logo
Six Key Lessons COVID-19 Taught Us For Next Time

Six Key Lessons COVID-19 Taught Us For Next Time

Forbes31-03-2025

(Photo by)
Getty Images
During the fall of 2019, in a lab in Wuhan, China, a cluster of atoms weighing less than one-trillionth of a gram mutated ever so slightly, cascading into the greatest disruption to human life in over a century. COVID-19 would go on to the lives of over 20 million people worldwide and over a million in the United States.
In a matter of months, the coronavirus had reshaped our world. It forced us indoors, upended economies, and brought suffering and loss to millions. It exposed cracks in our systems and magnified existing inequalities. And it tested the leadership of institutions, governments, and businesses.
Yet amidst the upheaval, it also accelerated innovation in vaccine development, proved the potential of global collaboration, and offered valuable lessons—lessons we dare not ignore.
Five years on, with the benefit of hindsight, what lessons did we learn from the Covid Crisis? What are the takeaways? What ideas can we carry forward? And how can we better prepare for next time? Here are six enduring lessons that the pandemic offers:
1. COVID-19 United Us at First But Divided Us at last.
According to a recent Pew survey, seventy-two percent of Americans believe COVID-19 did more to drive the country apart than to bring it together. Trust in government plummeted to a new low. In Covid's Wake: How Our Politics Failed Us, a new book that reviews the crisis, concludes that the scientific community overestimated the dangers of the virus and stifled dissenting scientific opinion. Models were designed solely to reduce deaths, failing to include other criteria, such as the effects of social isolation on children's mental health. Locking down at the pandemic's start may have been necessary, say these authors, but continuing the lockdowns for so long created lasting hardship and divisions.
Key takeaway: In a politically polarized era, one-size-fits-all health mandates from the National Institute of Health must be avoided. Public trust must be maintained, and local control ensured.
2. Resilience Is No Longer a Luxury—It's a Necessity.
When COVID-19 struck, organizations and individuals who demonstrated resilience – did best. They exhibited the ability to keep calm, remain flexible, and adapt readily, and weathered the storm far better than those who went into denial mode or dismissed COVID-19 as a hoax or government conspiracy. When supply chains buckled, when health officials enforced lockdowns, organizations that had invested in contingency planning and crisis management demonstrated resilience and staying power.
Key takeaway: Leaders who encouraged experimentation found the path forward. Those that did not floundered and went out of business. Individuals who cultivated a learning mindset, continuously monitoring and following the latest directives, kept functioning and recovered faster.
3. Health Security Is National Security.
In a 2015 TED Talk, Bill Gates warned that the greatest threat to humanity would come "not from a missile but a microbe.' Before the pandemic, a cascade of warnings went unheeded. In 2019, White House economists warned that a pandemic could devastate America. As the pandemic unfolded, delayed responses, magical thinking, mixed messages, and lack of coordination cost precious time and countless lives.
Before COVID-19, most thought little about public health infrastructure or infectious disease modeling. COVID-19 made clear that underinvesting in public health is not just a medical risk but a geopolitical and economic risk as well. In today's interconnected world, a virus emerging in one corner of the globe can bring entire economies to a halt and overwhelm healthcare systems thousands of miles away.
Key takeaway: Investments in early warning systems, stockpiling of essential medical supplies, and better international coordination must be considered strategic imperatives, not budget line items. Health security is just as important as military security.
4. Inequality Doesn't Disappear in Crisis—It Gets Exposed.
While the virus itself was biologically impartial, its impacts were anything but. Marginalized and vulnerable communities bore the brunt of both the health and economic fallout. Disparities in access to healthcare, employment protections, digital connectivity, and even clean air and water became painfully visible.
Essential workers—once taken for granted—emerged as the backbone of society. Grocery clerks, delivery drivers, sanitation workers, and healthcare aides kept our systems running while risking their own health. For a brief moment, the conversation around equity and inclusion gained renewed urgency.
Key takeaway: The challenge now is to act on that awareness going forward. The post-pandemic world must actively work to close gaps, not widen them, because, in the next crisis, those disparities will come back to haunt us all over again.
5. Innovation Is Our Lifeline in Crisis, and in the Future We Create.
In the darkest days of the pandemic, human ingenuity shined. Scientists across borders collaborated at unprecedented speeds to develop vaccines using novel mRNA technology. Educators adapted to online teaching. Companies retooled their operations, launched new services, and shifted to digital business models practically overnight.
The rapid rise of video-conferencing tools transformed the workplace and accelerated the remote work revolution. Long-standing barriers to telemedicine were swept away, and the technology sector didn't just survive; it became a vital infrastructure for continuity.
Key takeaway: Innovation wasn't optional in meeting the Covid-19 criai—it was oxygen. And the systems that encouraged experimentation, rapid iteration, and bold thinking fared better. The lesson is clear: we must nurture innovation not just in emergencies but as a daily discipline.
6. Leadership in Times of Crisis Reveals Character
Every crisis is a test of leadership. COVID-19 revealed which leaders were prepared and which were not. Some communicated clearly, showed empathy, and made smart decisions that saved lives and stabilized communities. Others disappeared, floundered, delayed, denied, or deflected—often with tragic consequences.
Effective crisis leadership wasn't about knowing all the answers. It was about asking the right questions, adapting quickly, and staying in touch with stakeholders. The best leaders demonstrated transparency, built trust, and showed compassion. The worst fueled division and confusion and stoked fear.
Key Takeaway: Leadership in crises reveals who we really are. The next disruption—whether from climate disaster, cyberattack, nuclear fallout, or global pandemic—won't wait for us to prepare. Preparedness is a mindset we must cultivate for the times in which we suddenly find ourselves living.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

De Blasio watches with glee as candidates attack Cuomo in NYC mayoral debate
De Blasio watches with glee as candidates attack Cuomo in NYC mayoral debate

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

De Blasio watches with glee as candidates attack Cuomo in NYC mayoral debate

NEW YORK — As mayoral hopefuls in Thursday night's Democratic primary debate landed sharp rejoinders against frontrunner Andrew Cuomo, one of the former governor's old foes broke out the popcorn. Former Mayor Bill de Blasio fired off a series ofgleeful postson X that reveled in the broadsides against Cuomo and lauded the performances of Comptroller Brad Lander, City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams and state Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani, the democratic socialist who is polling second behind Cuomo. 'Wow, @andrewcuomo is REALLY scared of @ZohranKMamdani! He's not even faking it…' de Blasio wrote. 'And Andrew is REALLY disrespecting all the New Yorkers who support Zohran.' City Comptroller Brad Lander was 'attacking consistently and really rattling Cuomo,' wrote de Blasio, who said the former governor's self-proclaimed executive experience consisted of harassing female employees and making decisions that resulted in the death of nursing home residents during Covid. The ex-mayor — who spent eight years being tormented by the former governor over issues as quotidian as how to euthanize a deer — called into question the governor's housing record, accused him of dodging a question about the Rent Guidelines Board and lampooned Cuomo's characterization of the subway as infested with crime. The former governor, of course, had responses for the attacks coming from the dais. He said a report that found he sexually harassed underlings — accusations he has denied — did not result in any criminal charges and was created to hurt him politically. He said his nursing home edicts were consistent with federal guidance during the height of Covid. He has cast the city as poorly run and falling into disrepair on account of the leadership of de Blasio and his successor, New York City Mayor Eric Adams. And he had sharp responses to Mamdani and others over their own legislative records and policies far to the left of his own. But de Blasio's sustained pile-on reinforced the acrimonious relationship between the two executives and appeared to be almost cathartic for the the former mayor. 'Is @andrewcuomo mimicking dialogue from the 1950's?' de Blasio wrote. 'I fully expect Gregory Peck or Jimmy Stewart to join him on stage.' Asked over text message Thursday night if he planned to make an endorsement, de Blasio took a much more laconic approach: "Nope."

'Afraid' for court: Trump DOJ sues NY over immigration enforcement in state courthouses
'Afraid' for court: Trump DOJ sues NY over immigration enforcement in state courthouses

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'Afraid' for court: Trump DOJ sues NY over immigration enforcement in state courthouses

NEW YORK − The Trump administration on June 12 sued New York state for its law restricting federal immigration enforcement inside state courthouses. The lawsuit challenges a New York state law that blocks immigration officials from arresting people at or near New York courthouses. The complaint, filed in federal court in Albany, New York, alleges the law frustrates federal immigration enforcement at a venue - state courthouses - where authorities can safely make arrests. U.S. Justice Department lawyers said New York's law and policies restricting cooperation with federal immigration officers violated the Constitution's Supremacy Clause, which gives federal law precedence over state law. The lawsuit filed in federal court in Albany comes after the administration has increased immigration enforcement at workplaces and while people appeared for immigration court hearings. People have protested against the federal actions in cities across the country. Attorney General Pam Bondi blamed so-called 'sanctuary city policies' for violence seen in California. Sanctuary policies generally refers to those limiting local law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration enforcement. The Justice Department has also sued four New Jersey cities for their laws. New York state had similar policies preventing agents from apprehending migrants, Bondi said in a statement. 'This latest lawsuit in a series of sanctuary city litigation underscores the Department of Justice's commitment to keeping Americans safe and aggressively enforcing the law,' she said. Justice Department lawyers challenged the 2020 state law preventing federal officials from arresting people for civil immigration violations at state courthouses without a signed judicial warrant. New York's 2020 law doesn't apply to federal courthouses or immigration court, according to the legislation's author, state Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal, a Manhattan Democrat who called the lawsuit 'baseless and frivolous." The Justice Department said in a news release that enforcement at courthouses reduces risk of people fleeing or dangerous situations, especially since there is enhanced screening inside court buildings. State officials said federal agents entering local courthouses make communities unsafe by preventing people from accessing the judicial system. The law ensures New Yorkers can pursue justice without fear, Geoff Burgan, a spokesperson for state Attorney General Letitia James, said in a statement. 'Due process means nothing if people are too afraid to appear in court,' he said. James would defend the law and 'all of New York's laws, just as she will continue to defend the rights and dignity of all who call New York home,' Burgan said. Hoylman-Sigal, who authored the law, said the lawsuit was part of the administration's 'ongoing assault on the rule of law in New York.' To avoid conflicting with federal law or federal immigration authority, the law doesn't apply to federal courts or immigration courts, he said in a statement. Meanwhile, it allows U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to arrest people in local courthouses when they have 'actual, valid judicial warrants.' 'At a time when masked ICE officials are roaming the state and lawlessly detaining New Yorkers without any due process, the law preserves access to justice and participation in the judicial process,' he said. A contentious issue has been federal agents targeting people in 'sensitive" areas. Prior Department of Homeland Security guidelines banned enforcement in areas such as schools, places of worship and hospitals. When President Donald Trump took office in January, DHS overturned the longstanding policy to give agents discretion on such actions. The administration enacted another policy permitting enforcement at or near courthouses. Justice Department lawyers also challenged two New York executive orders restricting civil immigration arrests at state facilities, and a separate policy preventing state employees from sharing information to federal officers related to civil immigration enforcement. 'Through these enactments, New York obstructs federal law enforcement and facilitates the evasion of federal law by dangerous criminals, notwithstanding federal agents' statutory mandate to detain and remove illegal aliens,' the complaint said. The same day as the lawsuit, Gov. Kathy Hochul was one of three Democratic governors testifying before Congress about "sanctuary" policies and immigration enforcement. Hochul said her state has cooperated with ICE since she's taken office. "But we have to draw a line somewhere,' Hochul said. 'New York cannot deputize our state officers to enforce civil immigration violations, such as overstaying a visa.' The administration's attack on the 2020 law would turn courthouses 'into traps,' Donna Liberman, executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, said in a statement. It would further force immigrant communities into the shadows. An initial conference date for the lawsuit was scheduled for Sept. 10, court records showed. Contributing: Bart Jansen, USA TODAY Eduardo Cuevas is based in New York City. Reach him by email at emcuevas1@ or on Signal at emcuevas.01. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump DOJ sues NY over immigration enforcement in state courts

New York Civil Liberties Union slams DOJ over ICE lawsuit
New York Civil Liberties Union slams DOJ over ICE lawsuit

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

New York Civil Liberties Union slams DOJ over ICE lawsuit

MANHATTAN (PIX11) — The New York Civil Liberties Union is slamming the U.S. Department of Justice for its lawsuit against New York's Protect Our Courts Act. 'The Trump administration's attack on the Protect Our Courts Act is a blatant assault on justice that would turn New York's courthouses into traps,' Executive Director Donna Lieberman said. 'Our legal system cannot function when people are too scared to step through courthouse doors. Without the Protect Our Courts Act, immigrant New Yorkers may not defend themselves against charges, avoid seeking protective orders, miss custody hearings, and stop fighting unlawful wage theft or eviction. No one is better off when justice is denied.' More Local News New York State Assemblywoman Michaelle Solages, who sponsored the Protect Our Courts Act, told PIX 11 News 'This lawsuit is a shameful display of federal overreach and political cruelty. They're using taxpayer dollars to uphold a law that upholds due process and the human rights of people and I think its really despicable.' Attorney General Pamela Bondi said, 'Lawless sanctuary city policies are the root cause of the violence that Americans have seen in California, and New York State is similarly employing sanctuary city policies to prevent illegal aliens from apprehension.' Bondi added, 'This latest lawsuit in a series of sanctuary city litigation underscores the Department of Justice's commitment to keeping Americans safe and aggressively enforcing the law.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store