Promising reform, Noem tells US Coast Guard Academy graduates they will lead a 'brand new' service
Noem, the keynote speaker at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy's commencement, outlined the Trump administration's plans to increase the service's military workforce by at least 15,000 by the end of fiscal year 2028. The plan also calls for reducing the number of admirals by 25%, boosting recruiting efforts and increasing the fleet, including icebreakers that are used in the Arctic.
'A new chapter for America's Coast Guard, one like we have never seen before, starts right now,' she told the 256 cadets, who became newly minted officers from the prestigious service academy in New London, Connecticut.
Noem spoke of the Coast Guard being 10% short of its enlisted workforce goals and relying on outdated aircraft and ships, some sailing with 75% of the needed crew members. She recalled a meeting with President Donald Trump, who she said asked what the Coast Guard needed.
'I said sir, they need everything,' Noem said. 'They've been neglected for too long.'
Big change is afoot
The Coast Guard has more than 43,000 active duty members, 8,000 reservists, and 30,000 auxiliary members.
'We are on the edge of transformational change,' said Adm. Kevin E. Lunday, who Noem announced Wednesday will become the service's new commandant. Lunday has been the service's acting commandant since Jan. 21, after Trump fired former Commandant Adm. Linda Fagan, the first female leader of the Coast Guard.
The administration's modernization plan, called Force Design 2028, officially takes effect on Wednesday, Noem said. Besides increasing the workforce, it calls for the appointment of a dedicated civilian leader to oversee the 234-year-old maritime service, essentially mirroring how the other branches of the U.S. military are led at the Pentagon.
Nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate, the proposed Coast Guard Service Secretary within the Homeland Security Department would advocate for a service 'weakened by decades of underinvestment, neglect and strategic drift,' and create a new level of accountability, according to the plan released Wednesday.
Such a change would require congressional approval. Currently, there is at least one bill before Congress that would create such a position.
'Creating a Secretary of the Coast Guard ensures they have the leadership, resources, and support they need to continue their vital missions,' said the bill's author, Republican U.S. Rep. Mike Ezell of Mississippi, chair of the House Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Subcommittee, in a recent written statement. 'It's time we give the Coast Guard the same level of recognition and advocacy that other military branches receive.'
Coast Guard is now under Homeland Security
Control of the Coast Guard was officially transferred from the U.S. Department of Transportation to DHS in 2003. The Commandant of the Coast Guard, a four-star admiral and the highest ranking Coast Guard officer, is now tasked with leading the service.
The Coast Guard competes for attention with more than a dozen components of the DHS, including U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Under the Trump administration's plan, the appointment of a secretary, accountable to the president and the DHS secretary and subject to congressional oversight, presents an opportunity to reform the service's organizational structure.
'The Coast Guard must be able to conduct its missions and deliver results without being mired in wasteful bureaucracy,' the report reads.
Many of the service academy graduates cheered the promised reforms during Wednesday's commencement. Cadet Veronica Krystofik of Colchester, Conn., who was named the Distinguished Graduate of the class of 2025, said Force Design 2028 marks 'the most significant shift in a century.'
'But I'm not worried because I know exactly who is stepping up to that challenge. Our class,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
22 minutes ago
- Reuters
US targets steel, copper, lithium imports under Uyghur forced labor law
WASHINGTON, Aug 19 (Reuters) - The Trump administration on Tuesday said it was targeting more imports of Chinese goods, including steel, copper and lithium, for high-priority enforcement over alleged human-rights abuses involving the Uyghurs. The Department of Homeland Security, in a post on X, said it was also designating caustic soda and red dates for high-priority enforcement under the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act. "The use of slave labor is repulsive and we will hold Chinese companies accountable for abuses and eliminate threats its forced labor practices pose to our prosperity," U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said separately on X. The Uyghur-related law restricts the import of goods tied to what the U.S. describes as China's human-rights abuses and ongoing genocide in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. U.S. authorities say Chinese authorities have established internment camps for Uyghurs and other religious and ethnic minority groups in China's western Xinjiang region. Beijing has denied any abuses.
The Guardian
34 minutes ago
- The Guardian
What security guarantees might Ukraine get in return for a peace deal?
European leaders have been holding a virtual conference call to discuss what security guarantees they could give to Ukraine in the event of a peace deal with Russia. The discussion follows Monday's unprecedented get-together in the White House hosted by Donald Trump. The US president met Volodymyr Zelenskyy and held talks with Britain's Keir Starmer, as well as the leaders of Germany, France, Italy, Finland, the European Union and Nato. The main topic was how to end the war in Ukraine, the continent's biggest since 1945, and how Europe might stop Russia from attacking again. Zelenskyy has said that the details will be worked out and 'formalised on paper' within a week to 10 days. As many as 30 countries – called the 'coalition of the willing' – are likely to be involved, with some help from the US, although what that might mean is unclear. Speaking after his meeting on Monday with Donald Trump and European leaders in the White House, Zelenskyy said their support could take many forms. One of those could be prysutnist (the Ukrainian word for presence), meaning they would provide troops. And it might include intelligence, as well as providing security in the air and on the Black Sea, or simply funds, he said. The key question is, which European governments are willing to take part in a peacekeeping mission inside Ukraine? The UK and France have indicated they are ready to send soldiers as part of a 'reassurance force'. France's president, Emmanuel Macron, confirmed: 'We have to help Ukraine on the ground.' Germany is more sceptical. Many details have yet to be worked out. Would western troops be stationed along a ceasefire line or provide a more limited training role in big cities such as Kyiv and Lviv? And what rules of engagement would they have if they came under Russian fire? Trump has promised to coordinate a Europe-led peacekeeping operation in Ukraine. 'When it comes to security, there's going to be a lot of help,' he said on Monday, sitting next to Zelenskyy in the Oval Office. The US president made clear European countries would be expected to carry most of the burden. 'They are a first line of defence because they're there. But we'll help them out,' he said. Ukraine wants to buy $90bn worth of US weapons and says they could form part of the security guarantee. Overall, however, Trump has been vague about how much the US would contribute. He has ruled out Ukraine's membership of Nato, which Kyiv believes would be the best deterrent against a future Russian onslaught. There seems no prospect the US would send its own troops to take part in a peace-keeping mission. One more realistic option would be for the Pentagon to provide logistical support to a proposed 'sky shield'. The plan envisages an air protection zone in the west and the centre of Ukraine, including over the capital Kyiv, enforced by European fighter jets. According to Trump, Vladimir Putin agreed during their summit in Alaska that Ukraine required security guarantees. Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff has said that these would be outside the auspices of Nato, but would be the equivalent of article 5, Nato's self-defence pact in which an attack on one is considered an attack on all. Russia's interpretation of guarantees, however, seems different from Witkoff's version. The Kremlin says it is categorically opposed to western troops in Ukraine. It is unlikely to accept a peacekeeping force as part of any deal. Putin's war goals, meanwhile, are unchanged and framed in terms of Russia's own existential security needs. He is demanding the entirety of Donetsk and Luhansk provinces, including territory Russia has been unable since 2014 to capture. Putin also wants Ukraine's 'demilitarisation and denazification' – meaning severe limits on the size of Kyiv's army, as well as Zelenskyy's removal. The intense diplomacy of the past few days may seem like progress. But Russia's basic position hasn't changed. Putin has shown no sign he respects Ukraine's sovereignty or that he wants to stop the war. While Russia's bombing continues discussion of security guarantees seems moot. We have been here before. In 1994 Kyiv agreed to give up its nuclear weapons in exchange for international security assurances. Under the terms of the Budapest memorandum the US, Russia, the UK, China and France said they would ensure Ukraine's 'territorial integrity' and 'political independence'. And to 'refrain from the use and threat of force'. At the time Ukrainian politicians thought giving up the country's nuclear arsenal left it open to Russian attack. The Clinton administration was insistent. In May 1997 Russia's president Boris Yeltsin signed a friendship treaty with his Ukrainian counterpart, Leonid Kuchma. Russia recognised Ukraine's post-Soviet borders. As part of the deal, Kyiv gave Moscow most of its navy, and leased the Crimean port of Sevastopol to the Russians for 20 years. Neither agreement stopped Russian aggression. In 2014 the Kremlin used its troops stationed in Crimea to seize and annex the peninsula. Putin now says the whole of Ukraine is 'historical Russia'. Ukraine's experience of betrayal – with late 20th-century pledges proving to be worthless – means it will want better guarantees this time.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Kim Jong Un makes nuclear pledge after South Korea-US military drills
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un condemned the joint US -South Korean military drills, labelling them an "obvious expression of their will to provoke war". Mr Kim vowed to rapidly expand North Korea 's nuclear arsenal and inspected an advanced warship being fitted with nuclear-capable systems. The annual 11-day drills, named Ulchi Freedom Shield, involve 21,000 troops and are designed to prepare for a potential attack from North Korea. Seoul and Washington maintain the exercises are purely defensive, despite Pyongyang regularly criticising them as rehearsals for invasion. Efforts to address North Korea's nuclear weapons development are expected to be discussed at an upcoming meeting between Donald Trump and South Korean president Lee.
