Latest news with #Act586
Rakyat Post
21-05-2025
- Health
- Rakyat Post
Private Clinic Fees Could Rise Up To 30% Under New Price Ruling
Subscribe to our FREE Treatment charges at clinics and hospitals could hike up by as much as thirty percent in the near future thanks to a new pricing directive that's being enforced, private medical practitioners warned. The Federation of Private Medical Practitioners' Associations Malaysia (FPMPAM) said clinics are now required to itemise charges that were bundled under single fee, and this means patients would bear the brunt of the cost increase, New Straits Times FPMPAM's president, Dr Shanmuganathan T.V. Ganeson explained that the new price display rule has disrupted the current billing system – consultation, treatment, and medication were all charged together previously. 'Clinics now have to unbundle costs, including operating expenses, which must be separately listed on the bill,' he said. An Utusan Malaysia report said the estimated patient charges could go up by 10 to 30 percent depending on the type of treatment and medication. Essentially, a standard consultation may cost RM10 to RM30 more than before. Private medical practitioners were not happy that the new rule was placed under an Act made for retail goods On 6 May, about 200 general practitioners (GP) gathered in front of the Prime Minister's office, seemingly to protest against a new rule that requires private clinics to display prices of medicine. The regulation was part of a broader set of anti-profiteering laws. That was the real reason behind the protest. The GPs were unhappy that the rule was being enforced under the Price Control and Anti-Profiteering Act 2011 (Act 723), and was calling for the government to put it under the Private Healthcare Facilities and Services Act 1998 (Act 586) instead. In a statement, the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA) said the consequence of being subjected to both Act 723 and Act 586 could result in enforcement overlaps. They also noted that Act 723 was designed for retail businesses, and are concerned that the overlap may cause confusion. READ MORE: Share your thoughts with us via TRP's . Get more stories like this to your inbox by signing up for our newsletter.
New Straits Times
20-05-2025
- Health
- New Straits Times
Clinic bills set to soar: Doctors warn of 30pct hike under new pricing rule
PETALING JAYA: Private medical practitioners have warned that treatment charges at clinics and hospitals could rise by as much as 30 per cent due to the enforcement of a new pricing directive. The Federation of Private Medical Practitioners' Associations Malaysia (FPMPAM) said that patients would bear the brunt of the cost increase, as clinics were now required to itemise charges that were previously bundled under a single fee. Its president Dr Shanmuganathan T.V. Ganeson said that the new rule disrupted the existing billing system, in which consultation, treatment, and medication were charged together. "Clinics now have to unbundle costs, including operating expenses, which must be separately listed on the bill," said Dr Shanmuganathan. According to Utusan Malaysia, estimates suggest that patient charges could rise by between 10 and 30 per cent, depending on the type of treatment and medication. In some cases, a standard consultation may cost RM10 to RM30 more than before. On May 6, some 200 doctors gathered at Laman Perdana near Perdana Putra in Putrajaya to protest the new directive. The group assembled at 9.30am before a 10-member delegation, led by Malaysian Medical Association (MMA) representative Datuk Dr R. Thirunavukarasu, entered the Prime Minister's Office to submit a memorandum. The protesters urged the government to review Act 723 and place regulation of medical practice solely under the Private Healthcare Facilities and Services Act 1998 (Act 586), which they argued was sufficient for the sector. While protests continue, most private clinics have already begun displaying medicine prices, as required. Bundled billing remains in place at many clinics for the time being, pending a decision from the Health Ministry. Patients may begin to see higher bills as early as August if no changes are introduced during the grace period. "Once the grace period ends, clinics will be required to provide a full breakdown of all charges," Dr Shanmuganathan said. The price display requirement, gazetted on May 1, falls under the Price Control and Anti-Profiteering Act 2011 (Act 723) and is enforced by the Domestic Trade and Cost of Living Ministry. It applies to all private clinics, hospitals, and pharmacies.
The Star
15-05-2025
- Health
- The Star
Govt weighs MMA proposal on medicine displays
PUTRAJAYA: The Health Ministry is contemplating a proposal from the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA) on the implementation of a rule for displaying medicine prices under the Private Healthcare Facilities and Services Act 1998 (Act 586), says Minister Datuk Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad. The proposal, which was included in a memorandum submitted by the MMA, has garnered the attention of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, who has advised the ministry to conduct a thorough study and evaluation of the proposal. 'The Prime Minister has asked me to carefully review their memorandum, and I have taken this matter seriously. 'I have directed the top leadership of the ministry to look into how we can address the request fairly and consider the feasibility of placing the medicine price display requirement under Act 586, which falls under the ministry's purview,' Dzulkefly told a press conference after attending the 2025 National Midwives and Nurses Day celebration here. He said the ministry is responsive and welcomes constructive suggestions aimed at strengthening the healthcare system. Last Tuesday, MMA urged the government to reassess the application of the Price Control and Anti-Profiteering Act 2011 (Act 723) within the medical sector. This request pertains to the recent regulation that mandates private clinics and pharmacies display the prices of medicines, which began this month. In its memorandum, the MMA expressed its full support for transparency in drug pricing; however, it recommended that this transparency be implemented through Act 586.
Barnama
15-05-2025
- Health
- Barnama
Woman Claims Trial To Unlawfully Practising Dentistry, Operating Unregistered Clinic
SEREMBAN, May 15 (Bernama) -- A woman pleaded not guilty in the Sessions Court today to charges of unlawfully practising dentistry and operating an unregistered private dental clinic in December last year. Nur Hafizah Harun, 21, who is not a registered dental practitioner, entered the plea before Judge Mohamad Kamil Nizam after the two charges were read to her. She was charged under Section 62(1) of the Dental Act 2018 (Act 804) and Section 4(1) of the Private Healthcare Facilities and Services Act 1998 (Act 586). The offences were allegedly committed at a premises in Seremban on Dec 6 last year. Both charges carry a fine not exceeding RM300,000 or imprisonment for up to six years, or both, upon conviction. Ministry of Health prosecuting officer Musfirah Musa proposed bail at RM10,000 for each charge, citing public interest and the potential health risks associated with the offence. "The use of unidentified substances and equipment, as well as unsanitary conditions, poses serious health hazards not only to customers but also to the general public, including risks of infectious diseases such as Hepatitis B, HIV, and others," she submitted. Meanwhile, the accused's lawyer, A. Partheeban, requested a lower sum, noting that his client is currently unemployed and that bail would be posted by her brother, a lorry attendant earning approximately RM2,000 per month. The judge set bail at RM6,000 for both charges and ordered the accused not to interfere with prosecution witnesses. The case was then fixed for mention on June 12. -- BERNAMA
New Straits Times
15-05-2025
- Health
- New Straits Times
Woman claims trial to practising dentistry illegally, running unregistered clinic in Seremban
SEREMBAN: A woman pleaded not guilty in the Sessions Court today to charges of unlawfully practising dentistry and operating an unregistered private dental clinic in December last year. Nur Hafizah Harun, 21, who is not a registered dental practitioner, entered the plea before Judge Mohamad Kamil Nizam after the two charges were read to her. She was charged under Section 62(1) of the Dental Act 2018 (Act 804) and Section 4(1) of the Private Healthcare Facilities and Services Act 1998 (Act 586). The offences were allegedly committed at a premises in Seremban on Dec 6 last year. Both charges carry a fine not exceeding RM300,000 or imprisonment for up to six years, or both, upon conviction. Health Ministry prosecuting officer Musfirah Musa proposed bail at RM10,000 for each charge, citing public interest and the potential health risks associated with the offence. "The use of unidentified substances and equipment, as well as unsanitary conditions, poses serious health hazards not only to customers but also to the general public, including risks of infectious diseases such as Hepatitis B, HIV, and others," she submitted. Meanwhile, the accused's lawyer, A. Partheeban, requested a lower sum, noting that his client is currently unemployed and that bail would be posted by her brother, a lorry attendant earning about RM2,000 per month. The judge set bail at RM6,000 for both charges and ordered the accused not to interfere with prosecution witnesses. The court later fixed June 12 for mention.
