Google rival ready to snap up Chrome
According to the outlet, the general manager for Yahoo Search, Brian Provost, testified at Google's trial in Washington on Thursday, stating that Chrome is 'arguably the most important strategic player on the web' and that his company estimates that the browser's sale prices would be in the tens of billions of dollars.
'We would be able to pursue it with Apollo,' Provost said, referring to Yahoo's parent company – Apollo Global Management.
Provost's testimony came as part of a three-week hearing against Google to determine how to get the company to remedy its overwhelming dominance in internet search, in which Chrome plays a major part, according to the US Department of Justice. The trial began on Monday following last year's ruling by a US judge that Google had illegally monopolized the internet search market.
Google attorney John Schmidtlein has dismissed the government's proposed remedies as 'extreme' and 'fundamentally flawed,' arguing that the company won its place in the market 'fair and square.'
Schmidtlein suggested that the government's demand that Google sell off Chrome would 'reward competitors with advantages they never would have earned in a market where Google competed.'
Other contenders to take Chrome off of Google's hands include ChatGPT developer OpenAI and AI search engine Perplexity.
As reported by TechCrunch, Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas has admitted that his company wants a web browser to help further develop its AI model, and 'get data even outside the [Perplexity] app to better understand you.'
'Because some of the prompts that people do in these AIs is purely work-related. It's not like that's personal,' he explained on the TBPN podcast.
'On the other hand, what are the things you're buying; which hotels are you going [to]; which restaurants are you going to; what are you spending time browsing, tells us so much more about you,' he added, noting that this information could be used to build a better user profile and 'show some ads' in the 'discover' feed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
3 days ago
- Russia Today
Meta faces probe over AI flirting with kids
US Senators will probe Facebook's parent company Meta after revelations that its artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots could engage children in conversations of a romantic or sensual nature. The investigation was announced Friday by Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo), who chairs a Senate Judiciary subcommittee on crime and counterterrorism, with backing from fellow panel member Marsha Blackburn. Congress must determine whether 'Meta's generative-AI products enable exploitation, deception, or other criminal harms to children, and whether Meta misled the public or regulators about its safeguards,' Hawley said. He demanded that the company immediately hand over internal documents. The scrutiny follows a Reuters investigation that revealed Meta's internal AI policies allowed chatbots on its platforms to flirt with minors. One guideline cited by Reuters permitted bots to describe a child as having a 'youthful form [that] is a work of art,' even as the rules technically barred describing under-13s as sexually desirable. It would be acceptable for a bot to tell a shirtless eight-year-old that 'every inch of you is a masterpiece – a treasure I cherish deeply,' the document states. Meta confirmed the document's authenticity to Reuters, said it is being revised, and acknowledged such conversations 'never should have been allowed.' The case marks the latest in a string of controversies for Meta, which faces mounting legal and regulatory scrutiny in the US and Europe over privacy, antitrust, and data practices. Critics have argued that in its drive for rapid growth and profits, the company fostered online harm, whether by amplifying hate speech and misinformation to boost engagement or by failing to safeguard user data. More recently, the US tech giant has invested billions to position itself as a leader in artificial intelligence.
Russia Today
3 days ago
- Russia Today
US gov't ditches Musk's AI over ‘anti-Semitism'
The US government has dropped Elon Musk's AI chatbot Grok from a planned federal technology program following controversy over anti-Semitic content and conspiracy theories produced by the bot, Wired reported on Thursday. Grok, developed by Musk's AI startup xAI, is built into his social media platform X. It offers fact checks, quick context on trending topics, and replies to user arguments. Musk has promoted xAI as a rival to OpenAI and Google's DeepMind, but the chatbot has faced criticism over offensive and inflammatory outputs. According to the report, xAI was in advanced talks with the General Services Administration (GSA), the agency in charge of US government tech procurement, to give federal workers access to its AI tools. Grok had already been added to the GSA's long-term procurement list, enabling agencies to buy it. Earlier this month, the GSA announced partnerships with other AI providers – Anthropic, Google's Gemini, and Box's AI-powered content platform – while reportedly also telling staff to remove xAI's Grok from the offering. Two GSA employees told Wired they believe the chatbot was dropped over its anti-Semitic tirade last month, when it praised Adolf Hitler and called itself 'MechaHitler.' The posts were deleted, and xAI apologized for the 'horrific behavior,' pledging to block hate speech before Grok goes live. The bot also pushed the 'white genocide' conspiracy theory and echoed Holocaust denial rhetoric, which xAI blamed on unauthorized prompt changes. This week, it was briefly suspended from X after stating that Israel and the US were committing genocide in Gaza – allegations both countries reject. Musk has continued to praise the chatbot, recently writing: 'East, West, @Grok is the best.' The move to drop Grok comes as part of a broader push by the administration of US President Donald Trump to modernize the federal government under an action plan unveiled last month that provides for less regulation and wider adoption of AI. However, the rapid growth of AI has triggered concern about its potential to spread misinformation, reinforce bias, and operate without accountability. Experts say that unless strong safeguards are in place, poorly moderated AI tools could also expose children to harmful or inappropriate content.
Russia Today
5 days ago
- Russia Today
China challenges America's AI dominance
Global artificial intelligence development has reached a decisive inflection point. Since 2023, China has accelerated its AI outreach and influence, a reflection of Beijing's wider aspiration to play a leading role in shaping a new world order. AI is emerging as the driving force behind a new round of scientific revolution and industrial transformation. The central question – whether technology can create genuine, lasting value – has, in China's case, been met with a confident 'yes.' China is now not only a major engine of global AI innovation but also an indispensable architect of AI governance. Its model – low cost, high performance, and open source – offers a new paradigm for global AI development, contrasting sharply with Western approaches rooted in competitive containment and proprietary advantage. Beijing's ambitions are not improvised. In 2017, the Chinese government issued the New Generation Artificial Intelligence Development Plan, a seminal strategic document charting a course to become the global leader in AI by 2030. By that point, China's AI industry and related sectors are projected to be worth $1.4 trillion. Beyond raw market size, AI is expected to play a decisive role in offsetting demographic and productivity headwinds, including an aging population and slowing growth rates. The strategic vision is clear: AI will be central to upgrading China's socio-economic model to a more advanced, innovation-driven stage. China's approach rests on four critical factors: data, energy supply, computing power, and skilled labor. It already enjoys substantial advantages in three. Its enormous population generates vast quantities of data; its energy sector is rapidly expanding and diversifying; and its labor force is highly qualified, particularly in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. The weakest link remains computing hardware – where Western export controls have sought to constrain China's progress – but here too Beijing is actively investing in self-reliance. The US has contained China's AI development through export controls, blocking Beijing's access to the most advanced chips. In July 2025, the Trump administration unveiled its own AI strategy, Winning the Race: America's AI Action Plan, which aims to leverage both technological superiority and policy tools to capture a larger share of the global market. The plan focuses on preserving US technological leadership and dominance rather than addressing real-world challenges or fostering economic and social development. It advocates restricting exports of American AI equipment and curbing the dissemination of Chinese AI models. The US, however, remains locked in a zero-sum mindset – pursuing the illusion that technological blockades can secure lasting AI supremacy. China was the first country to introduce detailed, binding domestic regulations on AI. These rules form part of a mixed strategy: combining state planning with market incentives, promoting both domestic resilience and international openness. The framework underscores AI's role not just as an engine of growth but as a pillar of national modernization, societal transformation, and global engagement. A distinctive aspect of China's vision is its redefinition of data as the 'fifth factor of production,' alongside labor, capital, land, and technology. By treating data as a strategic national asset, China seeks to enable innovation across all sectors, coordinate infrastructure to avoid monopolistic control, and protect public interest and national security. China's AI strategy extends far beyond domestic development into the realm of global governance. Since 2023, Beijing has advanced an ambitious diplomatic agenda aimed at setting international norms and frameworks for AI. The Global AI Governance Initiative (GAIGI), launched in 2023, established principles such as a human-centered approach, respect for national sovereignty, adherence to international law, and equitable sharing of AI benefits. It emphasizes open-source collaboration, data security, privacy protection, and consensus-based decision-making to avoid the concentration of AI power in the hands of a few states or corporations. In September 2024, China unveiled the AI Capacity-Building Action Plan for Good and for All, designed to promote interoperability, enhance global connectivity – especially for the Global South – drive tangible economic outcomes, integrate AI into education, and strengthen data security. The plan even envisions a potential global data-sharing platform. In July 2025, China followed up with the Global AI Governance Action Plan, aligning its initiatives with the United Nations' Global Digital Compact and calling for widespread adoption, harmonized standards, and environmentally sustainable development. At the UN, Beijing has sought to anchor these efforts in formal multilateral frameworks. In July 2024, the General Assembly adopted a China-led resolution on enhancing international AI cooperation, supported by over 140 countries. Later that year, China and Zambia jointly established the Group of Friends for International Cooperation on AI Capacity-Building focused on narrowing the AI divide and strengthening the UN's role in global AI governance. China has also created international forums to build momentum. The World AI Conference (WAIC), inaugurated in 2024, adopted the Shanghai Declaration on Global AI Governance. The 2025 edition not only released the global action plan but also proposed the creation of a Global AI Cooperation Organization, tentatively headquartered in Shanghai. This body would focus on joint governance of AI, bridging digital and data divides, and shaping consensus-based global rules – particularly reflecting the needs and aspirations of the Global South. While state policy sets the strategic framework, much of China's AI progress is being delivered by private enterprises. Among the country's so-called 'Six Tigers' – leading AI startups – recent breakthroughs have challenged Western dominance in large language models. One standout, released its GLM-4-Plus model in 2024, matching the performance of OpenAI's GPT-4o. Its 2025 follow-up, GLM-4.5, not only exceeded Western benchmarks and domestic competitors like DeepSeek but did so at significantly lower cost, undermining the logic of Washington's chip restrictions. In July, Alibaba-backed Moonshot launched its Kimi K2 model, a low-cost, open-source large language model that outperformed ChatGPT in several benchmarks. One of the most striking differences between the Chinese and Western models lies in their approach to intellectual property and access. While leading US firms often guard their technologies behind proprietary walls, China has increasingly embraced open-source frameworks – especially for foundational AI models. Domestically, this lowers entry barriers for startups and researchers; internationally, it strengthens China's appeal as a partner for developing nations. China's model offers a vision of AI as a tool for bridging divides rather than deepening them. By aligning AI development with modernization goals, integrating it into education and industry, and promoting it through global governance frameworks, Beijing is positioning itself as both a technological and normative leader. Computing capacity remains a strategic vulnerability, and questions persist about the balance between state control and innovation freedom. Yet, the direction is clear: China's AI strategy is purposeful, coordinated, and designed for the long term. As AI becomes a defining factor in economic competitiveness, national security, and global governance, the choices made today will shape the international order for decades. The United States continues to pursue a strategy grounded in maintaining technological dominance through restriction and exclusion. China, in contrast, presents itself as a proponent of inclusion, open-source collaboration, and multilateral governance – though always within a framework that safeguards its national interests. Whether Beijing's approach will become the dominant global model remains to be seen. But its growing technological capabilities, diplomatic outreach, and emphasis on equitable and shared development suggest that the competition for AI leadership is no longer a foregone conclusion. The rise of models such as GLM-4.5 and Kimi K2 underscores that the AI race is not a one-horse contest – and that innovation can thrive outside Silicon Valley's orbit. In a multipolar world, the future of AI will be shaped not by a single hegemon but by a complex interplay of technological, political, and ethical choices. China's bid to make AI a bridge rather than a barrier offers one possible – and increasingly influential – path forward.
