Iranian reveals why Islamic rulers built no shelters for airstrikes: ‘Culture of martyrdom'
An Iranian citizen claims the Islamic republic didn't build shelters for airstrikes because residents are expected to tough through the bombings and 'enjoy martyrdom.'
While Israelis have a plethora of public bomb shelters to help weather the storm of attacks from Tehran, Iranians claim that not only is their infrastructure lacking, but there is also a 'culture of martyrdom' that keeps them from seeking refuge.
'In this society, going to the shelters when there is a jet fighting or looming [airstrike] around it indicates you're chicken-hearted,' an Iranian journalist told the BBC's Global News Podcast. 'So you should [be] brave and brace for the bombardments and enjoy martyrdom.'
Advertisement
4 Iranians watch on as an Israeli airstrike hits an oil depot in Tehran, where there are no public shelters.
Getty Images
4 There was gridlock in Tehran on Sunday as residents rush to leave the capital amid the escalating violence.
AFP via Getty Images
To this point, Iran has yet to officially shut down any businesses despite the escalating attacks from Israel and Tehran officials repeatedly stating that the nation is at war.
The reporter, speaking under the condition of anonymity, said the best people can hope for is to hide in their own basements due to the lack of public shelters.
Advertisement
People also have the option of hiding out in Tehran's subways, 'but subways are not open to the people after 10:30 [p.m.],' the journalist pointed out.
The problem goes further as citizens in Tehran told the British outlet that they're still expected to commute to work amid the attacks between Israel and Iran, with many people having no idea where and when the attacks will come.
4 Smoke billows over Tehran after an Israeli airstrike targeted Iranian nuclear scientists.
AFP via Getty Images
Advertisement
The Israeli military, which sent out evacuation orders for all civilians to leave military sites, has offered no help either, residents claim.
'How are we supposed to know where a military site is and where isn't?' one person living in Tehran told the BBC.
'I can't just leave Tehran. I can't leave my elderly parents who can't travel far and long and leave the city myself,' another resident said. 'Besides, I need to show up to work. What can I do now?'
4 Tehran residents film a nearby explosion from an Israeli airstrike.
Ahmad Hatefi/UPI/Shutterstock
Advertisement
Despite the culture in place, some Iranians have decided to flee the capital and head to the rural north, with the widespread evacuation creating gridlock out of the city on Sunday, according to local reports.
Tehran's City Council Chairman Mehdi Charman said the city was looking for alternatives to help residents over the lack of bomb shelters, with the city ordering the subway system to remain open 24 hours a day to provide citizens shelter.
'Unfortunately, we in Tehran and in our other cities do not have shelters,' he told reporters Sunday.
Iran's Ministry of Health said at least 128 people have been killed and more than 900 injured since Israel launched its preemptive attack against Tehran on Friday.
The retaliatory attacks against the Jewish state have killed at least 14 people in Israel, according to the IDF.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Eyeing New Trade Deals at Critical G7 Summit
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump is set to arrive in the Canadian Rockies late Sunday evening for the Group of Seven (G7) summit, expressing optimism about potential trade agreements and dealmaking as world leaders prepare to address escalating global tensions. The gathering in Kananaskis, Alberta, will bring together leaders of the world's largest economies amid an increasingly volatile international landscape. Newsweek reached out to the White House via email on Sunday for comment. Why It Matters This G7 summit represents a critical test of international cooperation as leaders confront multiple crises simultaneously. The gathering comes at a pivotal moment when global trade relationships, Middle East stability, and international security concerns intersect, potentially reshaping diplomatic alliances and economic partnerships. What To Know "I think we'll have a few new trade deals," Trump told reporters at the White House on Sunday as he departed for the summit. The summit agenda encompasses a broad range of pressing issues, including fairness in global trade, critical minerals access, illegal migration, drug smuggling, and international security. However, the gathering is overshadowed by escalating conflict between Israel and Iran following Israel's surprise attack on Iranian leadership and nuclear facilities last week. Trump's trade ambitions at the G7 come against the backdrop of his administration's struggling "90 deals in 90 days" promise. Announced in April alongside sweeping tariffs, the initiative has yielded only two agreements so far—with the UK and China—far short of the ambitious 90-deal target before the July 9 deadline. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said last week that the administration would likely extend the 90-day pause on tariff implementation to allow more time for negotiations with trading partners acting "in good faith." Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has made the unprecedented decision to abandon the annual practice of issuing a joint communique at the summit's conclusion, reflecting the challenging diplomatic climate. The summit risks becoming a series of bilateral conversations rather than a unified display of international cooperation. Trump's inflammatory threats to make Canada the "51st state" and take over Greenland loom over the proceedings. French President Emmanuel Macron made a symbolic stop in Greenland on Sunday, declaring that the territory is "not to be sold" nor "to be taken." Other invited leaders from India, Ukraine, Brazil, South Africa, South Korea, Australia, Mexico, and the UAE will be focused on avoiding potential U.S. tariffs. What People Are Saying President Donald Trump on Middle East tensions: "Sometimes they have to fight it out, but we're going to see what happens. I think there's a good chance there will be a deal." French President Emmanuel Macron on Greenland: "Everybody in France, the European Union thinks that Greenland is not to be sold, not to be taken. The situation in Greenland is clearly a wakeup call for all Europeans." British Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Canada's sovereignty: "Canada is an independent, sovereign country and a much-valued member of the Commonwealth." Former Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chrétien on Trump's approach: "He tends to be a bully. If Trump has decided to make a show to be in the news, he will do something crazy. Let him do it and keep talking normally." President Donald Trump, from right, speaks with reporters as White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller and White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt listen before departing the White House on his way to attend... President Donald Trump, from right, speaks with reporters as White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller and White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt listen before departing the White House on his way to attend the G7 Summit in Canada, Sunday, June 15, 2025, in Washington. More AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta What Happens Next The summit officially begins Monday with Trump's bilateral meeting with Carney, followed by multilateral discussions throughout the week. World leaders will navigate complex negotiations on trade agreements while addressing the Israel-Iran crisis and surging oil prices. Reporting from the Associated Press contributed to this article.
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Like school shootings, political violence is becoming almost routine
'Such horrific violence will not be tolerated in the United States of America,' the president said. Advertisement And yet the expanding club of survivors of political violence seemed to stand as evidence to the contrary. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up In the past three months alone, a man set fire to the Pennsylvania governor's residence while Shapiro and his family were asleep inside; another man gunned down a pair of workers from the Israeli Embassy outside an event in Washington; protesters calling for the release of Israeli hostages in Boulder, Colo., were set on fire; and the Republican Party headquarters in New Mexico and a Tesla dealership near Albuquerque were firebombed. And those were just the incidents that resulted in death or destruction. Against that backdrop, it might have been shocking, but it was not really so surprising, when Saturday morning, a Democratic state representative in Minnesota, Melissa Hortman, and her husband, Mark, were assassinated in their home, and a Democratic state senator, John A. Hoffman, and his wife, Yvette, were shot and wounded. Advertisement Slowly but surely, political violence has moved from the fringes to an inescapable reality. Violent threats and even assassinations, attempted or successful, have become part of the political landscape — a steady undercurrent of American life. For months now, Representative Greg Landsman, Democrat of Ohio, has been haunted by the thought that he could be shot and killed. Every time he campaigns at a crowded event, he said, he imagines himself bleeding on the ground. 'It's still in my head. I don't think it will go away,' he said of the nightmarish vision. 'It's just me on the ground.' The image underscores a duality of political violence in America today. Like school shootings, it is both sickening and becoming almost routine, another fact of living in an anxious and dangerously polarized country. Trump was the victim of two assassination attempts during his campaign last year, during a speech in Butler, Pa., when a bullet grazed his ear, and two weeks later in Florida, when a man stalked him with a semiautomatic rifle from outside his golf course. Violent threats against lawmakers hit a record high last year, for the second year in a row. Since the 2020 election, state and local election officials have become targets of violent threats and harassment, as have federal judges, prosecutors and other court officials. As of April, there have been more than 170 incidents of threats and harassment targeting local officials across nearly 40 states this year, according to data gathered for the Bridging Divides Initiative at Princeton University. Advertisement Even in the stretches between acts of actual violence, the air has been thick with violent and menacing political rhetoric. Over the past five days — in which a senator was wrestled to the ground and handcuffed for trying to ask a question of a Cabinet secretary at a news conference — a governor was threatened with arrest by the president and with being 'tarred and feathered' by the speaker of the House. And as tanks prepared to roll down Constitution Avenue in Washington in a political display of firepower, the president warned that any protesters there would be met with 'heavy force.' The response to the Minnesota shootings Saturday followed a familiar pattern. Leaders in both parties issued statements condemning the latest incident and offering the victims their prayers. Then came calls for additional security. Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York, the minority leader, warned against merely denouncing the shootings and moving on. 'Condemning violence while ignoring what fuels it is not enough,' he said. 'We must do more to protect one another, our democracy and the values that bind us as Americans.' Schumer requested additional security for Democratic Minnesota Senators Amy Klobuchar and Tina Smith as he had earlier in the week for Senator Alex Padilla, Democrat of California, after Padilla was manhandled and briefly cuffed when he tried to ask a question of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. And Schumer asked the Senate sergeant-at-arms and the Senate majority leader, John Thune, to convene a full briefing on the security of members of the Senate. Klobuchar laid blame for the violence with growing partisanship and disinformation online. Klobuchar, who was a close friend of Melissa Hortman, the slain former Minnesota House speaker, urged politicians to reevaluate their own rhetoric. Advertisement 'People have just gotten angry and angrier, and they have started to act out what they read online,' Klobuchar said. 'At some point, you got to look in the mirror, when you look at what's going on here — every single elected official does.' Political violence has been part of the American story since the founding of the country, often erupting in periods of great change. Four presidents have been killed in office, and another was shot and seriously wounded. Members of Congress have been involved in dozens of brawls, duels, and other violent incidents over the centuries. Today, while most Americans do not support political violence, a growing share have said in surveys that they view rival partisans as a threat to the country or even as inhuman. Trump has had a hand in that. Since his 2016 candidacy, he has signaled at least his tacit approval of violence against his political opponents. He encouraged attendees at his rallies to 'knock the hell' out of protesters, praised a lawmaker who body-slammed a reporter and defended the rioters on Jan. 6, 2021, who clamored to 'hang Mike Pence.' One of his first acts in his second term as president was to pardon those rioters. On a day when 'No Kings' protests against the Trump administration were taking place across the country, the shooting's impact already extended into the political realm in practical ways. In Minnesota, where a search was underway for the shooter, law enforcement officials urged people to avoid the protests 'out of an abundance of caution.' And in Austin, Texas, the state police shuttered the state Capitol and surrounding grounds after receiving a credible threat against lawmakers planning to attend protests there Saturday evening. Advertisement 'One of the goals of political violence is to silence opposition,' said Lilliana Mason, a political scientist at Johns Hopkins University who studies violence and political partisanship. 'It's not just the act against a few people or victims. The idea is that you want to silence more people than you physically harm.' This article originally appeared in
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump says US will keep supporting Israeli air strikes
President Trump on Sunday said the United States will keep supporting Israel's air strikes on Iran amid escalating conflict between the two countries. The president was asked as he left for the Group of Seven (G-7) summit in Canada if the U.S. would continue to support Israel's defenses and replied, 'We do.' He added that he 'wouldn't say that' when asked if he had called on Israel to pause airstrikes into Iran. Additionally, when asked about how he plans to de-escalate the situation between Iran and Israel, Trump responded, 'it's time for a deal.' 'Sometimes they have to fight it out,' he added. 'We'll see what happens.' The president praised his relationship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The two leaders spoke on Friday. 'We get along very well and I think we have great respect for each other,' Trump said. The president had told ABC News earlier on Sunday that 'it's possible' the U.S. becomes involved in the current conflict between Iran and Israel. 'We're not involved in it. It's possible we could get involved. But we are not at this moment involved,' Trump told the outlet. Israel and Iran exchanged strikes for their third day on Sunday. Iran has been facing Israeli airstrikes while some of Iran's missiles have hit buildings in Israel, making it past air defenses. Israel bombarded Iran early on Friday morning, moving forward with its largest-ever military operation against its common Middle East rival and upending a push from Trump for a nuclear deal with Iran. The U.S. attempted to quickly distance itself from the strikes, which killed some of Iran's top military leaders.
