
Maga influencer and de facto national security adviser Laura Loomer holds outsized sway on Trump
And not just any war: they are applauding Donald Trump's high-risk decision to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities, a move that was considered a war too far even by the Bush administration.
Maga's quick flip-flop has made it clear that Maga was never really anti-war. Maga is about xenophobia, not isolationism, and its support for Trump's decision to bomb a Muslim country fits in with its support for his draconian campaign against immigrants.
But above all, Maga is about fealty to Trump.
That formula certainly helps explain why Laura Loomer, who has emerged as the most prominent Maga America First influencer in the early days of Trump's second term, has given her full support to his Iran strike.
In early April, Loomer, a 32-year-old pro-Trump online influencer widely seen as a rightwing conspiracy theorist, met with Trump and gave him a list of names of people on the staff of the national security council that she believed were not loyal enough to Trump or at least had professional backgrounds that she considered suspect. Trump fired six staffers. Later, national security adviser Mike Waltz, whom Loomer had criticized for his role in the Signalgate chat leak scandal, was ousted as well.
Loomer doesn't have a job in the government, but she has still emerged as one of Trump's most important and most polarizing foreign policy advisers in the early days of his second administration. She has had direct access to Trump and has used it to push for ideological purges inside the administration, instilling fear and anger among national security professionals.
In fact, when it comes to the national security side of the Trump administration, Loomer has been something akin to a one-woman Doge. Now the big question is how long her influence with Trump will last, or whether she will soon go out the same way as Elon Musk.
Loomer's power in the Trump administration is ill-defined. Her many critics say she has just been taking credit for moves that Trump was already planning. But Trump himself has said he takes her seriously, so it may be more accurate to describe her as Trump's de facto national security adviser.
Press reports recently suggested that Loomer's status in the White House was waning because she had overreached, much like Musk. She has left a trail of bitter Trump aides, while there have also been reports that Trump himself has grown weary of her. But, as if to disprove the reports that she was getting frozen out, Loomer had a private meeting with JD Vance in early June.
In a revealing interview on journalist Tara Palmeri's podcast in late April, Loomer said that her White House access came directly from Trump himself, and that she maintained her relationship with the president even as his aides tried to keep her out. 'Donald Trump is my biggest ally in the White House,' she said.
'I don't have delusions of grandeur, but I certainly do believe that a lot of the information I have given him has protected him and has prevented disasters from happening,' she added. 'I believe that the information that I provide is valuable. And I believe that it has proven itself to be an asset to President Trump and his apparatus. I don't know why some of the people that work for him don't want that information around him. But I'm not going to let that stop me. I'm going to keep on uncovering information and finding ways to get it to President Trump – and informing President Trump about individuals within his inner circle that are working against his agenda.'
Loomer added that 'it all comes down to vetting at the end of the day'.
Loomer's close ties to Trump first became big news during the 2024 presidential campaign, when she traveled with the Republican candidate on his campaign plane despite repeated efforts by Trump aides to keep her away. The aides were particularly upset that Loomer traveled with Trump on September 11, since she had earlier gained online infamy after posting a video claiming that the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center was an 'inside job'. To be sure, fears by his aides that Trump was associating with a conspiracy theorist ignored the fact that he relishes in spreading conspiracy theories far and wide. During the 2024 campaign, Trump promoted a conspiracy theory that Haitian immigrants were eating pets in Springfield, Ohio; that xenophobic lie became the hallmark of Trump's fall campaign.
Sign up to This Week in Trumpland
A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration
after newsletter promotion
Once Trump returned to office, Loomer began to flex her newfound power, and even professional ties to top Trump administration officials weren't enough to protect staffers from being fired after Loomer gave her list of names to Trump. Among those fired at the NSC was Brian Walsh, who had worked on the staff of the Senate intelligence committee for Marco Rubio, now serving as both secretary of state and national security adviser, when Rubio was in the Senate.
The most stunning purge attributed to Loomer came in April when Trump fired Gen Timothy Haugh, the director of the National Security Agency, along with his top deputy, after they had found their way on to Loomer's list as well. The fact that Loomer could trigger the firing of a senior military officer in charge of the nation's largest intelligence agency finally led to a bipartisan outcry in Washington. A group of Senate Democrats wrote to Trump saying that the firings were 'inexplicable', while Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican senator who is now a leading Trump critic, lamented that experienced military leaders were being ousted while 'amateur isolationists' are in senior policy positions. The moves even troubled Mike Rounds, a South Dakota Republican senator and Trump loyalist who is the chair of the cybersecurity subcommittee of the Senate armed services committee. Rounds made a point of praising Haugh during a subcommittee hearing soon after his firing and noted that 'men and women capable of leading the National Security Agency … are in short supply. We do not have enough of these types of leaders, and a loss of any one of them without strong justification is disappointing.'
But like Musk, Loomer has been so red-hot in the early days of Trump's second term that her fall seems almost inevitable, especially after she began to call out White House actions she didn't like.
In May, for example, she publicly criticized Trump's decision to accept a luxury jet from Qatar.
When news of the gift was first reported, Loomer posted a statement saying: 'This is really going to be such a stain on the admin if this is true.' She added: 'I say that as someone who would take a bullet for Trump. I'm so disappointed.' She later backtracked and became more supportive. But later she was critical of Trump's decision to withdraw the nomination of billionaire Jared Isaacman to be the head of Nasa, whose nomination she had supported. 'There is reason to believe that Isaacman may be facing retaliation because of his friendship with @elonmusk,' Loomer posted as the news first broke. Days later, Isaacman suggested that he also believes that his nomination was withdrawn because of his ties to Musk.
Loomer has been careful to try to limit her criticism to Trump's aides, and not to Trump himself. But it is an open question how long that distinction will make a difference for Loomer. During the Palmeri podcast, Loomer said that she is 'not going to be a sycophant and sit there and pretend that every little thing is great'. She added that 'there's a lot of incompetence in the White House. There's a lot of people in positions they shouldn't be in and they embarrass the president on a daily basis.'
That is the backdrop for Loomer's strong support for Trump's decision to attack Iran. Perhaps concerned that her earlier criticism was damaging her ties to Trump world, Loomer has been profuse with her praise of Trump's Iran attack, while also defending her America First credentials. In one post, she asked 'How is it not AMERICA FIRST to congratulate those who just made sure Islamists who chant 'DEATH TO AMERICA' … never have an opportunity to have a nuke?' She has even gone on the offensive against other rightwing influencers, including Tucker Carlson, who have dared criticize the Iran strike. 'I am screenshotting everyone's posts and I'm going to deliver them in a package to President Trump so he sees who is truly with him and who isn't,' Loomer posted. 'And I think by now everyone knows I mean it when I say I'm going to deliver something to Trump.'
For Maga influencers, staying on Trump's good side seems to matter more than issues of war and peace.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
43 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Scott Bessent takes vicious jab at Elon Musk after their West Wing punch-up
Trump's Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent landed a fresh attack on the President's former 'First Buddy' Elon Musk in the latest flare up in the duo's feud. During an appearance on CNN 's State of the Union Sunday Bessent told SOTU anchor, Dana Bash that the 'America Party' - the political party Musk registered with the Federal Election Commission Sunday wasn't of concern to the White House. Bash kicked off the exchange, noting that 'it's not a big secret that you had your differences with Elon Musk when he was working in the administration. He announced this weekend that he is starting a new political party.' 'Does that worry the Trump administration' Bash asked Bessent. Bessent replied, first acknowledging that 'the principles of DOGE were very popular,' referring to the Department of Government Efficiency which Musk foremrely led for the Trump Administration. 'I think, if you looked at the polling, Elon was not,' Bessent added. 'So, I believe that the boards of directors at his various companies wanted him to come back and run those companies, which he is better at than anyone,' Bessent continued. Bessent then further expended on the idea that Musk is better served concentrating his efforts in the business world, adding 'I imagine that those board of directors did not like this announcement yesterday and will be encouraging him to focus on his business activities, not his political activities.' Musk's interference in the Wisconsin Supreme Court race earlier in 2025 is one example of an instance where his involvement appears to have negatively impacted the conservative candidate in the race. Several weeks ago on Capitol Hill, Bessent came clean after weeks of speculation that he was the one responsible for the black-eye Musk was seen sporting during his last event as a member of the Trump administration. Bessent faced an unusual line of questioning when he testified on Capitol Hill during a hearing on his department's budget before the Ways and Means Committee back in June. Bessent was grilled about whether he really tackled Elon Musk in the White House last month. 'Mr. Secretary, how are you doing?' Representative Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.) said innocuously. 'So far, so good,' Bessent quipped back. 'Okay. I was just curious because I know Elon Musk body checked you at the White House. No animosity to Elon Musk, right?' Gomez continued. 'You know that?' Bessent asked about the sparring event. 'That's what I heard,' Gomez responded. Bessent had been partaking in three days of trade negotiations in London and had not yet been questioned about the story. 'So you believe, you believe what you read on Breitbart is what you are telling us, Congressman,' Bessent pressed. 'I didn't know ... If it's too sensitive for you I won't ask that question, but let me move' Gomez flubbed. 'I will take South Carolina over South Africa any day', Bessent replied, referring to his home state versus Musk's nation of birth. Musk was spotted with a black eye as he delivered a sort of farewell address in the Oval Office upon departing from his role as a 'special government employee' heading up Trump's Department of Government Efficiency DOGE). At the time, Musk claimed that the black eye was the result of roughhousing with his young son, X í¿ A-12, who is more commonly know as X. But speculation grew as more was revealed about his tense standoff with Bessent. Former Chief Strategist Steve Bannon told in May that Musk's turbulent time in the White House was marred when he was confronted over wild promises to save the administration 'a trillion dollars'. That's when an irate Musk physically 'shoved' 62-year-old Bessent. 'Scott Bessent called him out and said, "You promised us a trillion dollars (in cuts), and now you're at like $100 billion, and nobody can find anything, what are you doing?"' Bannon revealed. And that's when Elon got physical. It's a sore subject with him. 'It wasn't an argument, it was a physical confrontation. Elon basically shoved him.' Bannon said the physical altercation came as the two billionaires moved from the Oval Office to outside Chief of Staff Susie Wiles' office, and then outside the office of the then National Security Advisor, Mike Waltz.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Inside Elon Musk's clever plot to undermine Trump as billionaire's breakaway party ignites MAGA fury
The rollercoaster of a relationship between the world's richest man Elon Musk and President Donald Trump has captivated the attention of many political observers over the last yeah, but Musk's latest move could be his boldest. Musk officially filed a Statement of Organization Sunday with the Federal Election Commission for his 'America Party' political party after weeks of threatening the GOP. On July 4th, Musk asked his 221.7 million followers on X if it is time to make good on his threats to create a new political party and oust the Republicans who supported Trump's signature budget bill which narrowly passed through Congress after weeks of debate and different factions of the GOP plotting to the tank the legislation as various points the process. 'One way to execute on this would be to laser-focus on just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts,' he wrote on X. 'Given the razor-thin legislative margins, that would be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws, ensuring that they serve the true will of the people.' Republicans currently hold slim majorities in both the House and Senate with just a handful of seats giving them the edge over Democrats. Out of 100 seats in the U.S. Senate, 53 are held by Republicans. In the U.S. House of Representatives, 220 seats are held by Republicans and 212 are held by Democrats with three seats presently vacant due to members passing away. Trump's budget bill passed with narrow margins in both chambers last week, with some members of the President's party voting against the legislation. In the Senate, the vote was 51-50, with Vice President JD Vance casting the tie-breaker. Republican Senators Susan Collins of Maine, Rand Paul of Kentucky, and Thom Tillis of North Carolina joined Democrats in opposing the bill. In the House the vote was 218-214. Republicans Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania voted no. Musk and Trump got into a social media war during debate on the legislation, leading to Musk threatening to use his billions to start a third political party and Trump threatening to deport the naturalized American citizen. Last Monday before Trump's bill even passed, Musk escalated his attacks, saying lawmakers who campaigned on cutting spending but supported the bill 'should hang their heads in shame.' 'And they will lose their primary next year if it's the last thing I do on this Earth,' Musk declared. The Tesla and SpaceX CEO also called for a new political party, arguing the bill's massive spending showed 'we live in a one-party country — the PORKY PIG PARTY!' 'Time for a party that actually cares about the people,' he wrote. 'If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day,' Musk pledged in a post on X Monday evening. Musk, now worth over $400 billion, founded the AmericaPAC super PAC in 2024. AmericaPAC raised more than $260 million last year, much of it to back Republicans in swing districts. Over $88 million went to supporting Trump directly. The Senate version of Trump's bill, which also passed the House on Wednesday, is estimated to add between $3.3 billion and $4.5 billion to the national debt. 'The insane spending of this bill increases the debt ceiling by a record five trillion dollars,' Musk posted. Despite the relative unpalatability of a national third party or independent presidential campaigns, state level races are another story. There is precedent for a third party candidate running in place of a major party candidate, and some have even won. Two seats in the U.S. Senate are presently held by Independents, although those independents caucus with Democrats. Dozens of members of the U.S. Senate have been elected outside of the two major parties throughout the chamber's history. In one other relatively recent example, Independent Greg Orman ran against former GOP Kansas Senator Pat Roberts, albeit unsuccessfully in 2014. Orman managed to pull in 42.5% of the vote as the Democrat party did not field a candidate in the race. Musk was curiously silent in the hours following the congressional vote on Trump's budget bill but, on July 4th, he decided to weigh in: 'Great day for some … fireworks,' he wrote, adding two fire emojis. He also praised Republican Senator Rand Paul and Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, both of Kentucky, for voting against the bill for the amount of money it added to the country's deficit. '100,' the world's richest man wrote using an emoji in support of them. Musk has perviously threatened to primary any GOP lawmaker who voted in favor of Trump's signature legislation. Two Republican lawmakers who spoke to the Daily Mail on Thursday brushed aside Musk's potential threats against GOP members who voted for the big beautiful bill. Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.), a member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus brushed off Musk's threats when asked if he thought any members of his conference were worried about any potential retaliation from Musk for their vote. 'No, Elon Musk is for the country. No retaliation' Norman stated. Asked again if he thought his fellow Republicans could get primaried with millions of dollars flowing from Musk, Norman added the following. 'Elon Musk is a true patriot. He identified where our tax money went. For you, young people, you ought to be grateful that we had him.' 'No one else had the bandwidth to do what he did,' Norman noted, referring to Musk's work as Trump's former lead of the Department of Government Efficiency. Musk directly called out a pair of House Republicans who are a part of the conservative 'Freedom Caucus,' for their votes to pass the preliminary House version of the bill back in May. 'How can you call yourself the Freedom Caucus if you vote for a Debt Slavery bill with the biggest debt ceiling increase in history? @RepAndyHarrisMD @chiproytx,' Musk wrote, addressing the two GOP lawmakers directly. Another conservative Republican, Representative John McGuire (R-Va.) told the Daily Mail that he believes Musk is going to move on 'bigger and greater things.' 'I think yesterday, he said more nice things about President Trump,' McGuire added, referring to a recent positive post Musk's made on X, formerly Twitter. In that post, Musk praised Trump's peace making abilities. 'Credit where credit is due. Donald Trump has successfully resolved several serious conflicts around the world,' Musk wrote in a post made at around 1:30 AM Wednesday. McGuire is no stranger to competitive GOP primaries in red seats, as he himself came to Congress after he primaried former Rep. Bob Good, a fellow Republican from the right last year. While members of Congress brushed off Musk's threat's and even further political involvement following the passage of Trump's bill, some of the President's business allies are willing to to go scorched earth on the billionaire. Venture capitalist James Fishback - whose Azoria 500 ETF invests in companies that don't engage in DEI practices - posted on X that he was withdrawing support for Tesla and Elon Musk. Fishback noted that his firm 'decided to postpone next week's public listing of our Azoria Tesla Convexity ETF.' Fishback added that his organization's 'decision comes in direct response to Elon Musk's announcement that he is launching a new national political party.' While nearly all Republicans backed the budget, two conservative lawmakers from Kentucky — Rep. Thomas Massie and Senator Rand Paul — voted no. Massie was already criticized by the Trump White House for opposing the bill, and Musk defended him even before the final vote. It remains to be seen whether Musk's support for Massie was an exception, or a sign he's prepared to oppose Trump in future primaries within the GOP or even have a greater impact with his own political party in it's entirety.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
How Trump won over Republicans on Big Beautiful Bill
President Donald Trump wasn't on the House floor for Thursday's vote on his 'Big, Beautiful Bill' – but he was there in spirit, including on the right hand of one South Carolina lawmaker voting his way. Joe Wilson (R-S.C.), a member of the House Armed Services Committee, was sporting a custom ring on the big day with a golden image of the president's face as he cast his vote for the mega-bill that extended Trump's 2017 tax cuts. With Wilson's help, the massive bill passed 218–214 after a pressure campaign by Trump and congressional leaders kept lawmakers working overnight. 'It's gold Donald Trump on silver. You don't see it every day,' Wilson told the Daily Mail about the special jewelry he wore for the occasion. 'One of my staff was kind enough to get it for me,' he explained. Wilson's vote wasn't considered up for grabs, which may be why his staff came up with its own special Trump swag. For the dozen or so lawmakers who were wavering, the president applied his famous fear tactics – as well as charm and even an array of signed swag – to get Republicans to push the mammoth bill across the finish line. That came despite polls showing the bill was underwater, and even some supporters warning about steep cuts to Medicaid or fretting over the estimated $3 trillion it's expected to tack onto the national debt. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) testified to Trump's salesmanship in a video he posted after meeting with the president. 'The president was wonderful, as always,' Burchett gushed. 'Informative, funny, he told me he likes seeing me on TV, which was kind of cool.' Rep. Byron Donalds of Florida, a Trump loyalist, asked, 'Did you show them what he signed for you?' Burchett replied, 'Yeah, he signed a bunch of stuff. It's cool.' Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins also poured on the charm when she ran into Burchett outside the White House, offering a hug and asking, 'Are we getting it done?' 'Yes ma'am,' he replied, before adding, 'I'm a happily married man.' The video also shows Burchett gripping a gold challenge coin of the kind Trump doles out, as he did to an African reporter he once called 'beautiful.' 'Donald Trump absolutely was our closer, and Donald Trump never stopped,' said House Majority Whip Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.). 'Every day [he] was there in the fight [asking] "Who do I need to call? What do I need to do?"' Scalise said no president was 'more directly engaged.' Trump's economic advisor Kevin Hassett added, 'President Trump was in the Oval Office making phone calls to just about everybody in the House.' Not all of Trump's persuasive tactics worked. He golfed with ally Sen. Lindsey Graham and also with Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, one of three Senate Republicans who voted against the bill. Trump has notably avoided criticizing Paul but has vowed to primary Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who he ripped as a 'grandstander' for opposing the bill. Only Massie and Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.) voted against it in the House. Even lawmakers who had previously objected, like Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R-N.J.), ended up backing the bill after securing changes. Van Drew said limits on healthcare provider taxes would have devastated Medicaid in his state. 'I couldn't vote for it that way,' he said, but added he worked with Trump directly to get a change added in a final 'wrap-around' amendment. With the bill now passed, Van Drew acknowledged it becomes a messaging battle, given the CBO's projection that it could cut Medicaid by $1 trillion and cause nearly 12 million people to lose coverage. 'So now this changes from public policy into a policy of who's going to be a better mouthpiece... If we articulate that well, if we sell it well, if we talk about how we're still maintaining the safety net, then I think we'll be okay.'