logo
Does Getting Fit Guard Against Colorectal Cancer?

Does Getting Fit Guard Against Colorectal Cancer?

Medscape21 hours ago
Evidence continues to mount that building cardiovascular fitness can help lower an individual's risk for colorectal cancer (CRC).
The latest study — a sweeping analysis of 643,583 individuals, with more than 8000 cases of CRC and 10 years follow-up — found a consistent, inverse, and graded association between cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and the risk for the development of CRC — a benefit similar for men and women and across races.
CRC risk was 9% lower for each 1-metabolic equivalent (MET) task increase in CRF, objectively measured by an exercise treadmill test.
When assessed across CRF categories, there was a progressive decline in CRC risk with higher CRF, Aamir Ali, MD, and colleagues with Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, found.
Compared with the least fit individuals (METs, 4.8), the CRC risk was 14% lower in those falling in the low-fit CRF category (METs, 7.3), 27% lower for moderately fit people (METs, 8.6), 41% lower for fit individuals (METs, 10.5), and 57% lower for high-fit individuals (METs, 13.6).
Moderate CRF is attainable by most middle-aged and older individuals, by engaging in moderate-intensity physical activity such as brisk walking, which aligns with current national guidelines, the authors said.
The study was published online on July 28 in Mayo Clinic Proceedings.
The results dovetail with earlier work.
For example, in the Cooper Center Longitudinal Study, men with high mid-life CRF had a 44% lower risk for CRC and a 32% lower risk of dying from cancer later in life men with low CRF.
A recent meta-analysis for the World Cancer Research Fund estimated a 16% lower risk for colon cancer in people with the highest levels of recreational physical activity relative to those with the lowest levels.
A recent UK Biobank analysis using accelerometers linked higher daily movement to a 26% reduction in risk across multiple cancers, including bowel cancer.
Taken together, the data suggest that 'the more you exercise, the better your overall health is going to be — not just your cardiac fitness but also your overall risk of cancer,' Joel Saltzman, MD, medical oncologist at Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland, noted in an interview with Medscape Medical News .
Can You Outrun CRC Risk?
In the US, CRC is the second leading cause of cancer mortality, accounting for 51,896 deaths in 2019. The economic burden of CRC in the US is significant, topping $24 billion annually.
And while the incidence of colon cancer has decreased in older individuals during the past 3 decades, the incidence in younger adults has nearly doubled during the same period, 'underscoring the limitations of screening programs and the critical need for risk factor modification,' Ali and colleagues wrote.
'There is good evidence that exercise and healthy lifestyle/diet have significant benefit overall and as well for some potential risk reduction for colon cancer,' David Johnson, MD, professor of medicine and chief of gastroenterology, Eastern Virginia Medical School in Norfolk, Virginia, told Medscape Medical News.
'There are clearly suggestions of why this makes sense via the beneficial effects of exercise and physical activity in CRC pathways including but not limited to regulation of inflammation and aberrant cell growth/cancer pathways,' Johnson said.
He emphasized, however, that exercise and lifestyle are not the best way to prevent CRC.
'Appropriate screening, in particular by colonoscopy (by skilled physicians who meet high-quality performance national benchmarks) to detect and remove precancerous polyps, is the best approach for prevention,' Johnson said.
'At this point — albeit exercise is potentially helpful and a great general recommendation — my most current advice as an expert in the field, is that you cannot outrun CRC risk,' Johnson said.
Can You Outrun CRC Recurrence?
Prevention aside, the data thus far are even more supportive of risk reduction for patients who have had CRC and are targeting reduction of recurrence, Johnson said.
Perhaps the most compelling study was recently published in The New England Journal of Medicine.
The CHALLENGE trial enrolled patients with resected stage II or III colon cancer who had completed their adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with recurrences within a year of diagnosis were excluded, as they were more likely to have highly aggressive, biologically active disease.
Participants were randomized to receive healthcare education materials alone or in conjunction with a structured exercise program over a 3-year follow-up period.
The focus of the exercise intervention was increasing recreational aerobic activity over baseline by at least 10 METs — essentially the equivalent of adding about 45-60 minutes of brisk walking or 25-30 minutes of jogging three to four times a week.
At a median follow-up of nearly 8 years, exercise reduced the relative risk for disease recurrence, new primary cancer, or death by 28% ( P = .02).
'This benefit persisted — and even strengthened — over time, with disease-free survival increasing by 6.4 and 7.1 percentage points at 5 and 8 years, respectively,' Johnson noted in a Medscape commentary.
The CHALLENGE results are 'very compelling,' Bishal Gyawali, MD, PhD, associate professor of oncology at Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, noted in a separate Medscape commentary.
'If you compare these results with results from other trials, you'll see that this is a no-brainer. If this were a drug, you would want to use it today,' Gyawali said.
Saltzman told Medscape Medical News patients often ask him what they can do to help prevent their cancer from coming back. 'I would sort of say, 'Well, eat a healthy diet and exercise,' but I didn't have a lot of good evidence to support it.' The CHALLENGE study provides 'the proof in the pudding.'
With these strong data, 'it almost feels like I should be able to write a prescription for my patient to join an exercise program and that their insurance should cover it,' Saltzman said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Young Americans Dread Turning 26: Health Insurance Chaos
Why Young Americans Dread Turning 26: Health Insurance Chaos

New York Times

time5 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Why Young Americans Dread Turning 26: Health Insurance Chaos

Amid the challenges of adulthood, there is one rite of passage unique to the United States: the need to find your own health insurance by the time you turn 26. That is the age at which the Affordable Care Act declares that young adults generally have to get off their family's plan and figure out their own coverage themselves. When the A.C.A. was voted into law in 2010, its so-called dependent coverage expansion was immediately effective, guaranteeing health insurance to millions of young Americans up to age 26 who would otherwise have not had coverage. But for years, Republicans have whittled away at the infrastructure of the original law. Long gone is the requirement to buy insurance. Plans sold in the online insurance marketplaces have no stringent quality standards. Costs keep rising, and eligibility requirements and subsidies are a moving target. The erosion of the law has now created an 'insurance cliff' for Americans who are turning 26 and don't have a job that provides medical coverage. Some, scared off by the complexity of picking a policy and by the price tags, tumble over the edge and go without insurance, in a health system where the rate for an emergency room visit can be thousands, if not tens of thousands, of dollars. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

The presidential fitness test is nostalgia in the worst way
The presidential fitness test is nostalgia in the worst way

Washington Post

time5 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

The presidential fitness test is nostalgia in the worst way

Among those standing over President Donald Trump last week as he autographed another executive order, this one reviving the presidential fitness test from Trump's favorite decade — the pre-Civil Rights, pre-Voting Rights 1950s — was a leather-skinned bearded guy with a shaved head and trap muscles distending down a thick neck, trying not to look like the hulking bouncer he resembled. I didn't recognize him until I saw a caption from the photo op: Paul Levesque, better known as Triple H, from the professional wrestling theater. What an oxymoronic choice to exemplify a healthy lifestyle for kids. But then, it's just like this president — an overweight aficionado of fast food whose primary exercise appears to be clambering in and out of a golf cart — to resurrect the archaic youth fitness campaign that has little to do with the overall challenges to well-being kids face today. Levesque is a retired star from a fake sport with real drug problems. As his nutritionist Dave Palumbo told Matt Rivera during a podcast several years ago: 'The good thing about wrestling is that because it's not a professional sport per se, more entertainment, they are allowed to take hormone replacement. So they can go to HRT [hormone replacement therapy] places, they can get testosterone — 100 mg a week, whatever they prescribe nowadays — they can get HCG [Human Chorionic Gonadotropin], they can do HGH [human growth hormone] if they want. Those are acceptable, and a lot of the wrestlers do it.' But kids shouldn't. Nor should athletes. Such supplements are banned in sport by the World Anti-Doping Agency. Like so much of everything Trump does, however, reestablishing the old fitness test — sit-ups, pull-ups, a mile run — is about dismantling or dismissing something his Democratic predecessors did. It's about the president's preoccupation with what he thinks looks tough, his MAGA movement's imagining of masculinity, a Triple H, who retired from wrestling in 2022 after being frightened by an episode with heart failure. World Wrestling Entertainment, headed by major Trump campaign financiers Vince and Linda McMahon, denied Palumbo's claim. Vince McMahon beat a 1993 criminal indictment, supported by testimony from a doctor who was convicted, that McMahon and his organization supplied steroids to its wrestlers. One was superstar Hulk Hogan, who died last month of a heart attack at 71. Still, Trump invited faces from the troubled so-called sport of pro wrestling to stand with him before the public last week as imprimaturs of well-being, including Linda McMahon, rewarded a second time now for her largesse to the Trump campaign with a Cabinet appointment as Secretary of Education. Levesque is McMahon's son-in-law, too, and WWE's chief content officer. Trump also invited Pro Football Hall of Fame linebacker Lawrence Taylor, a registered sex offender who was arrested twice in the late '90s with crack cocaine, an addiction he admitted on '60 Minutes' to Mike Wallace. What kind of role models are these? By contrast, President Barack Obama, who fought a smoking habit and installed a basketball court at the White House to feed his athletic habit, included Olympic medalists Dominique Dawes, Allyson Felix, and Michelle Kwan on what was his President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports. It emphasized overall fitness that highlighted healthy eating. First lady Michelle Obama headed the effort that included a vegetable garden she planted and tended on the South Lawn with local kids. Trump during his first term infamously served a buffet of fast foods such as McDonald's, Burger King, Wendy's, and Domino's to visiting national champion college football teams. Trump's approach to youth fitness is on-brand nostalgia, in the worst way. Like his administration's thwarting wind energy construction and electric vehicle manufacturing in lieu of boosting coal mining and building more combustion engine cars. It isn't helpful. It's hurtful. And it's narrow-minded by focusing on competition — Trump placed 'sports' before 'fitness' in the program's title — to ensure what the president fanaticized as 'America's global dominance in sports.' Retired Spelman College president Beverly Tatum took an opposite approach when she led the all-women's HBCU in Atlanta for 13 years starting in 2002. In her soon-to-be-released book 'Peril and Promise: College Leadership in Turbulent Times,' Tatum recalled reading an article about the sedentary lives of young Black women and how it contributed to diabetes, high blood pressure, heart disease, breast cancer and other health vagaries that plague Black women. So, she took the unpopular tact of shutting down the small school's intercollegiate athletic program in favor of a wellness initiative for the entire student body. 'The overall approach to wellness that we were implementing at Spelman was certainly very much in line with the activities of the Obama White House,' Tatum, a psychologist by profession who wrote the noted book, 'Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria? and Other Conversations About Race,' told me Wednesday. 'And I say the Obama White House because Michelle Obama was one of the great champions of eating better and moving more. And our slogan was, 'Eat better. Move more. Sleep well.' 'If you've got those three things working, particularly for late adolescence — improving your diet, engaging in regular activity, not only for better physical health, but also mental health, and then … sleep,' Tatum said she and the Spelmanites learned, 'you are well on your way to a long and healthy life, which is of course what we wanted for our students.' Not some made-up machismo from the 1950s.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store