
Gabbard considering ways to revamp Trump's intelligence briefing
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump's intelligence chief is exploring ways to revamp his routine intelligence briefing in order to build his trust in the material and make it more aligned with how he likes to consume information, according to five people with direct knowledge of the discussions.
As part of that effort, National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard has solicited ideas from current and former intelligence officials about steps she could take to tailor the briefing, known as the President's Daily Brief, or PDB, to Trump's policy interests and habits.
One idea that's been discussed is possibly creating a video version of the PDB that's made to look and feel like a Fox News broadcast, four of the people with direct knowledge of the discussions said.
Currently, the PDB is a digital document created daily for the president and key Cabinet members and advisers that includes written text, as well as graphics and images. The material that goes into the classified briefing, and how it's presented, can shape a president's decision-making.
According to his public schedule, since his inauguration Trump has taken the PDB 14 times, or on average less than once a week, which is less often than his recent predecessors — including himself during his first term. An analysis of their public schedules during that same timeframe — from their inauguration through May during their first year in office — shows that former President Joe Biden received 90 PDBs; Trump received 55; and former President Barack Obama received 63.
The people with direct knowledge of the PDB discussions said Gabbard believes that cadence may be a reflection of Trump's preference for consuming information in a different form than the formal briefing, as well as his distrust of intelligence officials, which stretches back to his first term, when he accused them of spying on his 2016 campaign. They also said that even if the presentation of the PDB changes, the information included would not.
Asked for comment, DNI Press Secretary Olivia Coleman said in a statement,"This so-called 'reporting' is laughable, absurd, and flat-out false. In true fake news fashion, NBC is publishing yet another anonymously sourced false story."
A source familiar with the DNI's internal deliberations said that during Gabbard's confirmation process in the Senate, "there was bipartisan consensus that the PDB was in need of serious reform. DNI Gabbard is leading that reform and is ensuring the President receives timely, relevant, objective intelligence reporting."
In a statement, White House Spokesman Davis Ingle referred to this reporting as "libelous garbage from unnamed sources," and said, "President Trump has assembled a world-class intelligence team who he is constantly communicating with and receiving real time updates on all pressing national security issues. Ensuring the safety and security of the American people is President Trump's number one priority."
It is not unusual for the PDB to be tailored to individual presidents. The PDB's presentation was adjusted for Trump in his first term to include less text and more pictures and graphics. Gabbard has discussed more extensive changes, according to the people with direct knowledge of the discussions. It's unclear how far her effort will go, but the people with direct knowledge of it said she has entertained some unconventional ideas.
One idea that has been discussed is to transform the PDB so it mirrors a Fox News broadcast, according to four of the people with direct knowledge of the discussions. Under that concept as it has been discussed, the national intelligence director's office could hire a Fox News producer to produce it and one of the network's personalities to present it; Trump, an avid Fox News viewer, could then watch the broadcast PDB whenever he wanted.
A new PDB could include not only graphics and pictures but also maps with animated representations of exploding bombs, similar to a video game, another one of the people with knowledge of the discussions said.
"The problem with Trump is that he doesn't read," said another people with direct knowledge of the PDB discussions. "He's on broadcast all the time."
The people with direct knowledge of the PDB discussions spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the internal deliberations.
U.S. intelligence officials have created videos in the past to present information to presidents, including profiles of world leaders, for instance. Hollywood legend Charlton Heston narrated instructional films about highly classified topics for the Energy Department and the U.S. intelligence and military community. The films included information about nuclear weapons, requiring Heston to hold the highest relevant security clearance possible for at least six years.
Former intelligence officials who worked in the first Trump administration said Trump preferred to be briefed verbally and to ask questions but would not read memos or other lengthy written material.
During Trump's first term, the PDB evolved into a one-page outline of topics with a set of graphics, presented verbally by an intelligence officer about twice a week, according to a history of presidential briefings by John Helgerson.
To accommodate Trump's style and preferences, Vice President Mike Pence told the briefers to "lean forward on maps," according to Helgerson's book.
But there has not been a broadcast or cable news-style PDB presentation. While the PDB has gone through various transformations under different presidents since it was created in 1946, it has largely been in a written format that was then briefed to the president verbally.
Gabbard has also discussed tailoring some of the content in the PDB to Trump's interests, such as including more information on economic and trade issues and less routine focus on the war in Ukraine, according to three of the people with direct knowledge of the PDB discussions.
Including intelligence on issues the president particularly cares about is not unusual. The PDB for Biden included gender and climate change issues, one of those three people said.
"You shift with the priorities of the administration," that person said, adding that because of Trump's distrust of the intelligence community, getting him to embrace the PDB "is a very uphill fight."
As director of national intelligence, Gabbard oversees and approves the PDB. A large staff of analysts and other employees at the CIA compiles the PDB, creating detailed text, graphics and videos based on the latest intelligence gathered by America's spy agencies.
NBC News has reported that Gabbard plans to move the office that prepares the PDB from the CIA's headquarters in Langley, Virginia, to the national intelligence director's office a few miles away in McLean — apparently to bolster her office's role in presenting intelligence to the president.
The ODNI would need to expand its staff and acquire digital tools and other infrastructure to assemble the PDB, one of the five people familiar with the discussions said.
If the PDB were to be converted to a video for Trump, it would still most likely be provided in something like its current form to other top administration officials who receive it, that person said.
Because he has been taking the PDB a little less than once a week on average, Trump currently receives a product that one of the people familiar with the PDB discussions described as the "best of" highlights from the past week, in addition to anything new that day.
Discussions about potential changes to the PDB come amid questions about whether Gabbard may politicize the intelligence process, especially after her chief of staff, Joe Kent, asked analysts to revise an assessment on a Venezuelan criminal gang that appeared to undermine Trump's immigration policy, according to two sources with knowledge of the matter.
Two senior officials who led the National Intelligence Council were recently fired after the initial intelligence assessment contradicted Trump's assertions that the Tren de Aragua cartel was operating under the direction of Venezuela's regime, led by Nicolás Maduro. Trump cited claims about the regime's purported relationship with the cartel as his rationale for invoking a rarely used 1798 law, the Alien Enemies Act, to deport people suspected of being gang members without standard due process.
It's common for intelligence leaders to put their own staffs in place, but the move concerned congressional Democrats who already questioned some of Gabbard's efforts to have tighter control over what intelligence reaches Trump.
"Absent evidence to justify the firings, the workforce can only conclude that their jobs are contingent on producing analysis that is aligned with the president's political agenda, rather than truthful and apolitical," Rep. Jim Himes of Connecticut, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said in a statement.
An administration official previously told NBC News that the two officials were fired "because they were unable to provide unbiased intelligence."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
33 minutes ago
- The Hill
China accuses Hegseth of touting ‘Cold War mentality' in provocative speech
China accused Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth of espousing a 'Cold War mentality' in a speech 'filled with provocations' in Singapore on Saturday. 'Hegseth deliberately ignored the call for peace and development by countries in the region, and instead touted the Cold War mentality for bloc confrontation, vilified China with defamatory allegations, and falsely called China a 'threat,'' a spokesperson for the Chinese Foreign Ministry said on Monday. 'The remarks were filled with provocations and intended to sow discord. China deplores and firmly opposes them and has protested strongly to the U.S.,' the spokesperson continued. Hegseth, who took the stage at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore on Saturday, sought to woo Asian defense leaders to Washington's side, as he warned of the 'imminent' threat China poses to the Indo-Pacific region. China has threatened to overtake Taiwan, a potential reality Hegseth played into in his speech at the forum. 'There's no reason to sugarcoat it. The threat China poses is real, and it could be imminent,' Hegseth said, adding that any move on Taipei by Beijing 'would result in devastating consequences for the Indo-Pacific and the world.' China's foreign ministry spokesperson pushed back against claims that it poses a 'threat' and returned the accusation to the U.S. 'No country in the world deserves to be called a hegemonic power other than the U.S. itself, who is also the primary factor undermining the peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific,' the spokesperson said. 'To perpetuate its hegemony and advance the so-called 'Indo-Pacific strategy,' the U.S. has deployed offensive weaponry in the South China Sea and kept stoking flames and creating tensions in the Asia-Pacific, which are turning the region into a powder keg and making countries in the region deeply concerned. Hegseth's trip to Singapore — his second visit to the region as Pentagon chief — came amid a backdrop of heightened rhetoric between Washington and Beijing, which President Trump accused Friday of violating a temporary trade deal. European and Indo-Pacific countries have found themselves at a crossroads as of late, increasingly pulled between the competing interests of the U.S. and China as both struggle for dominance. In an attempt to sway Indo-Pacific nations, Hegseth promised continued American partnership and support to those wary of the Trump administration's commitment to the region. But the pledges came with a caveat repeated in Europe, Africa and elsewhere in the world: a call for an increase in defense spending. 'We ask, and indeed we insist, that our allies and partners do their part on defense,' he said. 'Sometimes that means having uncomfortable and tough conversations.' The Hill has reached out to the Defense Department for a response.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US will never default on its debt, claims Trump's Treasury Secretary
The US will never default on its debts, Donald Trump's Treasury Secretary has claimed, as he sought to downplay growing concerns over the state of the country's public finances. Scott Bessent told CBS news on Sunday that the US was 'on the warning track' but insisted it would not run out of cash despite approaching the so-called debt ceiling – the legal limit that the US government is permitted to borrow. He said: 'I will say the United States of America is never going to default. That is never going to happen. We are on the warning track and we will never hit the wall.' Economists have warned that Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful' spending bill will add trillions to the US's $37 trillion (£27.4 trillion) federal deficit over the next decade. The bill, which was approved by the US's House of Representatives last month, proposes raising the US debt ceiling by $4 trillion. It promises increased spending on the US military and a clampdown on illegal immigration alongside cuts to food aid, clean energy tax credits and Medicare, America's healthcare programme for poorer households. The US was downgraded by the credit ratings agency Moody's in May, in part owing to concerns over Mr Trump's policies and slowing economic growth across the Atlantic. In early May, Mr Bessent said there was a 'reasonable probability' that the US could run out of money by August without lifting the debt ceiling. Mr Bessent's comments come after Jamie Dimon, the chief executive of JPMorgan, warned last Friday that Donald Trump's financial plans could 'crack' the American bond market. Investors have become increasingly worried over the impact of Mr Trump's borrowing plans on US Treasuries. Mr Dimon said: 'I just don't know if it's going to be a crisis in six months or six years, and I'm hoping that we change both the trajectory of the debt and the ability of market makers to make markets.' Mr Bessent hit back at Mr Dimon, saying: 'I've known Jamie for a long time, and for his entire career he's made predictions like this. Fortunately none of them have come true. That's why he's a great banker. He tries to look around the corner. 'We are going to bring the deficit down slowly. This has been a long process, so the goal is to bring it down over the next four years.' He argued that the US was taking in a 'substantial tariff income' that could net the US government as much as $2 trillion, and pointed to plans for a clampdown on prescription drug prices. He said: '[The] president has a prescription drug plan with the pharmaceutical companies that could substantially push down costs for prescription drugs, and that could be another trillion.' Mr Bessent also said he was confident that Donald Trump and the Chinese president, Xi Jinping, would 'iron out' their difficulties in a call soon – following accusations from Mr Trump last week that Beijing had violated a truce on tariffs agreed in May. He said: '[Mr Trump] is going to have a wonderful conversation about the trade negotiations this week with President Xi. That's our expectation.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Forget tacos, can Trump have his tariff cake and eat it too? Wall Street's biggest bull thinks so
If President Donald Trump's tariffs settle around 10%, that could still allow the Federal Reserve to cut rates later this year while they generate revenue that helps with the massive budget deficit, according to Wells Fargo's Christopher Harvey, who thinks a levy at that level could be split between importers, corporations, and consumers. There has been much talk lately about President Donald Trump and tacos, but another food entering the tariff conversation could be cake. While his 'Liberation Day' announcement roiled markets, he has largely pulled back from his most aggressive stance since then, though on Friday night he said he will double steel tariffs to 50%. The overall direction of travel remains positive for Chris Harvey, Wells Fargo Securities' head of equity strategy, whose S&P 500 price target of 7,007 makes him Wall Street's biggest bull. 'The Trump administration does want to move things forward,' he told CNBC on Friday, hours before the steel announcement. 'They appear to want to push the ball forward, and I think that's a positive. We're now at the point where I think we're going to start to hear some real tangible results over the next couple of weeks.' Harvey added that he thinks stocks could jump by double digits in the second half of the year. His S&P 500 forecast implies an 18.5% surge from Friday's close. A key piece to his thesis is Fed Governor Christopher Waller's recent statement that if tariffs end up around 10%, then the central bank could be in a position to cut rates in the second half of the year. Tariffs are generally seen as inflationary and could force the Fed to hold off on monetary easing. But if consumers treat them as one-off price hikes and keep their longer-term inflation expectations anchored, then there could still be leeway to lower rates. For now, the effective tariff rate remains above 10%, though estimates differ. The Budget Lab at Yale put it at 17.8% last month, while Fitch put it at 13%. Harvey expects tariffs to settle in the 10%-12% range and said that even as clients express anxiety about all the uncertainty, they are still comfortable with the economy's fundamentals. That prompted CNBC's Scott Wapner to ask if Trump can have his cake and eat it too, namely, moving ahead with his tariff agenda and getting the Fed rate cuts that he's been demanding. 'I think so,' Harvey replied. 'So the reason why we said 10% is with 10% we think a third will be eaten by the importer, a third eaten by the corporation, and a third will be eaten by the consumer. That's not a big impact.' At the same time, he added that the tariffs will generate revenue that can help with the federal budget, which has seen massive deficits in recent years. Fears that deficits will worsen under Trump's proposed budget working its way through Congress have led to volatility in borrowing costs as bond market jitters have jolted Treasury yields. Meanwhile, as trade talks continue, it's more important for the Trump administration to reach deals with India, Japan and the European Union, Harvey said, adding that China is less critical since the U.S. is in the process of disintermediation from it anyway. But if tariff uncertainty stretches into June and July, then companies may start resizing their payrolls and then 'things start to fall apart,' he warned. That's why it's necessary to make progress on trade and reach deals with big economies like India, Japan and the EU, Harvey said. That way, markets can focus on next year, rather near-term tariff impacts. 'Then you can start to extrapolate out,' he explained. 'Then the market starts looking through things. They start looking through any sort of economic slowdown or weakness, and then we start looking to '26 not at '25.' This story was originally featured on