logo
Conclave: Inside the world's most secret ballot

Conclave: Inside the world's most secret ballot

Yahoo06-05-2025

This must be the most secretive election in the world.
When 133 Catholic cardinals are shut into the Sistine Chapel on Wednesday to choose a successor to Pope Francis, each one will have sworn an oath on the gospels to keep the details under wraps for life.
The same goes for every person inside the Vatican during the conclave: from the two doctors on hand for any emergency, to the dining-room staff who feed the cardinals. All vow to observe "absolute and perpetual secrecy".
Just to be sure, the chapel and the two guesthouses will be swept for microphones and bugs.
"There are electronic jammers to make sure that phone and wi-fi signals are not getting in or out," said John Allen, the editor of Crux news site.
"The Vatican takes the idea of isolation extremely seriously."
The lockdown isn't only about keeping the voting process secret.
It is also intended to stop "nefarious forces" from hacking information or disrupting proceedings, and to ensure those voting are not influenced by the outside world on what will perhaps be one of the biggest decisions of their lives.
Catholics will tell you the election is guided by God, not politics. But the hierarchy takes no chances.
On entering the conclave, everyone is obliged to surrender all electronic devices including phones, tablets and smart watches. The Vatican has its own police to enforce the rules.
"The logic is trust but verify," John Allen said.
"There are no televisions, newspapers or radio at the guesthouse for the conclave – nothing," said Monsignor Paolo de Nicolo, who was head of the Papal household for three decades.
"You can't even open the windows because many rooms have windows to the exterior world."
Everyone working behind the high Vatican walls for the conclave has been heavily vetted. Even so, they are barred from communicating with electors.
"The cardinals are completely incommunicado," said Ines San Martin of the Pontifical Mission Societies in the US.
"There will just be walkie-talkies for some specific circumstances like, 'we need a medic,' or 'Hey, the Pope has been elected, can someone let the bell-ringers in the Basilica know.'"
So what if someone breaks the rules?
"There is an oath, and those who do not observe it risk ex-communication," Msgr De Nicolo says, meaning exclusion from the church. "No one dares to do this."
It's a different matter in the run-up to the conclave.
Officially, the cardinals are banned from commenting even now. But from the moment Pope Francis was buried, parts of the Italian press and many visitors turned cardinal-hunters, trying to suss out his most likely successor.
They've been scouring establishments around the Vatican, ready to speculate on any sightings and possible alliances.
"Wine and Rigatoni: the Cardinals' Last Suppers", was one headline in La Repubblica which described the "princes of the church" enjoying "good Roman lunches" before lockdown.
Reporters have then been grilling waiters on what they might have overheard.
"Nothing," one of the servers at Roberto's, a couple of streets back from St Peter's, told me this week.
"They always go quiet whenever we get close."
The other prime spot to catch a cardinal is beside the basilica itself, next to the curve of columns that embraces the main square. Each morning there's a huddle of cameras and reporters on the lookout for the men in lace and scarlet robes.
There are now close to 250 cardinals in the city, called here from all over the world, although those aged 80 or over are not eligible to vote.
As they head into the Vatican for their daily congregations to discuss the election, each one is surrounded and bombarded with questions on progress.
They've given away little in response beyond the "need for unity" or assurances that the conclave will be short.
"The whole idea is for this to be a religious decision, not a political one," Ines San Martin explains. "We say the Holy Spirit guides the conversation and the vote."
But the Pope heads a huge, wealthy institution with significant moral authority and global sway on everything from conflict resolution to sexual politics.
So the man chosen – and his vision and priorities – matter far beyond the Vatican.
Certain Catholic monarchs had a veto on the election up until 1907. Today, voices from all quarters try to influence the debate – most obviously through the media.
At one point, Rome's Il Messaggero chided a presumed front-runner, Italian Cardinal Parolin, for "a sort of self-candidacy".
Then there was a video clip of Filipino Cardinal Tagle singing John Lennon's Imagine, apparently released to dent his popularity. It went viral instead.
Meanwhile, a glossy book highlighting some potential contenders is doing the rounds, lauding conservatives like Cardinal Sarah of Guinea for condemning the "contemporary evils" of abortion and the "same-sex agenda".
"There are groups in town who are trying to bang the drum on issues of interest to them," John Allen says. "The cardinals are aware of this kind of thing, they read the papers. But they will do everything they can to block it out."
"Are there lobbies going on? Yes, like in every election," Ines San Martin agrees. "But it's not as loud as I thought it would be."
She argues that is partly because Pope Francis appointed so many new cardinals, including from new places.
"Fifty or sixty percent of them don't even know one another. So even if you were an outside group, trying to have an agenda, it's very hard even to pick your cardinals to begin with."
By Wednesday morning, all the electors should be in place inside the Vatican – stripped of their phones and sealed off from the rest of the world.
John Allen believes personal preference will dominate over politics, 'liberal' or 'conservative' factions or the "rattle and hum of public debate".
"I really think the cardinals' discussions among themselves right now is key," said Ines San Martin. "A lot have been speaking up for the first time. You never know just how inspiring one of them might be."
Custom fireworks and standby firefighters: How the Vatican makes its smoke signal
Who will be the next pope? Key candidates in an unpredictable process

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Get ready for a flurry of activity from the Supreme Court
Get ready for a flurry of activity from the Supreme Court

USA Today

time2 hours ago

  • USA Today

Get ready for a flurry of activity from the Supreme Court

Get ready for a flurry of activity from the Supreme Court Show Caption Hide Caption Protesters line up outside Supreme Court birthright citizenship hearing Protesters shouted "birthright citizenship belongs to us!" outside the Supreme Court in Washington D.C. WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court is picking up the pace as it announces some of its most consequential decisions of the term before adjourning for the summer. The next cluster of opinions will drop on June 5, though the biggest outstanding decisions may not come until later. Those include whether the court will allow President Donald Trump to enforce his changes to birthright citizenship while his new policy is being litigated and whether the court will uphold Tennessee's ban on gender affirming care for minors. In addition to the court dispensing with the cases it debated in oral arguments in recent months, the justices are continuing to field an unusual number of emergency requests from the Trump administration to intervene in the many legal challenges to the president's policies. That could push the regular work of the court into July. Here's a look at the decisions expected in the coming weeks: Limiting challenges to Trump's executive authority Trump's executive order limiting birthright citizenship has been put on hold by judges across the country who ruled it's probably unconstitutional. During the May 15 oral arguments, none of the justices voiced support for the Trump administration's theory that the president's order is consistent with the 14th Amendment's citizenship clause and past Supreme Court decisions about that provision. But several of the justices have expressed concern about the ability of one judge to block a law or presidential order from going into effect anywhere in the country while it's being challenged. It was unclear from the oral arguments how the court might find a way to limit nationwide – or 'universal' – court orders and what that would mean for birthright citizenship and the many other Trump policies being challenged in court. Religious expression versus separation of church and state Of the three cases the justices heard about the First Amendment's protections for the right to practice religion, the biggest was the Catholic Church's bid to run the nation's first religious charter school. But the court deadlocked 4-4 over whether they could do that. That left in place a lower court's rejection of the school but without setting a precedent that must be followed for similar attempts in the future. More: Supreme Court blocks Catholic charter school in big setback for religion advocates In the other cases about the free exercise of religion, the court is likely to side with Catholic Charities in a dispute over when religious groups have to pay unemployment taxes. And the court's conservative majority sounded sympathetic to Maryland parents who raised religious objections to having their elementary school children read books with LGBTQ+ characters. The battle over transgender rights Transgender rights cases were already making their way to the Supreme Court from state actions and now the Trump administration policies regarding transgender people will accelerate that trend. The court has already granted the administration's emergency request that it be allowed to enforce its ban on military service by transgender people while that restriction is being challenged. In one of the court's biggest pending decisions, the justices will decide whether states can ban minors from receiving puberty blockers and hormone therapy. During December's oral arguments, a majority seemed to agree states can do that. But how they reach that conclusion will affect how much their decision applies to other transgender rights case including those about transgender athletes, whether health plans have to cover gender affirming care, where transgender inmates must be housed and if transgender people can serve in the military. Implications for parental rights While the court seems likely to rule against the parents challenging Tennessee's ban on gender affirming care for minors, they sounded poised to back the Maryland parents who want their elementary school children excused from class when books with LGBTQ+ characters are being read. And in a case about Texas' requirement that websites verify users are 18 or over, one justice expressed her own parental frustration over trying to control what her children see on the internet. Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who has seven children, said she knows from personal experience how difficult it is to keep up with the content blocking devices that those challenging Texas' law offered as a better alternative. But while the justices were sympathetic to the purpose of Texas' law, they may decide a lower court didn't sufficiently review whether it violates the First Amendment rights of adults so must be reconsidered. Gun cases could bring mixed results In one of the court's biggest decisions so far this year, a 7-2 majority upheld the Biden administration's regulation of untraceable 'ghost guns,' ruling that the weapons can be subject to background checks and other requirements. But the court is expected to reject Mexico's attempt to hold U.S. gunmakers liable for violence caused by Mexican drug cartels armed with their weapons. A majority of the justices sounded likely to agree with the gunmakers that the chain of events between the manufacture of a gun and the harm it causes is too lengthy to blame the industry. Neither case is directly about the Second Amendment's right to bear arms. And the court narrowly decided against taking up two cases about that right – Maryland's ban on assault-style weapons and Rhode Island's ban on high-capacity magazines. More: Supreme Court won't review bans on assault-style weapons and high-capacity magazines Planned Parenthood, but not abortion directly, is an issue Unlike last year when the court considered two cases about abortion access, that hot button issue is not directly before the court. But the justices are deciding whether to back South Carolina's effort to deprive Planned Parenthood of public funding for other health services because it also provides abortions. The issue is whether the law allows Medicaid patients to sue South Carolina for excluding Planned Parenthood from its Medicaid program. If the court says the patients can't sue, other GOP-led states are expected to also kick Planned Parenthood out of Medicaid. And anti-abortion advocates are pushing for the same action nationwide. Conservative challenges to Obamacare and internet subsidies The court is considering conservative challenges to Obamacare and to an $8 billion federal program that subsidizes high-speed internet and phone service for millions of Americans. The justices seemed likely to reject an argument that the telecommunications program is funded by an unconstitutional tax, a case that raised questions about how much Congress can 'delegate' its legislative authority to a federal agency. The latest challenge to the Affordable Care Act takes aim at 2010 law's popular requirement that insurers cover without extra costs preventive care such as cancer screenings, cholesterol-lowering medication and diabetes tests. Two Christian-owned businesses and some people in Texas argue that the volunteer group of experts that recommends the services health insurance must cover is so powerful that, under the Constitution, its members must be appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. Multiple discrimination challenges The court is deciding a number of cases about alleged discrimination in the workplace, at school and in drawing congressional boundaries. The justices appeared likely to rule that a worker faced a higher hurdle to sue her employer as a straight woman than if she'd been gay, a decision that would make it easier to file 'reverse discrimination' lawsuits. The court may also side with a Minnesota teenager trying to use the Americans with Disabilities Act to sue her school for not accommodating her rare form of epilepsy that makes it difficult to attend class before noon. It's less clear whether the court will agree with non-Black voters in Louisiana that the state's congressional map, which includes two majority-Black districts, discriminates against them. Decisions in all the cases are expected by the end of June or early July.

Opinion - The Meloni Doctrine: Italy's ‘transatlantic pivot' is reshaping European diplomacy
Opinion - The Meloni Doctrine: Italy's ‘transatlantic pivot' is reshaping European diplomacy

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion - The Meloni Doctrine: Italy's ‘transatlantic pivot' is reshaping European diplomacy

The White House meeting between Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and President Trump marked a pivotal moment in transatlantic relations. Behind the diplomatic pleasantries lies a sophisticated strategy that few observers have fully appreciated. Italy is executing a carefully calibrated 'transatlantic pivot' that positions Rome not merely as a loyal ally but as an indispensable bridge between a changing America and a fragmented Europe. Meloni's White House visit wasn't a diplomatic courtesy call. It represented the culmination of a strategic vision developed over years. The United States-Italy Joint Leaders' Statement signed by both leaders establishes three foundational pillars: security cooperation, shared prosperity and technological innovation. Security comes first for good reason. Meloni made headlines by committing Italy to the 2 percent GDP NATO defense spending threshold. This decision transcends budgetary policy. It signals Italy's determination to become a security provider rather than merely a security consumer within NATO. 'The war in Ukraine must end,' states the joint document, expressing full support for 'President Trump's leadership in negotiating a ceasefire and ensuring a just and lasting peace.' Vice President JD Vance's subsequent visit to Rome underscores this cooperation, with hints that the U.S. might soon propose easing Russian sanctions to build trust and potentially bring Kyiv to accept territorial compromises. Less noticed but equally significant is Italy's emerging role as a Mediterranean power broker. The joint statement explicitly references the Piano Mattei — Italy's comprehensive development initiative for Africa — as a framework that will receive American support. This represents a diplomatic victory for Rome. The U.S. acknowledgment elevates Italy's Mediterranean strategy from a national initiative to a component of Western geopolitical architecture. The statement positions Italy as a strategic hub for digital transformation in North Africa, noting that the U.S. welcomes 'American investments in AI computing and cloud services in Italy to maximize the opportunities of digital transformation and support Italy as the key regional data hub for the Mediterranean and North Africa.' Energy security figures prominently in this Mediterranean strategy. The document confirms plans to increase U.S. liquefied natural gas exports to Italy, reinforcing Italy's aspirations to become Europe's southern energy gateway. The third pillar — perhaps most forward-looking — centers on technological cooperation. Both nations pledge to use 'only trusted vendors' for critical infrastructure, signaling alignment on security concerns regarding certain foreign technology providers. Space collaboration receives special mention, with plans for 'two Mars missions in 2026 and 2028' and continued partnership on NASA's Artemis lunar program. The agreement also identifies frontier technologies — 6G, artificial intelligence, quantum computing and biotechnology — as areas for enhanced cooperation. Meloni's approach represents a sophisticated understanding of European power dynamics. Rather than pursuing narrow national interests, she positioned herself as a European leader engaging with Washington. Her discussions covered EU strategic concerns: common defense, industrial coordination and Mediterranean security. This approach reflects political maturity. Trump has accepted an invitation to visit Italy 'in the near future,' potentially hosting a U.S.-EU summit in Rome. This would represent a diplomatic triumph for Italy, with Rome securing the role of mediator during the current transatlantic tensions. Analyzing the Washington meeting reveals five key components of what might be called the 'Meloni Doctrine.' First is security credibility through concrete commitments. The 2 percent GDP defense pledge demonstrates Italy's seriousness about collective security. Second is values-based leadership. While Trump maintained his characteristic domestic focus, Meloni articulated a vision of Western democratic values that transcended transactional politics. Third is principled support for Ukraine. Italy maintained its commitment to Kyiv even as war fatigue was growing among some European partners. The fourth principle is trade pragmatism. Italy secured structured dialogue on tariffs, one of the most sensitive issues in transatlantic relations. Fifth is European representation. Meloni spoke not just for Italian interests but positioned herself as a voice for broader European concerns. The Italy-U.S. relationship now enters a new phase characterized by operational cooperation rather than rhetorical solidarity. Italy emerges as an active, reliable partner contributing to both Euro-Atlantic equilibrium and Indo-Mediterranean stability. Meloni returned from Washington stronger — not through proclamations but through substantive diplomacy. In an era of noise and slogans, this remains a rare achievement and a very valuable one for Italy's international standing. Luciano Magaldi Sardella, Ph.D., is an international geopolitical writer, official member at the White House Historical Association, and a graduate diploma holder in American Politics and International Studies at the European Open University. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Ex-Rams long snapper Jake McQuaide disrupts church by demanding answers in porn scandal
Ex-Rams long snapper Jake McQuaide disrupts church by demanding answers in porn scandal

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Ex-Rams long snapper Jake McQuaide disrupts church by demanding answers in porn scandal

It's not easy for NFL long snappers to stand out, their exacting trade hinging exclusively on repeating the same action without fail or fanfare. Yet Jake McQuaide, the former Rams two-time Pro Bowl long snapper and veteran of 14 NFL seasons, drew attention Saturday when he stood up. McQuaide rose during Mass at an Ohio Catholic church and snapped at Jason Williams, chancellor of the Cincinnati Archdiocese, demanding answers about rumors that two priests had viewed pornography on a parish computer. Shortly thereafter, McQuaide was removed from the sanctuary by police officers. During the outburst, McQuaide seemed to channel Sister Aloysius — Meryl Streep's character in the 2008 film "Doubt," — when he loudly questioned Williams, saying 'We want to put these rumors to rest. Can you answer this for me, fact or fiction?' Read more: Rams' Puka Nacua is learning a lot from new teammate Davante Adams According to video from Cincinnati news station WCPO, when someone at the alter told McQuaide, 'this is not the time for this," McQuaide responded by shouting, 'I'm sorry, sir, this is the time and the place. I will stand up. Did the priest use our parish computer to look at pornography? …True or false? True or false?' McQuaide's challenge occurred while Williams was reading a letter from Archbishop Robert Casey to the Our Lady of Visitation congregation that said the rumors were investigated and "no wrongdoing — either criminally or ecclesiastically — has been substantiated." The letter also said that one of the priests was taking a 'previously planned sabbatical." "Like gossip, the spreading of rumors is sinful, and we should all work to overcome this tendency of our fallen human nature," the letter said. Two Green Township police officers escorted McQuaide from the church. McQuaide was not charged, according to the police. Read more: Caleb Williams explains why he and his dad schemed to avoid going to the Bears from USC McQuaide grew up near Green Township and attended Cincinnati Elder High, an all-male Catholic diocesan school within the Archdiocese of Cincinnati founded in 1912. After attending Ohio State, McQuaide served as the Rams long snapper for 10 years, beginning in 2011 when the franchise was in St. Louis and ending after the 2021 season. Since then he has played for the Dallas Cowboys, Detroit Lions, Minnesota Vikings and Miami Dolphins, having appeared in 197 career games. Get the best, most interesting and strangest stories of the day from the L.A. sports scene and beyond from our newsletter The Sports Report. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store