logo
The real-life Day After Tomorrow: Scientists reveal exactly how COLD Britain will get if the Gulf Stream collapses - with some areas plunging to -30°C

The real-life Day After Tomorrow: Scientists reveal exactly how COLD Britain will get if the Gulf Stream collapses - with some areas plunging to -30°C

Daily Mail​a day ago

The UK could be plunged into a deep freeze with temperatures dropping as low as -30°C if climate change triggers a Gulf Stream collapse, experts have warned.
For years, scientists have sounded the alarm over the potential effects of global warming, from increased droughts to catastrophic floods.
But one scenario bears a stark resemblance to the film The Day After Tomorrow, in which parts of Britain could experience temperatures more common in northern Canada.
Researchers examined how Europe's climate could be affected if the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) were to substantially weaken in conjunction with 2°C of global warming.
Their analysis revealed that temperatures could plunge to -30°C in Scotland, while Edinburgh would spend nearly half of the year with a minimum temperature of below 0°C.
London, meanwhile, would experience cold extremes of -19°C and record over two months' worth of additional days with sub-zero temperatures compared to the late 19th century.
Expanding sea ice could cover parts of the British Isles, and there would also be increased winter storms, they warned.
The AMOC is the large-scale ocean circulation in the Atlantic Ocean that plays a crucial role in regulating both the global and European climate by redistributing heat through the ocean.
There is growing concern that the AMOC, of which the Gulf Stream is a part, may weaken or collapse under future climate change due to an influx of freshwater.
In the new study, researchers used a complex climate model to simulate a range of scenarios in which the circulation system substantially weakens by more than 80 per cent, while also including the effects of global warming.
They warned urgent action must be taken in an attempt to avoid these 'dangerous tipping points'.
'The relatively mild climate for a city such as Edinburgh would see drastic changes,' Michiel Baatsen, co-author of the study, said.
'For example, it would experience 164 days with minimum temperatures below zero, that's almost 50 per cent of the year, and an increase of 133 days compared to the pre-industrial climate.
'The Scandinavian climate would become much colder under such a scenario, with even Norway's typically mild west coast potentially experiencing extremes below -40°C — a drop of 25 degrees compared to the pre-industrial climate.'
The researchers explained that summer temperatures are not significantly affected by a weaker Atlantic Ocean circulation, although some places would see a slight increase in warm extremes or summer temperatures.
As a result, the contrast between summer and winter becomes greater, with much colder winters.
There was an unusually cold winter recorded in Europe 15 years ago. Pictured, a driver tries to dig a car out from under the snow in Allendale, Northumberland, January 5, 2010
What is the AMOC?
The Gulf Stream is a small part of a much wider system of currents, officially called the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation or AMOC.
Described as 'the conveyor belt of the ocean', it transports warm water near the ocean's surface northwards - from the tropics to the northern hemisphere.
When the warm water reaches the North Atlantic (Europe and the UK, and the US east coast), it releases the heat and then freezes. As this ice forms, salt is left behind in the ocean water.
Due to the large amount of salt in the water, it becomes denser, sinks, and is carried southwards – back towards the tropics – in the depths below.
Eventually, the water gets pulled back up towards the surface and warms up in a process called upwelling, completing the cycle.
Scientists think AMOC brings enough warmth to the northern hemisphere that without it, large parts of Europe could enter a deep freeze.
Beyond temperature effects, previous studies show that a weaker circulation system would also lead to less precipitation in Europe, along with faster sea-level rise in the Atlantic Ocean.
'Continued greenhouse gas emissions put us on a path to further extreme climate impacts, leading to more heatwaves, droughts, and other extreme weather events,' René van Westen, lead author of the study, said.
'The longer we keep burning fossil fuels, the worse these will get. At the same time, every fraction of a degree of global warming brings us closer to the collapse of the AMOC.
'Our new study shows that this would take Europe to the other extreme - a freezing cold future.'
'Policymakers must take heed - urgent and drastic cuts to greenhouse gas emissions are the only way to mitigate the most catastrophic impacts of the climate crisis and prevent the devastating consequences of an AMOC collapse on society.'
Commenting on the study Gareth Redmond-King, Head of International Programme at the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, said: 'A collapse of the AMOC, a critical ocean current, would tip the UK's current temperate climate into something like the cold of northern Canada, seriously reducing the land suitable for growing crops, and putting our food security in serious danger.
'Cutting emissions to net zero is the only solution we have to averting the most dangerous impacts of climate change.
Dr Bablu Sinha, Leader of Climate and Uncertainty, Marine Systems Modelling (MSM), National Oceanography Centre, said the results are 'physically plausible' and in line with previous modelling studies.
Professor Jon Robson, Research Fellow at the National Centre for Atmospheric Science at the University of Reading, added: 'A collapse in the strength of the AMOC would have serious implications, including for people living in Europe.
'This research adds to a growing worry that a collapse in the strength of the AMOC could mean sharp drops in European winter temperatures and increases in winter storminess across Northern Europe, even in a globally warming climate.'
However some experts urged a sense of caution.
Dr Alejandra Sanchez-Franks, Senior Research Scientist at the National Oceanography Centre, said: 'While these modelling studies are of great value to our community, it is important to be aware that our observational ocean records have not yet captured a tipping point, so the results of this study and their immediate impact on the real world must be interpreted with caution.'
The study, published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, was carried out by researchers from the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute and Utrecht University.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Diet soda shockingly linked to devastating disease that kills 100,000 Americans each year
Diet soda shockingly linked to devastating disease that kills 100,000 Americans each year

Daily Mail​

time5 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Diet soda shockingly linked to devastating disease that kills 100,000 Americans each year

Diet soda might no longer be a healthier option after all. A new study found people who regularly drink the diet alternatives have more than double the risk of developing Type 2 diabetes compared to people who reach for full-sugar beverages. And artificial sweeteners may be to blame. The scientists found that high intake of saccharin - a common zero-calorie artificial sweetener found in diet drinks - could be the main risk factor for the chronic illness, which is suffered by 37 million Americans. The FDA approved the use of saccharin as a zero-calorie alternative to sugar in various foods and beverages in 1977. But saccharin is at least 300 times sweeter than regular sugar and researchers now believe excess consumption may interfere with the body's natural process of utilizing glucose - a sugar the body uses for energy. Based on their findings, study author Lyn Steffen recommended 'limiting the use of any sweetener' and suggested choosing 'unsweetened water, coffee, tea, milk or a small amount of 100 percent fruit juice' for beverages. The researchers examined the diets of 4,654 adults between 1985 to 2015. The participants' average intake of artificial sweeteners, diet beverages, aspartame (a low-calorie artificial sweetener) and sucralose (a synthetic artificial sweetener) were measured in the first year, seventh year and Year 20. The study did not include people who regularly or occasionally drink full sugar sodas. Based on their results, the participants were divided into groups to determine their probability of developing Type 2 diabetes. During this 30-year period, 691 participants developed diabetes. Results showed that the participants who consumed the most diet sodas in the 30 year period had a 129 percent greater chance of developing diabetes than those who barely drank any diet beverages. Additionally, the researchers also found that those who drank sodas loaded with saccharin such as fountain Diet Coca Cola, Diet Dr Pepper and Tab had a 110 percent increased risk of diabetes. No link was found between diabetes and aspartame or sucralose. The observational study did not determine the reason why artificial sweeteners may lead to Type 2 diabetes. However, the researchers believe that consuming excessive diet sodas with artificial sweeteners that are overall much sweeter than real sugar may interfere with the body's metabolism process and lead to excess sugar in the bloodstream. According to the American Heart Association, men should consume no more than 36 grams or 150 calories of sugar per day while women should consume no more than 25 grams or 100 calories of sugar per day. However, an 8oz can of Sprite Zero contains 50 mg artificial sweeteners, Coke Zero contains 58 mg and Pepsi Max has 77 mg. Along with this, Diet Pepsi and Caffeine-Free Diet Pepsi both contain 111 mg and 118 mg, respectively while Diet Dr Pepper has a shocking 123 mg of artificial sweeteners. Both Diet Coke and Caffeine-Free Coke have 125 mg of artificial sweeteners too. Excess sugar consumption can pave the way for weight gain, high blood pressure, heart disease and insulin resistance, which can cause Type 2 diabetes. Type 2 diabetes is the most common form of the condition and over 37 million American adults suffer from this form of the chronic illness. The CDC reports that over 100,000 Americans die of diabetes every year. It is caused by either the pancreas not producing enough insulin - a hormone that regulates blood sugar levels - or the body's cells not responding properly to insulin. When you eat sugar, your body breaks it down into glucose, which the enters your bloodstream for energy absorption. To regulate blood sugar levels, the pancreas releases insulin, which helps glucose enter your cells for energy. But consuming excessive amounts of sugar can make the body resistant to insulin, meaning it can't effectively use the insulin to lower blood sugar. This leads to high blood sugar levels and a buildup of glucose in the bloodstream, which can damage the eyes, kidneys, nerves and heart.

Scientists reveal foot hack that's guaranteed to help you fall asleep
Scientists reveal foot hack that's guaranteed to help you fall asleep

Daily Mail​

time7 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Scientists reveal foot hack that's guaranteed to help you fall asleep

Scientists have revealed a foolproof method involving your foot to help you drift off. An Instagram post went viral after recommending struggling sleepers to try dozing of with one foot outside the covers, citing a major anthropological analysis. The post read: 'A fascinating 2023 study published in the Journal of Physiological Anthropology has confirmed that sleeping with one foot outside the blanket isn't just a quirky habit - it's a legit sleep hack.' Try this! If you're struggling to fall asleep, scientists have discovered a simple foot-based hack that can help you drift off faster While this sounds simple, research has shown that the change really can make a big difference to your quality of sleep. The reason the unusual trick works is because a reduction in core body temperature is one of the key signs that tells your body it's time to fall asleep. As the body's temperature falls, a signal is sent to your brain, triggering the production of melatonin - a chemical that eases the body to sleep and regulates the circadian rhythm. In the viral post, which was shared by Biohack Yourself Media, the caption reads: 'The soles of your feet have special blood vessels designed to dump heat fast. 'Exposing just one foot to cooler air helps lower your core body temperature.' Dropping your core body temperature will raise your melatonin levels and reduce the time it takes to fall asleep as well as improve overall sleep quality. Commenters shared the success they have had using this simple hack. One wrote: 'I do it always. Usually the whole one leg.' Another added: 'I've been doing this my whole life.' However, some commenters pointed out that sleeping with a foot out of the duvet triggered an irrational fear. As one commenter wrote: 'This is what a foot grabbing monster would say.' 'So the shadow man can pull me under the bed!!! Nice try but I don't think so,' another chimed in. While another asked: 'Who wrote this, the boogie man?!' Others had more practical concerns about sleeping with their leg exposed to the open air. A commenter complained that this might work fine 'until the mosquitos attack'. Another added that this is a good plan 'unless you have a cat'. While some people might not like the idea, science shows that keeping your feet cool really is one of the best ways to drift off. Although it isn't clarified in the post, the 2023 paper mentioned is likely a study conducted by Japanese researchers on the effects of bathing before bedtime. This study found that having a long, hot bath before getting into bed significantly improved sleep duration and sped up falling asleep. This might sound counterintuitive, but it is the total drop in core body temperature which causes the body's sleep reaction and not just being cold. By temporarily raising the core body temperature one to two hours before bed, you can create a bigger change and a more powerful sleep reaction. Getting your skin hot in the bath triggers a process that causes blood to rush to veins near the surface of the skin in a process called vasodilation. When you get out of the bath, more blood will be running through the exposed veins on your feet, allowing for even faster cooling. One 2023 study conducted by Chinese researchers recommended that taking a 24-minute footbath at 108F before bed was the optimal way to increase sleep quality. Keeping your feet exposed afterwards allows for even faster cooling and a greater sleep reaction. But if you let your feet get too cold the blood will stop flowing to the surface - a process called vasoconstriction - and the cooling process will be inhibited. Some studies have even recommended wearing socks to bed in order to maintain vasodilation and keep the core body temperature cool. A study conducted by Korean researchers found that participants slept significantly better and fell asleep faster while wearing warming socks. On average this led to participants getting 30 minutes extra sleep per night and falling asleep 7.5 minutes quicker.

‘It was simply mind-blowing': readers remember seeing Star Wars for the first time
‘It was simply mind-blowing': readers remember seeing Star Wars for the first time

The Guardian

time7 hours ago

  • The Guardian

‘It was simply mind-blowing': readers remember seeing Star Wars for the first time

A relatively long time ago in cinemas near and far away, the first Star Wars film captivated a generation of children and adults. As the British Film Institute in London this week screens the original 1977 theatrical version of the space opera, which has rarely been shown since the 1990s, readers have shared their recollections of its groundbreaking special effects, iconic heroes and villains, and queueing around the block for tickets. Most of those who responded to a Guardian callout recalled being mesmerised by the film's opening crawl, then 'blown away' by the first scene in which Princess Leia's starship is captured by an immense Imperial Star Destroyer. 'It loomed right over our heads in the theatre, immediately putting us in the action, alerting us to the huge stakes in this world,' said Marilyn Stacey, a 68-year-old paralegal and actor from Portland, Oregon, who saw the film with her boyfriend in Westwood, Los Angeles, soon after it opened in the US in May 1977. Many readers said Star Wars was the first 'grownup' film they saw as children, with their few previous trips to the cinema being for Disney films such as Mary Poppins or the Herbie comedies about a sentient Volkswagen Beetle. Mark Hannaby, who was six in 1978 when his father drove him from the suburbs of Wrexham, north-east Wales, to see the film at the biggest screen nearby at the Odeon in Liverpool, recalled how it captured his imagination. 'At that age, I don't think you expect the external world to correspond with your internal world,' said Hannaby, 52, now a journalism lecturer at the University of Chester. 'Dad said my face never left the screen. I was hungry for the story, and unusually uninterested in the wine gums he offered. Even for years afterwards, nothing really compared to it.' Lois Pass, from Southend-on-Sea, who didn't have a TV at home when she saw the film as a teenager in 1978, agreed. 'To suddenly see battles taking place in space, travel faster than the speed of light, plus this mysterious power – the Force – in a galactic battle between good and evil was simply mind-blowing,' she said. Like many readers, Cliff Ramshaw's anticipation for the film had been fuelled by its merchandising. By the time it came out in the UK, Ramshaw, now 58, had already read the novelisation and part of the Marvel comic book adaptation, and had decorated his school haversack with drawings of X-wings and Tie fighters. Unfortunately, his father did not share his enthusiasm for the film when he took him and his younger brother to see it in Sunderland in 1978. 'We arrived early and Dad, not wanting to hang around, took us in straight away [to an earlier screening],' he recalled. 'We sat down just in time to see the attack on the Death Star. After the movie ended we remained seated while the audience left and a new crowd arrived. We saw the beginning and middle of the movie and then, when the attack on the Death Star was about to start, Dad took us out of the cinema and drove us home!' Ramshaw, who now lives in the Cotswolds, didn't get to see the film the whole way through until it was aired on British TV four years later. But his unusual viewing experience did not dampen his love for Star Wars, and he later became a software engineer at George Lucas's visual effects company Industrial Light & Magic. Luke Skywalker's journey from a farm boy on a backwater planet to a hero of the rebellion particularly enraptured readers who had grown up in small or remote communities. Back in 1978, Pass, who grew up in the Essex coastal town of Shoeburyness, was grappling with discomfort about her 'lowly position on the social scale' at the local grammar school. 'There was Luke, a poor, scruffy, nobody from nowhere, just like me, suddenly plucked from obscurity to discover his true calling. Obi-Wan Kenobi revealing that there is a whole lot more to his life than he could ever have imagined [was] a potent message!' Many women who responded to the callout recalled how enamoured they were with Princess Leia's attitude. Rebecca Pollock, a HR worker from Brisbane, Australia, said: 'For a young girl, growing up in a country town in Queensland, watching an amazing heroine like Princess Leia dominate her world gave me a role model who was brave, adventurous and strong in the face of adversity. I loved it when she looked up at Darth Vader and talked back to him, and her banter with Han Solo. Her wit and sarcastic approach was so different to what I'd seen women be.' It wasn't just children and teenagers who were enraptured. Milton Justice, a former artistic director of the Stella Adler Academy of Acting and Theatre, saw the film after Carrie Fisher, who played Princess Leia, auditioned for a part in a murder-mystery film he was producing. 'I remember Carrie's audition, because she was very quirky as an actor. She didn't get the part. After Star Wars opened, I went back into the company and said: 'Are you guys crazy?' I later knew her socially. She really was one of the funniest people ever. Even some of the line readings she did in Star Wars had that kind of way that she saw life.' Justice, who now runs a podcast about acting, said back then many people in the movie industry thought Star Wars was just a one-off. 'In an odd sense, we might have been more respectful of the story than the special effects. I don't blame Star Wars for the fact that so many movies today have so many special effects that you don't even see the story. I think it's very separate from those kind of films.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store