School cell phone bans are a distraction. The real crisis isn't in your kid's hand.
Dear parents, every August, we buy the pencils, we pack the lunches and we tell ourselves we're ready. But as another school year begins, I want to ask you to take a breath – and look past the headlines.
Because if you believe what you're hearing, the biggest threat to our kids' future is in their pockets. Banning phones in schools, they say, will cure anxiety, raise test scores, restore childhood.
I understand the instinct – I'm a father myself. But I've also been a teacher, a principal, a senior education advisor to former New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio who oversaw the country's largest school system – and now the president of an education company. And I'm telling you: this is a distraction. Of course we don't want kids using their phones throughout the school day without purpose and intentionality. But the real crisis isn't in your kid's hand. It's in their reading scores.
Right now, one third of American eighth graders can't read at the National Assessment of Educational Progress "basic" testing benchmark. In some districts, the numbers are even worse. This isn't a new problem – it's just one we keep refusing to face head-on. Instead, we reach for easy fixes, fueled by nostalgia and fear. But banning phones won't turn back the clock on childhood. It will just widen the gap between the kids who have and the kids who don't.
Opinion: My 4-year-old asked for a smartphone. Here's what I did next as a parent.
Here's what I've seen in the classroom: when you take away cell phones, you don't create equity – you erase it. In underfunded schools, smartphones are calculators, translators, research tools and sometimes the only reliable internet connection a student has. For multilingual learners, for kids without Wi-Fi at home, that device is a lifeline. When we ban it, we're not protecting them – we're pulling up the ladder.
Not all screens are created equal
Let's be honest. The anxious generation isn't our kids – it's us. We're the ones struggling to navigate a changing world, grasping for control. But our children don't need us to fear the future. They need us to prepare them for it.
That means leaning into digital literacy, not running from it. It means investing in the tools and teaching that help kids learn how to use technology wisely. And it means addressing the root of the problem – not the symptom – by giving every child access to the kind of reading instruction, books and support they need to thrive.
Your Turn: Tablets, screen time aren't 'parenting hacks.' They're killing kids' attention spans. | Opinion Forum
I believe in meeting kids where they are – because that's where real learning begins. Not all screens are created equal, and the goal isn't to eliminate technology but to use it wisely. There's a big difference between passive consumption and purposeful practice.
Research shows that just 15 to 20 minutes a day of focused, high-quality reading can drive real progress – especially when it's supported by tools that are engaging, accessible and grounded in how kids actually learn. That's the idea behind many of the resources we build at Mrs Wordsmith, a company of which I'm president and where we use cell phones and other nontraditional approaches to teach students how to read.
This school year, don't let the conversation get hijacked. Ask your school leaders the hard questions, such as how are you teaching reading? How are you using technology to support learning? And what are you doing to ensure every child has the skills and knowledge to thrive in school and beyond?
Our kids deserve better than blanket bans and wishful thinking. They deserve an education built for the world they're actually going to live in.
Brandon Cardet-Hernandez is a member of the Boston School Committee and the president of Mrs Wordsmith.
You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
2 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Nagasaki survivors, on 80th anniversary, put hopes for a nuclear ban in the hands of youth
NAGASAKI, Japan — The southern Japanese city of Nagasaki on Saturday marked 80 years since the U.S. atomic attack that killed tens of thousands of civilians and left survivors who hope their harrowing memories can help make their hometown the last place on Earth to be hit by a nuclear bomb. The United States launched the Nagasaki attack on Aug. 9, 1945, which claimed 70,000 lives by the end of that year. The second American atomic bombing came three days after the first, on Hiroshima, which killed 140,000. Japan surrendered on Aug. 15, 1945, ending World War II. About 2,600 people from more than 90 countries attended a memorial event at Nagasaki Peace Park, where Mayor Shiro Suzuki and Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba spoke, among other guests. At 11:02 a.m., the exact time when the plutonium bomb exploded above Nagasaki eight decades earlier, participants observed a moment of silence as a bell rang. 'Even after the war ended, the atomic bomb brought invisible terror,' 93-year-old survivor Hiroshi Nishioka said in his speech at the memorial, noting that many who had initially survived without severe wounds started bleeding from gums and losing hair and soon died. 'Never use nuclear weapons again, or we're finished,' he said. Dozens of doves were released as a symbol of peace after a speech by Suzuki, whose parents are survivors of the attack. He said the city's memories of the bombing are 'a common heritage and should be passed down for generations' in and outside Japan. 'The existential crisis of humanity has become imminent to each and every one of us living on Earth,' the mayor said. 'In order to make Nagasaki the last atomic bombing site now and forever, we will go hand-in-hand with global citizens and devote our utmost efforts toward the abolition of nuclear weapons and the realization of everlasting world peace.' Survivors and their families gathered Saturday in rainy weather at Peace Park and nearby Hypocenter Park, located below the bomb's exact detonation spot, hours before the official ceremony. 'I simply seek a world without war,' said Koichi Kawano, an 85-year-old survivor who laid flowers at the hypocenter monument decorated with colorful origami paper cranes and other offerings. Some others prayed at churches in Nagasaki, home to Catholic converts who went underground during centuries of violent persecution in Japan's feudal era. The twin bells at Urakami Cathedral, which was destroyed in the bombing, rang together again after one of the bells that had gone missing after the attack was restored by volunteers. Despite their pain from wounds, discrimination and illnesses from radiation, survivors have publicly committed to a shared goal of abolishing nuclear weapons. But they worry about the world moving in the opposite direction. Aging survivors and their supporters in Nagasaki now put their hopes of achieving nuclear weapons abolition in the hands of younger people, telling them the attack isn't distant history but an issue that remains relevant to their future. 'There are only two things I long for: the abolition of nuclear weapons and prohibition of war,' said Fumi Takeshita, an 83-year-old survivor. 'I seek a world where nuclear weapons are never used and everyone can live in peace.' In the hope of passing down the lessons of history to current and future generations, Takeshita visits schools to share her experience with children. 'When you grow up and remember what you learned today, please think what each of you can do to prevent war,' Takeshita told students during a school visit this week. Teruko Yokoyama, an 83-year-old member of a Nagasaki organization supporting survivors, said she thinks of the growing absence of those she had worked with, and that fuels her desire to document the lives of others who are still alive. The number of survivors has fallen to 99,130, about a quarter of the original number, with their average age exceeding 86. Survivors worry about fading memories, as the youngest of the survivors were too young to clearly recall the attack. 'We must keep records of the atomic bombing damages of the survivors and their lifetime story,' said Yokoyama, whose two sisters died after suffering illnesses linked to radiation. Her organization has started to digitize the narratives of survivors for viewing on YouTube and social media platforms with the help of a new generation. 'There are younger people who are beginning to take action,' Yokoyama told the Associated Press on Friday. 'So I think we don't have to get depressed yet.' Nagasaki hosted a peace forum Friday where survivors shared their stories with more than 300 young people from around the country. Seiichiro Mise, a 90-year-old survivor, said that he's handing seeds of 'flowers of peace' to the younger generation in hopes of seeing them bloom. Survivors are frustrated by a growing nuclear threat and support among international leaders for developing or possessing nuclear weapons for deterrence. They criticize the Japanese government's refusal to sign or even participate in the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons as an observer because Japan, as an American ally, says it needs U.S. nuclear possession as deterrence. In Ishiba's speech, the prime minister reiterated Japan's pursuit of a nuclear-free world, pledging to promote dialogue and cooperation between countries with nuclear weapons and nonnuclear states at the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons review conference scheduled for April and May 2026 in New York. Ishiba didn't mention the nuclear weapons ban treaty. 'Countries must move from words to action by strengthening the global disarmament regime,' with the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, or NPT, at the center, complemented by the momentum created by the nuclear weapons ban treaty, said U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres, in a message read by Under-Secretary-General Izumi Nakamitsu in Nagasaki. Nagasaki invited representatives from all countries to attend the ceremony Saturday. The government in China notably notified the city that it wouldn't be present, without providing a reason. The ceremony last year stirred controversy because of the absence of the U.S. ambassador and other Western envoys in response to the Japanese city's refusal to invite officials from Israel. Ono and Yamaguchi write for the Associated Press and reported from Nagasaki and Tokyo, respectively.
New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Why racial discrimination is so deeply institutionalized in US higher education
Racial discrimination, long institutionalized across American academia, became an even stronger priority these last five years as colleges and universities rushed to the very woke-est concepts of 'justice'; unwinding it all will require bitter battles indeed. President Donald Trump last week directed Education Secretary Linda MacMahon to start collecting data from nearly every US university with an eye in on enforcing the Supreme Court's 2023 ruling banning most race-based college admissions. That's absolutely necessary, because most leaders of American higher education insist that such discrimination is simple justice to make up for past discrimination. Advertisement But the way these policies play out proves it's not. Notably, all these systems disadvantage Asian Americans (East and South Asians), even though past discrimination never worked in those groups' favor. And immigrants of African descent whose parents arrived quite recently nonetheless routinely win admission to top schools thanks to these quotas. Advertisement In short, the Ivy League and all the rest are every bit as obsessed with simple skin color as any Jim Crow white supremacist. And as determined to rationalize it. Notably, medical schools across the country justify drastic anti-white and -Asian discrimination by pointing to (scant and seriously faulty) research that claimed to find that black patients have far better outcomes with black doctors. Mind you, schools can pursue equal opportunity with income-based preferences; they just have to abandon the beyond-lazy categorization of everyone by skin color that they've self-righteously embraced for decades. Advertisement Imagining you have a hard empirical basis for your bigotry is all too human, and admitting that you don't is deeply challenging for all the folks who've believed for decades that they're fighting racism with these policies. That it's the Trump administration exposing their fundamental injustice makes the humiliation burn even deeper.
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
North Carolina Republicans are ready for Trump's school choice initiative
North Carolina is on the brink of becoming the first state to opt in to President Donald Trump's signature school choice initiative. Both the Republican-led House and Senate approved the ' Educational Choice for Children Act ' last month. Democratic Gov. Josh Stein had the chance to stand up for parental freedom and school choice. Instead, he chose to join the ranks of other Democratic governors who sold out parents and students in favor of entrenched education bureaucrats. I look forward to leading the North Carolina Senate in overriding the governor's veto to provide families with another avenue to choose the education that best meets their child's needs. We in North Carolina have been working toward universal school choice for more than a decade. In 2023, when the legislature overrode then-Gov. Roy Cooper's veto and made taxpayer-funded school choice scholarships available to every family in the state, a key parental choice battle was won. Now, we're poised to expand on that win even further because of President Trump's leadership. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025 — a defining domestic policy achievement for President Trump's second term — allows states to opt in to a new federal tax credit of up to $1,700 for contributions to organizations offering scholarships to students who wish to attend a private school. This is a monumental shift enabling philanthropic giving aimed at student-centered investments in education. That means parents will have even more resources at their disposal to send their children to the school that's right for them. This major federal move toward educational freedom, ushered in by President Trump and delivered over the finish line by Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), is a landmark moment in American education policy. When the idea of publicly funded education gained traction in the 19th century, it represented a shift from an exclusive luxury available only to the economically (and racially) privileged, to universally accessible public education. Free schools, funded by taxpayers, meant the children of sharecroppers and day laborers had the opportunity to escape their economic class and enjoy a life their parents couldn't. We no longer live in the 19th century. Today, class difference doesn't segregate who can go to school and who can't, but it does segregate who can go to the school that's best for them and who is stuck in a school that doesn't suit their God-given gifts. Today, parents have a multitude of schooling options for their kids. They ought to have the economic freedom and ability to choose among them. It does not make sense to impose a 19th-century framework on the 21th-century education landscape. It is outdated to assign students to single schools and force parents to fork over more money (in addition to what they already pay in taxes) if they want, and their child needs, something different. In other words, we should no longer fund systems and bureaucracies. We can, and should, fund students. That is why we fought for more than a decade in North Carolina to create a taxpayer-funded scholarship program available to all families who do not believe their assigned district school is the right place for their children. Now, North Carolina families aren't required to double-pay for their child's K-12 education — first in taxes, then for tuition. They can receive an Opportunity Scholarship, funded with their tax dollars, and use it to attend a private school. And in the near future, if the legislature successfully overrides Stein's veto and opts in to the 'One Big Beautiful Bill's' school choice tax credit, North Carolina parents will have yet more opportunity to choose a school that helps their children realize their full potential. North Carolina House Speaker Destin Hall (R) and I have made this a priority for the General Assembly. We both agree: President Trump's leadership presents an opportunity to improve the educational options available to North Carolina families, and it's incumbent on us to follow through on it.
