Latest news with #AIevolution
Geeky Gadgets
11-08-2025
- Geeky Gadgets
Why ChatGPT 5 is Dividing the AI Community : Future of AI or a Step Backward?
Is ChatGPT 5 a new leap forward or a step back in AI evolution? Since its release, OpenAI's latest model has sparked a firestorm of opinions, with some hailing its technical prowess while others lament its perceived shortcomings. Imagine relying on a trusted tool for years, only to have it abruptly replaced with no option to revert—a scenario that has left many users frustrated. Critics argue that GPT-5, despite its impressive advancements in logic and efficiency, sacrifices the creativity, flexibility, and user-centric design that made its predecessors beloved. This tension between innovation and usability has ignited a heated debate: is ChatGPT 5 truly the future of AI, or has OpenAI miscalculated its audience's needs? In this feature, David Shapiro explores the polarizing reception of GPT-5, unpacking the key criticisms and the undeniable strengths that have divided its user base. From complaints about robotic responses and stricter limitations to praise for its enhanced coding capabilities, the model's rollout has been anything but smooth. But what does this controversy reveal about the broader challenges of AI development? And could the backlash hold valuable lessons for the future of user-focused innovation? Whether you're a skeptic, a supporter, or somewhere in between, this discussion will challenge your perspective on what progress in AI should look like. ChatGPT 5 Rollout Controversy Why the Rollout Strategy is Under Fire OpenAI's rollout strategy for GPT-5 has been a focal point of criticism. By discontinuing earlier models entirely, the company effectively forced users to adopt GPT-5 without offering a transitional period or the ability to revert to older versions. This abrupt shift has been widely perceived as a misstep, particularly for users who relied on earlier models for specific tasks. The absence of a phased rollout has left many users struggling to adapt, amplifying dissatisfaction with the transition. For businesses and individuals accustomed to the reliability of earlier models, the lack of choice has been particularly disruptive. A gradual rollout could have allowed users to test ChatGPT 5 alongside older versions, providing time to adjust workflows and assess the new model's capabilities. Instead, the sudden change has left some users questioning whether OpenAI prioritized innovation at the expense of user experience. Key User Complaints About ChatGPT 5 Despite its technical advancements, GPT-5 has faced a wave of criticism from users who feel it falls short in several critical areas. Common complaints include: Short, robotic responses that lack the depth and personality of earlier models, making interactions feel less engaging. that lack the depth and personality of earlier models, making interactions feel less engaging. Increased reliance on prompt engineering to achieve nuanced or complex outputs, which adds a layer of complexity for users. to achieve nuanced or complex outputs, which adds a layer of complexity for users. Limited innovation , with no new features such as video or image generation, leaving some users underwhelmed. , with no new features such as video or image generation, leaving some users underwhelmed. Persistent bugs in complex code generation and a diminished ability to handle autonomous tasks effectively. in complex code generation and a diminished ability to handle autonomous tasks effectively. Unpredictable responses and opaque decision-making processes, which reduce trust in the model's reliability. and opaque decision-making processes, which reduce trust in the model's reliability. Stricter restrictions, tighter prompt limits, and reliance on outdated training data, which hinder the model's versatility. These issues have led some users to view GPT-5 as a cost-cutting measure rather than a meaningful leap forward in AI development. For those who valued the flexibility and creativity of earlier models, the changes introduced with GPT-5 have been a source of disappointment. ChatGPT 5 Hate! Is it really that bad? Watch this video on YouTube. Here are additional guides from our expansive article library that you may find useful on ChatGPT 5. Strengths That Shouldn't Be Overlooked Amid the criticism, it is important to recognize the strengths that GPT-5 brings to the table. The model demonstrates notable improvements in areas such as coding, research, and logical reasoning. Its enhanced efficiency allows for faster performance, making it a valuable tool for users with technical or research-oriented needs. Additionally, GPT-5's reduced operational costs provide an economic advantage for businesses seeking to integrate AI into their workflows. For users who can use its strengths, GPT-5 represents a step forward in AI capabilities. Its ability to handle complex tasks with greater precision highlights its potential as a tool for specialized applications. However, these benefits are most apparent to users with specific technical requirements, leaving others questioning whether the model's focus on efficiency has come at the expense of versatility. Challenges in Meeting Diverse User Needs The controversy surrounding GPT-5 underscores a broader challenge for OpenAI: addressing the diverse needs of its user base. Many users relied on earlier models for tasks such as creative writing, emotional support, or simpler interactions—areas where GPT-5's more technical focus falls short. This has reignited the debate over whether future AI models should specialize in specific tasks or aim to remain general-purpose. OpenAI's current approach highlights the difficulty of catering to a wide audience with varying expectations. While some users appreciate the model's technical advancements, others feel alienated by its limitations in areas that were previously strengths. This tension reflects the broader challenge of balancing innovation with accessibility, a critical consideration for the future of AI development. What This Means for AI Development The mixed reception of GPT-5 raises important questions about the direction of AI development. The lack of user choice during the rollout has highlighted the need for greater flexibility and user-centric design in AI tools. Additionally, the backlash underscores the challenge of balancing innovation with user satisfaction and operational efficiency. As AI continues to evolve, developers must navigate these complexities to create tools that meet the needs of a diverse and demanding user base. The debate surrounding GPT-5 serves as a reminder that technological progress must be accompanied by thoughtful implementation to ensure that advancements benefit all users, not just a select few. Lessons for the Future of AI The release of GPT-5 has been a pivotal moment in the AI landscape, showcasing both the potential and the challenges of technological progress. While the model excels in certain domains, its rollout strategy and perceived limitations have alienated some users. The controversy highlights the importance of prioritizing user needs and balancing innovation with practical usability. For AI developers, the lessons from GPT-5's reception are clear. Future models must strive to offer greater flexibility, making sure that users have the tools they need to adapt to new technologies. By addressing the diverse needs of their audience, developers can create AI systems that not only push the boundaries of innovation but also deliver meaningful value to users across a wide range of applications. Media Credit: David Shapiro Filed Under: AI, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Forbes
26-06-2025
- Business
- Forbes
Beyond Prompts: Agentic AI And The Dawn Of Self-Directed Intelligence
Daniel A. Keller, CEO and President of InFlux Technologies Limited and Flux. From a conceptual perspective, agentic AI represents a shift from traditional AI or even the more recent and widely adopted generative AI. In what may be the shortest timeline in the history of proliferative technology, AI systems have evolved from struggling with essential speech recognition to executing complex, well-defined tasks with intelligence levels that often surpass human capabilities in scope and speed. Agentic AI introduces a unique form of autonomous intelligence. This enables AI systems to operate with a degree of independence that outpaces the predefined restrictions of older AI frameworks. Instead of using rule-based systems that generate content from prompts like older AI systems, agentic AI systems are designed to plan and act almost independently to achieve goals. What Agentic AI Is Agentic AI broadly refers to AI systems that can act almost independently, make decisions and adapt to evolving circumstances without requiring constant human intervention. These systems are characterized by their capacity to reason and plan. Agentic AI can evaluate situations, consider multiple options and devise strategies to achieve objectives like a human professional would. Unlike static models, agentic AI systems continuously learn from their data and improve their performance over time. They can also interface with digital systems or data warehouses to make real-time decisions. Their approach is goal-driven, which affords them the flexibility to tackle problems by "thinking" outside the proverbial box. This shift is fueled primarily by advancements in machine learning, reinforcement learning and multi-agent systems. For instance, frameworks like DeepMind's AlphaGo demonstrated early forms of agentic behavior. The system mastered the game of Go and developed its own unique tactics, defeating reigning European champion Fan Hui 5-0 in a tournament match. Modern agentic AI builds on these foundations, integrating large language models (LLMs), sensory processing and decision-making algorithms to create far more versatile systems. From Generative AI To Agentic AI Generative AI, made popular by models like ChatGPT and, more recently, Deepseek, excels at producing human-like text, images or other outputs based on user prompts. However, its limitations are obvious; it operates within the confines of the user's scope and cannot autonomously pursue broader objectives. Agentic AI, on the other hand, can move beyond prompt-driven responses to proactive problem-solving. For example, while a generative AI might draft an email when prompted, an agentic AI could manage an entire communication workflow, going as far as to schedule email campaigns based on responses without human input. This transition from passive to active intelligence marks the dawn of autonomous systems capable of functioning as agencies rather than mere AI tools. Revolutionizing Cloud Infrastructure Management Traditionally, cloud infrastructure management relies on human engineers and monitoring tools to handle everyday tasks, ranging from resource allocation to incident response. Yes, these systems are designed to be robust; however, they often struggle with real-time optimization and scalability, especially under unpredictable workloads. With agentic AI, the AI could autonomously manage the cloud infrastructure, optimizing performance, reducing costs and enhancing reliability. For example, it can monitor real-time metrics from servers, virtual machines and containers. When a sudden spike in traffic occurs, the AI can dynamically reallocate resources, scaling up compute instances or redistributing workloads across regions, thus preventing bottlenecks and lags. Using reinforcement learning, agentic AI can predict potential failures, such as hardware degradation or network congestion, by analyzing historical performance data and external factors like global internet traffic trends. It can then proactively schedule maintenance or reroute traffic to avoid downtime. Typically, agentic AI operates as a network of specialized agents, each managing a different component in the system. These agents collaborate to ensure seamless operations, such as prioritizing low-latency resources for real-time applications. While agentic AI can handle routine optimizations, it does not entirely exclude the human touch. It can escalate complex situations to human engineers, providing data-driven recommendations to streamline decision-making. Implications And Challenges The rise of agentic AI holds profound implications for industries ranging from healthcare to finance to urban planning. Agentic AI could manage patient care in healthcare based on real-time health data. It could autonomously detect fraud, adjust investment portfolios or negotiate contracts in finance. However, this autonomy also raises critical challenges: Who is responsible when an agentic AI makes a suboptimal decision, such as misallocating cloud resources during a critical outage? Ensuring accountability requires robust governance frameworks like the OECD AI Principles. Autonomous systems must be designed with fail-safes to prevent unintended consequences. Since agentic AI systems, like their predecessors, can inherit biases from training data, rigorous testing and transparency are necessities. Deploying agentic AI in legacy cloud systems requires significant infrastructural upgrades, posing serious challenges for smaller organizations. The Future Of Agentic AI The dawn of agentic AI signals a future where intelligent systems are tools and partners in decision-making. As these systems become more sophisticated, they could redefine industries, reshape economies and even alter societal structures. For instance, urban planning could leverage agentic AI to reduce energy consumption and enhance public safety. However, realizing this potential requires addressing technical, ethical and regulatory hurdles. Collaborative efforts between researchers, policymakers and industry leaders will be crucial to ensure agentic AI serves our best interests. Rounding Off We are entering a new era where prompt-based interfaces are no longer the peak experience of AI utility. Agentic AI represents the first real step toward machines that can initiate, adapt and evolve. These systems won't just answer our questions; they can pursue objectives, solve novel problems and collaborate with humans as autonomous partners. As we stand on the verge of this new frontier, the question is not whether agentic AI will shape the future, but how we will shape it to ensure an innovative yet ethical world. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
