Power shift: How Tesla's turmoil is steering global capital towards India
Getty Images (Image for representation) The Musk–Trump standoff may have caused a ripple of fear in US markets, but for India, it is a signal to act.
In the high-stakes arena of global business and politics, few collisions make markets tremble like the fallout between a tech titan and a political juggernaut. This is exactly what unfolded in early June 2025 when Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, clashed publicly with former U.S. President Donald Trump. The result? This was a devastating blow to Tesla's stock, which plunged by over 14% in a single day, wiping out an estimated $150 billion in market capitalisation. This was not just a stock market blip; it was the most severe single-day loss for Tesla since its listing and one of the most dramatic wealth erasures in corporate history.The catalyst? Trump's verbal attacks on Musk during a campaign rally, accusing him of being "disloyal" and threatening to cut off federal contracts and regulatory support for Tesla and SpaceX if he regains the presidency, were also included. Investors responded with a swift selloff, and Tesla's valuation fell below the trillion-dollar mark. Global markets watched in shock as this political-personal feud spilled over into financial chaos.However, amid this volatility lies a powerful truth: in global disruption, emerging markets like India often find their greatest opportunities. As the U.S. grapples with political instability and tech industry turbulence, India stands poised to benefit from capital reallocation, tech realignment, and supply chain diversification. While damaging to U.S. markets, the Tesla shockwave could become a springboard for India's clean-tech and high-growth sectors.
India has been on an accelerated path toward electrification, and Tesla's current struggles have only sharpened the global spotlight on India's domestic electric vehicle (EV) ecosystem. As Tesla faces regulatory headwinds and reduced investor confidence, India's homegrown EV sector is booming, powered by market demand and policy incentives.
In the fiscal year 2024–25, India's EV market crossed a new milestone with over 1.7 million electric vehicles sold, reflecting a 96% year-on-year increase. Leading the charge are Indian companies such as Tata Motors, Mahindra Electric, and Ola Electric, which have committed billions of rupees to expand their EV product lines, charging infrastructure, and battery assembly capabilities.
The Indian government's Faster Adoption and Manufacturing of Hybrid and Electric Vehicles(FAME-II) scheme and the Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) Scheme for Advanced Chemistry Cell Battery Storage worth ₹18,100 crore have further catalysed industry momentum. States such as Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, and Maharashtra have introduced EV-specific policies offering land, tax exemptions, and power subsidies to manufacturers. As global investors rethink high-risk bets in politically volatile environments such as the U.S., they are increasingly drawn to India's policy stability, market scale, and rising consumer demand.Analysts at Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs recently highlighted India's EV sector as a 'structural investment theme' for the next decade. Tesla's hiccups may prompt global auto majors to partner with or invest in Indian EV startups as a hedge against Western uncertainty, creating an entirely new lane for India's industrial growth.Tesla's valuation collapse was not just a corporate crisis; it exposed the deeper fragility of global supply chains tethered to geopolitical risks. Tesla's core supply lines depend heavily on rare earth elements (REEs), lithium, and semiconductors, many of which are sourced from China, South America, or politically sensitive regions.With U.S.–China tensions rising and Trump threatening tighter trade policies, the world's clean energy future needs new anchors—and India is stepping into that vacuum. In response to the rising global demand and strategic concerns, India unveiled its Critical Minerals Strategy (2023), identifying 30 minerals, including lithium, cobalt, and nickel, as essential for national security and industrial development.The Geological Survey of India discovered a significant 5.9-million-ton lithium reserve in Jammu and Kashmir—India's first—and auction processes are already underway for its commercial extraction. Meanwhile, India's semiconductor manufacturing mission—backed by a ₹76,000 crore incentive package—has begun bearing fruit. Micron Technology, in collaboration with Tata Group, is establishing chip assembly and testing units in Gujarat. These developments are being closely monitored by global players looking to diversify away from China and the U.S. India's proven IT prowess, skilled workforce, and competitive cost structures provide it with a unique advantage in scaling both battery and semiconductor supply chains.According to BloombergNEF, global clean energy investments are expected to cross $2 trillion in 2025, and India is projected to attract nearly $60 billion, up from $45 billion in 2024. The Tesla–Trump debacle added urgency to this diversification. Indian companies working in battery storage, solar inverters, EV components, and green hydrogen can now tap into redirected global capital that would have otherwise flown into American companies.Moreover, India's space technology sector, often overlooked, is quietly booming. As Trump's remarks also targeted SpaceX and its satellite network Starlink, Indian startups like Skyroot Aerospace, Agnikul Cosmos, and Pixxel are seizing the moment to attract international investments. With 30 private satellite launches scheduled for 2025 and a supportive government ecosystem, India's space economy could grow to $13 billion by 2026, up from $7 billion in 2022, according to the EY-ISpA.The Musk–Trump standoff may have caused a ripple of fear in U.S. markets, but for India, it is a signal to act. As Western investors reassess the risks of politicised corporate battles, India offers a pragmatic alternative rooted in stable policy, scalable infrastructure, and strategic clarity. The Tesla fallout, while costly for America's most iconic EV brand, might accelerate India's emergence as a global industrial and investment powerhouse. In the wreckage of a $150 billion loss lies the blueprint for India's trillion-dollar leap.
The contributors is Assistant Professor and Research Supervisor, St. Thomas College (Autonomous), Thrissur – Kerala.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
7 minutes ago
- Business Standard
'Relationship is excellent': Trump confirms trade deal with China finalised
Trump says a trade deal with China has been finalised, with key agreements on rare earth supplies, tariffs, and student visas, pending final approval from both leaders after talks in London Prateek Shukla New Delhi US President Donald Trump on Wednesday claimed that a trade deal with China has been finalised, pending final approval from both him and Chinese President Xi Jinping. In a post on Truth Social, Trump stated, 'Our deal with China has been finalised, pending final approval from President Xi and myself. As part of the agreement, China will supply, upfront, full magnets and any necessary rare earth materials.' He added: 'We will be imposing a total of 55 per cent in tariffs, while China will impose 10 per cent. The relationship between our countries is excellent. Thank you for your attention to this matter. In return, the United States will provide what was agreed upon, including allowing Chinese students to study in our colleges and universities—something I've always supported.' Framework reached after London talks Trump's remarks come shortly after the United States and China reached an initial understanding on a new trade framework, following two days of high-level discussions in London involving senior officials from both governments. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick confirmed that the agreement is expected to resolve long-standing trade tensions, particularly over restrictions on rare earth minerals and magnets, which are critical to defence and electronics industries. Officials said the framework will now be presented to Presidents Trump and Xi for formal approval. Further details on implementation timelines and the full scope of reciprocal commitments are expected following the final summit between the two leaders. The earlier Geneva talks had collapsed largely due to China's export restrictions on essential minerals. In response, the Trump administration introduced its own set of export bans, halting the shipment of semiconductor design tools, aircraft, and other critical goods to China. A crucial de-escalation A breakthrough between the two giant economies was much-needed. Following Trump's 'Liberation Day' announcement on April 2, trade between the US and China had virtually frozen. The imposition of a 145 per cent tariff on most Chinese imports made it economically unviable for American companies to source goods from what had long been their second-largest trading partner. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who led the US delegation in the negotiations, described the previous tariff structure as 'unsustainable.' On May 12, both sides announced plans to scale back their record-high tariffs, marking a turning point in the talks. This is especially significant considering China's near-total dominance in the supply of rare earth elements — materials essential for producing everything from cars and jet engines to MRI contrast dyes and certain cancer medications.
Indian Express
11 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Foreign minister Jaishankar asked if India can trust US President Donald Trump. His reply: ‘Meaning what?'
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar weighed in on India's foreign policy priorities and ties with major global players — including the United States under Donald Trump during his visit to Brussels this week. In a conversation with European media network Euractiv, he was asked whether India could trust Trump. Jaishankar replied: 'Meaning what?'. The interviewer then expanded on the question, asking, 'Is he (Trump) as good as his word? Is he a partner India is willing to deepen ties with?' 'I take the world as I find it,' was Jaishankar's reply. 'Our aim is to advance every relationship that serves our interests — and the US relationship is of immense importance to us. It's not about personality X or president Y.' Jaishankar's frank comments come as New Delhi and Washington have differed over US role in the cessation of hostilities between India and Pakistan. The US President has often reiterated his claim of mediating peace between New Delhi and Islamabad, while India has asserted that the decision was made strictly bilaterally. Speaking at a campaign event on May 31, Trump once again said he 'got India and Pakistan to stop fighting' by linking trade talks to de-escalation. 'We talk trade, and we say we can't trade with people who are shooting at each other and potentially using nuclear weapons… They understood and they agreed, and that all stopped,' he said. Earlier, on May 10, when the two nuclear-armed countries agreed to stop firing and military action, the United States claimed credit for brokering the ceasefire with Trump saying the two countries agreed on a full and immediate ceasefire 'after a long night of talks mediated by the United States'. New Delhi has dismissed such remarks in the past and maintains that the ceasefire following Operation Sindoor was the outcome of direct bilateral engagement with Pakistan. Indian officials have underlined that no foreign government, including the United States, was involved — and that trade negotiations with Washington were unrelated to any security decisions made in the region. Jaishankar, who is in Brussels to meet European Union (EU) leaders, also spoke about India's foreign policy priorities from counterterrorism and trade to multipolarity and global trust. On the recent clash with Pakistan following the Pahalgam terror attack, Jaishankar urged the West to see India's response under Operation Sindoor as an anti-terror operation—not a border spat. 'This isn't merely an India-Pakistan issue. It's about terrorism,' he said, adding: 'Let me remind you—Osama bin Laden lived in a Pakistani military town, right next to their equivalent of West Point. That very same terrorism will eventually come back to haunt you.' He also criticised the international media coverage for reducing the situation to 'tit-for-tat between two nuclear-armed neighbours.' Noting Europe's search for 'strategic autonomy,' Jaishankar said multipolarity is already here. 'Europe must now make decisions based on its own capabilities and interests… I hear terms like 'strategic autonomy' being used—these were once part of our vocabulary,' he remarked. Calling the EU a 'major pole' in the global order, Jaishankar said: 'That is precisely why I'm here: to deepen our relationship in this multipolar world.'
Hindustan Times
16 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Privilege motion against Suvendu Adhikari for remarks against Mamata Banerjee
Kolkata: West Bengal assembly speaker Biman Banerjee on Wednesday accepted a privilege motion moved by four Trinamool Congress (TMC) legislators against leader of the opposition Suvendu Adhikari for allegedly making defamatory remarks against chief minister Mamata Banerjee outside the assembly house on Tuesday. The speaker told the media that the motion has been sent to the assembly's privilege committee for review. 'The committee will submit its report by the next session,' he said. The next session is likely to be held in September, according to assembly officials. On Tuesday, Mamata Banerjee targeted the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) alleging that the Pahalgam terror attack had proved the Centre's failure to provide security to Indian citizens. She made the remarks during discussions on a resolution moved by the TMC government condemning the April 22 terror attack and hailing the subsequent action by the Indian armed forces against Pakistan. In the resolution, which was adopted unanimously, the name of the Indian action, Operation Sindoor, was, however, not mentioned. After the proceedings, Adhikari told reporters outside the assembly house that Banerjee batted for Pakistan throughout her speech. 'She batted for Pakistan all the way and also insulted our Prime Minister and Union home minister,' he said. Hours after this, TMC legislators submitted an application at the speaker's office seeking permission to move a privilege motion against Adhikari.
