A giveaway to the rich, disguised as school choice
Our leaders call Alabama's effective voucher program the CHOOSE Act. There's some grim irony in that.
Of course, you can choose to pay for private school tuition, whatever your reasons may be.
But it's not my choice. Or what the families of 730,000 Alabama students want. We pay taxes to support the teachers educating our children in public schools. And we want teachers and staff to have the resources they need to help students thrive.
Yet our leaders plan to divert that money from classrooms into the pockets of wealthy families, in the form of $7,000 tax breaks. More if they have more than one kid enrolled in a private school.
Yes, yes. Under this law, the credit could cover something besides a non-public academy. But considering that two-thirds of the initial applicants to the program are already in private school or homeschooled, it's not hard to predict how the program will operate.
You might also note current eligibility is limited to those making 300% of the poverty level. That sounds a lot more restrictive than it is.
The cap is almost $80,000 a year for a family of three and around $96,000 for a family of four. Alabama's median household income is $62,212 a year. So we're already letting those making more than half the households in the state into the program.
That mild regulation goes away in 2027. Which means the 1% will get in. And that you will be paying private school tuition for people who don't need the help.
That's not how one sells a voucher program. Instead, you preach 'choice' to families and educators locked in a public education system built on discrimination.
'The CHOOSE Act will provide an opportunity for students to learn and thrive in an environment that best meets their needs, which could be a public school,' said Rep. Danny Garrett, R-Trussville, the sponsor of the law, during House debate last year.
Even U.S. Sen. Katie Britt gets into it, claiming that her own federal version of this is OK because 'your zip code shouldn't determine your opportunities.'
Nor should dead racists, the main reason why some zip codes have a lot more opportunity than others. But even if we accept Garrett and Britt's premises, the CHOOSE Act isn't going to help poor kids. Seven thousand dollars won't get a student struggling with poverty to a private school. Not when the average private school tuition in Alabama is $8,298 a year.
One gets an image of a person in an Armani suit walking into a cell block and proclaiming freedom to the inmates while holding a $7,000 check in one hand and a $8,298 key in the other.
Freeing our schools from the prison of Jim Crow means trusting local communities with school funding; ending tax breaks to elite Alabamians that drain public services and spending money on students.
The CHOOSE Act sort of acknowledges that. Implicit in the law is the premise that any private school in Alabama is superior to any public school.
Why?
Because many private schools invest far more money in their students than the $13,461 per pupil our state does, a number that would be even lower without the 18% the federal government kicks in. Altamont in Birmingham charges over $30,000 a year for high school. Montgomery Academy asks for $19,000 for students in grades 10-12.
Just think what we could achieve if Alabama spent $30,000 a year on a public school student. Or $24,000, which gets Massachusetts nation-leading results on standardized tests. Or $17,277, the average per-pupil spending in the United States.
The CHOOSE Act has to nod at the fact that school spending works. But it also operates within the worldview of a state government that promotes private privilege over public welfare. Money can only go to people who already have it. Not the undeserving poor.
And a lot of that money is about to head out the door. The 2026 education budget originally included $100 million to fund the CHOOSE Act. Sen. Arthur Orr, R-Decatur, the chair of the Senate's education budget committee, increased that to $135 million due to 'overwhelming, large applicant numbers' for the program.
Expect that number to grow even more as the caps come off the program. Public school funding will suffer. Arizona in 2022 expanded an existing voucher program along the lines of what Alabama has just implemented. It proved far more expensive than they anticipated, and it's contributed to budget problems in the state. That could happen here, and public school students will pay the price.
The key to public school improvement is obvious: collecting more taxes from the wealthy — who pay less to the state government in percentage terms than the poorest 20% — and investing them in public education. Making the system better for everyone.
But Alabama legislators have signaled they'd much rather assist children who don't need the help.
The rest of us have no choice in that.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
08-07-2025
- Axios
State Rep. Johnny Garrett announces bid for Congress
State Rep. Johnny Garrett announced Tuesday he's entering next year's U.S. House race to replace Rep. John Rose. Why it matters: Garrett is viewed as a top contender for the safely Republican seat in the 6th district that represents part of Nashville. Zoom in: Garrett, 46, is a pro-Trump conservative and attorney who is also active in the successful Goodlettsville Little League Baseball program. He says his top priorities as a representative would be to help Trump "lower taxes, secure borders, peace through strength, keeping men out of women's sports, and ensuring our nation is safe and secure." What he's saying: Garrett cited the "conservative agenda that President Trump has led" when asked for his elevator pitch to voters. "It's so razor thin in D.C. That's where we need good conservative fighters up there to extend their majority." The big picture: The next 18 months will reshape Tennessee politics. The state could have a new governor, U.S. senator and at least two new U.S. House members. Rose is leaving Congress in order to run for governor. Sen. Marsha Blackburn is viewed as a likely gubernatorial candidate as well. Former U.S. Rep. Van Hilleary is expected to announce his candidacy for Rose's seat later this week. Zoom out: U.S. Rep. Mark Green announced his retirement from the 7th Congressional District, creating a free-for-all special election for later this year.

Boston Globe
27-06-2025
- Boston Globe
Colleges warn the 'big, beautiful bill' could be ugly for their bottom lines, and for many students
Advertisement Fixing the debt crisis is a popular issue across the political spectrum. But abruptly scaling back student loans could deal a major blow to the revenue most schools and students rely on to pay the bills. Altogether, these moves could impose 'unprecedented levels of stress' on smaller private colleges and two-and-four-year public schools that educate Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up If enough federal aid is revoked, experts said, it could even erase one of the bright spots of Massachusetts' higher education landscape: a surge in enrollment at community colleges that have been made effectively tuition-free with help from federal assistance and Pell Grants, a large bucket of aid for low-income students. Related : Advertisement Universities are already in a fragile spot: Enrollment in Massachusetts has As a result, more than 20 colleges have 'If you're trying to say, 'Well, what does this mean for higher ed?,' it's about [the] deep trends and issues that are not new' to colleges, Garrett said. 'They're just indirectly being weaponized now for political reasons.' What exactly will become law is a moving target, as Trump's signature bill moves through the Senate, after it narrowly passed the House in May. Legislators for both chambers have agreed to set annual and lifetime caps on student loans taken out by parents and for graduate school, and to make changes to plans that tie loan repayment to a debtor's earnings. Congress is also debating proposals that would, for the first time, hold colleges responsible for student outcomes, amid criticism that schools have soaked up federally subsidized student loans without delivering a successful education. That could mean Advertisement The Bunker Hill Community College campus in Charlestown. Lane Turner/Globe Staff The House proposed major changes to Pell Grants, the largest financial aid program for low-income students. Their version of the bill required students to take 15 credit hours per semester to receive a maximum Pell grant, up from the current 12. It would cut off access entirely to students enrolled in fewer than 7.5 hours, effectively penalizing part-timers who comprise a considerable chunk of Pell recipients at community colleges and other schools that cater to working adults. (Most of these changes are not in the version now before the Senate.) That move alone would threaten $57 million in aid to 42,000 public-college students in Massachusetts, state officials found. In all, Massachusetts has expanded state financial aid programs flow of federal money. 'This is bad for our students and bad for our economy, as it would hold back our next generation of workers from being able to afford to go to school,' Governor Maura Healey said in a statement about the proposed cuts. Related : The effects could be felt most keenly at Massachusetts' 15 community colleges. Their enrollment grew by 24 percent between fall 2022 and 2024, after the launch of MassEducate and MassReconnect, which cover the remaining tuition and fees for most community college students after factoring in federal assistance. The uptick in students raised concerns about overcrowding and But community college leaders now worry that a constriction in financial aid would reverse the enrollment trend and make it tough to balance their budgets. At Bunker Hill Community College in Charlestown, for example, roughly 80 percent of students attend part-time, due to other jobs and commitments, and 44 percent receive Pell Grants that range from $740 to $7,395 per year. The House proposal would take assistance away from many of those students who do not attend college full-time. Advertisement 'This is a tectonic change. We haven't had something like that for multiple decades,' said Bunker Hill president Pam Eddinger. 'We pay federal taxes to the government thinking that they will have an even-handedness in returning that to the state. It's an unwinding of that kind of federal responsibility, really.' And it will bear out in our workforce for years to come, when fewer residents are equipped to be nurses, dental hygienists, and other essential jobs, said Nate MacKinnon, executive director of the Massachusetts Association of Community Colleges. 'It's remarkable to see a policy proposal that could potentially decrease the number of people in the workforce,' he said. 'That seems un-American in every way.' Many private colleges could also see their financial woes deepen, especially ones that have struggled to keep up enrollment and remain in the black. Fifteen Massachusetts colleges have seen enrollment decline by at least 10 percent from 2011 and 2021, including at dozens of staff positions in fall 2023. In Amherst, Hampshire College experienced severe financial strain in 2019 and needed a multimillion -dollar fundraising effort to avoid a merger. Five years later, just as Hampshire Through it all, nearly 40 percent of Hampshire students have been low-income Pell Grant recipients, among the highest proportion of any four-year college, according to a Advertisement The proposals from Congress could threaten that, said Hampshire president Edward Wingenbach, by squeezing university budgets even further. 'The places that are making the most opportunities available for low- and moderate- income students are the places that are least able to do it financially,' Wingenbach said. 'If you reduce Pell support, you make it much harder for schools that are making huge efforts and sacrifices to support those students.' Clark University students and workers on the picket line during a strike at the school in May. Matthew J. Lee/Globe Staff In some ways, support for students is already suffering. President Trump's 2026 budget proposal recommends eliminating funding for a program called TRiO, which offers tutoring, guidance, and career counseling to low-income college students. In Massachusetts, 26 institutions collect more than $22 million a year in TRiO funds, and serve over 20,000 students annually, according to an analysis by the Hildreth Institute, a Boston-based higher ed research firm. Even existing funding seems to be in limbo. TRiO coordinators at Middlesex Community College have yet to hear about the renewal of the school's five-year TRiO grant, which funds math tutoring and tours of four-year colleges for about 300 students, plus programming for high schoolers considering further study. 'I don't think we can replace [that money],' said Joanne Jaber Gauvin, the TRiO director at Middlesex. 'If it goes away, it would be really unfortunate.' If federal funding goes away, there's little hope of backfilling it with state money, said Vincent Pedone, executive officer of the Massachusetts State University Council of Presidents. Related : Massachusetts devotes just 2 percent of the state budget to higher ed, and even revenue from the so-called millionaire's tax — which must be spent on education and transportation — has not flowed in great quantities to universities. If federal legislators enact deeper cuts to Medicaid, food stamps and other programs, it could require the state to deliver more money to meet those needs and translate to even less state funding to help higher education. Legislators are often inclined to cut from the state dollars for universities before other buckets, because colleges have their own revenue source in tuition. Advertisement 'Whenever state budgets are restrained, higher education sees a cut in appropriations, which leads to an increase in tuition and fees,' he added. 'If our public higher education system is destabilized because of federal action, students will be left behind. It's not a maybe. That, to me, is just unconscionable.' University of Massachusetts Amherst Chancellor Javier Reyes said in an email last week the proposals currently under discussion would have 'far-reaching consequences for universities nationwide,' including the Western Massachusetts campus. They're not quite yet sure what they'd be, Reyes said, but they're bracing nonetheless. 'UMass would not be exempt, and no area of our campus would remain untouched by the effects of such cuts,' he wrote. 'Whether the cuts are as deep as described in the President's proposed budget, or are somewhat less severe, Diti Kohli can be reached at
Yahoo
13-06-2025
- Yahoo
At least 14 'No Kings' protests planned across Alabama Saturday
President Donald Trump speaks during a special commencement event on Thursday, May 1, 2025, in Coleman Coliseum at The University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, Ala. (Laura Chramer for Alabama Reflector) A group of at least 14 protests under the banner 'No Kings' are planned for Saturday in Alabama. The demonstrations are part of nationwide effort that organizers say aim to reject President Donald Trump's 'made-for-TV' show of force coinciding with his birthday and Flag Day, a date chosen by organizers to reclaim the symbol of the American flag. 'Real power isn't staged in Washington. It rises up everywhere else,' organizers stated on the website. 'The flag doesn't belong to President Trump. It belongs to us.' The nationwide 'Hands Off' protests drew thousands of people in early April to several cities around the state, including Montgomery, Birmingham and Tuscaloosa. The protests focused on concerns about the administration's efforts to deport immigrants under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 and attacks on federal agencies. Protestors pointed to concerns about federal workforce reductions and attacks on the LGBTQ+ community, particularly transgender individuals. Protests Saturday are scheduled from Florence and Huntsville in the northern part of the state to Dothan and Mobile in the south. The following protests are planned at various times throughout Saturday. Auburn/Opelika: Toomer's Corner at 4 p.m. Birmingham: 27th Street South & 3rd Avenue South at 6 p.m. Dadeville: 125 N Broadnax St at 11 a.m. Dothan: Houston County Courthouse at 11 a.m Florence: Mobile Plaza at 11 a.m. Fort Payne: 205 Gault Ave N at 11 a.m. Guntersville: Marshall County Courthouse at 10 a.m. Huntsville: Campus 805 Butler Green at 11 a.m. Jacksonville: Jacksonville Square at 11 a.m. Mobile: Government Plaza at 12 p.m. Montgomery: Alabama Department of Archives and History at 10 a.m. Scottsboro: Jackson County Courthouse Square at 4 p.m. Selma: Edmund Pettus Bridge at 11 a.m. Tuscaloosa: Federal Building & Courthouse at 6 p.m.