'Homeland would've been stolen': AK Natives sound off on Biden energy bans as Trump officials tour tundra
FIRST ON FOX: Alaska Natives and residents of the vast North Slope Borough communities along the Arctic Ocean got a rare chance this week to directly discuss their concerns with White House officials, typically 3,500 miles away in Washington.
Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, Energy Secretary Chris Wright and EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin joined Alaska Gov. Mike Dunleavy and local residents in Utqiagvik (formerly Barrow) as part of a multi-day visit to the oil and gas fields, workers and neighbors in the frigid but crucial region.
Charles Lamp, a Native resident of Kaktovik – the main remote community within the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) a few hundred miles eastward – said until President Donald Trump and the officials assembled in Utqiagvik took office, North Slope residents and their energy development hopes felt besieged by that same far-flung federal government.
Lamp voiced similar concerns to those Fox News Digital had been told in the past by Alaska officials, in that environmental activists in the Lower 48 and federal officials who ideologically align with them have tried speaking for them in opposition to developing ANWR and other sites where none of those same activists live.
"There's one thing that I want to bring up – we were under attack in Kaktovik by environmental groups," Lamp said.
"On Day 1, President Trump told the Fish and Wildlife Department to deny their requests. And that was such an amazing thing for us to be able to see. And we were so proud of our president then because he made sure that our ancestral homelands weren't going to be stolen – and [instead] protected," Lamp said, as many in the North Slope actually support the development of their Native homelands versus cordoning them off through regulation – as they bring jobs and resources.
"So I really need to bring back this immense gratitude to President Trump for that action and being able to write something that, if the other guy (Joe Biden and Kamala Harris) would have won, there's no doubt in my mind that our homeland would have been stolen and there's nothing we could have done about it," he said.
"Trump had the heart and the wherewithal to be able to right this wrong."
He told Burgum to invite Trump to Kaktovik to see ANWR and its "Section 1002" – the oil and gas development sector – for himself.
Burgum said he believes Trump would be open to the opportunity – and that the president has already pleasantly surprised regional corporate stakeholders with his openness to questions that the oil companies felt loath to even consider asking a president.
"President Trump does care super deeply about this and at a deep level," Burgum said, adding the president shocked ConocoPhillips representatives in a recent meeting when he asked what they needed to improve their North Slope operations.
When the company noted improved roads would be helpful, Trump asked rhetorically why a road couldn't be built, according to Burgum.
"[They] were kind of like, 'Wow, I didn't know we could ask that.'"
Wright also addressed the Utqiagvik meeting, and added in separate comments that he visited the Prudhoe Bay Discovery Well – a 1960s operation that first opened Alaska to energy development and at one point represented one-quarter of U.S. oil output.
"Unfortunately, the last few decades have seen a long, slow decline of North Slope oil production – not because they're running out of oil. In fact, there's an amazing amount of untapped, unproduced oil up here. It's because of federal regulation, bureaucracy. It's made it so expensive and difficult to operate," Wright said.
He added that with the "Big, Beautiful, Twin Natural Gas Pipeline" ultimately constructed, Alaska could be the key to global energy security by drawing buyers in Korea and Japan away from China.
"It's great to be part of history again here in the great North Slope oil fields of Alaska," Wright said.
Dunleavy last week headlined a global sustainable energy conference in Anchorage, which also drew the attention of those same potential stakeholders from Asia.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
Podcast: Stock Indexes Slip After Muted Inflation Report
President Trump responded to the report on consumer prices by repeating calls for the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates by a full percentage point. Plus: Shares of nuclear-technology company Oklo surged after it was selected to power an Alaskan Air Force base. And stock in General Motors rose after the company announced a $4 billion plan to produce more vehicles in the U.S. 🎧Listen: The WSJ's Danny Lewis hosts the Minute Briefing podcast.
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Trump administration proposes to slash emission limits on power plants
Trump administration proposes to slash emission limits on power plants Show Caption Hide Caption What do Lee Zeldin's EPA rollbacks mean for Americans? Lee Zeldin announced the Environmental Protection agency would roll back regulations aimed fighting climate change and pollution. The Environmental Protection Agency announced Wednesday two major proposals that would repeal greenhouse gas emissions regulations and weaken mercury pollution standards for fossil-fuel power plants, part of the Trump administration's effort to revive coal. The proposals include the repeal of all greenhouse gas standards and a separate one to roll back Biden-era limits on mercury and soot from the country's dirtiest coal plants. Greenhouse gases contribute to climate change, while mercury toxins can cause brain impairment. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, joined at the press conference by several Republican lawmakers and Navajo Nation President Buu Nygren, justified the moves by citing the country's ambition for energy dominance and the rising power demand from artificial intelligence data centers. 'Data centers that support AI alone will eat up 10% of U.S. energy supply within 10 years,' Zeldin said. 'Right now, it's about 3 to 4% of total U.S. electricity demand.' He also said that the administration is removing these Obama- and Biden-era rules to relieve fossil-fuel power plants from regulatory burdens, directly attacking the central piece of the Biden administration's climate policy, including stricter pollution limits on mercury and particulate matter pollution. A public comment period will follow the proposed repeals, after which the EPA will revise and finalize the rule. However, legal challenges could complicate that process. Critics of the Trump administration's energy policy say they're concerned because it doesn't factor in the health impacts on local communities, which are often low-income families who live closer to the power plants. This move also comes at a time when decades-long progress to clean up air is facing a threat from frequent, raging wildfires blanketing cities and towns in smoke. 'Rolling back this lifesaving update would be a grave mistake that would expose people to toxic pollution proven to harm brain development, trigger asthma attacks, and cause cancer and premature death,' American Lung Association President and CEO Harold Wimmer said in a statement. EPA data shows that power plants are the second-largest source of greenhouse gas emissions, after vehicle exhaust. Power plants released nearly 1.5 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide in 2023, according to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program. The agency did not release a complete count of all emissions for 2023. But 2022 data show the electric power sector made up a quarter of all U.S. emissions that year. 'Any government that was acting in good faith to meet the challenge of climate change would look to reductions from power plants as a first step,' Joseph Goffman, a former assistant administrator at the EPA office overseeing air pollution rules, told USA TODAY over email. 'But this administration is not a good faith actor and is certainly not acting to protect Americans,' Goffman said. USA TODAY previously reported that President Donald Trump granted exemptions to over 60 power plants that delayed when they would have to meet the more stringent Mercury and Air Toxics Standards by two years. Under the proposals made on June 11, the plants would never have to comply with the Biden-updated pollution limits. Zeldin pointed out that the limits on mercury pollution in effect since 2012 would remain. Emissions from power plants have been declining over the past decade, thanks in part to EPA regulations. But experts say the administration's move could put that progress at risk. During Trump's inauguration, the president declared a national energy emergency and later in April signed an executive order to boost the coal industry amid increased demand for electricity for artificial intelligence data centers. The revival efforts are happening as fossil fuels, particularly coal, are being phased out due to the decreasing costs of renewables and their ability to reduce harmful emissions. Search the coal plant closest to you below. Includes facilities beyond the ones exempted from the EPA rule. A recent report from the International Energy Agency projected that 'electricity demand from data centers worldwide is set to more than double by 2030.' Artificial intelligence will be the most significant driver, the report said. In May, the Department of Energy ordered two fossil-fuel plants to continue operating through the summer despite their earlier plans to shut down last month. J.H. Campbell, a coal-fired plant in Michigan, was expected to retire in May. Eddystone Generating Station in Pennsylvania was planning to shut down its gas units in May. The Department of Energy's orders require the operators to keep them running for 90 days to 'minimizing the risk of generation shortfall.' Earlier this year, the U.S. Energy Information Administration said in a report that the country's electricity prices in 2024 were already cheaper and less volatile than before. The proposed repeal of greenhouse gas limits and updated Mercury and Air Toxics Standard would save power generators $1.2 billion and $120 million per year, respectively, in regulatory costs, according to the EPA. 'American families will pay the cost of these rollbacks in higher health care bills from emergency room visits, missed workdays and missed school days,' said Michelle Roos, executive director of Environmental Protection Network, a group of former EPA staff. 'The only people who benefit from these rollbacks are the biggest emitters of toxic pollution who don't want to install cleaner technologies,' Roos said.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
E.P.A. Axes Biden's Climate and Pollution Limits on Power Plants
The Trump administration moved Wednesday to erase limits on greenhouse gases from power plants and to weaken restrictions on their other hazardous emissions, including mercury, arsenic and lead. Lee Zeldin, the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, hailed a 'historic day' and said the proposed changes would unshackle the coal, oil and gas industries from 'expensive, unreasonable and burdensome regulations' imposed by the Biden administration. Together, the moves mark a major blow to efforts to tackle climate change and to reduce threats to public health. The power sector is the country's second largest source of pollution that is heating the planet, behind transportation. The Trump administration is pursuing an aggressive agenda to bolster the production and use of fossil fuels, while also scrapping policies that reduce planet-warming emissions. 'E.P.A. is helping pave the way for American energy dominance, because energy development underpins economic development, which in turn strengthens national security. And, most importantly, the American public voted for it last November,' Mr. Zeldin said at a news conference at the agency's headquarters in Washington. He labeled efforts to fight climate change a 'cult' and said the pollution limits written by the Biden administration were designed 'to destroy industries that didn't align with their narrow-minded climate change zealotry.' Mercury emissions are a particular hazard from power plants that burn coal and oil. Those plants account for 44 percent of all mercury emissions in the United States, according to the E.P.A. Once in the atmosphere, mercury converts into methylmercury, which can accumulate in fish and other food. Exposure can cause serious neurological damage in developing fetuses and children, and has been associated with respiratory ailments and heart disease in adults. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
