Should I max out my cash Isa NOW in case the £20,000 allowance is cut?
In a typical year, I use roughly 75 per cent of my £20,000 tax-free Isa allowance to invest in stocks and shares, and the rest in cash.
I've now heard the cash Isa allowance might be reduced.
If it was hypothetically cut to £4,000 in April 2026, it wouldn't really change much of my current strategy.
However, this feels like a last chance to max out the cash element of an Isa and given the recent market turmoil, I might just stick the full £20,000 into cash now.
Is that a sensible move?
Helen Kirrane of This is Money replies: You're not the only one to wonder whether it's time to fill your cash Isa to the limit.
Fuelled by rumours of cash Isa allowance cuts in the run up to the Spring Statement, savers poured over £4billion into cash Isas in the month of March alone.
In the Spring Statement document it was revealed the Government was considering making reforms to cash Isas, after weeks of speculation - though nothing is set in stone.
Among the reforms suggested were cutting the £20,000 allowance for cash Isas, while allowing savers to maintain that limit if they invested in stocks and shares. A £4,000 limit for cash Isas has been speculated in recent months.
Record numbers of investors have also turned to cash Isas as a safe haven for their nest eggs amid economic turmoil in the wake of US President Donald Trump's tariff war.
We spoke to three financial experts for advice on whether you should follow the herd and redirect your investments to a cash Isa.
Susannah Streeter, head of money and markets at Hargreaves Lansdown replies: It would be unwise to let speculation over future government policy disrupt your long-term financial planning.
Despite the rumours over changes to cash Isas, none have yet materialised, and any tweaks would have to follow a government consultation.
If you have already built up an emergency savings pot of three to six months essential expenditure, and don't need to spend money you have set aside within the next five years, it's really still worth looking at investing at least some of the money in a stocks and shares Isa.
History has shown that over the long term there's a better chance of beating inflation by investing in the stock market or funds compared to leaving money in a savings account. The recent market volatility may have been concerning, but drip feeding your stocks and shares Isa can enable you to ride out the ups and downs in the market.
For peace of mind, you could still consider splitting your allocation between a cash Isa and a stocks and shares Isa and there are currently some good deals on offer in the savings market.
As competition heated up over tax year end, the rates on offer remained relatively elevated but this is now starting to change.
Rates fell back a little during the month, which isn't surprising given more interest rate cuts have been priced in this year.
Given that markets now expect multiple rate cuts in 2025, it's worth bearing in mind that fixed rate deals above 4 per cent may not be around by the end of the year.
Laura Suter, director of personal finance at AJ Bell replies: Firstly well done on having a saving and investing strategy, that's a great start.
I think the main thing is to trust in that plan and not deviate from it just because of rumours that the Government might change the rules.
We don't know what the Government will do when it comes to Isas – or indeed if they will do anything.
It's also worth noting that they are unlikely to implement the changes immediately, which would give people a window to take action if they needed to.
But based on your plan above you've determined you only need around £5,000 a year to be saved into cash, and don't need higher cash levels than this.
It would feel counterintuitive to start stuffing your cash Isa just because you're worried the allowances may change. While cash is a great place for money you need in the short term or money you don't want to take any risk with, it's not ideal for long-term savings.
You should look at your cash pot and work out if it's sufficient for your emergency pot and your short-term spending goals, like house renovations, moving home in the next few years, your children's education, or even a big holiday or new car.
You might find, like many people do, that they are unintentionally hoarding too much in cash that could be earning a potentially higher return in investment markets.
You can then assess your longer-term investment goals and work out whether you're on track to reach them with your investment portfolio. That might include a longer-term house move, early retirement, setting aside money for kids or something else on the horizon.
Rachel Springall, Finance Expert at Moneyfacts Compare replies: It is a worthy debate on whether to invest in cash or stocks and shares, and for any individual it comes down to how long they are looking to invest in either element.
Investing in cash is popular, but over the longer-term, stocks are typically expected to weather most storms and can beat pure interest over time.
It is understandable for savers to be concerned of the potential limits on cash Isas to be cut, but those who want to max it out can move subscriptions into stocks and shares from cash later.
It may be more convenient to just put funds from a stocks and shares Isa into a cash fund, which are at the lower end of the risk spectrum, but usually this is only done temporarily during period of market turmoil.
A cash Isa on the other hand can offer different options, from easy access, notice, to fixed, the latter providing a clear guaranteed return on any investment, and of course, safe return of the original capital.
Any investment in a stocks and shares Isa is at risk of turmoil, so it's important to monitor them carefully.
If you are prepared to make a clear list and actively manage a portfolio, it can be smoother to move around pots to take advantage of stock market boons, but also to be more risk adverse.
However, it is usually wise for savers to avoid pulling out of stocks in the aftermath of significant falls, because they then can not benefit from rises once the markets improve.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
ALEX BRUMMER: 'Wise old hen' Chancellor dances on a pinhead
Rachel Reeves's pledge to restore fiscal stability and confine herself to one budgetary event a year is threadbare. When she delivers Labour's first full spending review next Wednesday, it will be her fourth visit to the dispatch box. As the Economist magazine remarked this week, it has been 'all pain, no gain'. Most of her difficulties can be traced back to the alleged discovery of a £22billion black hole in her public spending audit on July 30 last year. Reeves established a narrative, repeated by rote by her Cabinet colleagues, about a terrible inheritance. The number was contrived, in that the biggest element was a giveaway to public sector unions and railway workers, which brought a temporary truce. The Chancellor has made a series of tactical and strategic mistakes. At that very first appearance at the Treasury, she sowed the seeds of festering political dissonance by withdrawing the winter fuel allowance from pensioners. A costed gain to the Exchequer of £1.4billion last year and £1.5billion this year has proved ferociously politically expensive. It is now to be partly reversed in the spending review with the fuel payments restored but taxed as income for better-off silver surfers. Reeves then created a new rod for her back in her first Budget in October. The impact of £40billion of tax increases, fuelled by the debilitating rise in National Insurance Contributions, caused a growth stammer. The fundamental error was in shaping the fiscal rules. Taxation and current spending would be broadly balanced. The Government would only borrow for investment. But by leaving herself so little room for error on current spending, £10bn of headroom, the Chancellor sprung a trap. She ignored Harold Macmillan's dictum, 'Events, dear boy, events.' The headroom detonated another booby trap. Reeves's third intervention came in the spring. She took the axe to welfare, most notoriously to personal independence payments (PIPs) for those claiming disability benefits. It started a debate about Labour values, which has exposed Reeves to pressure to restore £3.5billion of payments to families with more than two children. Which brings us to the spending review. Any hopes that this would be the moment for Reeves to repair struggling public services have been smashed. A downgrade to the Office for Budget Responsibility's growth forecast, surging defence spending, the U-turn on winter fuel and the rocketing cost of servicing the national debt mean the envelope for current spending is negligible, with overall increases confined to 1.2 per cent or so. The joy, such as it is, will come from the capital spending plans. We had a flavour of this earlier in the week when Reeves unsheathed £15billion of transport investment across the North. One cannot but think most of these are reheated plans already announced by her predecessors. Infrastructure is critical and the Elizabeth Line in London and HS2 activity around Birmingham provide graphic evidence of how bold schemes can generate growth. But axing a supercomputer project in Edinburgh, as the Chancellor did last July, hardly speaks to UK tech ambition. In conversation at the CBI this week, Reeves described herself as a 'wise old hen' among G7 finance ministers as elections have brought newbies to the table. Her fiscal fortitude is creditable. Further tax increases, having pledged not to come back for more, would be a deception too far.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Tariff-hit steel maker Tata begs for US trade deal
Britain's biggest steel maker has urged Labour to step up efforts to finalise a US trade deal as the industry remains saddled with double digit tariffs. Rajesh Nair, boss of Tata Steel UK, said a deal with Washington is needed 'as soon as possible'. There is growing frustration that an agreement made last month has yet to take effect. Additional steel and aluminium tariffs remain at 25 per cent. The UK, however, was spared a recent doubling of the rate to 50 per cent, which hit other countries. Doubt continues over whether Indian-owned Tata will benefit from either exemption. That is because it imports steel from sister companies in India and Europe for finishing in the UK. US rules state that steel must be 'melted and poured' in the country they are imported from. Nair said it was 'critical for our business that melted and poured in the UK is not a requirement to access the steel quotas in any future trade deal'.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Leading businessmen Simon Peckham urges politicians to back UK firms
Politicians have been urged by one of Britain's leading businessmen to get behind wealth creators. As concern grows that the Government is hammering the private sector, Simon Peckham, who has made a fortune buying up and turning around industrial firms, said ministers 'should support' business. 'It would be nice if politicians understood that what [business] people are trying to do is generate wealth,' he said. 'If you don't generate wealth you don't generate tax income, and if you don't generate tax income you won't have any money to spend on causes they want to support, and which civilised countries probably should support.' Peckham is best known as the former boss of Melrose, the FTSE 100 firm which thrived by snapping up businesses under its 'buy, improve, sell' mantra. Most controversially, it took over and broke up the historic British industrial conglomerate GKN, earning opprobrium from unions and politicians. Peckham, 62, has since moved on to new venture Rosebank, which operates under the same principle and yesterday announced its first deal, the purchase of 72-year-old US firm Electrical Components International (ECI), a leading global supplier of electrical systems. Rosebank said it was raising £1.1bn to fund the deal, which it said values ECI at less than £1.5billion. The company said takeover opportunities had been 'enhanced by the turbulence of recent months' as Donald Trump's tariffs throw global trading into turmoil. Rosebank's acquisition of a US firm with more than £900m in annual revnenues represents a rare win for a UK-listed firm at a time when London's stock market is being degraded by foreign takeovers as well as the departure of many of its leading companies for New York. UK firms are being hammered by Labour's determination to saddle them with higher taxes and a raft of new workers' rights. Chancellor Rachel Reeves this week failed to rule out raising taxes further. Peckham said Rosebank would '100 per cent' remain on the UK market, adding 'we are proud to be so'. But he urged UK politicians to do more to back business.
