlike conventional parental controls which block access to entire sites and can be bypassed, the technology developed by UK AI specialists SafeToNet cannot be disabled as it is embedded in the phone's operating system.
It allows a child to remain on social media or other platforms but stops them seeing harmful content within them. The AI technology also extends to the phone's camera and video which prevents them taking any sexual 'selfies' or images that could be shared with a sexual predator or friends.
The phone's AI technology, known as HarmBlock, has been initially trained to block children from seeing any sexual content but will be extended to prevent them accessing 'gore', extreme violence, self-harm and suicide content, say Richard and Sharon Pursey, the founders of SafeToNet.
The online safety measures – to be announced on Sunday alongside a new starter phone designed with parents for children – have been welcomed by the Government whom SafeToNet has consulted in developing its technology.
A government spokesman said: 'Technological innovations offer opportunities to improve safety online, especially for children, which is why we wholeheartedly welcome this important work by partners like SafeToNet.
'It is encouraging to see a handset manufacturer use their technology to respond to real public concerns, particularly amongst parents, around safeguards for children.
'The Government will not accept child sexual abuse in any form. It is vital that legislation is robust enough to keep children safe, and last month we introduced new laws to crack down on this.'
The Purseys, husband and wife founders of SafeToNet and parents to four children, have spent 13 years developing the online safety technology which compresses huge gigabytes of tech so it can run on a phone at super-fast speeds without burning its battery.
'It must not destroy the user's experience of the application or the device. And of course, it has to be accurate, and accuracy is linked quite obviously to safety, because if we spot the harm and block the harm and prevent it from being seen, then we've safeguarded the child,' said Mr Pursey.
The AI technology has been trained to detect and block sexual imagery through the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF), a Cambridge-based charity that works with police, the Government and industry to seek out and remove child abuse imagery worldwide from the internet.
The tech has to be able to distinguish a benign holiday snap taken on a beach from a sexualised image that could be a precursor to a child being harmed or put at risk.
'We won't deploy unless we are accurate'
'We won't get this deployed unless we are highly accurate,' said Mrs Pursey. 'So we train our models on millions and millions of images to make sure that accuracy levels are as high as possible.'
The tech is targeted at protecting children when they livestream or use video as these modes of communication pose the biggest risk of online harm.
It is also why the AI models have to operate at superfast speeds and be capable of detecting potential threats even when there is background noise and little light.
The AI has also been trained to detect and block text messages that could be the precursor to a child being groomed by a paedophile although this element of the technology will not be immediately deployed.
The Purseys want to extend it to all devices used by children. 'Our vision in a perfect world is that we'd be able to produce our technology so that it doesn't matter who the manufacturer is or what the device is, you should be able to just press a button and download it,' said Mr Pursey.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
12 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour has condemned London to be Europe's capital for Rolex and Range Rover theft
Britain is facing an epidemic of shoplifting. Retailers are collectively facing just under three thefts per minute, almost double what it was 10 years ago. Over half a million such offences were reported last year. The rise of this larceny has partly been blamed on the downgrading in 2014 of the seriousness of 'low value' theft of items worth less than £200. The Government has announced that this policy is being reversed, but it looks set to make an equally serious mistake which will likely see London becoming Europe's capital of high-value thefts. It is not as if this problem is not already with us. While Range Rovers are no longer the most stolen car (Toyota Hilux pickup trucks now top that uncoveted league), they have been so prone to being pilfered that insurance rates soared. In London, annual quotes of over £20,000 became the norm as a result. The same phenomenon is true for insuring watches and jewellery. When I took a look myself, I found fine art premiums in general are 0.3pc of value or less – those for valuables that are worn will often be 10 times higher, at 3pc or more.


Telegraph
42 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The Bank of England's credibility is seeping away
The Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) should not have lowered its main policy interest rate this month. That cut from 4.25pc to 4pc was a 'significant error', I wrote last week, that could 'come back to bite us'. Financial market movements over the last week have convinced me I was wrong. The MPC's latest move was in fact a very significant error. If officials at the Bank of England aren't alarmed about the growing gap between the MPC's policy rate and the cost global investors now charge the UK Government to borrow, they should be. And if ministers aren't concerned, not least Treasury ministers, I have to wonder if they really understand what is going on. My main objection to the MPC's latest rate cut is that UK inflation remains high and is rising. By lowering rates when inflation is still clearly a problem, besetting Britain to a greater extent than other comparable economies, the MPC undermines the Bank of England's credibility – at a time when such credibility is sorely needed. During the year to June, the consumer price index rose 3.6pc, up from 3.4pc the previous month. This is the highest headline inflation rate since January 2024, with CPI growth consistently above the 2pc inflation target since last October. Driven by elevated food, energy and transport costs, UK inflation is the highest in the G7 – and has been since June 2024. Britain also uniquely saw month-on-month CPI increases in April, May and June, so our inflation outlier status has become even more stark over recent months. Earlier this month, even the MPC upped its inflation forecast to 4pc this autumn – but raised rates regardless. And there were no compelling reasons in the minutes of the committee's latest deliberations why price pressures will ease any time soon, let alone fast enough to justify dropping rates when inflation, on the Bank's own reckoning, will be double the official target as early as next month. The seeping away of the Bank's credibility is now playing out in real time, not least since last weekend. Over the past year, as the policy rate has come down incrementally from 5.25pc to 4pc, the rate the Government pays to borrow long-term money has moved decisively in the opposition direction. This is a bad sign, signalling that financial markets – not least the global pensions funds and insurance companies that lend government's big money and dominate sovereign bond markets – have a different view of inflation to MPC policymakers. In competitive auctions to lend the Government money, these major institutional investors, even as the MPC has been cutting, have been demanding higher rates when lending to compensate for the elevated inflation they still think is coming. Since last August, as the policy rate has shifted down 1.25 percentage points, the UK's 30-year gilt yield has been pushed sharply up – from less than 4.5pc a year ago to 5.3pc on the morning of Thursday Aug 7, prior to the MPC's midday announcement, a rise of more than 0.8 percentage points in the opposite direction. By last weekend, that market-driven borrowing cost had gone up to 5.43pc, flying in the face of the Bank of England. Some mortgage providers even raised fixed-term lending rates following the MPC's cut – no doubt because they saw gilt yields reflecting investors' concerns the committee's view on inflation is wrong. Such rate-splitting, as I call it, when policy and market rates move against each other, is a sign of growing financial instability. It indicates that market expectations have become unanchored from policymaker preferences – and in the end the market always wins. I'm concerned that, over the past week, we've seen the 30-year rate rise even more, touching 5.57pc on Friday. So since the policy rate has been lowered 0.25 percentage points, the long-term cost of government borrowing has moved rightly the same amount in the opposite direction. I argued last week that by lowering rates when inflation was clearly not tamed, the MPC was in danger of 'rate-splitting' to an even greater extent. That is what has happened. Long-term bond yields are influenced by a multitude of factors, of course, and have lately been nudging up across the world. But the UK's outlier inflation status is matched by its outlier status when it comes to long-term borrowing costs too. Our 30-year yield is also easily the highest in the G7. Even the governments of Europe's previous 'debt-crisis' nations can now borrow long-term money a lot more cheaply than the UK – namely Italy (4.52pc), Greece (4.26pc) and Spain (4.18) at the time of writing. And those rising borrowing costs, of course, need to be paid by the British state – increasingly, it seems, by borrowing even more. In April 2024, the Office for Budget Responsibility estimated that the UK Government would borrow £85bn over the following 12 months. When the fiscal year ended this April, that total was actually £148bn, no less than £105bn of which was spent on debt interest. In June alone, borrowing was £20.7bn – no less than £16.4bn of which was spent servicing our existing national debt. This is utter madness. While the MPC should not have cut rates earlier this month, in the end those really at fault are government ministers – and, more generally, a political and media class that, for so many years, has dismissed the concerns of those of us who have constantly warned that nation states, while they can of course borrow, need to both borrow and spend responsibly. Successive UK governments have not been doing so – today's Labour administration to an increasingly reckless extent.


The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
How Kevlar could save Scotland's crumbling concete homes
The ReGrid system, which has been developed by Windsor-based firm Structural Repairs, is a lightweight reinforcing mesh which consists of 'high-strength' carbon fibres interwoven with Kevlar threads. It can be directly applied to surfaces affected by reinforced aerated autoclaved concrete (RAAC), the brittle building material linked to several collapses in recent years. RAAC campaigner Wilson Chowdhry. According to the company, installation would take around two days for a standard RAAC-affected home, and would not require residents to be relocated. It has already been used to repair RAAC-affected properties owned by National Rail. Chowdhry told The Herald: 'We urge the Scottish Government and the UK Government to commission an urgent feasibility study into this product, and for local authorities nationwide to engage directly with Structural Repairs Ltd to fully understand the scope and potential of this innovative RAAC solution. 'Time is running out for RAAC homeowners, who face mounting pressure from local authorities intent on pressing ahead with costly and highly disruptive remediation or demolition schemes — creating deep uncertainty and distress for affected families.' In March 2025, Aberdeen City Council approved plans to demolish and rebuild more than 500 RAAC-blighted properties in the city's Balganask neighbourhood. The project, which would result in the demolition of 366 council owned properties and 138 private homes, could cost as much as £150m. Meanwhile, in Clackmannanshire, three blocks of flats in the town of Tillicoultry have been empty since residents were evacuated in October 2023. Chowdhry has approached both local authorities with the ReGrid proposal. He told The Herald that the plan could prove to be a 'game changer' for homeowners facing the threat of eviction from their homes. People were evacuated from dozens of flats in Tillicoultry. (Image: Scott Barron) The veteran campaigner said: 'The ReGrid system offers a credible, non-intrusive, and far more affordable alternative to full roof replacements. 'Because ReGrid is only a fraction of the cost of conventional approaches, a national funding programme from the Scottish Government or UK Government becomes a realistic and achievable proposition — bringing hope to thousands of families who currently see no affordable path forward. 'We call on decision-makers to pause existing schemes, properly investigate this technology, and immediately begin a study of ReGrid — because every week of delay leaves more families trapped in limbo.' Homeowners affected by RAAC have previously told The Herald of the mental anguish caused by the crisis. Lynn Winstanley, who lives in Balnagask, said earlier this year: 'It's been very stressful for everyone. We weren't planning on selling our home, we would have picked a better economic state. 'People can't afford to take a loss on their homes. It's so difficult for everyone, especially those with young kids." Now, campaigners hope that the ReGrid solution could provide homeowners with a second chance at staying in their properties. Read more: 'No respect from day one': Where do the RAAC-hit residents of Balnagask go from here? 'We hold the cards': residents hit out at 'measly' council RAAC payments Calls for public inquiry to reveal origins of RAAC concrete crisis In a letter to Aberdeen City Council, Chowdry wrote: 'I would like to draw your attention to a potential solution that could significantly enhance Aberdeen City Council's approach to RAAC remediation. 'This approach could serve both council-owned and privately-owned RAAC homes in Aberdeen more quickly, cost-effectively, and with far less disruption than current replacement-roof proposals. It may also ease the financial and logistical pressures facing adjoining private homeowners who are presently tied into council-led repair programmes. 'If agreeable, I can arrange an introduction with the developers, who have offered to carry out a site survey, structural scan, and pull test on my daughter Hannah's RAAC-affected home in Aberdeen as a pilot demonstration. 'Such a test case could provide valuable evidence in evaluating its suitability for use within the city." Roger Line, Structural Repair CEO, told The Herald: "We believe that with the right engineering expertise and proven reinforcement technology, many RAAC-affected structures can be made safe, serviceable, and sustainable for decades to come." A spokesperson for Clackmannanshire Council said: 'Following consultation with the affected residents, the Council recently agreed to move forward with a plan for roof repairs at the three blocks of flats in Tillicoultry evacuated due to RAAC. 'Council officers are continuing to engage with everyone affected by the RAAC evacuations and we are committed to doing all we can to support residents through this ongoing process. 'We have also reached out to Aberdeen City Council to find out more about the proposed use of this material.' Aberdeen City Council has been approached for comment.