Man who raped and killed Chch sex worker won't be released early
A man who raped a sex worker he'd met in Christchurch, then ran her over with his car, reportedly laughing as he did, before throwing her half-naked body into a river has failed to secure an early release from prison.
However, for the first time in nearly 10 years, Peter Waihape has consented to be seen by a psychologist.
It's the first notable steps he has taken towards rehabilitation since 2014, when he withdrew his consent to be seen by a psychologist after just seven sessions, and had received no treatment since then.
But, in a report released by the New Zealand Parole Board last week, Waihape has been seeing a psychologist fortnightly and has had 20 sessions.
"He is considered to have made early progress," the board said, noting, however, that "he is still assessed as a high risk of violent reoffending and an above average risk of sexual reoffending".
Waihape was sentenced to life in prison with a minimum non-parole period of 18 years in 2005 for the rape and murder of a 24-year-old sex worker he'd met in Christchurch.
She'd agreed to go with him to a car park before they had an argument about his refusal to wear a condom.
Waihape then strangled her, bound her hands and raped her before pushing her out of the car and then running her over with his vehicle multiple times.
She became trapped under the car and was pleading for her life, but Waihape took no notice and ran her over again with witnesses saying he was laughing as he did so.
Waihape then later drove the woman to the Avon River and threw her body into the water.
Three days before the murder, Waihape sexually assaulted a teenager whom he'd abducted off the street.
Waihape drove the girl around for several hours, violated her, then dropped her off. He had been released from prison just days before.
Waihape first became eligible for parole in January last year, when the board noted it had serious concerns about him.
At that hearing, Waihape told the board he was willing to resume work with a psychologist and complete any rehabilitative work he needed to do, despite not having done any since 2014.
"For his part, Mr Waihape told us that when he was previously seen by the psychologist, he was not ready to engage. He was very entitled. He reacted inappropriately and he had recognised that since," panel convenor Neville Trendle said.
"He had addressed his own conduct with others ... He said that he was now accepting that he needed help."
Significant work ahead
In his latest appearance before the board last month, the psychologist he'd been seeing noted his good conduct in prison, and said that generally he interacts well but will walk away when he feels frustrated.
The board said that he was articulate and spoke well, and that his psychologist had validated a lot of what he'd said, and it had a profound impact on him.
"Mr Waihape believes he needs significant individual work. He told the Board that he has made changes in his thinking and his behaviour and has managed many stressful and frustrating situations by simply not engaging," the board's ruling reads.
"We spoke with him about the importance of building trust with others and communicating around what is going on in his inner world."
The board said that while Waihape had made progress, there was still significant work ahead and declined parole.
He will be seen again in another year.
Sexual Violence
By Jeremy Wilkinson
Open Justice reporter
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
18 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Suitcase murders-accused Hakyung Lee makes rare appearance in court
Hakyung Lee in 2022. Photo: RNZ / Nick Monro A woman accused of murdering her two children and hiding their bodies in suitcases has made a rare in-person court appearance as her trial date nears. Hakyung Lee's hair covered her eyes and she wore a dark grey hoodie over a grey T-shirt when she appeared for criminal callover at the High Court in Auckland on Wednesday morning. The appearance was for a progress update ahead of her trial, which is now set to begin on 8 September. Lee's case has moved slowly since the bodies of Yuna Jo and Minu Jo were found in suitcases in Auckland in 2022 . Hakyung Lee was extradited from South Korea to New Zealand that same year, with her trial originally set for April of last year. Justice Downs thanked Lee for appearing in person. "I know the court is not your favourite place," he said. He told Lee her lawyers were working hard to make sure her trial would go ahead without another delay. "I am relieved to tell you progress is being made," he said. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
NZ Herald
18 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Neurodivergent student quits University of Canterbury after being accused of cheating
But the University of Canterbury defended its handling of the matter, saying its standard processes were followed. 'He actually found his place' David's early years of schooling were marred by memories of shame and being treated as the 'naughty boy' because of his conditions. But now in his 30s, after encouragement from his wife, he decided to become the first person in his family to go to university. The first year and a half of his study went well, reaffirming his decision to pursue a Bachelor of Arts. 'It took me probably a good year to convince him to go to university and give it a go,' his wife, Margaret*, told RNZ. 'I went when I was in my 20s, so I'm like 'I know you, you're very intelligent, you will thrive there' and he was. His first year and a half was great. Everybody was saying he actually found his place. 'I'd spent a long time in my life working menial middle-range jobs and I thought why not give it a shot, and I've thrived up until this point. I'm sitting on a decent GPA, which is sort of unexpected,' David added. However, it was not without its difficulties and his neurodiversity entitled him to use a computer for spell-checking during his exams. That was where the problem arose. While sitting a 200-level closed-book exam on June 9, an exam officer told David he had seen him access Google using the computer. David said he had no intention of going into Google and he believed it opened as a result of a hyperlink in the word processing programme he was using for spell checking. After explaining that to the officer, he assumed that was the end of it. More than two weeks later, on June 25, he received an email: 'I have had a matter referred to me by the Proctors Office. The allegation against you is that you accessed the internet on two separate occasions in a closed book exam'. David met with the proctor the next day. 'I said 'if anything's happened, it's purely by mistake. It might have accidentally opened an external tab. That wasn't my intention',' David said. 'She turned round and said to me 'well, look, sometimes we make mistakes. We all make mistakes and sometimes it's easier just to own up and admit it and we can make this go through a lot smoother'.' David said he reiterated his innocence and the proctor responded by telling him 'well the process is going to be a long, drawn-out one then'. He left the meeting feeling as if his guilt had been decided. 'I said to [my wife] they're going to find me guilty anyway,' he said. 'We even started putting together an appeals process because that was the opinion I got when I met the proctor – they had already determined my guilt.' Then came silence. David received his exam results, but his grade for the paper in question was not published. On July 8, he reached out to the proctor. 'I am still investigating this case and waiting for a reply to an internal email I sent on 30 June. This process may have been delayed due to the term break and colleagues taking annual leave. I have followed up with the colleague concerned and hopefully I receive a reply soon,' the proctor's response said. Margaret said the stress and anxiety it caused David was difficult to watch. 'This has been really heartbreaking to see him just lose all this faith in this institution and just crumble beneath the really poor policies,' she said. David said he felt awful. 'Disenfranchised. Embarrassed. I try to keep my neurodiversity hidden and the fact that I opened myself up enough to tell UC, I feel like they abused my trust,' he said. By July 13, his GP was so concerned he wrote a letter to the university on David's behalf. 'Based on [David's] account, these allegations appear to be unfounded and the way they have been handled has had a profound impact on both his mental and physical health,' the letter said. '[He] reports that he was given very limited support when informed of these accusations, and the process appears to have lacked appropriate sensitivity. He has since experienced severe psychological distress, including panic attacks, and I have noted a marked deterioration in his overall wellbeing.' Finally, on July 24, four weeks after his meeting with the proctor, David received an email clearing him of wrongdoing. 'Thank you for taking the time to meet with me on 26 June 2025. I appreciate the honest and open conversation and as discussed; I am following up formally advising you of the outcome of this referral,' the letter started. 'As indicated at our hui I have investigated this allegation and gathered the necessary information required to make an informed decision regarding this referral from UC Concerns. I appreciate your patience while I have done so and with the information before me, I have reached the decision that you did not breach the University Academic Misconduct Regulations.' No apology. There was no apology and no further explanation. 'No sorry for the stress. No sorry for the accusation. Just we carried out our process and we consider it the end of the situation,' David said. The University of Canterbury needed to assess whether its processes were suitable for neurodiverse students, he said. His treatment meant he no longer felt safe to pursue his studies and he would not be returning next year to complete his degree. Instead, David had used his credits to attain a certificate and diploma of arts. 'It feels like they've actually stolen part of my future identity because I'm actually the first person in my family to go to university,' he said. 'I was hoping that some of the nieces and nephews would actually follow me in, but not after this experience.' University responds The university did not directly address RNZ's questions about whether an apology was warranted. But in a statement, the University of Canterbury defended how it handled the situation. The response has been edited for length: '[David]'s case was managed in line with our normal academic misconduct process, which, by necessity, takes time to investigate thoroughly and ensure fairness. '[David] participated in a closed book exam on June 9. For closed book exams, students are advised that they may not refer to any course materials or other resources during the exam. The two exam supervisors reported that during the exam, on two separate occasions, they observed [David] opening an internet page on the device he was using during the exam. 'It is usual process for students to be invited to attend a meeting with a Proctor to discuss an allegation of academic misconduct, and they are able to bring a support person. 'The UC Proctor's recollection of the meeting differs from that of [David]. The Proctor explained that this was an initial meeting to discuss the allegation and to give [David] an opportunity to respond. 'At the time of the first meeting, the Proctor did not have access to [David]'s neurodiversity information, as this is securely managed through UC's Accessibility Service for formal exam and learning arrangements. [David] shared this information with the Proctor during the meeting to explain why he had special exam arrangements in place. 'The academic misconduct process that was followed in [David]'s case has been reviewed by UC's Head Proctor, in response to the concerns raised by [David]. The review confirmed that UC's standard processes were followed and that [David] was given a fair opportunity to respond. 'Following the completion of the investigation, the Proctor determined that academic misconduct had not occurred. '[David]'s privacy complaint has been investigated by UC's Privacy Officer, and a response has been provided to him on August 4. The Privacy Officer determined that no privacy breach occurred.' David and Margaret have also complained to the Human Rights Commission and the Ombudsman. *Not their real names -RNZ
Techday NZ
18 minutes ago
- Techday NZ
Online scams trap one third of victims in Australia, New Zealand
Recent research from Trend Micro has revealed that online scams are a prevalent threat in both Australia and New Zealand, affecting a substantial proportion of the population in each country. The study, which surveyed 1,025 Australian and 517 New Zealand consumers aged 18 and over, found that two-thirds of participants in both countries had been targeted by online scams, and a significant share had fallen victim. In Australia, 27% of respondents reported having fallen for an online scam, whereas in New Zealand, the figure was higher at 33%. Financial loss and delayed detection According to the survey, nearly one-third of scam victims in both countries only realised they had been targeted after experiencing financial losses or failing to receive goods they had paid for. This demonstrates how easily such scams can go unnoticed until consequences become serious. Common scam tactics The research highlights a shift in scamming techniques, with perpetrators increasingly exploiting digital convenience and emotional triggers rather than relying solely on traditional, technical methods. In Australia, 25% of scam victims reported being deceived by promoted items on social media marketplaces or retail sites that appeared legitimate, while in New Zealand, this affected 32% of victims. Other methods include investment scam texts (19% in Australia, 17% in New Zealand), and urgent messages from impostors posing as official organisations demanding payments or personal data (18% in Australia, 9% in New Zealand). Scammers frequently manipulate digital communication behaviour. In both countries, 39% of users had been asked to switch to another app during an online conversation - a tactic often used by scammers to continue their schemes in environments with fewer security controls. In Australia, 13% of victims were contacted by impostors posing as trusted acquaintances, while in New Zealand the figure was 18%. Other platforms used include dating apps and messaging services, through which false trust is established to increase the scam's credibility. Risks of overconfidence and device use The widespread daily use of smartphones is creating more opportunities for cybercriminals. In Australia, 46% of respondents use their phones 1-4 hours each day, 27% for 5-8 hours, and 12% for more than 8 hours. In New Zealand, 45% use their mobile devices 1-4 hours daily, 30% for 5-8 hours, and 14% for more than 8 hours. Despite high engagement with banking, shopping, and social functions on these devices, many consumers are not employing security best practices. Nearly half of Australians (47%) and half of New Zealanders (50%) do not use antivirus or security software on their mobile devices. The survey also revealed that 87% of Australians and 88% of New Zealanders use banking apps on their phones, yet 61% and 62% respectively do not use virtual private networks (VPNs) for added protection. Among those not using security software, 39% in both countries believe their phones are secure as is, while significant proportions rely on their own caution or remain unaware of available protections. Cost concerns also deter 17% of respondents in both countries from adopting security solutions. Stigma and underreporting Embarrassment continues to suppress the true scale of online scams, with many victims hesitant to disclose their experiences. In Australia, although 88% of victims share their experience, nearly four in ten of those who remain quiet (38%) do so out of shame. In New Zealand, while 81% disclose their ordeal, almost half (47%) of silent victims cite embarrassment as the reason. Advocacy for awareness and protection "Scam culture has gone mainstream. Our research shows Australians are unknowingly putting themselves at risk, placing trust in their devices, their instincts and everyday platforms without the right protection in place," said Ashley Millar, Director, Consumer Education and Marketing at Trend. "With the increasing sophistication of technology, scams are no longer easy to identify, making them harder to spot – even for the most cautious consumers. That's why education is critical, understanding how scams work is the first step to avoiding them. But when awareness slips or instincts fail, having antivirus and mobile security in place is an essential safety net," he finished. Advice for consumers Trend Micro recommended several basic precautions to mitigate scam risks. These include being sceptical of unverified sources, not switching to different apps during conversations, pausing before clicking on links or providing personal information, installing security software on smartphones, and staying updated on evolving scam tactics. The findings underline how digital habits and confidence in online platforms can expose users to significant risks if appropriate security and awareness measures are not followed.
