logo
3 Signs You're ‘Too Understanding' In Relationships, By A Psychologist

3 Signs You're ‘Too Understanding' In Relationships, By A Psychologist

Forbes2 days ago

In a loving relationship, being understood is one of the most powerful emotional experiences. To feel truly seen and still accepted is a cornerstone of emotional safety. It allows individuals to expose their flaws without fear of rejection, creating a sense of belonging that many describe as feeling deeply loved or even 'at home.'
But when that understanding is never met with reciprocatory effort or reflection, it stops being a connection and starts becoming harmful. Over time, what often begins as compassion becomes concession.
Harmful patterns are excused, boundaries are blurry and one partner begins to carry the emotional weight for two. The desire to be understanding can unintentionally harm the person offering it as well as the one receiving it.
There's a dark side to being too understanding. Here are three beliefs that are signs of such behavior, and how to steer clear of it.
When someone brings up their trauma, their past or the pain they've carried for years, the obvious compassionate response is to listen and to understand. But for those who lean too far into empathy, understanding can become a reflex rather than a choice.
A 2017 study published in The Family Journal examined 374 couples living together and found something fascinating: empathy, especially when shown by women, was a strong predictor of not only how much love individuals felt for their partners but also how much love their partners felt in return.
The researchers found that men's empathy tended to enhance their own experience of the relationship but had a limited effect on how their partners felt. In contrast, women often carried out the bulk of emotional labor, supporting not only their own well-being but their partner's as well.
This reflects a deeper imbalance. When empathy flows mostly in one direction, the emotional health of the relationship often relies on the more understanding partner. That imbalance can go unnoticed for months, even years, until the emotional strain begins to show.
So the next time you hear yourself saying:
Ask yourself: 'Is this empathy being met with responsibility?' Because while compassion creates space, it cannot sustain a relationship without accountability.
In some relationships, empathy starts to look like compliance. One partner adapts; not just to support but to survive the dynamic. They make small adjustments, avoid sensitive topics and lower expectations. All to preserve peace and avoid hurting their partner.
So when someone says, 'I understand that loving you is difficult, but I'm still here,' it's often less about connection and more about endurance. It's a situation where they are trying to fit into the narrative that the other person has built.
Over time, their needs begin to disappear. Not because they stopped having them, but because those needs didn't fit into their partner's world.
A 2021 study published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology explored the effects of expressive suppression — the act of hiding one's negative emotions — on both individuals and their romantic partners.
Across three dyadic studies, researchers found that greater suppression was consistently linked to lower relationship satisfaction, reduced feelings of responsiveness and higher emotional threat during conflict discussions.
While some suppression may be intended to preserve harmony, the study found that when this behavior becomes habitual, especially for those low in attachment anxiety, it undermines both partners' well-being.
In other words, when one person excessively suppresses their negative emotions, like walking on eggshells and staying silent to not upset the partner, it leads to emotional burnout and relationship dissatisfaction, especially when it's chronic.
Empathy becomes self-abandonment when you start slashing away parts of who you are to accommodate a relationship that doesn't align with your emotional needs.
One of the most overlooked signs of being too understanding is the slow realization that you're always the one who gets it. You understand their moods, their past and the way they treat you when they are hurt. You make excuses for their behavior, justify their outbursts and try to de-escalate conflict before it even starts.
But when the relationship becomes emotionally one-sided, that understanding no longer brings connection; instead, it enables imbalance. You're not meeting halfway. You're meeting them where they are, every time.
This kind of emotional labor is rarely acknowledged because it doesn't look like effort. It looks like patience, tolerance, even compassion. But underneath, it's a form of relational overextension, where one person handles the regulation, the empathy and the repair work while the other becomes passive in the emotional life of the relationship.
Over time, this dynamic reshapes the expectations within the relationship. The more you understand them, the less they feel the need to understand you. Not because they're cruel or incapable, but because you've trained the system to run without their effort.
A 2016 study published in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships examined 315 unmarried couples and found that in relationships where one partner was significantly more committed than the other — what the researchers called 'asymmetrically committed relationships' — the more committed partner reported greater emotional distress, more conflict and even higher rates of aggression.
What makes this finding especially striking is that it held true even when the more committed partner had high levels of emotional investment, suggesting that commitment without reciprocity doesn't protect against burnout.
This is what makes asymmetrical empathy so hard to detect. It feels generous. But it removes the expectation that you should be heard too, or that your emotions deserve the same care and curiosity.
In emotionally healthy relationships, empathy flows both ways. There's space for both partners to be vulnerable, to misstep and to repair. But when you're the only one making sense of things, you also become the only one holding the relationship together.
Take this science-backed test to find out if you're staying true to yourself — or just keeping the peace in your relationships: Authenticity In Relationships Scale

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Johnny Depp
Johnny Depp

Fox News

time19 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Johnny Depp

Johnny Depp has been acting for almost 40 years and has portrayed many characters on the screen, but among the long list of films he has been in, most know him as Jack Sparrow from the "Pirates of the Caribbean" franchise. Depp was born in Owensboro, Kentucky on June 9, 1963, to parents John and Betty Sue. He moved to Florida and spent a lot of his childhood there. Before starring in movies, primarily as the dark and chilling character, young Depp was in a band called "the Kids." His music career extended later in his career as well, as he was in another band called the "Hollywood Vampires." Depp's past relationships were complicated to say the least, but his first known relationship was with Lori Anne Allison, a makeup artist. The couple moved to Los Angeles, where he got connected with Nicholas Cage, and his decades-long acting career began. His movie debut was in "A Nightmare on Elm Street" in 1984. Although he has been in a lot of popular movies like "Sleepy Hollow," "Alice in Wonderland," and "Sweeney Todd," he is most known for the character that he played for over 10 years, Captain Jack Sparrow. Johnny Depp played Jack Sparrow in five "Pirates of the Caribbean" movies from 2003 to 2017. His "Pirates" costars include Orlando Bloom and Keira Knightley. Depp has a net worth of $100 million (per Celebrity Net Worth), a long list of movies behind him and a long list of celebrity girlfriends, wives and proposals. After his divorce from Lori Anne Allison, he had relationships with many big Hollywood names, including Sherilyn Fenn, Jennifer Gray, Winona Ryder, Ellen Barkin and Kate Moss. After Moss, he had a 14-year relationship with with Vanessa Paradis. The former couple share two children together, a daughter, Lily-Rose Depp, and a son Jack Depp. In 2015, Depp and Amber Heard got married, but divorced in 2016. Heard wrote an op-ed for The Washington Post, implying that she was abused by Depp in 2018, and the two have been suing back and fourth since. The two took part in a very public defamation lawsuit in March and April 2022.

The Benefits And Drawbacks Of RFK Jr.'s New COVID Vaccine Recommendations
The Benefits And Drawbacks Of RFK Jr.'s New COVID Vaccine Recommendations

Forbes

time23 minutes ago

  • Forbes

The Benefits And Drawbacks Of RFK Jr.'s New COVID Vaccine Recommendations

SAVANNAH, GA - DECEMBER 15: A nurse shows off a vial of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine ... More outside of the Chatham County Health Department on December 15, 2020 in Savannah, Georgia. (Photo by) RFK Jr. and the HHS will no longer recommend annual COVID-19 vaccines for healthy pregnant women and young adults, according to a video announcement posted on X May 27 by Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. A few days later, the CDC took a slightly different stance and stated that children between the ages of 6 months and 17 years may get the COVID-19 vaccine through shared decision-making between parents and healthcare providers. The CDC also updated the adult immunization schedule to say there is 'no guidance' on use for pregnancy. These decisions have sparked much debate among public health experts, policymakers and government officials. Here are the pros and cons of such a policy shift. As Kennedy cited in his video announcement, the U.S. seems to be aligning its vaccine policy with other countries such as the U.K. and Australia that have stopped recommending routine COVID-19 vaccines for young healthy adults. In addition, according to the new recommendations, the focus of vaccinations will largely be on high-risk populations, namely those who are 65 years of age and older as well as younger individuals with at least one medical condition that puts them at high risk for COVID-19. This could allow resources and attention to be redirected to the populations that need the vaccine most. The new recommendations also demand evidence in answering important questions the public deserves to know. For younger healthy American adults, getting approval for the vaccine will require placebo-controlled trials to show a benefit for that particular population. As an example, does a healthy 31-year-old male with no medical problems need to get a COVID-19 booster every single year, even after having received several COVID-19 boosters in the past? These are the types of questions that all Americans would like to and deserve to know with respect to COVID vaccinations. On the flip side, the new recommendations have many public health experts concerned. Pregnant healthy females could be barred from getting the COVID-19 vaccine, since the CDC has failed to provide guidance on the issue. Without a strong recommendation from the CDC, many pregnant patients could face real barriers from insurance companies to cover the vaccine, according to The New York Times. Pregnant women are at high risk for COVID infection and complications because pregnancy results in a weakened immune system. As Dr. Steven Fleischman, President of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists states, 'The science has not changed. It is very clear that COVID infection during pregnancy can be catastrophic and lead to major disability.' The new recommendations could harm vulnerable populations. In addition to potential decreased vaccination rates and adverse outcomes for pregnant females, children could also suffer. When pregnant females get vaccinated against COVID-19 in the third trimester, they are able to pass along antibodies and protection to their infants, who have not developed mature immune systems. If pregnant females do not get vaccinated, infants will lack these antibodies and could then go on to develop severe complications from the virus should they get infected. Finally, the new recommendations could limit access to the vaccine to those that want it. Private insurance companies usually require FDA approval and CDC recommendations to cover the vaccine as part of health insurance. The current CDC recommendations simply state young children may get the vaccine with shared-decision making, not outright stating that they should get the vaccine. In addition, the CDC falls short in explicitly recommending the vaccine for pregnant females. This could prevent private insurance companies from fully covering the vaccine. Ultimately, this may mean some pregnant women and those that cannot afford the vaccine may not have access to it. The new recommendations for the COVID-19 vaccine for children and pregnant females was made without the customary use of independent advisors, and could have important implications for public health. While aligning with international practices, the move could significantly limit the amount of vaccines available for millions of Americans.

CNN Poll: A record share of Americans want the government to get more done. Few trust either party to do it
CNN Poll: A record share of Americans want the government to get more done. Few trust either party to do it

CNN

time24 minutes ago

  • CNN

CNN Poll: A record share of Americans want the government to get more done. Few trust either party to do it

Neither the Republican nor the Democratic Party has consolidated a majority of the public behind its approach, with more than 4 in 10 saying that neither party can get things done or has strong leadership, a new CNN survey conducted by SSRS finds. Despite those widespread doubts, Americans increasingly say they see meaningful differences between the two parties. The poll, taken as public opinion resettles in the first months of Donald Trump's second administration, also finds a record-high share of the public saying that the government should be doing more to solve problems. Americans are evenly split on which party best reflects their views on the role of the federal government, with one-third of respondents saying neither party does. Amid a wave of skepticism among Democrats about their own party's effectiveness, the GOP currently holds the advantage across several key attributes — though with a shrinking advantage on the economy, which regularly polls as Americans' top concern. Americans see Republicans and Democrats as offering vastly contrasting visions of the country. An 81% majority say they see important differences between the two parties, marking an increase from two years ago across political, age and educational lines. Just 18% say the parties are 'pretty much the same,' down from 28% in 2023 and roughly one-third in CNN and Gallup polling dating back to 2002. But even among those who say there are critical differences between the two major parties, a sizable minority say neither reflects their vision across a range of issues: Nearly 20% who see such differences still say neither party reflects their perspective on at least 5 out of 9 issues they were asked about in the poll. Asked to choose which of the parties they see as the 'party that can get things done,' 'the party with strong leaders' or the 'party of change,' the lion's share of the public – more than 4 in 10 – say that neither party fits the bill. At the same time, most Americans, 58%, now say that the government should do more to solve the country's problems – a record high in more than 30 years of CNN's polling. While Democratic views on the role of government have remained largely unchanged over the past two years, the shares of Republicans and independents who say that the government is doing too many things have both fallen since the White House changed hands. While neither political party is viewed as especially strong or effective, skepticism weighs particularly heavily on the Democratic Party. Americans are far more likely to see Republicans than Democrats as the party with strong leaders: 40% say this descriptor applies more to the GOP, with just 16% saying it applies to the Democrats. They're also more likely to call Republicans the party that can get things done by 36% to 19%, and the party of change, by 32% to 25%. That's in large part because of relatively anemic support for Democrats among their own partisans. GOP-aligned adults are 50 points likelier than Democratic-aligned adults to say their own party has strong leaders, and 36 points likelier to view their party as able to get things done. True independents, those who don't lean toward either party, are particularly grim in their views of the parties on these issues: 76% say neither party has strong leaders or can get things done, and 72% that they view neither as the party of change. While the public as a whole sees the GOP as relatively effective, they also say, 41% to 30%, that it's better described as the party of extremism, the only attribute tested that fewer than 30% said applied to neither party. Roughly one-sixth of Republican-aligned adults say they view the GOP as representing extremism, compared with roughly one-tenth of Democratic-aligned adults who say the same of their own party. Beyond Americans' shifting views of government, the survey also finds ebbing belief in the achievability of the American Dream. A 54% majority says that most people who want to get ahead can make it if they're willing to work hard, down from 67% in 2016, and lower than other polling on the same question dating back to the 1990s. Nearly half, 45%, say they don't view hard work and determination as any guarantee of success for most people. That rises to a 52% majority of Black Americans and 53% among those younger than 30, as well as 53% of those who don't agree with either party on the economy, 65% among Democrats and 71% among those who describe themselves as liberal. Americans are closely split on which party represents the middle class, with a third saying neither does. The view that neither party stands for the middle class rises to 38% among those who say hard work and determination are no guarantee of success for most people. Asked which party best reflects their views on handling the economy more broadly – a perennial top issue that has frequently favored the GOP – the public gives the Republican Party an advantage, but a shrinking one. The party's 7-point margin on the issue now is down from 15 points in May 2022, and marks their narrowest advantage on the issue over that time. The Republican Party also sees a diminished edge on immigration, another typically strong topic for the Trump-led party: What was a 14-point lead in November 2023 now stands at just 6 points. Looking outward, Americans are now evenly divided on which party's views on world affairs more closely match their own, an issue where Republicans held a 6-point edge in 2023. Across issues tested in the poll, Republicans held the widest advantage – 13 points – on their approach to crime and policing, and that margin has largely held over time. The public also leans modestly toward the GOP when it comes to taxes (by a 7-point margin) and the federal budget (5 points). Support for legal abortion remains strong in CNN's polling, with a rising share of the public, 36%, now saying that abortion should be legal under any circumstances. Roughly 6 in 10 Democrats now say abortion should always be legal, up from 44% in 2016. In a CNN survey last year, a roughly two-thirds majority of the public opposed the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe vs. Wade. By a 10-point margin, Americans say their views on abortion align more with the Democrats than the Republicans, although that's down from a 16-point advantage in fall 2023. Roughly two-thirds of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents say the GOP reflects their views on abortion – significantly lower than the share who side with their party on issues such as the economy or immigration. Amid internal Democratic arguments over the party's messaging on issues surrounding race and gender, the poll finds that Americans side with the Democratic Party over the Republican Party on the way society deals with LGBTQ issues by an 8-point margin and with racial issues and education by a 7-point margin each. By a wide margin, 72% to 27%, most Americans say that growing racial diversity does more to enrich than threaten American culture. That's slightly broader agreement than last fall, though it still falls short of the more than 8 in 10 who called diversity enriching during Trump's first term. The sense of diversity as a threat is largely concentrated among the GOP, particularly among Republican-aligned men. Currently, 45% of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents call diversity a threat, up from just 20% who said the same in 2019, during Trump's first term in office. Democratic opinion has moved little in that time. Democrats held their widest advantage in the poll, 14 points, on handling climate change. A 58% majority of adults say they're at least somewhat worried about the risks of climate change in their community, down slightly from the 63% who said they were at least somewhat worried in the fall of 2023. About one-quarter in each poll said they were very worried. By a 5-point margin, Americans say their view of how to protect U.S. democracy aligns more with the Democratic Party than the Republican Party. Roughly half of Americans say that democracy in the U.S. today is under attack, with 36% saying it's being tested, and only about 13% that it's not in any danger. While these concerns have held roughly steady since 2021, partisan dynamics have shifted sharply in that time. In the latest poll, 72% of Democrats see democracy in crisis, compared with just 29% of Republicans. By contrast, during Joe Biden's presidency, concerns were either roughly balanced or higher among the GOP. The CNN poll was conducted among 2,539 adults nationwide by SSRS from May 5-26, using a combination of online and telephone interviews. The survey samples were originally drawn from two sources – an address-based sample and a random-digit dial sample of prepaid cell phone numbers – and combined. Respondents were initially contacted by mail or by phone. Results for the full sample have a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 2.7 percentage points.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store