Rinku Singh removed as SVEEP icon over political neutrality concerns following engagement with Samajwadi Party's MP
The Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) of Uttar Pradesh has officially removed cricketer Rinku Singh from his role as the state icon of the Systematic Voters' Education and Electoral Participation (SVEEP) program.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The decision, approved by the Election Commission of India (ECI), was communicated to the Aligarh district election officer (DEO), citing concerns over political neutrality.
The CEO UP Office wrote to Aligarh DEO, that all the promotional content such as posters, videos, media and other medium featuring Rinku Singh should be removed with immediate effect.
Official source said, 'Rinku Singh, who was previously featured in various voter awareness campaigns, has been dropped following his engagement to Samajwadi Party Member of Parliament Priya Saroj.
The ECI believes that Rinku's personal association with an active political figure could compromise the impartiality of the SVEEP initiative and it's also against the rules. Therefore, all promotional materials—including posters, banners, videos, and digital content featuring Rinku are being removed.
'
Rinku and Priya's engagement ceremony took place on June 8 at in Lucknow and was attended by prominent political figures including SP chief Akhilesh Yadav, Dimple Yadav, Shivpal Yadav, and Jaya Bachchan, along with over 20 MPs.
In its letter to Aligarh DEO, the ECI emphasized that fairness and neutrality are paramount in public campaigns.
'ECI acknowledges Rinku's stature as a renowned sports figure, however his personal ties to a political leader could be perceived as partisan in public, thereby affecting the credibility of the voter awareness drive,' added source.
The decision has sparked mixed reactions on social media. While some users criticized it as overly cautious, others supported the move, arguing that public campaigns must remain free from political influence. No official statement has been issued by either Rinku Singh or Priya Saroj regarding the matter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
Assam: Final voter rolls published ahead of BTC elections
Guwahati: The Final Photo Electoral Rolls for all 40 constituencies of the Bodoland Territorial Council (BTC) were published on Wednesday, marking a key step ahead of the upcoming council election, the Assam State Election Commission said in a statement. This year's roll reflects a significant expansion, with the inclusion of 81 new villages in the Bodoland Territorial Region (BTR) as per the delimitation notification issued by the Assam government on June 25, 2025. According to the updated data, the BTR now has a total of 26,58,477 registered voters, comprising 13,23,673 male electors, 13,34,787 female electors, and 17 voters classified as 'others". The council area is served by 3,279 polling stations, although the figure may change as the final list of polling stations is scheduled for release on August 18 following a rationalisation exercise. The Election Commission has made the Final Electoral Roll (without photographs) available for public inspection at multiple locations, including Circle Officer offices, Block Development Officer offices, municipal bodies, town committees, sub-registry offices, police stations, tea garden offices, and Gaon Panchayat or Village Council Development Committee offices within each constituency. The official statement said that the voters can also access the rolls online through the OERMS portal and district administration websites. 'Electors may verify their details using their EPIC (Elector's Photo Identity Card) number issued by the Election Commission of India (ECI) or by downloading the electoral roll for their respective polling stations from the citizen corner on the website,' it also mentioned. In a move aimed at encouraging greater participation, the Commission has also announced that eligible individuals whose names appear in the ECI's supplementary roll and who hold valid EPIC cards will still be able to file claims for inclusion in the BTC electoral roll until the last date for filing nominations. This provision applies to those qualifying as voters under the ECI's current summary revision exercise. The updated electoral roll is expected to serve as a critical tool for both voters and political parties as campaigning intensifies in the run-up to the BTC elections. With expanded coverage and easier access to voter information, the State Election Commission is aiming to boost transparency, ensure fair representation, and maximise participation across the Bodoland Territorial Region.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
SC says multiple documents for citizenship in Bihar SIR are voter-friendly
The Supreme Court on Wednesday observed that the availability of multiple documents to prove citizenship under the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar's electoral rolls was 'voter-friendly rather than restrictive.' Justice Joymalya Bagchi made the observation during a hearing on petitions challenging the Election Commission of India's (ECI's) June 24 directive ordering the SIR. Senior Advocate A M Singhvi, appearing for one of the petitioners, had raised concerns about the exclusionary nature of the verification exercise. A Bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi is hearing multiple petitions contesting the ECI's directive, which mandates that voters not listed in the 2003 electoral roll must furnish documents to prove citizenship. Individuals born after December 2004 are also required to submit citizenship proof of both parents, with additional conditions if a parent is a foreign national. The court noted that the SIR in Bihar permits any of 11 documents to be submitted to establish citizenship, whereas the earlier summary revision in Jharkhand allowed only seven documents for identity verification. While acknowledging concerns around Aadhaar exclusion, Justice Bagchi said the broader set of documents available in Bihar makes the process 'voter-friendly rather than restrictive.' Singhvi, however, questioned the "compelling need" to conduct the SIR in such a short timeframe, arguing that it could lead to mass voter exclusion. He pointed out that many women in Bihar lack matriculation or educational certificates issued by recognised boards, which are among the 11 approved documents. Legal scope of ECI's powers debated Justice Bagchi highlighted that Section 21(3) of the Representation of the People (RP) Act grants the ECI some flexibility to conduct a special revision 'in such manner as it may think fit,' subject to limitations. He posed a question to the legal counsels on whether this provision gave the ECI 'residuary discretion' to introduce additions such as enumeration forms or extra documentation for the revision process. Senior Advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, also appearing for the petitioners, countered that Section 21(3) 'cannot take away my right to adult suffrage under Article 326 at any cost,' nor the right to vote under Section 62 of the RP Act. 'This is a battle between a constitutional entitlement and a constitutional right,' Justice Bagchi remarked. Allegations of EC website changes after Rahul Gandhi's remarks Advocate Prashant Bhushan, representing the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), submitted that the ECI removed the searchable list of electoral rolls from its website after Congress leader Rahul Gandhi accused the poll body of aiding 'vote theft' on August 4. 'The searchable list was available till August 4,' Bhushan told the court. The Bench also clarified that it would not take up matters related to the SIR in West Bengal, as the state Assembly elections are scheduled for 2026. 'Bengal can wait. Nothing is happening now,' the court said. The hearing is expected to continue on Thursday.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Bihar SIR is a battle between EC's power over polls and citizens' right to vote: SC
The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar's electoral rolls is a battle between the Election Commission of India's 'power' over elections and the ordinary citizen's right to be named in electoral rolls, and to be allowed to vote, the Supreme Court observed on Wednesday (August 13, 2025). Justice Joymalya Bagchi, part of the Bench headed by Justice Surya Kant hearing petitions against the SIR, observed that poll-bound Bihar was in the middle of a contest between Article 324, which empowers the Election Commission (EC) to control elections, and the constitutional right of adult suffrage enshrined in Article 326 of the Constitution. Bihar SIR row hearing highlights on August 13, 2025 'Casual removal of voting rights' The judge's observation was in response to arguments raised by senior advocates A.M. Singhvi and Gopal Sankaranarayanan that the procedure of sending pre-filled enumeration forms to electors, only to later delete 65 lakh of them from the electoral roll without any prior enquiry or physical hearing — that too, with just two months left for the Assembly election in November — was, to say the least, a 'casual way of doing away with citizens' right to vote'. 'An elector means someone who is already in the electoral roll. The enumeration form, indicative documents are just figments of the imagination of the EC. There is no such procedure in the Representation of the People Act. I have a statutory right to remain in the electoral roll. The procedure for removal from the electoral roll is 'absolutely strict' as intended by the Parliament. Removal would only be subsequent to an enquiry, even for one elector. It is the concept of the 'little man' laid down in the Supreme Court by Justice Krishna Iyer… Who gave the EC power to do this, under which law and what authority?' Mr. Sankaranarayanan submitted. EC's discretionary power Justice Bagchi referred to the 'elbow room' provided to the EC under Section 21(3) of the Representation of the People (RP) Act, which says that the EC can conduct a 'special revision' in 'such manner as it may think fit'. 'Does this provision give the EC some residuary discretion to introduce elements like enumeration forms, additional indicative documents?' Justice Bagchi quizzed the petitioners. However, Mr. Sankaranarayanan responded that Section 21(3) only contemplated a special revision of 'any one constituency or a part of a constituency'. 'Can the provision be used to change the electoral rolls of the entire country from a time of your own choice? Does it authorise EC to embark on an en masse revision of the electoral rolls across the country?' the senior advocate responded. Section 21(3) was meant to be resorted to only in 'exceptional circumstances', he said. Summarising Section 21(3), Justice Bagchi said that it authorised the EC to devise procedures for special revision of the electoral roll in case of exceptional circumstances like a natural disaster. 'Otherwise, the EC has to strictly follow Rules 4 to 24 of the Registration of Electors Rules,' Justice Bagchi said. Voter inclusive vs exclusionary Justice Bagchi and Mr. Singhvi debated on whether giving citizens an option to choose from as many as 11 'indicative' documents to prove their citizenship and find their way back to the electoral roll could be considered 'voter-inclusive' rather than 'voter-exclusionary', as argued by the petitioners. The judge pointed out that earlier summary revisions provided a choice of only seven documents. Mr. Singhvi, however, said the list of 11 documents was 'impressive, but hollow'. They were either irrelevant, non-existent, or had minimum coverage in Bihar, he said, noting that only 1% of Bihar's residents has a passport. Most women in the State do not have matriculation certificates, Mr. Singhvi said, adding that 87% had Aadhaar, which was not included as one of the EC's 11 approved documents. Justice Kant said the central civil services were mostly populated by people from Bihar. 'I am not talking about those few. I am talking about the poor and marginal population of Bihar who live in flood-prone, poverty-stricken and rural areas… The EC says these documents are indicative of your citizenship, but they have only exclusionary value,' Mr. Singhvi submitted. 'EC's malafide intentions' So far, he said, the SIR has only witnessed the 'de facto deletion of electors'. 'The SIR policy is to presumptively exclude the entire mass of electors in Bihar since 2003 and then put the onus on them to come with any of the indicative documents to prove their citizenship... These are people who have voted in five to 10 elections since 2003, and you have deleted 65 lakh of them without any enquiry, physical interviews, verification or giving them an opportunity to produce documents,' Mr. Singhvi said. Advocate Prashant Bhushan argued that the 'malafide' of the EC was evident from its haste in conducting the SIR, its refusal to accept Aadhaar or voter ID cards, its refusal to publish the names of the 65 lakh deleted voters and the specific reasons for their exclusion, and the removal of the mechanism to search for names in the draft electoral roll after Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's press conference on the issue.
