Octoname Helps Remember Names Effortlessly and Solve the Embarrassing Problem of Forgetting Names
Octoname, a flashcard-style memory app, helps users remember names and build meaningful connections.
Toto, the Cofounder of Octoname, shared the story behind the app's creation, 'The idea behind Octoname was born from a common and deeply personal struggle: forgetting names in social or professional settings. In search of a solution, I began writing down names and practicing them regularly; eventually, I turned this routine into an app that could help others as well. Octoname was born.'
Octoname's simple interface is designed to promote long-term memory retention through spaced repetition and visual reinforcement, methods often used in language learning and cognitive training. The app turns the overwhelming process of memorizing dozens of names into a manageable and enjoyable, daily practice.
Using Octoname, a user can now:
Create custom flashcards for each person they meet by adding their name, photo, where meeting happened, and any personal notes.
Organize people into groups such as Work, Gym, Conference, for easier review.
Mark names as 'remembered' or 'still learning' to keep track of progress.
Practice with flashcard review sessions at your own pace.
Review regularly to keep names fresh in mind, even after months.
Whether preparing for a meeting, gearing up for a networking event, or simply navigating daily social encounters, Octoname helps users walk in confidently and leave a lasting impression, simply by saying names correctly.
Before any event, a user can prepare themselves by :
Quickly scanning his list
Build confidence and leave a great impression by greeting people by name.
'Stop saying, I'm just bad with names. That excuse is holding you back: from deeper connections, better opportunities, and real confidence in every social setting. With Octoname, remembering names becomes second nature. ' Toto Alpha concludes.
From students and teachers to expats, professionals, and event organizers, Octoname is built for anyone who meets a lot of people and wants to show up as their best, most connected self.
To download Octoname on the App Store, visit: https://apps.apple.com/de/app/octoname/id6747905410.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Apple Appoints Sabih Khan as New COO
Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. The latest announcement is out from Apple ( (AAPL)). Apple Inc. announced that Sabih Khan has been appointed as the new Chief Operating Officer, effective July 25, 2025, succeeding Jeff Williams. Khan, who has been with Apple since 1995, previously held senior positions in operations and product operations, and his appointment is part of a planned transition by the company. The most recent analyst rating on (AAPL) stock is a Hold with a $211.00 price target. To see the full list of analyst forecasts on Apple stock, see the AAPL Stock Forecast page. Spark's Take on AAPL Stock According to Spark, TipRanks' AI Analyst, AAPL is a Outperform. Apple's overall stock score is primarily driven by its strong financial performance, buoyed by high profitability and efficient cash flow management. While technical analysis indicates potential near-term weakness, Apple's long-term growth prospects, particularly in services, support its valuation. The recent earnings call reinforces optimism, though macroeconomic challenges remain. Investors should weigh Apple's strategic initiatives against its premium valuation. To see Spark's full report on AAPL stock, click here. More about Apple Apple Inc. operates in the technology industry, primarily focusing on consumer electronics, software, and services. It is renowned for its innovative products such as the iPhone, iPad, Mac computers, and various software platforms. Average Trading Volume: 53,239,639 Technical Sentiment Signal: Buy Current Market Cap: $3192.7B Learn more about AAPL stock on TipRanks' Stock Analysis page.
Globe and Mail
3 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Could a Quantum Computing Bubble Be About to Pop? History Offers a Clear Answer
Key Points IonQ, Rigetti Computing, D-Wave Quantum, and Quantum Computing have reached valuation levels well beyond those seen during prior stock market bubbles. Each of these companies has recently raised capital through a series of equity offerings and stock issuances. These moves could suggest that the valuation levels for these businesses are not only abnormally high, but unsustainable. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Last summer, companies such as IonQ (NYSE: IONQ), Rigetti Computing (NASDAQ: RGTI), D-Wave Quantum (NYSE: QBTS), and Quantum Computing (NASDAQ: QUBT) were unknown penny stocks. However, as quantum computing steadily made its way toward center stage in the artificial intelligence (AI) realm, each of these companies witnessed meteoric rises in their share prices. Over the last 12 months, IonQ stock has blasted higher by 517%, while Rigetti, D-Wave, and Quantum Computing have experienced surges of at least 1,500% as of this writing (July 21). With valuations reaching historically high levels, could investors be on the verge of witnessing a quantum computing bubble bursting? Is quantum computing in a bubble? The chart below illustrates valuation trends among popular quantum computing stocks on a price-to-sales (P/S) basis. IONQ PS Ratio data by YCharts. As I outlined in a prior article, the quantum computing stocks above are trading at far higher P/S multiples compared to levels seen during the dot-com and COVID-19 stock bubbles. For example, during the internet boom in the late 1990s, stocks such as Amazon, Cisco, and Microsoft experienced peak P/S ratios in the range of 30x and 40x. Taking this a step further, popular COVID stocks such as Zoom Communications and Peloton saw P/S multiples top out at 124x and 20x, respectively. The big theme here is that IonQ, Rigetti, D-Wave, and Quantum Computing are each trading for valuation multiples that could be seen as historically high, even when compared to prior bubble events. With that said, other AI companies that are also exploring quantum computing -- such as Nvidia, Amazon, Alphabet, and Microsoft -- currently trade for much more reasonable valuation multiples when compared to the companies in the chart above. For this reason, I do not think the entire quantum computing landscape is at risk of experiencing a bubble-bursting event. However, IonQ and its peers have been dropping some breadcrumbs in recent months that lead me to think the smaller quantum computing players could be on the verge of a harsh sell-off. What's going on under the hood with quantum computing stocks? After some digging into certain filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), I think IonQ, Rigetti, D-Wave, and Quantum Computing may be trying to signal some important things to investors: In February, IonQ announced that it planned to raise up to $500 million through a series of stock issuances. The company doubled down on its capital-raising ambitions more recently, offering 14,165,708 shares at a price of $55.49 -- raising nearly $1 billion in the process. In June, Rigetti raised $350 million in capital after completing an at-the-market (ATM) equity offering. Between June 11 and June 27, D-Wave Quantum raised $400 million through an ATM offering. Of note: This followed a prior raise of $150 million that occurred in January. In late June, Quantum Computing raised $200 million following the issuance of 14 million shares at an average price of $14.25. What's really going on here? With each of these quantum computing stocks trading near all-time highs, it appears to me that management is looking to take advantage of frothy market conditions. IONQ data by YCharts. Quantum computing is a research-heavy, capital-intensive industry. Management at IonQ and its peers surely understand this, and so I see these capital raises as a calculated move to capitalize on inflated, overstretched valuations. Should you invest in quantum computing stocks? To me, any hint of a bubble surrounding IonQ and its smaller peers may already be in the process of bursting. Under the surface, the various stock issuances and equity offerings annotated above could suggest that management does not believe current price levels are sustainable. By using the dot-com and COVID bubbles as benchmarks, history would suggest that a major correction could be on the horizon for these small quantum computing stocks. Issuing stock to raise funds is not sustainable in the long run. Furthermore, consistently diluting shareholders through these offerings could call into question how these companies are allocating capital. In my eyes, if investors are seeking exposure to the quantum computing industry, they are best off exploring more diversified opportunities in big tech as opposed to the smaller, more speculative players analyzed in this piece. Where to invest $1,000 right now When our analyst team has a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041%* — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. They just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025
National Post
3 hours ago
- National Post
Tea app promising safe dating for women hacked, putting users' privacy at risk
Tea, a provocative dating app designed to let women anonymously ask or warn each other about men they'd encountered, rocketed to the top spot on the U.S. Apple App Store this week. On Friday, the company behind the app confirmed it had been hacked: Thousands of images, including selfies, were leaked online. Article content 'We have engaged third-party cybersecurity experts and are working around the clock to secure our systems,' San Francisco-based Tea Dating Advice Inc. said in a statement. Article content Article content Article content Article content Tea founder Sean Cook, a software engineer who previously worked at Salesforce and Shutterfly, says on the app's website that he founded the company in 2022 after witnessing his own mother's 'terrifying' experiences. Cook said they included unknowingly dating men with criminal records and being 'catfished' — deceived by men using false identities. Tea markets itself as a safe way for women to anonymously vet men they might meet on dating apps such as Tinder or Bumble — ensuring that the men are who they say they are, not criminals and not already married or in a relationship. It's been compared to the Yelp of dating. Article content In an Apple Store review, one woman wrote that she used a Tea search to investigate a man she'd begun talking to and discovered 'over 20 red flags, including serious allegations like assault and recording women without their consent.' She said she cut off communication. 'I can't imagine how things could've gone had I not known,' she wrote. Article content Article content Article content A surge in social media attention over the past week pushed Tea to the No. 1 spot at the U.S. Apple Store as of July 24, according to Sensor Tower, a research firm. In the seven days from July 17-23, Tea downloads shot up 525 per cent compared to the week before. Tea said in an Instagram post that it had reached four million users. Article content A female columnist for The Times of London newspaper, who signed into the app, on Thursday called Tea a 'man-shaming site' and complained that 'this is simply vigilante justice, entirely reliant on the scruples of anonymous women. With Tea on the scene, what man would ever dare date a woman again?' Article content 'Over the last couple of weeks, we've gotten hundreds of calls on it. It's blown up,' attorney Minc said. 'People are upset. They're getting named. They're getting shamed.' Article content In 1996, Congress passed legislation protecting websites and apps from liability for things posted by their users. But the users can be sued for spreading 'false and defamatory' information, Minc said.
