Trump contradicts Netanyahu, Palestinians in Gaza facing 'real starvation'
US President Donald Trump (R) meets with Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on February 4, 2025. (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS / AFP)
US President Donald Trump has contradicted Israeli Prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, saying that Palestinians in Gaza are facing real starvation.
His remarks came after Netanyahu declared on Sunday that 'there is no starvation in Gaza, no policy of starvation in Gaza.'
Trump rejected these claims and said images of hungry children show 'real starvation' that one can't 'fake'.
Gaza starvation
Aid agencies have for months been saying that an Israeli blockade on the supply of food, fuel, and medication is killing Palestinians in the enclave.
The United States already backs food centres under the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, but the UN says hundreds of Palestinians have been killed by Israeli troops while trying to access these and other humanitarian aid sites.
ALSO READ: Israel accused of starving Gaza 'by design' — South Africa addresses ICJ
No 'bold-faced lie'
Asked on Monday if he agreed with Netanyahu that it was a 'bold-faced lie' to say Israel was fuelling hunger in Gaza, Trump said television shows another side to what the Israeli Prime minister had uttered.
'I don't know, I mean, based on television I would say not particularly because those children look very hungry, but we're giving a lot of money and a lot of food and other nations are now stepping up, I know that this nation [Scotland] is.'
Reporter: Netanyahu said there is no starvation in Gaza. Do you agree with him?
Trump: I don't know. Based on television, I would say not particularly pic.twitter.com/tSkGClKhc4 — Acyn (@Acyn) July 28, 2025
'Gaza is a mess'
Speaking during a meeting with UK Prime minister Keir Starmer, Trump said: 'Nobody's done anything great over there. The whole place is a mess… I told Israel maybe they have to do it a different way.'
His comments followed the UN's humanitarian chief's statement that 'vast amounts' of food were needed to avert starvation.
War deaths
Israel's war in Gaza has killed 59,921 Palestinians, mostly civilians, according to the Palestinian health ministry.
The Hamas 7 October 2023, attack on Israel resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, according to an AFP tally based on official figures.
ALSO READ: Israeli strikes kill children collecting water in Gaza
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
44 minutes ago
- eNCA
Filmmakers try to cash in on India-Pakistan battle
NEW DELHI - Indian filmmakers are locking up the rights to movie titles that can profit from the patriotism fanned by a four-day conflict with Pakistan, which killed more than 70 people. The nuclear-armed rivals exchanged artillery, drone and air strikes in May, after India blamed Pakistan for an armed attack on tourists in Indian-administered Kashmir. The fighting came to an end when US President Donald Trump announced a surprise ceasefire. Now, some Bollywood filmmakers see an opportunity to cash in on the battle. India tagged its military action against Pakistan "Operation Sindoor", the Hindi word for vermilion, which married Hindu women wear on their foreheads. The name was seen as a symbol of Delhi's determination to avenge those widowed in the April 22 attack in Kashmir's Pahalgam, which sparked the hostilities. Film studios have registered a slew of titles evoking the operation, including: "Mission Sindoor", "Sindoor: The Revenge", "The Pahalgam Terror", and "Sindoor Operation". "It's a story which needs to be told," said director Vivek Agnihotri. "If it was Hollywood, they would have made 10 films on this subject. People want to know what happened behind the scenes," he told AFP. Agnihotri struck box office success with his 2022 release, "The Kashmir Files", based on the mass flight of Hindus from Kashmir in the 1990s. Coloured narratives The ruling right-wing Bharatiya Janata Party gave that film a glowing endorsement, despite accusations that it aimed to stir up hatred against India's minority Muslims. Since Hindu nationalist Prime Minister Narendra Modi took office in 2014, some critics say Bollywood is increasingly promoting his government's ideology. Raja Sen, a film critic and screenwriter, said filmmakers felt emboldened by an amenable government. "We tried to wage a war and then we quietened down when Mr Trump asked us to. So what is the valour here?" Sen told AFP of the Pakistan clashes. AFP | Shammi MEHRA Anil Sharma, known for directing rabble-rousing movies, criticised the apparent rush to make films related to the Pahalgam attack. "This is herd mentality... these are seasonal filmmakers, they have their constraints," he said. "I don't wait for an incident to happen and then make a film based on that. A subject should evoke feelings and only then cinema happens," said Sharma. Sharma's historical action flick "Gadar: Ek Prem Katha" (2001) and its sequel "Gadar 2" (2023), both featuring Sunny Deol in lead roles, were big hits. In Bollywood, filmmakers often seek to time releases for national holidays like Independence Day, which are associated with heightened patriotic fervour. "Fighter", featuring big stars Hrithik Roshan and Deepika Padukone, was released on the eve of India's Republic Day on January 25 last year. Anti-Muslim bias Though not a factual retelling, it drew heavily from India's 2019 airstrike on Pakistan's Balakot. The film received mixed-to-positive reviews but raked in $28 million in India, making it the fourth highest-grossing Hindi film of that year. This year, "Chhaava", a drama based on the life of Sambhaji Maharaj, a ruler of the Maratha Empire, became the highest-grossing film so far this year. It also generated significant criticism for fuelling anti-Muslim bias. "This is at a time when cinema is aggressively painting Muslim kings and leaders in violent light," said Sen. AFP | TAUSEEF MUSTAFA "This is where those who are telling the stories need to be responsible about which stories they choose to tell." Sen said filmmakers were reluctant to choose topics that are "against the establishment". "If the public is flooded with dozens of films that are all trying to serve an agenda, without the other side allowed to make itself heard, then that propaganda and misinformation enters the public psyche," he said. Acclaimed director Rakeysh Omprakash Mehra said true patriotism is promoting peace and harmony through the medium of cinema. Mehra's socio-political drama "Rang De Basanti" (2006) won the National Film Award for Best Popular Film and was chosen as India's official entry for the Golden Globe Awards and the Academy Awards in the Best Foreign Language Film category. "How we can arrive at peace and build a better society? How we can learn to love our neighbours?" he asked. "For me that is patriotism."
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
FW de Klerk Foundation urges South Africa to diversify trade amid US tariffs
Bongani Hans | Published 17 hours ago Apartheid's last president, FW De Klerk's foundation has added its voice in calling for South Africa to stop being overly reliant on America and look elsewhere for trade deals amid concerns over President Donald Trump's 30% tariffs on exports. In what could be seen as the country's population bending together against the economic squeezing tariffs, the foundation echoed DA leader John Steenhuisen in calling for the country to spread its wings wider, looking for alternative markets across the world. Steenhuisen, in his capacity as Agriculture minister, said recently that the country is strengthening its trade alliances with the likes of Chile, Peru, and New Zealand 'to jointly lobby for fair and stable trade treatment of fresh produce' through the Southern Hemisphere Association of Fresh Fruit Exporters. He also said the state had finalised new phytosanitary protocols for the export of avocados to China, table grapes to Vietnam and the Philippines, and maize to India. FW de Klerk Foundation's Ismail Joosub called for the strengthening of trading ties ' with our BRICS partners and Africa'. The foundation was concerned about the South African Reserve Bank warning that the tariffs could cost the country around 100,000 jobs, 'hitting our agriculture and automotive sectors the hardest.' South Africa is a member of BRICS, which the US sees as a threat to its global economic and political dominance. 'China's vast market, for instance, can buy more of our minerals, wine, and fruits. 'India, Brazil, and others present growing export destinations if we proactively pursue them,' Joosub said in a statement. He issued the statement on Friday, the same day Trump implemented the tariffs, which he said would be effective on August 7. According to, Charles A. Ray, a chairperson of the US-based Foreign Policy Research Institute's African Program and former US ambassador to Cambodia and Zimbabwe, US was unhappy with South Africa's proximity to China and Russia and its membership with BRICS. He said it ' has since become an alternate political forum to the US-led West, seeking to shift the global order more to the advantage of China and to move away from the US dollar's domination of the global economy'. According to one of Trump's Executive Orders, South Africa was undermining the US's foreign policy and posed threats to the US and its allies' security and interests. ' Our government is already working with industry to find alternative markets for our goods and support affected sectors with contingency plans. 'We should build on this by ramping up trade promotion in Asia, the Middle East and across Africa. 'In short, if one door closes, we must be ready to open many others,' said Joosub. He said another step to protect and grow the economy was to invest in youth, skilling young people by taking advantage of an initiative that China has established through its Luban Workshops, which are vocational training centres in nearly 20 countries. 'South Africa should welcome such initiatives and even expand them here at home, [as] at last year's BRICS summit in Johannesburg, a BRICS Skills Challenge showcased how collaboration in fields like robotics, data science and aerospace can help our youth develop critical skills. 'Millions of talented South African youth remain on the margins, [so] we need to harness their potential through education, training and entrepreneurship support,' he said. Joosub also called for the country to look at technical exchange programs, scholarships, and joint research with programmes with China, India and others to help the country cultivate much-needed skills in engineering, artisans and the innovation sectors. 'By equipping young South Africans with world-class skills, we not only reduce unemployment but also make our economy more competitive globally. 'Our Constitution's preamble enjoins us to ' free the potential of each person , ' and there is no greater potential waiting to be freed than that of our youth,' he said. The foundation was concerned that unemployment was already at 32,9% and youth unemployment exceeded 46%. 'We cannot afford further blows. It's a stark reminder that nearly half of young South Africans struggle to find work,' he said. He said the US was punishing South Africa for its domestic policies, including affirmative action and Black Economic Empowerment, and the country's diplomatic stance on the Russia-Ukraine war and a genocide case against Israel , which he said the US views as creating barriers or running counter to its interests. 'We should be candid: while the American approach is blunt, it has exposed fault lines in our own house. 'This tariff standoff is, in part, a reaction to our policy choices - and it compels us to reflect on whether those choices are achieving their intended goals,' said Joosub. President Cyril Ramaphosa believes his administration will still be able to find a way out of the 30% tariffs before August 7. [email protected]
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
'Propaganda masquerading as strategic realism'
Palestinian children clamour for a meal at a charity kitchen in the Mawasi area of Khan Yunis in the southern Gaza Strip. Image: AFP Ziyad Motala There is a certain predictability in the Sunday Times' editorial arc of late, an increasingly tired soliloquy in praise of empire, veiled in the language of pragmatism and national interest. But even by its declining standards, the paper's recent conduct reveals something altogether more disquieting: an abdication of journalistic integrity in favour of ideological alignment with Zionist hasbara and Washington's punitive caprice. For months, the Sunday Times stonewalled a public inquiry, refusing to disclose that its columnist, S'thembiso Msomi, had taken a trip to Israel and written an article in April 2025, a reverent portrayal of Israeli resilience masquerading as impartial analysis, which was funded by the South African Jewish Board of Deputies. This silence was not inadvertent. It was calculated. Only this past Sunday, after a formal complaint was lodged with the Press Council, did the paper grudgingly acknowledge this inconvenient fact. The admission came in the form of a subdued notice buried deep within the paper, accompanied by the usual euphemisms of 'clarification' and 'apology.' One suspects the intent was plain: to bury the admission and hope the public would move on, none the wiser. This is no minor infraction. The Press Code is unambiguous: publications must disclose when a third party finances the cost of news gathering. Failure to do so compromises not only the perceived neutrality of the journalist but the editorial independence of the publication itself. The Sunday Times, one of South Africa's prominent newspapers, violated this basic tenet of ethical journalism and only confessed months later when cornered. But Msomi's subsidised propaganda piece is merely the tip of a much larger ideological iceberg. For some time now, the Sunday Times has become a dependable sanctuary for pro-Israel apologetics and the exculpation of American imperial tantrums. William Gumede's April 27 supplication for normalisation with Israel was not just intellectually lazy; it was ideologically revealing. That his organisation, Democracy Works, has itself been the recipient of funding from several dubious foreign entities raises questions about whether we are reading South African analysis or something concocted in the backrooms of Tel Aviv and Washington, D.C. Not to be outdone, David Bruce, in a piece on July 18, urged the ANC to 're-engage' with Israel, as though genocide were a minor irritant to be filed under diplomatic collateral. This week, Richard Gumede once again joined the chorus with a patronising lecture about South Africa's 'anti-American' posture, couched, of course, in the language of concern for ordinary South Africans. He argues that the ANC's refusal to grovel before Donald Trump's grotesque 'America first' foreign policy is somehow an affront to rational diplomacy. It is a line of reasoning so bankrupt, so wilfully ahistorical, that one wonders whether Gumede has mistaken State Department press releases for political philosophy. To Gumede, the refusal to embrace the punitive actions taken by the United States against its adversaries, China, Russia, and Iran, is symptomatic of ideological recklessness. That these are states with whom South Africa has longstanding economic and strategic ties is brushed aside. That they are themselves frequent targets of American hostility for daring to act independently of Washington's diktats is of no concern. And that Donald Trump's America is perhaps the least principled, most corrupt and least coherent United States government in recent memory is something Gumede conveniently omits. Let us be clear. No state, regardless of its alliances or ideological pretensions, should enjoy impunity for violating international law or trampling on human rights. Those who commit war crimes or persecute their people must be held accountable without exception. Yet to invoke China, Russia or Iran as stock villains to deflect from the horrors in Gaza is not only evasive, it is intellectually bankrupt. Any person possessed of even modest moral clarity can see what is unfolding there: a sustained campaign of collective punishment, bolstered by the silence and acquiescence of the self-styled democratic West. Only a fool believes the United States has a principled interest in human rights. The historical record is unambiguous. So long as the foreign despot salutes the American flag and pledges fealty to Washington, tyranny becomes tolerable, and repression conveniently overlooked. It is particularly rich that Gumede offers up corruption as one of the United States' primary concerns with South Africa. One must ask: Is this the same United States whose president auctioned off foreign policy to the highest bidder, made his inaugural visits to the gilded palaces of Riyadh and Abu Dhabi, and returned with real estate contracts for his family? Is this the America whose transactional foreign policy includes deals with murderers and autocrats in exchange for arms deals and hotel licences? If so, Gumede's invocation of corruption is not just misguided. It is obscene. Equally revealing as what the Sunday Times chooses to publish is what it deliberately leaves out. While major newspapers across the globe devoted front pages this Sunday to the deepening famine in Gaza, where Israel stands credibly accused of weaponising starvation against a besieged population, the Sunday Times offered not a single article on the subject. Instead, readers were served yet another polemic lamenting South Africa's supposed diplomatic 'missteps' for refusing to placate the unplacatable. At the very moment when two respected Israeli human rights organisations, B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights Israel, joined the growing international consensus that Israel is committing genocide, the Sunday Times chose to publish yet another piece dismissing South Africa's ICJ application as nothing more than political 'lawfare.' This posture is part of a broader pattern of editorial capture. In an earlier column by Rowan Polovin on May 18, the Sunday Times provided a platform for the chair of the South African Zionist Federation to distort history, sanitise Israeli apartheid, and peddle neocolonial binaries between the "West" and global irrelevance. Polovin's article was not journalism. It was propaganda masquerading as strategic realism, replete with the ugliest strands of ethnic chauvinism and settler-colonial nostalgia. This is not journalism. It is ideological mimicry. The Sunday Times' descent into apologetics for Zionist repression and American belligerence reflects a broader pattern among certain elite opinion-shapers in South Africa. They dress up subservience and Israeli apartheid as realism, and fealty to empire as prudence. But the effect is the same: the slow domestication of South African political discourse in service of foreign powers whose only consistent principle is the ruthless preservation of their interests. In an age when facts are politicised and justice is routinely subverted, affectations of neutrality serve only to mask complicity. The Sunday Times has not simply abdicated its duty to inform. It has aligned itself with the architects of obfuscation, giving comfort to power, to oppression, and Israeli apartheid, something unimaginable in a democratic South Africa bending to the whims of Donald Trump. * Ziyad Motala, Professor of Law, Howard Law School ** The views expressed in this article are necessarily those of The African, IOL or Independent Media.
