New clashes rock Syria's Druze heartland as tribal fighters reinforce Bedouin
WALGHA : Armed tribes supported by Syria's Islamist-led government clashed with Druze fighters in the community's Sweida heartland today, a day after the army withdrew under Israeli bombardment and diplomatic pressure.
The United Nations called for an end to the 'bloodshed' and demanded an 'independent' investigation of the violence, which has claimed nearly 600 lives since Sunday, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.
The renewed fighting raised questions over the authority of interim president Ahmed al-Sharaa, whose interim government also has difficult relations with the Kurdish minority in the northeast and the Alawite minority on the Mediterranean coast.
It was Sharaa who ordered government forces to pull out, saying that mediation by the US and others had helped avert a 'large-scale escalation' with Israel.
Tribal reinforcements from across Syria gathered in villages around Sweida today to reinforce local Bedouin, whose longstanding enmity towards the Druze erupted into violence last weekend.
Anas al-Enad, a tribal chief from the central city of Hama, said he and his men had made the journey to the village of Walgha, northwest of Sweida, because 'the Bedouin called for our help and we came to support them'.
An AFP correspondent saw burning homes and shops in the village, now under the control of the Bedouin and their allies.
The Britain-based Observatory said 'the deployment of tribal fighters to Sweida province was facilitated by government forces, because government forces are unable to deploy to Sweida under the terms of the security agreement with Israel'.
Israel sends aid for Druze
Israel, which bombed the Syrian army in Sweida and Damascus earlier this week to put pressure on the government to withdraw, said today that it was sending aid to the Druze community in Sweida.
'In light of the recent attacks targeting the Druze community in Sweida and the severe humanitarian situation in the area, foreign minister Gideon Saar has ordered the urgent transfer of humanitarian aid to the Druze population in the region,' the foreign ministry said.
The 2 million shekel (nearly $600,000) package includes food parcels and medical supplies, the ministry said.
A ceasefire was supposed to take effect yesterday, but Sharaa's office accused Druze fighters of violating it.
Sweida has been heavily damaged in the fighting and its mainly Druze inhabitants have been deprived of mains water and electricity, while communication lines have been cut.
The UN office for the coordination of humanitarian affairs said that nearly 2,000 families had been forced from their homes in Sweida province.
Rayan Maarouf, editor-in-chief of local news outlet Suwayda 24, said the humanitarian situation was 'catastrophic'.
'We cannot find milk for children,' he told AFP.
UN demands independent probe
UN high commissioner for human rights Volker Turk called for an end to the bloodshed, saying 'the protection of all people must be the utmost priority'.
He demanded 'independent, prompt and transparent investigations into all violations' adding that 'those responsible must be held to account'.
The latest violence erupted on Sunday after the kidnapping of a Druze vegetable merchant by local Bedouin triggered tit-for-tat abductions, the Britain-based Observatory said.
The Islamist-led government sent in the army, promising to put a halt to the fighting, but witnesses and the Observatory said the troops sided with the Bedouin and committed many abuses, against Druze civilians as well as fighters.
The interim government has had strained relations with Syria's religious and ethnic minorities since it toppled long-time leader Bashar al-Assad in December.
This week's fighting marks the most serious outbreak of violence since government forces battled Druze fighters in Sweida province and around Damascus in April and May, leaving more than 100 people dead.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
10 hours ago
- The Star
UN prepares aid to Sweida after Syrian government green light
A man rides a motorcycle past a destroyed car, following deadly clashes between Druze fighters, Sunni Bedouin tribes and government forces, in Syria's predominantly Druze city of Sweida, Syria July 25, 2025. REUTERS/Khalil Ashawi/File Photo DAMASCUS (Reuters) -The United Nations is preparing to send a convoy of humanitarian aid to Syria's southern province of Sweida, three aid officials told Reuters, after days of bloodshed left hundreds dead and displaced an estimated 175,000 people. The preparations began after Syria's foreign ministry granted U.N. aid agencies a green light to access Sweida directly, according to correspondence seen by Reuters, following three deliveries of U.N. aid to the province carried out by the Syrian Arab Red Crescent. The new U.N. convoy will include food and other supplies, according to Marianne Ward, head of the U.N.'s World Food Programme in Syria. "We're organising a convoy with a variety of different U.N. agencies' support, which we expect will be the beginning of blanket access" to vulnerable communities, Ward told Reuters. The violence in Sweida began on July 13, when local factions from the Druze - a minority offshoot of Islam - clashed with Bedouin tribal fighters. Syria's government sent in troops to quell the fighting, but the clashes intensified, with more than 1,000 people killed, according to the Syrian Network for Human Rights, a war monitor. A fragile ceasefire brokered by the U.S. brought calm nearly a week later, but residents of Sweida told Reuters that electricity, food, medicine and water all remained scarce. More than 52,000 people had also fled to the neighbouring province of Daraa. "Essentially anyone who lives in Sweida now needs support, and anybody who has left Sweida to go to Daraa needs support," Ward said in an interview in Damascus. The WFP has already sent nearly 250 metric tons of wheat flour to bakeries in Sweida and ready-to-eat meals for 50,000 people in the province, as well as food support to 10,000 people in Daraa. But sustained tensions in the province had prevented aid groups from opening a regular route to Sweida in the days leading up to the government's green light, humanitarian sources said. Ward said U.N. agencies needed a stable ceasefire to produce a permanent calm to reach Sweida residents directly. "We can't just drop it and run away - we have to be able to bring it and provide it to those people who need it most," Ward said. (Reporting by Khalil Ashawi and Maya Gebeily)
Malay Mail
12 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Even MAGA's having doubts: How Israel is losing the American right — Che Ran
JULY 30 — For decades, Israel could rely on bipartisan, no-questions-asked support from Washington — especially from the Republican right. Evangelicals, conservative pundits, and red-state politicians rallied behind Tel Aviv with Bible verses in one hand and defence budgets in the other. But cracks are forming. Loud ones. And not just on the liberal side of the aisle. In what may be one of the more dramatic shifts in US foreign policy sentiment, parts of Donald Trump's MAGA base — the loudest flag-wavers for Israel since the Bush era — are starting to whisper, hesitate, even pull back. Take this in: in 2017, Democrats sympathised with Israel over the Palestinians by 13 points. By 2025? That number flipped—43 per cent now side with Palestinians. But here's the kicker: even Republicans are wobbling. Last year, 78 per cent of GOP voters said they stood firmly with Israel. This year? Just 64 per cent. Sympathy for Palestinians didn't rise. It's Israel's own standing that dropped. And the signs aren't just in polling data — they're in the people. Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, not exactly a bastion of logic, recently proposed slashing half a billion US dollars from Israel's Iron Dome funding. Only six voted with her. But the shock wasn't in the failure — it was in the fact that the proposal even came from within Trump's camp. Tucker Carlson, once the high priest of Fox News nationalism, openly mocked pro-Israel hawks like Ted Cruz over Iran. He didn't just criticise policy — he questioned their knowledge, their motives, their blind allegiance. When even Tucker stops toeing the line, something's shifting. A supporter displays a bejeweled 'Make America Great Again' necklace at a campaign event by former US President and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump in Macon, Georgia, on November 3, 2024. — AFP pic And then there's the bombshell that turned even the die-hard evangelicals uneasy: an Israeli strike on the Holy Family Catholic Church in Gaza. Not the first attack on a church, but the one that finally rang alarm bells across conservative America. Even Mike Huckabee — Mr. 'Israel can do no wrong' — was forced to condemn it. All this, against the backdrop of the Epstein scandal clawing its way back into the headlines. Trump's close personal ties with the convicted sex trafficker are once again under scrutiny. And now, right-wing conspiracy circles are connecting Epstein's enablers to Israel's Mossad. Wild theories aside, the optics are ugly. And MAGA voters — already restless — are paying attention. It's leaking like a burst pipe under Jalan Sultan Ismail during rush hour — just spraying nonsense everywhere and no one knows who's in charge. A recent Pew survey shows 50 per cent of Republicans under 50 now view Israel negatively. That's not just a generational divide — it's a warning shot. Netanyahu's long game was simple: double down on the right, shrug off the left. But now the right's got questions. The money will keep flowing — donors like Miriam Adelson won't shut the tap off anytime soon — but votes are harder to buy. Sympathy even more so. Michael Knowles, a leading conservative voice, put it bluntly: 'You're losing me.' And that sums up the moment. Israel's global image, once bulletproof, is now slipping — on both sides of the American aisle. The Iron Dome may still function, but the narrative shield? Let's just say… it's got a few gaping holes. * This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Malay Mail
2 days ago
- Malay Mail
Iran warns of ‘decisive' retaliation if attacked again by US or Israel
TEHRAN, July 29 — Iran's foreign minister warned on Monday that it would respond to the United States and Israel in a 'more decisive manner' should they attack Iran again. The comments appeared to be in response to remarks by US President Donald Trump, who had threatened earlier in the day to 'wipe out' the Islamic republic's nuclear programme if it resumed atomic activities following a round of US strikes last month. 'If aggression is repeated, we will not hesitate to react in a more decisive manner and in a way that will be IMPOSSIBLE to cover up,' Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in a post on X. 'If there are concerns about the possible diversion of our nuclear program into non-peaceful purposes, the 'military option' proved incapable — but a negotiated solution may work,' he added. It remains unclear how much damage was caused by the US strikes on Tehran's nuclear facilities, which came after Israel launched a surprise bombing campaign that it said was aimed at preventing Iran from obtaining an atomic weapon. Israel's attacks had derailed US-Iran nuclear negotiations that began in April. Over the course of the 12-day war, Iran responded with missile attacks on Israeli cities, as well as one on a nearby US base in Qatar — a response Trump had previously shrugged off. During a visit to Scotland on Monday, Trump maintained the previous strikes on Iran 'wiped out their nuclear possibilities'. 'They can start again. If they do, we'll wipe it out faster than you can wave your finger at it,' he added. Before the war broke out, the United States and Iran were divided over uranium enrichment — with Tehran describing it as a 'non-negotiable' right, and Washington calling it a 'red line'. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) says Iran is the only non-nuclear-armed country currently enriching uranium to 60 per cent — a short step from the 90-per cent enrichment required for a nuclear weapon. Tehran, which has consistently denied pursuing a bomb, has said it is open to discussing the rate and level of enrichment, but not the right to enrichment itself. In his post, Araghchi said: 'No one in their right mind would abandon the fruits of tremendous investment in homegrown and peaceful technology' just because of foreign bullying. — AFP
