Latest news with #APOC
Travel Daily News
4 days ago
- Business
- Travel Daily News
Brussels Airport 's Operations Centre has a 10th anniversary
Brussels Airport celebrates 10 years of APOC, its operational nerve centre, which sets a global benchmark for airport coordination and innovation. Ten years ago, Brussels Airport opened its Airport Operations Centre (APOC), the nerve centre where all operational partners, including airlines, baggage handlers, and emergency services, work side by side to coordinate airport operations. What began as an innovative collaboration between a few airport partners in 2015 has grown into a leading and internationally recognised model for coordinated airport operations, ensuring a safe and pleasant journey for 70,000 passengers each day. The Airport Operations Centre (APOC), Brussels Airport's nerve centre, is celebrating its 10th anniversary. In APOC, various airport partners work together in a single location to coordinate operations and ensure a safe, efficient, and pleasant journey for an average of 70,000 passengers per day at Brussels Airport. In total, around 300 employees from the airport operator and its partners, including airlines, handlers, emergency services, external security service providers and customer service staff, work for APOC. 'Ten years ago, the launch of APOC marked an important milestone in the way we manage airport operations together with our partners. Today, it stands as the beating heart of our daily activities, where collaboration and innovation converge to deliver a smooth and safe journey for all our passengers. The true strength of APOC lies in the combination of strong human collaboration and advanced technology. That is what makes it so effective. I am proud of what we have achieved together with our partners and we remain committed to further enhancing operational excellence through smart technologies and close cooperation in the future.', says Arnaud Feist, CEO of Brussels Airport. Brussels Airport APOC as a model for other airports With financial support from the European Commission, APOC opened its doors in 2015 in the Skyhall, the former departure hall, before moving in 2018 to its current location in the heart of the terminal to be even closer to daily airport operations. The beating heart of the airport is continuously staffed by around 50 employees who constantly monitor and coordinate essential activities, including passenger and baggage processes. In 2021, the Airport Operations Plan (AOP) was implemented, which uses algorithms and artificial intelligence to provide accurate forecasts of peak times and passenger flows. Based on the information from the AOP, APOC can prepare for busy periods, such as the summer holidays, and swiftly take the necessary measures to respond to unexpected situations or incidents, ensuring the safety and smooth operation of the airport. Over the last ten years, Brussels Airport's APOC has established itself as a benchmark in international airport operations. In 2024, through its subsidiary Airport Intelligence, Brussels Airport contributed to the development of 'Airport Operations Centres: A Guidebook', in collaboration with the European umbrella organisation Airports Council International (ACI), providing insights into the operation of an APOC. The guidebook is considered a benchmark for APOCs worldwide and uses Brussels Airport's model as a source of inspiration for other airports. As a consultancy, Airport Intelligence has supported the establishment and optimisation of APOCs at more than ten airports across Europe and Asia over the past three years. As the airport evolves, its operational needs evolve as well. Brussels Airport therefore continues to invest in innovation and advanced technologies at APOC to remain a frontrunner. This includes the development of a new, state-of-the art nerve centre: APOC 360. The upgraded APOC is expected to be operational by 2028. With this, Brussels Airport aims to further strengthen cooperation with its partners and lift the efficiency of airport operations to an even higher level in the future.
Yahoo
07-03-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Fundraising in Anchorage Assembly campaigns has dropped off a cliff
Mar. 6—With less than a month until voting closes in Anchorage's municipal elections, the competitive frenzy and lavish spending surrounding district-level races in recent years are mostly absent. Donors are spending a fraction of what they did in the 2022 and 2023 cycles. And in several cases, candidates are functionally running unopposed. Election packets will be mailed to voters on March 11, and ballots must be cast in person or postmarked by April 1. Half of the Assembly's 12 seats will be decided, and with just two incumbents running, at least four members elected this spring will be new to the body. In spite of the stakes, the most recent round of campaign finance reports published by the Alaska Public Offices Commission paints a very different picture from those of recent years. Campaign money in the 2022 and 2023 election cycles was, by local standards, off the charts. That was in part because of a uniquely contentious political phase coming out of the pandemic lockdowns, the election of Mayor Dave Bronson and clashes between the Assembly and Bronson administration during unruly, packed public meetings. The other factor at play was a 2021 federal court decision striking down the state's individual campaign contributions, undamming a reservoir of political spending. In 2024, there was a mayor's race and subsequent runoff between Bronson and Mayor Suzanne LaFrance that replicated many of the same dynamics, but no Assembly seats were on the ballot. This year, just a fraction of the money raised in many district-level races has been brought in. What's more, several races are significantly lopsided in terms of campaign resources and operations, with one candidate doing all the fundraising while their rivals are — in some cases — mounting no visible campaign at all. One example of this year's trend is in West Anchorage. By this point in the 2023 campaign, eventual winner Anna Brawley had raised nearly $69,000 against her main rival's $64,552 in what was one of that year's most competitive races. This year, incumbent Kameron Perez-Verdia, seeking a third term, has raised $52,468, according to his latest APOC disclosure. Neither of the two other candidates who filed for that seat, Jonathan Duckworth and Amie Steen, reported any fundraising to APOC, nor do either of them have campaign websites set up. The dynamic is the same in East Anchorage and South Anchorage, the two most expensive district races in 2022 and 2023, respectively, as well as in the Midtown district. In 2022, the contest between incumbent Forrest Dunbar and Bronson-aligned challenger Stephanie Taylor racked up close to a half-million dollars, a record for an Assembly race. This year in East Anchorage, though there are still weeks to go, first-time candidate Yarrow Silvers reported $33,405 in donations to her campaign. Neither of her challengers, Angela Frank or John Stiegele, filed campaign reports. South Anchorage saw the most expensive race in the 2023 cycle between Zac Johnson and Rachel Ries. This year, just one candidate, Keith McCormick, has mounted a visible campaign, raising $21,048 according to his latest APOC filing. His challenger, Darin Colbry, reported no fundraising and doesn't have a campaign website. And in Midtown, where there is no incumbent candidate, first-time candidate Erin Baldwin Day, a community organizer and policy advocate, has raised close to $40,000 from a mix of liberal-leaning politicos, union political action groups, and current Assembly members. Running against her is Don Smith, who represented South Anchorage on the Assembly between 1975 and 1985, but has no evident campaign fundraising or spending so far this year. Money does not necessarily win local political races. But particularly in low turnout municipal races lacking an incumbent who has name recognition, it can play a big role drawing votes. At this point the most competitive Assembly seat is shaping up to be in downtown Anchorage, between the Daniels: Daniel Volland, the incumbent, and Daniel George, a Realtor with a background in Republican state and congressional politics. By Feb. 28, Volland raised $37,405 from a mix of elected officials, small donors, family members, and sizable contributions from organized labor groups. George raised about half of that, $18,131. However, his donors represent an unusual coalition to support the more conservative candidate in what is typically Anchorage's most liberal voting district. George's most recent fundraiser on March 3 was hosted by prior elected officials spanning the political spectrum, from previous Assembly members like Sheila Selkregg and John Weddleton to prominent local conservatives such as recent Anchorage first lady Deb Bronson and former Republican state Sen. Anna MacKinnon. Among George's donors are several vocal neighborhood and zoning advocates, as well. A third candidate, Nicolas Danger, has not reported any fundraising. In Eagle River, Jared Goecker, who ran unsuccessfully to replace Republican state Sen. Kelly Merrick, reported raising $6,264, including a contribution from the Alaska Republican Party. Challenger Kyle Walker reported raising $1,490 during February from four donations. A third candidate, David Littleton, reported nothing to APOC. Campaign strategy has shifted in recent years, as Anchorage voters and candidates have grown accustomed to ballots arriving to them in the mail weeks before they have to be returned. In recent cycles, candidates have sat on their war-chests until roughly when ballots begin arriving in peoples' mailboxes, then blitzed potential voters' with direct mail and digital ads during the small window when many people have newly started tuning into the looming election.
