South-east Asia sees near 150 per cent rise in heart disease, study shows
The number of people with cardiovascular disease surged by 148 per cent in South-east Asia over the past three decades, with the condition becoming the region's leading cause of mortality and morbidity, according to new research.
A total 37 million people in the region suffered from cardiovascular disease in 2021 and 1.7 million died from it.
The findings by researchers at Seattle-based Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IMHE) and the National University of Singapore (NUS) are based on analysis of health data between 1990 and 2021 from 10 South-east Asian countries that make up the Asean bloc.
The results, published this week in a special edition of The Lancet Public Health dedicated to the region, highlight the growing burden of public health, including cardiovascular disease, mental disorders, smoking and road injuries.
The main reasons contributing to cardiovascular disease were high systolic blood pressure, dietary risks, air pollution, high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and tobacco use.
The aging population in the region also contributes to the big jump in case numbers, according to Dr Marie Ng , the lead author and affiliate associate professor at IMHE and associate professor at NUS.
'Without immediate action from each of the countries, these preventable health conditions will worsen causing more death and disability across Asean,' said Prof Ng, who sought proper resource allocation from governments.
It is worth noting that during the Covid-19 pandemic, the incidence of deaths due to cardiovascular disease rose more than predicted and a separate study from 2023 flagged the risk of increase in cardiovascular disease in children born to mothers infected with Covid during pregnancy.
The latest study published in The Lancet Public Health found that more than 80 million people in Asean suffered from major mental disorders, 70 per cent higher than in 1990. A closer look by age showed 15 to 19-year-olds had the steepest climb in prevalence at nearly 11 per cent.
Here are excerpts of other key findings:
Smoking remains a major public health concern. Since 1990, the number of smokers in every Asean country has increased, and the total number jumped by 63 per cent to 137 million, although the smoking prevalence has declined. Tobacco smoking accounted for about 11 per cent of all-cause mortality across the region, with the death rate varied from less than 70 per 100,000 males in developed Singapore to more than five times higher in Cambodia.
Injuries killed hundreds of thousands of people in 2021 across South-east Asia, with road accidents being the leading cause in most countries, followed by falls, self-harm, drowning and interpersonal violence. Road injuries were particularly severe in Thailand, where 30 deaths per 100,000 people were reported in 2021. The global average death rate is 15 per 100,000. BLOOMBERG
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
US CDC weighs travel notice for China as chikungunya cases rise
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox China has recorded nearly 5,000 cases of the mosquito-borne illness since one infection was introduced in early July. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is planning to issue a travel notice for China as chikungunya infections rise in the country, a spokesperson told Bloomberg News. China has recorded nearly 5,000 cases of the mosquito-borne illness since one infection was introduced in early July. Guangdong, a province near Hong Kong, has recorded nearly 3,000 cases in the last week. 'CDC is aware of the reported chikungunya outbreak in Guangdong Province in China and is currently assessing the size and extent of the outbreak,' the spokesperson said in a statement. The Atlanta-based agency issues travel health notices for people to be aware of the risks for certain outbreaks and natural disasters and provide preventive actions they can take, including which vaccines are available. Chikungunya can cause an abrupt fever and severe joint pain, especially in the hands and feet, according to the CDC. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
7 hours ago
- Business Times
How conspiracy theories about Covid's origins are hampering our ability to prevent the next pandemic
IN LATE June, the Scientific Advisory Group for the Origins of Novel Pathogens (Sago), a group of independent experts convened by the World Health Organization (WHO), published an assessment of the origins of Covid. The report concluded that although we don't know conclusively where the virus that caused the pandemic came from: a zoonotic origin with spillover from animals to humans is currently considered the best supported hypothesis. Sago did not find scientific evidence to support 'a deliberate manipulation of the virus in a laboratory and subsequent biosafety breach'. This follows a series of reports and research papers since the early days of the pandemic that have reached similar conclusions: Covid most likely emerged from an infected animal at the Huanan market in Wuhan, and was not the result of a lab leak. But conspiracy theories about Covid's origins persist. And this is hampering our ability to prevent the next pandemic. Attacks on our research As experts in the emergence of viruses, we published a peer-reviewed paper in Nature Medicine in 2020 on the origins of Sars-CoV-2, the virus that causes Covid. Like Sago, we evaluated several hypotheses for how a novel coronavirus could have emerged in Wuhan in late 2019. We concluded the virus very likely emerged through a natural spillover from animals – a 'zoonosis' – caused by unregulated wildlife trade in China. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Since then, our paper has become a focal point of conspiracy theories and political attacks. The idea Sars-CoV-2 might have originated in a laboratory is not, in itself, a conspiracy theory. Like many scientists, we considered that possibility seriously. And we still do, although evidence hasn't emerged to support it. But the public discourse around the origin of the pandemic has increasingly been shaped by political agendas and conspiratorial narratives. Some of this has targeted our work and vilified experts who have studied this question in a data-driven manner. A common conspiracy theory claims senior officials pressured us to promote the 'preferred' hypothesis of a natural origin, while silencing the possibility of a lab leak. Some conspiracy theories even propose we were rewarded with grant funding in exchange. These narratives are false. They ignore, dismiss or misrepresent the extensive body of evidence on the origin of the pandemic. Instead, they rely on selective quoting from private discussions and a distorted portrayal of the scientific process and the motivations of scientists. So what does the evidence tell us? In the five years since our Nature Medicine paper, a substantial body of new evidence has emerged that has deepened our understanding of how Sars-CoV-2 most likely emerged through a natural spillover. In early 2020, the case for a zoonotic origin was already compelling. Much-discussed features of the virus are found in related coronaviruses and carry signatures of natural evolution. The genome of Sars-CoV-2 showed no signs of laboratory manipulation. The multi-billion-dollar wildlife trade and fur farming industry in China regularly moves high-risk animals, frequently infected with viruses, into dense urban centres. It's believed that Sars-CoV-1, the virus responsible for the Sars outbreak, emerged this way in 2002 in China's Guangdong province. Similarly, detailed analyses of epidemiological data show the earliest known Covid cases clustered around the Huanan live-animal market in Wuhan, in the Hubei province, in December 2019. Multiple independent data sources – including early hospitalisations, excess pneumonia deaths, antibody studies and infections among healthcare workers – indicate Covid first spread in the district where the market is located. In a 2022 study, we and other experts showed that environmental samples positive for Sars-CoV-2 clustered in the section of the market where wildlife was sold. In a 2024 follow-up study, we demonstrated those same samples contained genetic material from susceptible animals – including raccoon dogs and civets – on cages, carts, and other surfaces used to hold and transport them. This doesn't prove infected animals were the source. But it's precisely what we would expect if the market was where the virus first spilled over. And it's contrary to what would be expected from a lab leak. These and all other independent lines of evidence point to the Huanan market as the early epicentre of the Covid pandemic. Hindering preparedness for the next pandemic Speculation and conspiracy theories around the origin of Covid have undermined trust in science. The false balance between lab leak and zoonotic origin theories assigned by some commentators has added fuel to the conspiracy fire. This anti-science agenda, stemming in part from Covid origin conspiracy theories, is being used to help justify deep cuts to funding for biomedical research, public health and global aid. These areas are essential for pandemic preparedness. In the US this has meant major cuts to the US Centers for Disease Control and the National Institutes of Health, the closure of the US Agency for International Development, and withdrawal from WHO. Undermining trust in science and public health institutions also hinders the development and uptake of life-saving vaccines and other medical interventions. This leaves us more vulnerable to future pandemics. The amplification of conspiracy theories about the origin of Covid has promoted a dangerously flawed understanding of pandemic risk. The idea that a researcher discovered or engineered a pandemic virus, accidentally infected themselves, and unknowingly sparked a global outbreak (in exactly the type of setting where natural spillovers are known to occur) defies logic. It also detracts from the significant risk posed by the wildlife trade. In contrast, the evidence-based conclusion that the Covid pandemic most likely began with a virus jumping from animals to humans highlights the very real risk we increasingly face. This is how pandemics start, and it will happen again. But we're dismantling our ability to stop it or prepare for it. THE CONVERSATION Edward Holmes is an NHMRC leadership fellow and professor of virology at University of Sydney. Andrew Rambaut is professor of molecular evolution at University of Edinburgh. Kristian Andersen is professor and director of infectious disease genomics at The Scripps Research Institute. Robert Garry is professor of microbiology and immunology at Tulane University.
Independent Singapore
a day ago
- Independent Singapore
SG retirement trap: Why retiring at 65 in Singapore might be the biggest mistake of your life; a wake-up call for SG's mid-lifers
SINGAPORE: We've all heard the mantra: work hard, save up, retire at 65, then finally kick back and relax. But what if that blueprint to life's golden chapter is actually fool's gold? According to Xueni Yang, a licensed private wealth advisor in Singapore who spends her days advising senior executives and high-net-worth families on how to make their money matter: Waiting until 65 to retire could be a costly — and regretful — mistake. 'I spend a lot of my time helping senior executives in their 50s figure it out. Financially, many are ready, but emotionally, not quite,' Xueni said. Her message is that retirement isn't just about the dollars in your CPF or the timeline set by the government. It's also about health, mental clarity, and freedom — and all of those are ticking away, one week at a time. Cognitive decline doesn't wait for retirement Xueni pulls no punches. Cognitive decline begins much earlier than we think, she warns. While many associate forgetfulness with frailty in their 80s, the slippery slope actually begins in their early 60s. In Singapore, a Duke-NUS (medical school) study found that 15 – 20% of people aged 60 and above suffer from mild cognitive impairment (MCI). That's one in five. MCI isn't just about misplacing your keys — it's a measurable decline in memory, focus, and emotional balance. And the kicker is that over half of those affected will slide into dementia within five years. Imagine this: you wait your whole life to retire at 65, only to realise that your mental sharpness has already begun to dull. Early cognitive decline might affect your ability to manage finances, travel with confidence, or pick up new skills — the very things people dream of doing in retirement, Xueni says. In short? Your bucket list could be compromised before you even get to open the bucket. Your health clock is louder than your CPF alarm Singaporeans boast one of the highest life expectancies in the world — 84.1 years, according to the World Health Organization. Sounds like plenty of time, right? Well, not quite. Our healthy life expectancy — the years we can live without serious illness or disability — is only 73.6 years, Xueni reveals. That means if you retire at 65, you get roughly nine years of active living before potential health complications start showing up uninvited. Think about that: just nine solid years to travel, hike, play with your grandkids, or start that painting class you've postponed since 1989. The sad reality is that if we delay retirement till 65 or later, we might be spending our healthiest years working — and our retirement years managing health issues, she added. You've got less time than you think (and that's a good thing) Xueni's not trying to be a buzzkill. Her message is actually one of empowerment. She just wants to replace vague optimism with crystal-clear reality. If you're 45 today, you have about 1,500 weeks of good health left. If you're 55, that's fewer than 1,000 healthy weeks, she explains. That's a finite number of Sunday brunches, sunset walks, and pain-free mornings. 'Because if most of those weeks are spent stuck in overtime, putting off serious retirement planning, and waiting for someday, it's time to rethink. Someday is today,' she stressed. See also Can the average Singaporean actually afford to stop working? Retirement isn't the end … Xueni is flipping the script on what retirement means. It doesn't have to be all-or-nothing. She calls on people to take control of their retirement timeline. 'This is your life and your timeline,' she says. 'Retirement doesn't mean doing nothing. It could mean scaling back, switching to part-time work, or finally exploring a passion project you've put off for years.' The first step is awareness. The second is action. How to prepare for early or semi-retirement (without panicking) Xueni's retirement plan isn't about throwing caution to the wind — it's about being intentional: Spend less than you earn: Simple, but powerful Invest wisely and avoid costly mistakes: Don't chase hot stock tips or jump into trendy investments you barely understand Prioritise one home and one clear goal: Now is not the time to buy that fifth investment property In Singapore, where shiny condos and 'forever working' mentalities often dominate the retirement conversation, Xueni's advice feels refreshingly grounded. She adds, 'Focus on liquidity, not fixed assets. Invest in your health because there's no point in wealth if you're not healthy enough to enjoy it.' Her bottom line is, 'Freedom isn't about how much you have saved in your retirement accounts. It's about having the energy and clarity to enjoy the years you have worked hard for.' Retirement should be a reward instead of a regretful mistake Xueni's message is sobering and hopeful. She's not telling you to quit tomorrow , but she's urging Singaporeans to stop putting off life in the name of a distant finish line. Retirement, she says, should be a reward, so don't let it become a regretful mistake. If you're in your 40s or 50s, now's the time to revisit your financial plans, reimagine what freedom looks like, and most importantly , reclaim your time while you still have plenty of good years ahead. Watch Xueni Yang's full video to hear her advice in her own words below: In other news, when Lim Wei Ming sat at his Tanjong Pagar office one March morning, staring at his CPF retirement projections, he didn't see it as his golden years. Instead, he saw it as a financial black hole. Wei Ming saw his decades of dutiful saving and climbing the corporate ladder led to one cold, hard truth: even with the maximum Central Provident Fund (CPF) contributions, retirement in Singapore might be more sobering than celebratory. His calculations resulted in a modest S$2,800 monthly payout from CPF, compared to a real-world expense of nearly S$8,000. Mortgage, mum's medical bills, daughter's overseas uni fees —all of that wasn't fiction. This is Singapore's retirement reality. But Lim, like hundreds of Singaporean seniors, discovered a game-changer: remote work. You can read how he went about it over here: Remote work for Singaporean elders: How a 58 y/o man in SG secured his financial lifeline and retirement needs with just a laptop and Wi-Fi
