logo
Cracking the Code: Understanding Social Security and Maximizing Your Benefits

Cracking the Code: Understanding Social Security and Maximizing Your Benefits

Epoch Times29-04-2025

Social Security is a phrase often used in retirement planning and has been discussed in the media recently. For many, though, it remains a mystery. It provides income, but how does it really work? Further, it's easy to become overwhelmed by countless claims, strategies, and confusing terminology.
This post, however, will help you navigate Social Security's complexities, maximize your benefits, and secure a more comfortable retirement.
What Exactly Is Social Security?
Imagine a safety net made up of generations of hardworking Americans. That's what Social Security is all about. The program was
While working, you and your employer contribute 6.2 percent of your wage through the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA). In turn, the Social Security Trust Fund benefits current beneficiaries. In a sense, today's workers are supporting yesterday's retirees.
Decoding the Benefit Calculation
Social Security checks don't appear out of nowhere. The amount is calculated based on your lifetime earnings. As a simplified breakdown, here is what you need to know.
Your earnings history determines Social Security retirement benefits. To calculate your benefit, the Social Security Administration (SSA) uses the following formula:
Your highest 35 years of earnings
(adjusted for inflation)
Your age at the time you begin claiming
Your full retirement age
For your information, based on the 2024 edition of the
Full Retirement Age (FRA)
A person's FRA is the age at which they can receive 100 percent of their Social Security benefit. Depending on your birth year, it may be:
The FRA for those born between 1943 and 1954 is 66.
Those born between 1955 and 1959 will see an increase in FRA.
If you were born in 1960 or later, your FRA is 67.
You can start claiming at age 62 but must accept a 30 percent reduction. Alternatively, you can delay benefits past your FRA and increase your monthly payment up to 70 years of age.
The Million-Dollar Question: When Should You Claim?
Here is where 'strategy' comes in. There is no one-size-fits-all solution. In each case, it varies:
Claiming early (Age 62–FRA).
Pros:
You get to access your income sooner. This is a great option if you need the money or want to retire early.
Cons:
It is possible to have your benefits permanently reduced by up to 30 percent. In addition, your spouse will receive lower survivor benefits as a result.
Claiming at FRA.
Pros:
The benefit you receive is full and unreduced. This is a good middle ground for many people.
Cons:
If you delay, you lose out on the extra boost.
Delaying Until 70.
Pros:
Your benefit increases by 8 percent every year you delay past FRA up to age 70. Over your lifetime, this can amount to a substantial sum.
Cons:
It takes longer for your income to arrive. As such, you might not 'break-even' if you don't live a long life.
Making Sense of the Break-Even Point
In Social Security discussions, the term 'break-even' is often used. It means the benefits you receive from delaying exceed those you would have received from claiming earlier. If you expect to live well into your 80s or beyond, delaying benefits can be beneficial financially.
Strategies to Maximize Your Benefits
Time isn't everything; it's all about playing the long game.
Work at Least 35 Years
With fewer than 35 years of income under your belt, zero-income years are included in your benefit calculation, reducing it. Replacing low-earning years from your early career with part-time work later in life may even be possible.
Boost Your Earnings
You'll receive more benefits if you earn more (especially during years of higher wages). An individual's lifetime earnings are affected by income from raises, promotions, side gigs, and self-employment.
Strategic Delaying
In addition to delaying your benefits beyond your FRA, you may also be able to increase your monthly check considerably. This is particularly useful for those with longer life expectancies and families that have a long lifespan.
Spousal Coordination
To boost household income, married couples can use several strategies:
Spousal benefit
.
At FRA, a spouse can receive up to 50 percent of the other's benefits, even if they didn't work much.
Claim and suspend
.
While one spouse receives a spousal benefit, the other claims their own benefit at FRA.
Survivor benefits
.
After turning 60, widows and widowers can switch from survivor benefits to their own higher benefits.
Increase Your Tax Awareness
Up to 85 percent of your Social Security benefits may be taxable, depending on your other sources of income (pension, withdrawals from retirement accounts, etc.). You can minimize your tax burden if your income does not exceed certain thresholds.
As of 2025, the basic thresholds are as follows:
Single filers
.
An income over $25,000 may be subject to partial taxation.
Joint filers
.
If your income exceeds $32,000, your benefits will be taxed.
Conduct an Earnings Test
If you claim benefits before FRA and continue to work, the Social Security Administration may temporarily withhold part of your benefit. As an example, if you are under the FRA in 2025, you lose $1 for every $2 you earn over $22,320. Although the money isn't lost, it can affect short-term cash flow because it will be added back to your benefits later.
Use Online Tools
The SSA's website (ssa.gov) has calculators and access to your Social Security Statement. By regularly checking your statement, you can ensure that your earnings record and benefits are also accurate.
Be Aware of Special Situations
Divorced individuals.
It may be possible to claim benefits based on your ex-spouse's record if you were married for more than ten years.
Survivors.
Benefits may be available to survivors' spouses and minor children.
Public employees.
The Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) or Government Pension Offset (GPO) can reduce the benefits of some government workers.
Debunking Common Social Security Myths
Let's debunk some of the most common myths to help you better understand this vital part of your financial future.
'The Social Security System Is in Financial Trouble'
This is a big one, and it causes unnecessary worry. It is not likely that Social Security will disappear overnight. It is a pay-as-you-go system: you and your employer contribute to FICA taxes, but that money primarily pays current benefits.
Social Security indeed faces some financial challenges. Historically, the system has collected more than it has paid out, accumulating a nice surplus. The tide is turning, however. With more people retiring and living longer, more benefits are being paid out than taxes are being collected.
Related Stories
4/26/2025
4/25/2025
The key takeaway is this: without changes, the surplus will disappear
Another way to think of it is like your car running low on gas. While it won't stop working immediately, you'll have to refuel soon. This is where Congress comes in. As they did in 1983, they will need to make adjustments. Among those adjustments could be raising the retirement age, raising taxes, or taxing benefits differently.
'Social Security Benefits Must Be Claimed by Age 62'
Many people make potentially costly decisions because of this myth. Yes, 62 is the earliest you
can
claim benefits. However, it is not required.
You will receive your full, unreduced pension when you reach your 'full retirement age' (FRA). Your FRA depends on your birth year; if you were born after 1960, your FRA is 67.
At 62, you can claim early and get a permanent reduction in your monthly payments. For example, claiming benefits at 62 could mean a 30 percent reduction in monthly income if your FRA is 67. Even if you plan to live a long retirement life, that's a significant sum.
On the flip side, if you can hold off until age 70, you'll get a 'bonus' of about 8 percent more per year for each year you delay claiming your FRA. In other words, if your FRA is 67 and you wait until 70, your monthly income will increase by 24 percent. If you wait from 62 to 70, your income will increase by 77 percent.
'Retirement Income Will Be Derived Mainly From Social Security'
Although Social Security is an important part of your retirement plan, it usually isn't enough to live comfortably. The purpose of this is to supplement your income, not to be your sole source.
Think of it as one piece of a puzzle. To maintain your desired lifestyle, you'll probably need other sources of income, such as savings, investments, or pensions. With the help of a financial advisor, you can prepare a comprehensive income plan that includes Social Security and other sources of income.
'Guaranteed Colas Are Available Every Year'
Your benefits are adjusted for inflation through the cost-of-living adjustment (COLA). The Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers
However, there is no guarantee that there will be a COLA every year. If there is no significant inflation, there will be no adjustment. The same thing happened in 2010, 2011, and 2016.
Fortunately, the COLA process is automatic. As such, Congress does not need to vote every year.
'There Is No Way You Can Get All the Money Back You Put Into the Program'
This will differ depending on your circumstances, especially how long you live. As a safety net, Social Security provides a guaranteed lifetime income.
Inflation-protected Social Security income provides inflation-free income for life, unlike FICA. Whether you live to 100 or beyond, you'll keep receiving payments. In addition, if you pass away before your spouse, they may be eligible for survivor benefits.
'A Person Can Outlive Their Social Security Benefits'
This is simply not true. You will receive payments every month until you die. It is a federally backed, inflation-indexed, guaranteed income stream.
'For Other Programs, the Government Raids Social Security'
Unlike the government's general fund, the Social Security trust fund is separate from it. Nevertheless, the government borrows from Social Security.
As with other government bonds, tax revenue is invested in Treasury securities. There is no limit to how the government can use the money, but it must repay it with interest.
Despite the appearance that the government is stealing from Social Security, they always repay the money, and the interest increases Social Security's assets.
'After Reaching Full Retirement Age, You Can Claim Early and Get a Bump Up'
This is a common misconception. As soon as you start receiving benefits, the amount is fixed. Your FRA benefit does not increase automatically.
You can, however, suspend your benefits after reaching your FRA and restart them later. As a result, your benefits will increase by 8 percent every year you delay.
It's also possible to cancel your benefits within the first 12 months, repay the benefits you've received, and then claim again later. However, you can only do this once.
'Social Security Benefits Are Tax-Free'
Before 1984, this was true. Benefits may now be taxed up to 85 percent, depending on your income.
Depending on your overall income, you will be taxed on your benefits.
The Long-Term View
In retirement, Social Security is a crucial piece of the puzzle. Having a thorough understanding of it is essential for making informed decisions. Prepare for the future by running the numbers, consulting a financial advisor, and planning for the long-term.
The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors. They are meant for general informational purposes only and should not be construed or interpreted as a recommendation or solicitation. The Epoch Times does not provide investment, tax, legal, financial planning, estate planning, or any other personal finance advice. The Epoch Times holds no liability for the accuracy or timeliness of the information provided.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AT&T says conducting investigation into claims leaked data is for sale
AT&T says conducting investigation into claims leaked data is for sale

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

AT&T says conducting investigation into claims leaked data is for sale

After Hackread reported that the previous leaked data of 88M AT& T customers now includes both date of birth and Social Security numbers, an AT&T spokesperson said in a statement: 'It is not uncommon for cybercriminals to re-package previously disclosed data for financial gain. We just learned about claims that AT&T data is being made available for sale on dark web forums, and we are conducting a full investigation.' Confident Investing Starts Here:

Sen. Cory Booker says he won't accept campaign donations from Elon Musk
Sen. Cory Booker says he won't accept campaign donations from Elon Musk

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Sen. Cory Booker says he won't accept campaign donations from Elon Musk

Sen. Cory Booker on Sunday said he would not accept campaign donations from tech mogul Elon Musk but urged the former Trump adviser to 'get involved right now in a more substantive way' in Democrats' push against the sweeping GOP-backed spending bill. 'This bill is disastrous for our long-term economy,' Booker told NBC News' 'Meet the Press.' 'This is an American issue, and I welcome Elon Musk not to my campaign. I welcome him right now, not to sit back and just fire off tweets, get involved right now in a more substantive way in putting pressure on Congress people and senators to not do this.' Asked directly whether he would ever accept campaign funding from Musk, Booker said, 'I would not accept money from Elon Musk for my campaign, but I would be supportive of anybody, including Elon Musk, putting resources forward right now to let more Americans know' about the bill. Booker's remarks come as other Democrats, like Rep. Ro Khanna of California, have floated welcoming Musk into the Democratic Party after a feud between President Donald Trump and the Tesla and SpaceX CEO exploded into public view last week. 'We should ultimately be trying to convince him that the Democratic Party has more of the values that he agrees with,' Khanna told Politico last week after Musk and Trump fired off a series of social media posts criticizing each other. The falling out started after Musk called the budget bill a 'disgusting abomination' in a post on X. In subsequent posts on Truth Social, the president accused Musk of 'wearing thin' and said 'he just went crazy.' Musk later accused Trump of 'ingratitude' in another post on X after he spent $250 million boosting Trump's campaign in 2024 and accused Trump of links to deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in a now-deleted post. On Saturday, in a phone call with NBC News, Trump said he has no desire to repair his relationship with Musk after their public spat. The president also responded to a direct question about what might happen if Musk decided to financially support Democrats in the 2026 midterm elections, days after Musk wrote in a post on X, 'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people,' appearing to refer to Republicans who voted for the GOP-backed spending bill in the House. 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Trump told NBC News, adding that there could be 'serious consequences.' In May, House Republicans passed a sweeping domestic policy bill called the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' that would extend tax cuts passed in the first Trump administration, increase funding for border security and eliminate federal taxes on tips and overtime pay. The bill has also drawn scrutiny from Democrats for slashing funding for Medicaid and some food stamps while adding work requirements for Medicaid, which provides health care for low-income Americans. Musk and some Senate Republicans have blasted the bill for estimated effects it could have on the federal debt and deficit, though Trump and House Republicans have downplayed those concerns. 'More Americans have to understand that if this bill passes, average Americans are going to see their costs skyrocket as this president again pushes legislation that is indicative of his chaos, corruption and cruelty towards Americans,' Booker said on Sunday. This article was originally published on

U.S. envoy closely eyes Canada defence spending; says NATO about collective defence
U.S. envoy closely eyes Canada defence spending; says NATO about collective defence

Hamilton Spectator

time2 hours ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

U.S. envoy closely eyes Canada defence spending; says NATO about collective defence

OTTAWA - The American ambassador to Canada is closely watching as Ottawa shapes its defence budget, but says the U.S. will not dictate what the Canadian government must spend. 'We're not expecting anything; that's not our job to make those expectations,' Ambassador Pete Hoekstra said in an interview with The Canadian Press this past Friday, a day after NATO defence ministers endorsed new spending targets. Hoekstra also said the point of the NATO military alliance is to defend each other when under attack. He noted Americans haven't forgotten the 'investment and the sacrifice' Canadian troops made in Afghanistan when the U.S. invoked the NATO treaty's article on collective defence. 'They were fulfilling the commitment that they made to NATO — that when one of us is attacked we are all attacked, and we will defend each other,' Hoekstra said of Canadian soldiers. Hoekstra was not directly commenting on U.S. President Donald Trump's statement in March that Washington would not necessarily come to the aid of countries that don't pay their fair share on defence and that Canada has been freeloading on American defence of the continent. He did acknowledge Canada's defence spending has been an 'irritant' in the relationship with the U.S. This past week, defence ministers from NATO countries met in Brussels to discuss raising the member spending target on defence to as much as five per cent of GDP. Canada has never met NATO's existing spending target of two per cent since it was established in 2006. Trump and Prime Minister Mark Carney are engaged in what both sides have characterized as 'intensive' discussions toward the new economic and security deal the two leaders agreed to work on once the Canadian election concluded in April. NATO figures suggest Canada's defence spending rose from about one per cent in 2014 to 1.33 per cent in 2023. The NATO secretary-general's annual report, released in April, said Canada's defence spending would hit 1.45 per cent for 2024. In terms of absolute dollars, a Canadian Global Affairs Institute analysis last year said Canada ranks as the seventh largest spender in NATO, and the 14th largest in the world. Carney promised during the recent election campaign to move up Canada's deadline for meeting the 2 per cent threshold from 2032 to 2030 or sooner but has not yet shown a plan for how to do that. It will require Canada to add billions of new dollars annually. The prime minister is set to join other heads of government from NATO countries for an annual summit starting June 24 in the Netherlands. They are expected to approve a new defence investment plan that defence ministers hammered out this week, which would have member nations invest 3.5 per cent of GDP on core defence spending, and 1.5 per cent on defence and security-related investment such as infrastructure and resilience. That proposal is coming amid waning American commitments and a revanchist Russia. In recent years, both Democrats and Republicans have urged Canada to boost its Arctic defence, and the previous Biden administration praised much of what Ottawa outlined in an Arctic foreign policy last year. Trump has suggested defence of the Arctic is part of his 'Golden Dome' plan for a continental missile-defence shield. On May 27, the president said he told Ottawa it would cost US$61 billion to be part of the project. Hoekstra said he hasn't seen a breakdown of the costs, but said the 'really awesome technology' is likely estimated at 'proportionally what we think the Canadian share should be.' Defence Minister David McGuinty said Canada was reviewing its defence spending from 'top to bottom' and would have more to say about its plans soon, though the government isn't planning to table a budget until the fall. Hoekstra framed NATO as part of the wide partnership the U.S. has with Canada in security, which also includes secure energy flows and stopping illicit drugs. 'We need to do the things that will keep our citizens safe,' Hoekstra said. 'There are a lot of things that Americans and Canadians have in common, and we're looking forward to great days.' Hoekstra said Trump is trying to take the U.S. off an unsustainable trajectory, which he framed as millions of people crossing the U.S. border undocumented, spending way beyond government revenue and large trade deficits. 'The president is transforming that, because we need to,' he said. Trump's discussions with Carney will likely include the sweeping reform of border security that the Liberals tabled in Parliament last week. Hoekstra had yet to go through the legislation as of Friday. The ambassador said he's focused on win-win policies for both countries and not the prospect of Canada becoming an American state, despite Trump raising the notion as a way for Canadians to save on the cost of joining his Golden Dome project. Former Canadian diplomat Colin Robertson has said Hoekstra is limited in how much he can diverge from Trump's comments. But he said the ambassador has great access to the president, and his public messaging likely reveals how he has been advising Trump. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 8, 2025.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store